9 months ago

End-of-life decision-making for children with severe developmental disabilities

244 I.H. Zaal-Schuller

244 I.H. Zaal-Schuller et al. / Research in Developmental Disabilities 49–50 (2016) 235–246 regarded the life of their child as less valuable than the life of a normally developing child. This strengthened the parents in their conviction to persuade the physician of the intrinsic value of their child’s life. Several parents underlined the importance of having sufficient time and obtaining sufficient information during the decision-making process (Friedman, 2006; Morrow et al., 2008; Rapoport et al., 2013; Reilly et al., 2010; Sharman et al., 2005). Information from other parents who had gone through the same process was considered especially helpful (Morrow et al., 2008; Rapoport et al., 2013). The importance of sufficient time and information during EoLDM applies not only to children with SDDs but to all children with critical illnesses (Carnevale et al., 2007; Curley & Meyer, 2003; Meert et al., 2000; Michelson et al., 2009). A recent review describing the experiences of parents of medically complex infants (including children with SDDs) also concluded that parents feel strongly guided by their wish to do what is best for their child and not for themselves. Other factors by which this group of parents felt guided were the seriousness of the child’s illness and the existence of additional treatment options, such as experimental therapies if the child did not respond to initial treatments (Allen, 2014). Studies about complex decision-making in children mostly focus on EoLDM, especially decisions to withhold or withdraw life-sustaining prolonging treatment. However, in children with SDDs, almost every decision is complex. As noted previously, children with SDDs frequently suffer from complex medical problems (Chaney & Eyman, 2000; Oeseburg et al., 2011; van Schrojenstein Lantman-de Valk et al., 1997). Parents are therefore continuously faced with challenging decisions (Tamburro, Shaffer, Hahnlen, Felker, & Ceneviva, 2011). Moreover, each decision has consequences for the next decision and also has significant influence on the child’s quality of life. Recent studies indicate that parents want to be involved in all aspects of care for their child: not only care in general but also specific care, such as the management of epilepsy and necessary surgery (Rallison & Raffin-Bouchal, 2013; Redley et al., 2013; Sheela, Latha, Liu, Lem, & Kaler, 2005; Vallenga, Grypdonck, Tan, Lendemeijer, & Boon, 2006). Moreover, most parents regard themselves as the experts in the care of their child (Avis & Reardon, 2008; Iversen, Graue, & Clare, 2009; Rallison & Raffin-Bouchal, 2013). At the same time, they have to face encounters with multiple health care professionals. They often experience these encounters as negative (Iversen et al., 2009; Rallison & Raffin-Bouchal, 2013; Redley et al., 2013; Sleigh, 2005). Parents indicated for example that they were not listened to (Sleigh, 2005); that they were excluded from the decision-making process regarding fundoplication (Fox et al., 2012), an operation predominantly carried out in children with SDDs; and that they did not receive sufficient information (Ager, Downs, Fyfe, & Leonard, 2009; Iversen et al., 2009; Marcovitch, 2005; Sleigh, 2005; Tandy, 2012). Several parents indicated that they would have especially appreciated information from other parents who had already been through this process (Iversen et al., 2009). The high prevalence of challenging decisions that parents of children with SDDs have to make over a long period of time, and the fact that all of these decisions have serious consequences for the child and his/her family, make these decisions ‘critical treatment decisions’. In our opinion, using this one uniform term will facilitate further research. This review has several limitations. First, the number of included studies is small, and all studies were performed in Anglo-Saxon countries. This limits the generalizability of the outcomes. Second, in several studies being included the sample size was small (Madrigal et al., 2012; Rapoport et al., 2013; Reilly et al., 2010; Sharman et al., 2005) and/or there was a potential sample bias resulting from the self-selection of participants (Guon et al., 2014; Madrigal et al., 2012; Reilly et al., 2010). Furthermore, the type of decision parents had encountered varied greatly. This makes it harder to compare the different viewpoints of parents in EoLDM. Finally, there was a considerable variation in how much time had passed between the decision-making and the data collection phase. We do not know whether this may have affected the parents’ evaluation. We are well aware that because of these limitations, the outcomes that we describe should be interpreted with caution and require further research among larger groups of parents of children with SDDs making different types of critical treatment decisions. The strength of this review is that it provides a comprehensive overview of the literature about the role of parents in EoLDM in children with SDDs. An interesting theme for further research is the question what parents and physicians both mean when they use the concept ‘the child’s best interest’. A second interesting theme is the influence of cultural, religious and socio-economic factors on parental decision-making. This requires the inclusion of other, preferably non-Western, countries. 5. Conclusion Although the experienced involvement in EoLDM of parents of children with SDDs varied widely, parents were largely in agreement about their wish to actively share in the decision-making process. Compared with parents of normally developing children, the presence of an SDD does not seem to make a substantial difference in either parents’ preferences regarding EoLDM or the factors by which they feel guided in their decision-making. Doing what is best for their child, seeing their child suffer, and their child’s perceived will to survive were the three most important guiding factors mentioned by parents. Parents often felt that the information provided by the physician was not sufficient, and they underlined their desire to speak with other parents who had gone through the same process. Many parents reported that they felt that they had to advocate for their child’s interests. Parents of children with SDDs face very different types of decisions, ranging from surgery to the management of epilepsy to decisions to withhold life-prolonging treatment, including artificial nutrition and hydration. Parents sometimes foresee these decisions but may also be taken by surprise. We suggest the term critical treatment decisions as the overall term for the

