28.02.2018 Views

Revitalization of Rivers in India Draft Policy - Isha Guru Jaggi Vasudev

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Revitalization</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Rivers</strong> In <strong>India</strong><br />

<strong>Draft</strong> <strong>Policy</strong> Recommendation<br />

LAND USE PATTERNS<br />

ON RIVERSIDES<br />

Data and maps <strong>of</strong> land use along the entire length <strong>of</strong> the rivers <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>India</strong> are to be made available. To implement any solution on a piece <strong>of</strong><br />

landmass, it will be essential to know who owns the land. Broadly the land<br />

can be classified as public land, or land owned by a private <strong>in</strong>dividual – a<br />

farmer, or an <strong>in</strong>dustry. The percentage <strong>of</strong> riverside land owned by private<br />

farmers is expected to be 60%-75% <strong>in</strong> the state <strong>of</strong> Madhya Pradesh. 2 It<br />

will be safe to assume that <strong>in</strong> most states, except the Himalayan states<br />

(like Uttarakhand where most <strong>of</strong> the land <strong>of</strong> the state is reserve forest,<br />

<strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g riverside lands), riverside land held by the governments will be<br />

around 25 to 40%.<br />

Therefore, the solution <strong>of</strong> afforestation should have two different<br />

approaches – one for public land (river banks and forest land) and<br />

another for the farm land. While the solution proposed for the public<br />

land will have the forest as the primary stakeholder, the farm lands will<br />

have farmers and their livelihood as the priority. So <strong>in</strong> the case <strong>of</strong> public<br />

land, rais<strong>in</strong>g dense forests with native and endemic trees and shrubs<br />

is suggested as the solution and for farm lands, agro-forestry based<br />

livelihood is suggested.<br />

Ideally the solution suggested will work best when implemented on<br />

the entire length on either side <strong>of</strong> the river cont<strong>in</strong>uously from the orig<strong>in</strong><br />

<strong>of</strong> the river until it meets the sea (or another river). But the solution<br />

proposed here and the means to implement it are novel. Therefore a<br />

target <strong>of</strong> 1 km on either sides <strong>of</strong> river on a cont<strong>in</strong>uous stretch <strong>of</strong> 100 km<br />

or more is suggested. Although the 1 km-width suggested <strong>in</strong> the solution<br />

is scientifically valid, 3 for tributaries and smaller streams this width<br />

could be correspond<strong>in</strong>gly smaller (e.g. 500 m or less). The one-kilometer<br />

corridor recommendation is also supported by the widely held view<br />

amongst forest experts that even one square kilometer <strong>of</strong> forest is enough<br />

to generate ra<strong>in</strong>fall by harvest<strong>in</strong>g pass<strong>in</strong>g clouds given the Ekman spiral<br />

phenomenon (see Chapter 2).<br />

108

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!