21.04.2018 Views

Concentrated Poverty

Concentrated Poverty

Concentrated Poverty

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

from the city to the suburbs, and<br />

demographic changes (the rise in oneparent<br />

households and decrease in<br />

labor market participation). These<br />

changes were intertwined<br />

with America's history of ethno-racial<br />

segregation that produced the ghetto,<br />

white flight from American cities, which<br />

led to a declining tax base to provide<br />

city services, and the civil rights<br />

movement, which allowed better-off<br />

blacks to leave inner-city areas.<br />

Although concentrated poverty<br />

increased among blacks, Hispanics, and<br />

whites throughout 1970-1990s,<br />

increases were far more dramatic<br />

among blacks, followed by Hispanics,<br />

and then to a much lesser extent whites.<br />

1990-2000<br />

The number of people living in highpoverty<br />

neighborhoods declined by 24%<br />

or 2.5 million people, in the 1990s. The<br />

steepest declines in high-poverty<br />

neighborhoods occurred in metropolitan<br />

areas in the Midwest and South. The<br />

share of the poor living in high-poverty<br />

neighborhoods declined among all racial<br />

and ethnic groups. This was especially<br />

the case for African Americans, wherein<br />

the share of poor black individuals living<br />

in high-poverty neighborhoods declined<br />

from 30 percent in 1990 to 19 percent in<br />

2000. This decline of high-poverty<br />

neighborhoods occurred in rural areas<br />

and central cities, but suburbs<br />

experienced almost no change.<br />

Scholars have also recognized<br />

qualitative shifts in areas of<br />

"concentrated poverty." In a study of<br />

Southern California metropolitan areas<br />

(a state which did see rises in<br />

concentrated poverty through the '90s<br />

against the national trend), Wolch and<br />

Sessoms point to the growing number of<br />

working poor populations and the<br />

emergence of inner-suburban poverty<br />

which qualify as areas of "extreme<br />

poverty" under the 40% threshold do not<br />

demonstrate the same negative social<br />

behaviors or physical decay of the<br />

traditional image that the statistic was<br />

first designed to designate. Other<br />

scholars, have alternatively argued for<br />

an expansion of the term and challenge<br />

Jargowsky's claim of decreased poverty<br />

concentration in the 1990s. Swanstrom<br />

et al. have shown that by using the<br />

relative definition of poverty as<br />

employed in Europe based on 50% of<br />

the median income in each region, the<br />

'90s actually saw an increase in<br />

concentrated poverty through most<br />

American cities.<br />

2000-Present<br />

Whatever gains may have been made in<br />

the reduction of concentrated poverty in<br />

the '90s, it is clear that they did not<br />

persist. Between 2000 and 2005–09, the<br />

population in extremely poor<br />

neighborhoods climbed by more than<br />

one-third, from 6.6 million to 8.7 million.<br />

The share of poor people living in these<br />

sorts of neighborhoods, and thus<br />

confronting the "double burden" of their<br />

own poverty and the poverty of those<br />

around them, grew from 9.1 percent to<br />

10.5 percent during that<br />

time. A Brookings<br />

Institution<br />

report attributes this trend to both the<br />

downturn of 2000 and the 2008<br />

recession. This poverty not only affected<br />

inner cities, but continued to spread into<br />

the suburbs, extending<br />

the suburbanization trend<br />

of<br />

concentrated poverty first noted in the<br />

1990s. Furthermore, the study found<br />

that the concentrated poverty rate of<br />

Page 28 of 134

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!