Views
1 week ago

ECOBuilder-Specifiers Journal spring2018

Building Better Thermal

Building Better Thermal Performance into Public Sector Projects Andy Mitchell from NBT, UK distributor of Pavatex woodfibre insulation, discusses the reasons why so many buildings fail to meet their designed thermal performance. Pressure on public sector budgets has prompted a more creative and strategic approach to planning and designing public sector property assets. Local authorities have not only reviewed their property portfolio and how it can deliver best value; many have also embarked on rationalisation programmes, often involving the construction of new buildings fit for the 21 st century, where services can be combined to reduce operational costs. Critical to that cost management goal is the sustainability of public sector buildings, in terms of thermal performance, maintenance requirements and service life. The insulation used and the way in which this is specified and installed as part of the building fabric is critical to all three sustainability parameters because it will determine heat loss, solar gain and the risk of issues associated with moisture build up, such as damp, mould and condensation. The same principles apply to social housing properties, where longevity of the asset, minimising maintenance, reducing heating bills and ensuring tenant comfort are all important specification and design considerations. All of this may seem fairly fundamental and integral to Part L compliance. However, there’s a hitch. Many buildings fail to meet their designed thermal performance due to issues with air tightness and thermal bridging and there is no legal requirement to check if the energy performance of the building, once built, meets its designed energy performance. Meeting Part L is essentially a paper exercise and this is a missed opportunity to work with the supply chain to simplify design details and ensure thermal coherence of the finished build, which would often result in a faster build programme and less waste too. The U-Value Issue The most commonly quoted thermal performance criteria is the U value, which is calculated based on the heat loss of a building’s principal areas – such as walls, roof, windows etc. – and considers every component of 28 ECOBUILDER - THE SPECIFIER SPRING 2018 each. However, to achieve genuine thermal performance this should not be considered in isolation but in combination with, psi values (thermal bridging) and air tightness. To achieve the required U-values, the specifier selects an insulation material with low thermal conductivity – the Lambda value. The lower the conductivity of the material, the higher performance it gives as an insulator. In theory, therefore, materials with very low conductivity, such as PIR insulation, can be specified in smaller quantities to achieve high levels of thermal performance in the finished structure. But there are a couple of problems with this assumption. Firstly, we don’t construct buildings using a single material in isolation, so the Lambda value of one element of the wall or roof build up, i.e. the insulation, can be seriously compromised by the additional materials that surround it, often required for structural or weatherproofing purposes. Instead, the thermal conductivity of the insulation material needs to be considered in the context of the entire building envelope and floor structure. A good illustration of this is woodfibre insulation, like Pavatex. Woodfibre has a higher Lambda value than PIR but it is high density and can be applied to the external envelope of a building as a complete thermal wrap requiring much smaller section fixings for external weathering surfaces such as cladding. Its thermal performance in practice is better, therefore, despite the fact that its Lambda value would suggest otherwise on paper. Consequently, it is vital that the specifier considers the verified Lambda value within the context of all the repeating components of the principal areas of the building envelope when designing a project. Secondly, the effectiveness of the building envelope also depends on the psi values (thermal bridging detailing), collectively known as the Y-value. Proportionately, thermal bridging has little impact on poorly insulated older buildings as there is so much heat loss through the principal areas. For a Part L compliant building, however, as much as one third of a building’s heat can be lost through thermal bridging. Once again, the solution to this is delivering a thermal wrap around the principal building fabric, which can perform even better when solutions are incorporated to address high heat loss thermal bridge details, such as overlapping insulation onto window frames, for example. Achieving Improved Airtightness The other major cause of heat loss is air escaping from the building and we measure this as air tightness at m 2 / m 3 @50pa. The Part L requirement of 5m 2 /m 3 @50pa is the equivalent of a hole the size of a 20p in every square metre of the building envelope: not quite the hermetically sealed boxes that people fear air tightness will deliver! Insulation can only trap the heat within the building if the envelope provides good levels of air tightness because warm air will naturally escape through any gaps, increasing heat loss. While designers and specifiers cannot always control construction integrity, good airtightness can be aided at the design stage with simple details that are more easily executed on site. In most cases, airtightness is better delivered from the inside of the building envelope, enabling a pressure test at first fix to show up any issues so that the contractor can make good. Additionally, careful consideration should be given to the sequencing of the construction. We must be mindful also that incorporating elements to improve the thermal performance of our building changes the physics of the structure. We must, therefore, avoid creating new problems, such as trapped moisture or summer overheating as a byproduct of the focus on preventing heat loss. Ultimately, we must stop focusing on U-values alone; the most costly of the three ways of reducing heat loss. By delivering thermal performance through a combination of U-values, Y-values and air tightness, we are more likely to deliver the low energy public sector built environment we need to drive performance, whilst reducing cost.

The Next generation of insulation solutions used on 1000’s of projects throughout the UK delivering cost effective thermal performance Contact NBT T 01844 338338 E info@natural-building.co.uk www.natural-building.co.uk

The Victorian Terrace, BRE Innovation Park - Ecobuild Product Search
Systems & Solutions for a changing World! - Ecobuild
TECU® Copper for Roof and Façade Cladding Product ... - Ecobuild
Wood Fibreboard Product Applications - Ecobuild
the environmentally compatible building product - Ecobuild
Insulate Magazine Ecobuild 2018 Special Edition
Top ten reasons to specify STYROFOAM XPS in inverted roofing
The KVH®-1plus® warranty system. - Ecobuild
Electric Underfloor Heating Solutions - Building Products Index
Specify With Confidence - Phase-A-Matic, Inc.
GREEN BUILDINGS GUIDE: SpEcIfyING paRchEm pRoDUctS
Βιοκλιματική Δόμηση - Eco - building Club
A Practical Guide to Creating a Sustainable Community Building