Views
10 months ago

Brasil só deve dominar Leitura em 260 anos, aponta estudo do Banco Mundial Relatorio Banco Mundial _Learning

Box 11.2 Citizen-led

Box 11.2 Citizen-led assessments have raised awareness of the learning crisis in South Asia and Sub-Saharan Africa Citizen-led learning assessments are locally designed measurements of basic reading and mathematics competencies. Typically conducted by networks of civil society organizations, these assessments test children whether they are in or out of school—something that conventional testing cannot do. Their goal is to increase awareness of learning outcomes and to encourage stakeholders to take action to improve learning. Citizen-led assessments have been conducted mainly in South Asia and Sub-Saharan Africa. For example, the Campaign for Popular Education (CAMPE)— a network of over 1,000 nongovernmental organizations (NGOs), researchers, and educators in Bangladesh—began carrying out assessments of this kind in 1999. Evaluations of these initiatives concluded that: • The public finds these assessments more salient than larger-scale, more complex national assessments, because the citizen-led assessments focus on a narrower set of basic competencies, starting with recognizing letters and numbers. • The initiatives successfully disseminated their results and raised awareness about the learning crisis. They also increased the focus on learning in government planning documents. • In India, partnerships between some state governments and Pratham, an NGO that seeks to improve education quality, have designed interventions to address the problems identified by the Annual Status of Education Report (ASER) assessment. Moreover, the government of India now holds its National Achievement Survey annually (rather than once every three years) to track learning more frequently. While the assessment results have led to action in some cases, the link to improved learning is not automatic. Over the short period that the ASER in India and Uwezo a in Tanzania have been operating, their assessment results do not show any clear overall pattern of increases in learning—although some Indian states showed significant improvements between 2010 and 2016. Sources: WDR 2018 team, based on Chowdhury, Choudhury, and Nath (1999); Rath and others (2015); R4D (2015). a. Uwezo means “capability” in Kiswahili. policy making are often missing. 18 Some evaluations take too long to inform decision making; others fail to track key drivers of low system performance. Even where usable information exists, government agencies may lack the incentives or capacity to use it well. 19 Independence also matters: reliable, salient information can provide incentives for better performance, but biased media may protect the interests of particular groups at the expense of better public services. In Argentina between 1998 and 2007, newspapers that received government funding published fewer reports on corruption than did others. 20 What are the characteristics of an information system that promotes learning (table 11.1)? First, information needs to be credible, politically salient, and publicly available. Second, clear targets for progress Table 11.1 Principles for making the most of information and the roles that actors can play Principles for making the best use of information • Provide regular, credible, politically salient, and publicly available information on learning. • Set clear targets or expectations for learning, so there is a benchmark for judging performance. • Align information with the political and administrative jurisdictions that have authority to act. • Build information systems that are responsive to the policy cycle and facilitate decision making. Source: WDR 2018 team. Roles that different actors can play • Government institutions: Produce and disseminate national assessment results; conduct in-house evaluations; support education research and evaluation in external research institutes. • Civil society and private sector: Produce and disseminate citizen-led learning assessments; use assessments and research to support interventions that improve learning. 202 | World Development Report 2018

