376190585-ISLAMIC-GOD-IS-KNOWABLE-BUT-NOT-COMPREHENSIBLE-BY-FINITE-KNOWLEDGES-OF-FINITE-SUPPOSITA

Page 10 of 36
Knowledge of Actuality of Human Nature [T1] and the Knowledge of Actuality of Assumption of Human
Nature [T3] then there is no implication that their Knowledges implieth the Knowledge of their
Potentialities [P1,P2] and the Holder of their Potentialities [The Hypostasis].
But the Knowledge OF Potentiality say P1 cannot be posterior to the Knowledge of the thing say T1
which is actualized from Potentiality in the Thing T2.
This shews that God , Godhead of God and the Hypostasis in the Godhead of God [If there is any in
Godhead] can be known without the Human Nature and the Assumption Of Human Nature [If there are
some].
The Knowledge of Hypostasis in Godhead of God [if there is any ] can be attained with out the
Assumption of the Human Nature and the Human Nature itself.
If the Male Human Nature [T1] and Assumption of Male Human Nature [T3] cannot be known
without their Potentialities P1,P2 being Known then as the Potentialities [P1,P2] and the thing
[t2] in which these two [T1,T3] are, are Logically Prior to them [T1,T2].So the Knowledges of
respective Potentialities [P1,P2] and the Thing [T2] is prior to the Respective Knowledges of
[T1,T3]. So it requireth that the respective Knowledges of P1,P2,T2, MUST exist prior to the
respective Knowledges of T1,T3.How ever it may be argued that this Priority is only Logical and
not of Time. But this argumentation is incorrect and wrong.Since the Potentialities and the
Holder of these Potentialites canbe known even if the Actualization of Potentialities hath not
Occurred. This meaneth that the Hypostasis and each one of the Potentialities in the
Hypostasis canbe Known even if there actualization do not occur , or if it occurs even then it
is not necessarily Known [Not the case “Necessarily Not Known”].
As Incarnation , Human Nature, Assumption of Human Nature etc. are Relative(ly) Necessary
and Not Absolute(ly) Necessary, [in Trinitarian Christology] there fore they are Absolute(ly)
Contingent. No Contingent is Absolute(ly) Necessary for Knowing the Absolute (ly) Necessary
Being.
Note 1:=The Term Motion may be defined as the Transition [‘Intiqa:l] of some thing say T1 from the
Domain of Potentiality /Potency into the line of Actuality in a thing T2 ,which is in Actualization and not
in Potency. This Motion may be termed as Actualization.
Page 10 of 36