08.04.2018 Views

113992242-Dravidian-Settlements-in-Ceylon-and-the-Beginnings-of-the-Kingdom-of-Jaffna-By-Karthigesu-Indrapala-Complete-Phd-Thesis-University-of-London-1965

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>the</strong> 1a1r,rattir as one <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir leaders The V1?ri- were <strong>of</strong>ten<br />

considered to be <strong>of</strong> a higher social atatus than <strong>the</strong> IaI%kRi<br />

Although <strong>the</strong> ffaikk ra forces <strong>in</strong> <strong>Ceylon</strong> were drawn from both<br />

sections, as <strong>the</strong>y admit <strong>in</strong> our <strong>in</strong>scription, <strong>the</strong> Nabltantra<br />

division, who alone call <strong>the</strong> Valafijiyar <strong>the</strong>ir m±taik4,<br />

appears to have been drawn from <strong>the</strong> Valkii. This assumption<br />

is fur<strong>the</strong>r streng<strong>the</strong>ned by <strong>the</strong> fact that <strong>the</strong> 'Nakaratt.r 4ir'<br />

are referred to as those who accompany <strong>the</strong> atantra The<br />

phrase Nakarattr baa been translated by Paranavitana<br />

as <strong>the</strong> 'Nakarattir <strong>and</strong> o<strong>the</strong>rs'f' But literally uiffr means<br />

'those <strong>in</strong>cluded', from uflitu mean<strong>in</strong>g '<strong>in</strong>clude'. The phrase<br />

would, <strong>the</strong>refore, mean 'those <strong>in</strong>cluded (<strong>in</strong> a group) with <strong>the</strong><br />

Nakarattir'. This seems to be a reference to <strong>the</strong> Iafi1tai leaders.<br />

The reason why this group is mentioned as those who accompany<br />

<strong>the</strong> Z4ahitantra must be <strong>the</strong> subord<strong>in</strong>ate position held by <strong>the</strong>m<br />

<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> presence <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> ValAksi. The leaders <strong>of</strong> both sections<br />

were <strong>in</strong>vited for <strong>the</strong> meet<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> aik1ra.g obviously<br />

because <strong>the</strong> latter were drawn from both seetions <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Dravidian</strong>s.<br />

1. E.G., XI, p. 61 <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> text ; The Imperial Gazetteer <strong>of</strong> India,<br />

XVIII, pp. 198-199.<br />

2. B.A.Saletore, 2• cit., p. 68 ff.<br />

3. See supra, p. 151<br />

k. See supra, p. s5S

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!