on learning can strengthen incentives by providing measures of system performance. Third, meaningful information on learning needs to be aligned with political or decision-making power, so that the public can hold education decision makers more accountable. Finally, information needs to be usable by policy makers, administrators, and other system actors— that is, it must be timely, accurate, policy relevant, and sensitive to the policy cycle. Building coalitions and strengthening incentives Education systems are made up of many actors who pursue interests that do not always align with learning. Addressing this requires action on two fronts. First, coalitions of interest groups are needed to build a consensus around the actions that will strengthen accountability for better learning. This often requires mobilizing support from groups that are not actively involved in agenda-setting or that do not engage with others. Second, the incentives of bureaucrats and other system actors need to align more closely with learning (table 11.2). Mobilizing support and building coalitions to improve learning System actors have a better chance of enacting reforms when they act collectively. Some actors have more power to shift policy toward learning, in part because they are better organized. 21 For example, in many countries teachers’ unions have a powerful voice in debates on reform, whereas the collective voice of parents and students is often muted. Mobilizing support and building coalitions of a range of system actors have helped to improve learning. Many countries have built support for proposed policy changes through wide-ranging consultations that try to bring together key interest groups. 22 Peru’s Business Association for Education organized an information campaign that helped shift public opinion to support reforms that began in 2006. Government reformers used information on the poor learning outcomes of the education system to mobilize public support for efforts to strengthen teacher accountability, which led to sustained improvements in learning. 23 Alliances between education stakeholders have also formed in some countries to realize the right to education through the legal system (box 11.3). Though mobilization efforts can be successful at rebalancing interests, they may be less successful at shifting the interests of those opposed to reforms. Education reform is a long process, and well-organized opposition can derail it, particularly during implementation. In Peru, the government successfully mobilized public support to get reforms approved, but it was less successful at getting buy-in from teachers, which led to continued resistance from teachers’ unions during implementation. While the broad reform direction remained intact and learning improved, this experience highlights a potential trade-off between managing the politics of reform and getting implementation right. When reformers have to devote effort to managing opposition, that effort can divert attention from implementing reforms well. Lack of buy-in from important groups deters them from contributing to policy design or implementation, thereby undermining the sustainability of the reform. 24 Building broad-based coalitions of stakeholders is important at all stages of the policy cycle. Malaysia created a performance delivery unit to spearhead comprehensive reforms in many sectors, including education. The unit uses “labs” that build coalitions of stakeholders and involve them in all stages of reform, Table 11.2 Principles for building effective coalitions and the roles that actors can play Principles for building effective coalitions • Mobilize support for reforms through clear articulation of the problems of low learning. • Develop a political strategy to mobilize support and build long-term coalitions for learning. • Avoid direct confrontation in favor of negotiation and compensation where possible. • Encourage strong partnerships between schools and communities. • Strengthen the capabilities of organizations responsible for education services. Source: WDR 2018 team. Roles that different actors can play • Government institutions: Develop open, inclusive spaces to discuss reform and identify technically and politically feasible solutions; build the appropriate institutional capacity. • Civil society and business organizations: Advocate for better education systems; support community and parent action at all levels to improve outcomes. • Teachers and unions: Advocate for system improvements; use system knowledge to engage in debates on reform. How to escape low-learning traps | 203

  • Page 6 and 7:

    © 2018 International Bank for Reco

  • Page 8 and 9:

    95 Choose learning metrics based on

  • Page 10 and 11:

    O.6 9 School completion is higher f

  • Page 12 and 13:

    Map B6.3.1 135 Linguistic diversity

  • Page 14 and 15:

    ecause of these shortcomings threat

  • Page 16 and 17:

    xiv | ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The team is g

  • Page 18 and 19:

    xvi | ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Ousmane Dione

  • Page 21 and 22:

    OVERVIEW Learning to realize educat

  • Page 23 and 24:

    OVERVIEW Learning to realize educat

  • Page 25 and 26:

    Figure O.1 Shortfalls in learning s

  • Page 27 and 28:

    Figure O.3 Children from poor house

  • Page 29 and 30:

    Figure O.6 School completion is hig

  • Page 31 and 32:

    Figure O.8 Socioeconomic gaps in co

  • Page 33 and 34:

    methods, and they need to care enou

  • Page 35 and 36:

    often lack the organization, inform

  • Page 37 and 38:

    Figure O.12 Many countries lack inf

  • Page 39 and 40:

    FIGURE O.13 Low-performing countrie

  • Page 41 and 42:

    Figure O.14 It’s more complicated

  • Page 43 and 44:

    overlooked. The evidence on success

  • Page 45 and 46:

    consultations that have tried to br

  • Page 47 and 48:

    in regional learning assessments (s

  • Page 49 and 50:

    75. Duflo, Hanna, and Ryan (2012);

  • Page 51 and 52:

    Research Triangle Park, NC: Centro

  • Page 53 and 54:

    Levitt, Steven D., John A. List, Su

  • Page 55:

    Adolescents Are Out of School as Ai

  • Page 58 and 59:

    1 Schooling, learning, and the prom

  • Page 60 and 61:

    Box 1.1 Schooling as human capital

  • Page 62 and 63:

    Education promotes economic growth

  • Page 64 and 65:

    Learning and the promise of educati

  • Page 66 and 67:

    people need a range of skills—cog

  • Page 68 and 69:

    Box 1.3 Comparing attainment across

  • Page 70 and 71:

    74. For OECD countries, see Heckman

  • Page 72 and 73:

    Evidence from Kenya.” NBER Workin

  • Page 74:

    12757, National Bureau of Economic

  • Page 78 and 79:

    2 Thegreatschooling expansion—and

  • Page 80 and 81:

    Figure 2.3 Nationalincomeis correla

  • Page 82 and 83:

    Box 2.1 Accessdenied:Theeffectsoffr

  • Page 84 and 85:

    their brightest child to secondary

  • Page 86 and 87:

    Hanushek, Eric A., and Ludger Woess

  • Page 88 and 89:

    SPOTLIGHT1 Thebiologyoflearning Res

  • Page 90 and 91:

    outcomes. Finally, intense stress o

  • Page 92 and 93:

    Figure 3.1 Mostgrade6studentsinWest

  • Page 94 and 95:

    Box 3.1 Thosewhocan’treadbytheend

  • Page 96 and 97:

    Figure 3.4 Learningoutcomesvarygrea

  • Page 98 and 99:

    meeting global development goals wi

  • Page 100 and 101:

    language and cognitive abilities ar

  • Page 102 and 103:

    Box 3.3 Teachersmayperceiveloweffor

  • Page 104 and 105:

    13. UNESCO (2015). 14. Filmer, Hasa

  • Page 106 and 107:

    Learning Community of Practice.”