I.H. Zaal-Schuller et al. / Research in Developmental Disabilities 49–50 (2016) 235–246 245 wide array of decisions that parents have to make for their child over time—decisions that almost always have important implications for the child’s quantity and quality of life. Funding sources This study is part of a research project entitled ‘‘End-of-life decision-making in children with severe intellectual disabilities’’. This project is funded by the Rehabilitation Fund: R2011131 (het Revalidatiefonds), the Fund for Intellectual Disabilities: L2011057 (het Fonds Verstandelijk Gehandicapten) and Erasmus Medical Centre, Department of Intellectual Disability Medicine: SC200007. These funds did not in any way influence the data acquisition, data analysis, or drafting of this manuscript. Financial disclosure The authors indicate that they have no financial relationships relevant to this article to disclose. Conflict of interest statement The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose. References Ager, S., Downs, J., Fyfe, S., & Leonard, H. (2009). Parental experiences of scoliosis management in Rett syndrome. Disability & Rehabilitation, 31(23), 1917–1924. doi: Allen, K. A. (2014). Parental decision-making for medically complex infants and children: An integrated literature review. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 51(9), 1289–1304. Avis, M., & Reardon, R. (2008). Understanding the views of parents of children with special needs about the nursing care their child receives when in hospital: A qualitative study. Journal of Child Health Care: For Professionals Working With Children in the Hospital and Community, 12(1), 7–17. doi: http:// Berger, M. L., Martin, B. C., Husereau, D., Worley, K., Allen, J. D., Yang, W., et al. (2014). A questionnaire to assess the relevance and credibility of observational studies to inform health care decision making: An ISPOR-AMCP-NPC Good Practice Task Force report. Value Health, 17(2), 143–156. Bittles, A. H., Petterson, B. A., Sullivan, S. G., Hussain, R., Glasson, E. J., & Montgomery, P. D. (2002). The influence of intellectual disability on life expectancy. Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences, 57(7), M470–M472. Brotherton, A., & Abbott, J. (2012). Mothers’ process of decision making for gastrostomy placement. Qualitative Health Research, 22(5), 587–594. http:// Carnevale, F. A., Canoui, P., Cremer, R., Farrell, C., Doussau, A., Seguin, M. J., et al. (2007). Parental involvement in treatment decisions regarding their critically ill child: A comparative study of France and Quebec. Pediatric Critical Care Medicine, 8(4), 337–342. 01.PCC.0000269399.47060.6D Chaney, R. H., & Eyman, R. K. (2000). Patterns in mortality over 60 years among persons with mental retardation in a residential facility. Mental Retardation, 38(3), 289–293.;2 Choong, K., Cupido, C., Nelson, E., Arnold, D. M., Burns, K., Cook, D., et al. Academy of Critical Care: Development Evaluation and Methodology (ACCADEMY). (2010). A framework for resolving disagreement during end of life care in the critical care unit. Clinical & Investigative Medicine, 33(4), E240–E253. Cochrane Netherlands (2015). Checklists and downloads Retrieved 27/10/2015, from h Cremer, R., Binoche, A., Noizet, O., Fourier, C., Leteurtre, S., Moutel, G., et al. (2007). Are the GFRUP’s recommendations for withholding or withdrawing treatments in critically ill children applicable? Results of a two-year survey. Journal of Medical Ethics, 33(3), 128–133. jme.2006.015990 Curley, M. A., & Meyer, E. C. (2003). Parental experience of highly technical therapy: Survivors and nonsurvivors