February 13
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
WWW.DAILYHERITAGE.COM.GH<br />
DAILY HERITAGE TUESDAY, FEBRUARY <strong>13</strong>, 2018<br />
To accomplish great things, we<br />
must not only act, but also dream,<br />
not only plan, but also believe.<br />
—Anatole France<br />
•Dr Dominic Ayine, MP Bolga Central<br />
•Mr Martin Alamisi Amidu,<br />
Special Prosecutor nominee<br />
• Tony Lithur , Lawyer<br />
Amidu too old<br />
BY MUNTALLA INUSAH<br />
muntalla.inusah@dailyheritage.com.gh<br />
APRIVATE legal<br />
practitioner, Mr<br />
Tony Lithur has,<br />
upon the instructions<br />
of the<br />
Member of Parliament<br />
for Bolga Central, Dr<br />
Dominic Ayine, filed a suit at the<br />
Supreme Court challenging the<br />
eligibility of Special Prosecutor<br />
nominee, Mr Martin Amidu.<br />
Dr Ayine, a former Deputy<br />
Attorney General (AG) under<br />
the erstwhile National Democratic<br />
Congress administration in<br />
his lawsuit contends that Mr<br />
Amidu, 66 years of age, is too<br />
old to hold public office, under<br />
which the Special Prosecutor’s<br />
office falls.<br />
Mr Amidu, a former AG who<br />
has earned himself the name<br />
‘Citizen Vigilante’ for his public<br />
fight against corruption, was<br />
nominated by the President earlier<br />
this year and is expected to<br />
appear before the Appointments<br />
Committee of Parliament today.<br />
The applicant is not seeking<br />
to injunct the process per his suit<br />
at the apex court; he is rather<br />
• To be Special Prosecutor<br />
• Says MP who has dragged the<br />
‘Citizen Vigilante’ to court<br />
seeking among other things a<br />
declaration that “by a true and<br />
proper interpretation of Articles<br />
190(1)(d), 199(1), 199(4), and 295<br />
of the 1992 Constitution, the retirement<br />
age of all holders of<br />
public office created pursuant to<br />
Article(1)(d) is 60 years, anyhow<br />
not beyond (65).”<br />
The 26-page document filed<br />
at the registry of the apex court<br />
further argued that, “any other<br />
interpretation would result in an<br />
unlawful amendment of Article<br />
199 of the Constitution by legislation.”<br />
According to him, sections of<br />
the constitution states that “no<br />
person above the age of 65 years<br />
is eligible for employment in any<br />
public office created under Article<br />
190(1) (d).”<br />
He is, thus, seeking a declaration<br />
from the Supreme Court<br />
that Mr Amidu, “is not qualified<br />
or eligible to be nominated as the<br />
Special Prosecutor under Section<br />
<strong>13</strong>(3) of the Office of the Special<br />
Prosecutor Act, 2018 (Act<br />
959).<br />
“A declaration that by true<br />
and proper interpretation of article<br />
190(1)(d), 199(1), 199(4) and<br />
294 of the 1992 constitution, the<br />
retirement age of pall holders of<br />
public officers created pursuant<br />
to 190(10d, is 60 years, anyhow<br />
not beyond 65 years.”<br />
The former deputy AG is also<br />
seeking a declaration that “by a<br />
true and proper interpretation of<br />
articles of 190(1)(d), 199(4) of<br />
the 1992 constitution, no person<br />
above the age of 65 is eligible for<br />
employment of any public office<br />
created under article 190 (1)(d).”<br />
He added that, “by reason of<br />
his age, 66 years, Mr amidu is not<br />
qualified or eligible to be nominated<br />
as the Special Prosecutor<br />
under section <strong>13</strong> article three of<br />
the office of the Special Prosecutor,<br />
Act, 2018 Act 959.<br />
According to him, “by reason<br />
of his age, 66 years, Mr Martin<br />
Amidu is not qualified or eligible<br />
to be approved by Parliament as<br />
Special Prosecutor under section<br />
<strong>13</strong>(3) of the office of the Special<br />
Prosecutor Act, 2018, Act 959.<br />
He contends that, “by reason<br />
of his age, 66 years, Mr amidu is<br />
not qualified or eligible to be appointed<br />
by His Excellency the<br />
President of the Republic as the<br />
Special Prosecutor under secretion<br />
<strong>13</strong> (3) of the office of the<br />
Special Prosecutor Act, 2018,<br />
Act 959.”<br />
He is further seeking a declaration<br />
that any purported nomination<br />
by the AG or approval by<br />
Parliament of appointment by<br />
his Excellency the President of<br />
the Republic of Amidu as the<br />
Special Prosecutor under section<br />
<strong>13</strong>, 3 of the office of the Special<br />
Prosecutor Act, 2018, Act 959 is<br />
unconstitutional and therefore<br />
null and void.<br />
He prayed that, in the event,<br />
“Amidu has already been vetted<br />
and approved by Parliament and<br />
or appointed by his Excellency<br />
the President of the Republic as<br />
the Special Prosecutor under section<br />
<strong>13</strong>, 3 of the office of the<br />
Special Prosecutor Act, 2018 Act<br />
959 prior to the final determination<br />
of his suit, an order annulling<br />
such nomination<br />
approval and appointment.”