20.03.2018 Views

GA_032218

The Glencoe Anchor 032218

The Glencoe Anchor 032218

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

8 | March 22, 2018 | The glencoe anchor news<br />

glencoeanchor.com<br />

Glencoe Village Board<br />

Green Bay Trail restoration<br />

to proceed following concerns<br />

Leave the<br />

writing<br />

to the pros.<br />

Local writing<br />

professionals for all<br />

your copy needs.<br />

BOOST YOUR BUSINESS NOW:<br />

708.329.8594 or content@22ndcm.com<br />

FOR MORE: 22CMBOOST.COM<br />

Margaret Tazioli<br />

Freelance Reporter<br />

The Green Bay Trail<br />

South of South Avenue<br />

will soon have much less<br />

buckthorn — and a much<br />

more open feel as a result.<br />

After postponing this<br />

section of the trail’s restoration<br />

project for nearly<br />

three months due to neighbor’s<br />

concerns, the Village<br />

decided to move ahead<br />

with the removal of invasive<br />

plants in the next<br />

week or so at the Village<br />

Board meeting Thursday,<br />

March 15.<br />

The Friends of the Green<br />

Bay Trail is spearheading<br />

the effort to not only<br />

remove the invasive plant<br />

species on the trail — but<br />

to replant with hardy native<br />

plants.<br />

With the help of landscape<br />

professionals, like<br />

Bob Kirschner, director<br />

of restoration at the Chicago<br />

Botanic Garden, the<br />

Friends have created a plan<br />

to place nearly $100,000<br />

worth of native plants approved<br />

for survival in the<br />

different types of soil after<br />

the buckthorn is removed.<br />

The Friends also included<br />

a non-native, but fast<br />

growing, green giant arborvitae<br />

in their plan since<br />

it can provide additional<br />

screening from Green Bay<br />

Road.<br />

As neighbors learned<br />

of the plan to continue the<br />

Friends of the Trail’s restoration<br />

work South of South<br />

Avenue, however, they became<br />

concerned.<br />

Last week, The Anchor<br />

reported a petition opposing<br />

the work circulated and<br />

was sent to the Village.<br />

Some, like Terri Atkinson,<br />

of Wentworth Avenue,<br />

are still unsatisfied<br />

with the completed work<br />

between Harbor and Scott<br />

Avenue. They’re confused<br />

why another section<br />

of the trail is beginning to<br />

receive investment when<br />

they don’t feel the first section<br />

is complete.<br />

Whether or not that section<br />

is complete is a topic<br />

of conversation that will<br />

continue through the next<br />

year, but unlike the section<br />

from Harbor to Scott, the<br />

section south of South Avenue<br />

has a plan, a budget,<br />

a timeline and partnerships<br />

with the Village and park<br />

district from the get-go. In<br />

contrast, the section from<br />

Harbor to Scott started six<br />

years ago as three volunteers<br />

tramping through the<br />

trail cutting out buckthorn<br />

in their free time.<br />

Following the Friends’<br />

community meeting in<br />

December discussing their<br />

trail restoration plan, the<br />

Village received an email<br />

from a concerned resident<br />

and set up a meeting with a<br />

couple of concerned neighbors<br />

early last month.<br />

The work of tearing<br />

out the buckthorn was set<br />

to begin in January but<br />

was postponed due to the<br />

raised concerns.<br />

The primary concerns<br />

of the 10 or so neighbors<br />

directly next to the section<br />

of the trail south of<br />

South Avenue were about<br />

their property values and<br />

privacy. The loss of vegetation<br />

will expose more<br />

of the train and more of<br />

the headlights from Green<br />

Bay Road traffic and if not<br />

completed properly, could<br />

result in a less attractive<br />

trail which would reduce<br />

the value of nearby homes,<br />

according to their petition.<br />

Kayri Havens from the<br />

Chicago Botanic Garden<br />

said it is very unlikely the<br />

work will adversely affect<br />

property values.<br />

“Plants will grow up<br />

and provide a much more<br />

beautiful and much more<br />

ecologically appropriate<br />

screen than the buckthorn<br />

does,” she said. “I think as<br />

these restorations mature,<br />

they will actually help<br />

property values.”<br />

Carl Leonard, of Ida<br />

Lane, expressed concern<br />

about the quantity of plants<br />

to be replanted.<br />

“Although we truly applaud<br />

the intent and desire<br />

to eliminate buckthorn, we<br />

feel the plan has not allocated<br />

appropriate resources<br />

to prevent the buckthorn<br />

from repopulating once its<br />

removed,” Leonard said.<br />

The Friends have, however,<br />

set up a “Trust for<br />

the Trail” with ambitious<br />

fundraising goals “to ensure<br />

future leaders will<br />

always have the resources<br />

to maintain our projects,”<br />

according to its website.<br />

After nearly two hours<br />

of conversation — including<br />

ample amounts of public<br />

comment — Trustee<br />

Gail Lissner made a motion<br />

to postpone the trail<br />

work until all concerns had<br />

more opportunity to be addressed<br />

but no one moved<br />

to second her motion. So,<br />

the work will proceed in<br />

the next 7-10 days with the<br />

beginning of buckthorn<br />

and poison ivy removal.<br />

Read the full story at<br />

GlencoeAnchor.com.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!