of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support. Pediatric Critical Care Medicine, 4(2), 214–219. da Costa, D. E., Ghazal, H., & Al Khusaiby, S. (2002). Do Not Resuscitate orders and ethical decisions in a neonatal intensive care unit in a Muslim community. Archives of Disease in Childhood—Fetal and Neonatal Edition, 86(2), F115–F119. de Vos, M. A. (2015). Sharing the burden of deciding—How physicians and parents make end-of-life decisions. University of Amsterdam h record/1/446966i (Doctoral Dissertation). de Vos, M. A., van der Heide, A., Maurice-Stam, H., Brouwer, O. F., Plotz, F. B., Schouten-van Meeteren, A. Y., et al. (2011). The process of end-of-life decision-making in pediatrics: A national survey in the Netherlands. Pediatrics, 127(4), e1004–e1012. Devictor, D. J., Tissieres, P., Gillis, J., & Truog, R. (2008). Intercontinental differences in end-of-life attitudes in the pediatric intensive care unit: Results of a worldwide survey. Pediatric Critical Care Medicine, 9(6), 560–566. Eden, L. M., & Callister, L. C. (2010). Parent involvement in end-of-life care and decision making in the newborn intensive care unit: An integrative review. Journal of Perinatal Education, 19(1), 29–39. Fox, D., Barnard, J., Campagna, E. J., Dickinson, M., Bruny, J., & Kempe, A. (2012). Fundoplication and the pediatric surgeon: Implications for shared decisionmaking and the medical home. Academic Pediatrics, 12(6), 558–566. Friedman, S. L. (2006). Parent resuscitation preferences for young people with severe developmental disabilities. Journal of the American Medical Directors Association, 7(2), 67–72. Gillam, L., & Sullivan, J. (2011). Ethics at the end of life: Who should make decisions about treatment limitation for young children with life-threatening or life-limiting conditions? Journal of Paediatrics and Child Health, 47(9), 594–598. Guon, J., Wilfond, B. S., Farlow, B., Brazg, T., & Janvier, A. (2014). Our children are not a diagnosis: The experience of parents who continue their pregnancy after a prenatal diagnosis of trisomy 13 or 18. American Journal of Medical Genetics, A, 164A(2), 308–318. Iversen, A. S., Graue, M., & Clare, J. (2009). Parents’ perspectives of surgery for a child who has cerebral palsy. Journal of Pediatric Health Care, 23(3), 165–172. doi: Kon, A. A. (2010). The shared decision-making continuum. Journal of the American Medical Association, 304(8), 903–904. jama.2010.1208

Children's participation in the decision-making from a
Developmental Disabilities - Vinfen
Aspects of Disability Decision Making: Data and Materials
Disability Decision Making: Data and Materials, May 2006
NYS Office of People with Developmental Disabilities
Education and Training in Developmental Disabilities - Division on ...
Persons with Developmental Disabilities Program - Family ...
Education and Training in Autism and Developmental Disabilities
Education and Training in Autism and Developmental Disabilities
Sex Offenders with Developmental Disabilities
End of life
Model to Assist Family Members in End-of-Life Decisions
etadd_48(1) - Division on Autism and Developmental Disabilities
2008 Pathway Guide to Lewis County's Developmental Disabilities ...
A Strategic Path Forward: - Florida Developmental Disabilities Council
Short Breaks Disabled Children
Joystick-controlled cars for drivers with severe disabilities - VTI
[+]The best book of the month Decisive: How to Make Better Choices in Life and Work [DOWNLOAD]
Budgeting and Decision Making - StudyGuide.PK
People with Developmental Disabilities in Illinois
Extending inclusion - The Council for Disabled Children
Communicating with people with disabilities - Novita Children's ...