  • Page 108 and 109:

    SPOTLIGHT2 Povertyhindersbiological

  • Page 110 and 111:

    early childhood interventions that

  • Page 112 and 113:

    particularly true in low-income cou

  • Page 114 and 115:

    In such contexts, learning metrics

  • Page 116 and 117:

    Learning assessments of key foundat

  • Page 118 and 119:

    technical challenges. 54 Ex ante li

  • Page 120 and 121:

    Heckman, James J., Rodrigo Pinto, a

  • Page 122 and 123:

    SPOTLIGHT3 Themultidimensionality o

  • Page 124:

    Notes 1. Schönfeld (2017). 2. For

  • Page 128 and 129:

    SPOTLIGHT 4 Learning about learning

  • Page 130 and 131:

    changes in school leadership, schoo

  • Page 132 and 133:

    5 There is no learning without prep

  • Page 134 and 135:

    FIGURE 5.1 It pays to invest in hig

  • Page 136 and 137:

    etter cognitive development, more p

  • Page 138 and 139:

    Box 5.2 Communities can leverage th

  • Page 140 and 141:

    Box 5.3 Providing information on ch

  • Page 142 and 143:

    sometimes mattering more than the e

  • Page 144 and 145:

    and above and indicates the ability

  • Page 146 and 147:

    Carneiro, Pedro, Flavio Cunha, and

  • Page 148 and 149:

    from Poor Rural Areas Go to High Sc

  • Page 150 and 151:

    ————. 2017. World Developme

  • Page 152 and 153:

    Table 6.1 Models of human behavior

  • Page 154 and 155:

    Figure 6.1 Only a small fraction of

  • Page 156 and 157:

    Box 6.3 Reaching learners in their

  • Page 158 and 159:

    comparable, suggesting similarly la

  • Page 160 and 161:

    19. He, Linden, and MacLeod (2008,

  • Page 162 and 163:

    Harris-Van Keuren, Christine, and I

  • Page 164 and 165:

    Yoon, Kwang Suk, Teresa Duncan, Sil

  • Page 166 and 167:

    Table 7.1 Models of human behavior

  • Page 168 and 169:

    girls. Even beyond building entire

  • Page 170 and 171:

    Pradesh, India, providing community

  • Page 172 and 173: from a Randomized Experiment in Ecu
  • Page 174 and 175: 8 Build on foundations by linking s
  • Page 176 and 177: on their effectiveness is scant. Ev
  • Page 178 and 179: or nonprofits with industry-specifi
  • Page 180 and 181: 16. Aubery, Giles, and Sahn (2017).
  • Page 182 and 183: Fares, Jean, and Olga Susana Puerto
  • Page 184 and 185: SPOTLIGHT 5 Technology is changing
  • Page 186 and 187: All of those skills that help indiv
  • Page 189 and 190: PART IV Making the system work for
  • Page 191 and 192: aligned with the overall goal of le
  • Page 193 and 194: many countries they do not routinel
  • Page 195 and 196: thinking, the curriculum alone will
  • Page 197 and 198: Box 9.3 Can private schooling be al
  • Page 199 and 200: financial support in anticipation o
  • Page 201 and 202: Institute for Educational Planning,
  • Page 203 and 204: SPOTLIGHT 6 Spending more or spendi
  • Page 205 and 206: Figure S6.2 The relationship betwee
  • Page 207 and 208: public investment. A central elemen
  • Page 209 and 210: 10 Unhealthy politics drives misali
  • Page 211 and 212: Figure 10.1 Contradictory interests
  • Page 213 and 214: Box 10.2 How politics can derail le
  • Page 215 and 216: Trapped in low-accountability, low-
  • Page 217 and 218: Educational Research and Innovation
  • Page 219 and 220: 11 How to escape low-learning traps
  • Page 221: Box 11.1 Using information to align
  • Page 225 and 226: Box 11.4 Using “labs” to build
  • Page 227 and 228: education systems effectively requi
  • Page 229 and 230: Box 11.7 Burundi improved education
  • Page 231 and 232: shift aligned funding with new real
  • Page 233 and 234: Notes 1. Cassen, McNally, and Vigno
  • Page 235 and 236: Working Paper 21825, National Burea
  • Page 238: ECO-AUDIT Environmental Benefits St