13.02.2018 Views

February 13

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

WWW.DAILYHERITAGE.COM.GH<br />

DAILY HERITAGE TUESDAY, FEBRUARY <strong>13</strong>, 2018<br />

To accomplish great things, we<br />

must not only act, but also dream,<br />

not only plan, but also believe.<br />

—Anatole France<br />

•Dr Dominic Ayine, MP Bolga Central<br />

•Mr Martin Alamisi Amidu,<br />

Special Prosecutor nominee<br />

• Tony Lithur , Lawyer<br />

Amidu too old<br />

BY MUNTALLA INUSAH<br />

muntalla.inusah@dailyheritage.com.gh<br />

APRIVATE legal<br />

practitioner, Mr<br />

Tony Lithur has,<br />

upon the instructions<br />

of the<br />

Member of Parliament<br />

for Bolga Central, Dr<br />

Dominic Ayine, filed a suit at the<br />

Supreme Court challenging the<br />

eligibility of Special Prosecutor<br />

nominee, Mr Martin Amidu.<br />

Dr Ayine, a former Deputy<br />

Attorney General (AG) under<br />

the erstwhile National Democratic<br />

Congress administration in<br />

his lawsuit contends that Mr<br />

Amidu, 66 years of age, is too<br />

old to hold public office, under<br />

which the Special Prosecutor’s<br />

office falls.<br />

Mr Amidu, a former AG who<br />

has earned himself the name<br />

‘Citizen Vigilante’ for his public<br />

fight against corruption, was<br />

nominated by the President earlier<br />

this year and is expected to<br />

appear before the Appointments<br />

Committee of Parliament today.<br />

The applicant is not seeking<br />

to injunct the process per his suit<br />

at the apex court; he is rather<br />

• To be Special Prosecutor<br />

• Says MP who has dragged the<br />

‘Citizen Vigilante’ to court<br />

seeking among other things a<br />

declaration that “by a true and<br />

proper interpretation of Articles<br />

190(1)(d), 199(1), 199(4), and 295<br />

of the 1992 Constitution, the retirement<br />

age of all holders of<br />

public office created pursuant to<br />

Article(1)(d) is 60 years, anyhow<br />

not beyond (65).”<br />

The 26-page document filed<br />

at the registry of the apex court<br />

further argued that, “any other<br />

interpretation would result in an<br />

unlawful amendment of Article<br />

199 of the Constitution by legislation.”<br />

According to him, sections of<br />

the constitution states that “no<br />

person above the age of 65 years<br />

is eligible for employment in any<br />

public office created under Article<br />

190(1) (d).”<br />

He is, thus, seeking a declaration<br />

from the Supreme Court<br />

that Mr Amidu, “is not qualified<br />

or eligible to be nominated as the<br />

Special Prosecutor under Section<br />

<strong>13</strong>(3) of the Office of the Special<br />

Prosecutor Act, 2018 (Act<br />

959).<br />

“A declaration that by true<br />

and proper interpretation of article<br />

190(1)(d), 199(1), 199(4) and<br />

294 of the 1992 constitution, the<br />

retirement age of pall holders of<br />

public officers created pursuant<br />

to 190(10d, is 60 years, anyhow<br />

not beyond 65 years.”<br />

The former deputy AG is also<br />

seeking a declaration that “by a<br />

true and proper interpretation of<br />

articles of 190(1)(d), 199(4) of<br />

the 1992 constitution, no person<br />

above the age of 65 is eligible for<br />

employment of any public office<br />

created under article 190 (1)(d).”<br />

He added that, “by reason of<br />

his age, 66 years, Mr amidu is not<br />

qualified or eligible to be nominated<br />

as the Special Prosecutor<br />

under section <strong>13</strong> article three of<br />

the office of the Special Prosecutor,<br />

Act, 2018 Act 959.<br />

According to him, “by reason<br />

of his age, 66 years, Mr Martin<br />

Amidu is not qualified or eligible<br />

to be approved by Parliament as<br />

Special Prosecutor under section<br />

<strong>13</strong>(3) of the office of the Special<br />

Prosecutor Act, 2018, Act 959.<br />

He contends that, “by reason<br />

of his age, 66 years, Mr amidu is<br />

not qualified or eligible to be appointed<br />

by His Excellency the<br />

President of the Republic as the<br />

Special Prosecutor under secretion<br />

<strong>13</strong> (3) of the office of the<br />

Special Prosecutor Act, 2018,<br />

Act 959.”<br />

He is further seeking a declaration<br />

that any purported nomination<br />

by the AG or approval by<br />

Parliament of appointment by<br />

his Excellency the President of<br />

the Republic of Amidu as the<br />

Special Prosecutor under section<br />

<strong>13</strong>, 3 of the office of the Special<br />

Prosecutor Act, 2018, Act 959 is<br />

unconstitutional and therefore<br />

null and void.<br />

He prayed that, in the event,<br />

“Amidu has already been vetted<br />

and approved by Parliament and<br />

or appointed by his Excellency<br />

the President of the Republic as<br />

the Special Prosecutor under section<br />

<strong>13</strong>, 3 of the office of the<br />

Special Prosecutor Act, 2018 Act<br />

959 prior to the final determination<br />

of his suit, an order annulling<br />

such nomination<br />

approval and appointment.”

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!