14.12.2012 Views

Processing of Primary Fischer-Tropsch Products - University of Alberta

Processing of Primary Fischer-Tropsch Products - University of Alberta

Processing of Primary Fischer-Tropsch Products - University of Alberta

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Hydrogenation with an tmsulphided catalyst is more difficult, since the acids<br />

tend to leach the metal from the catalyst. Hydrotreating technology is<br />

therefore not the obstacle, but catalyst selection is difficult. The hydrogenated<br />

product responds well to the addition <strong>of</strong> commercial quality improving<br />

additives.<br />

Hydroisomerisation: The main difference between hydrotreating and<br />

hydroisomerisation is that the latter uses a catalyst that includes acid<br />

functionality. This enables the isomerisation <strong>of</strong> the feed to take place while<br />

doing the hydrotreating. This results in a product with better cold flow<br />

properties, albeit at the potential loss <strong>of</strong> some Cetane. The reactive nature <strong>of</strong><br />

the feed needs to be taken into account when the catalyst and operating<br />

conditions are specified. The catalysts used for hydrocracking and<br />

hydroisomerisation are the same. At low processing severity<br />

hydroisomerisation is the dominant reaction pathway, but as processing<br />

severity increases more hydrocracking will take place, thereby increasing the<br />

production <strong>of</strong> low octane naphtha. Gum formation on the acidic sites <strong>of</strong> the<br />

hydroisomerisation catalyst is also possible if the feed in not hydrotreated.<br />

The use <strong>of</strong> a hydroisomerisation catalyst as an intermediate bed in a<br />

hydrotreater is therefore preferable to using hydroisomerisation as a refining<br />

option on its own.<br />

It is possible to extract some <strong>of</strong> the linear ct-olefins (typically C12-C15<br />

range) to produce detergent alcohols by hydr<strong>of</strong>ormylation [53]. This has been<br />

done in the Sasol Secunda refineries.<br />

One shortcoming that is still left unaddressed is the low density <strong>of</strong> the<br />

diesel. This can only be redressed by aromatics addition. Blending with biodiesel<br />

improves the physical density but does not improve the energy density and high<br />

energy density is actually the desired product characteristic for the fuel user.<br />

Even Euro-4 does not impose a limit on aromatics for diesel, only polyaromatics<br />

(< 11%). Some limitation on aromatics content is indirectly provided by the<br />

reduction in upper density limit to 845 kg.m 3.<br />

3.2.9 Heavier than Czz hydrocarbons<br />

The fraction <strong>of</strong> the HTFT product with a boiling point higher than 360~<br />

is small, but not negligible. Like the diesel fraction (Cll-C22) it consists mainly <strong>of</strong><br />

hydrocarbons, mostly olefins, with a low degree <strong>of</strong> branching and oxygenates.<br />

Size reduction <strong>of</strong> the hydrocarbon chains is the most important objective, since<br />

post-processing in the appropriate carbon number range is always possible.<br />

Another important issue is the density <strong>of</strong> the diesel. The preferred refining option<br />

is:<br />

9 Hydrocracking: Hydrogen addition, rather than carbon rejection, underpins<br />

the molecular size reduction. It is a clean, well-known and efficient<br />

497

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!