atw 2018-05v6

inforum

atw Vol. 63 (2018) | Issue 5 ı May

RESEARCH AND INNOVATION 330

experiments, only negligible interaction

occurred near the interface

[21] and no indications for spinodal

decomposition were found [26].

UMo phase behaviour

Few experiments have been carried

out so far using heavy ions that

directly target effects in the UMo

kernels. One major finding was the

reduction of the orthorhombic

α-phase of Uranium during irradiation,

i.e. the stabilization of the bcc

γ-phase [8]. This is an imperative

requirement for the fuel. The same

effect was observed in-pile [34],

though quantitative comparisons are

still outstanding.

Ternary alloys like U 8 wt % Mo

1 wt % Pt which originally were

considered to improve irradiation

behaviour showed no improvement

and partially even a destabilisation

of the γ-phase of the fuel and were

therefore discarded, too [32].

Conclusion

Altogether, the experiments very well

demonstrate the applicability of the

approach to use Iodine-127 irradiation

for qualitative and even quantitative

experiments to reliably simulate

numerous in-pile irradiation effects.

Even though the burn-up equivalent

that has been reached up to now

with ions was comparably low

(n < ∼ 6 ∙ 10

20

) for HPRR conditions,

important contributions were made to

the development of UMo fuels.

In the future, improved ion beam

diagnostics will open the door to the

analysis of high-burn-up effects like

the recrystallization of UMo kernels.

The necessary fission density equivalents

can be reached with only a few

days of beam time, depending on the

influence of fission rate/ion flux.

Subsequent fission gas implantation

additionally allows studying gasdriven

effects – first demonstration

experiments were successfully carried

out with Kr ions.

The main advantage of this

technique is its effectiveness: No

additional radioactivity is involved,

the complete cycle from experiment

design over irradiation to post irradiation

examinations can be carried

out in a few weeks. Even though the

method has obvious limitations, it is

well able to minimize the number of

costly and time consuming in-pile

irradiation experiments.

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the

MLL staff for their great support

during our beam-times and also in

the times in-between as well as all

members of the working group

“Hochdichte Kernbrennstoffe”.

The work was supported by a

combined grant (FRM1318) from the

Bundesministerium für Bildung und

Forschung (BMBF) and the Bayerisches

Staatsministerium für Bildung und

Kultus, Wissenschaft und Kunst

(StMBW).

References

[1] M. Meyer, G. Hofman, S. Hayes, C. Clark,

T. Wiencek, J. Snelgrove, R. Strain, K.-H.

Kim, Low-temperature irradiation

behavior of uranium-molybdenum alloy

dispersion fuel, Journal of Nuclear

Materials 304 (2002) 221–236.

[2] A. Leenaers et. Al.: Post-irradiation

examination of uranium-7 wt %

molybdenum atomized dispersion

fuel, Journal of Nuclear Materials 335

(2004) 39–47.

[3] G. Hofman et. Al.: Post irradiation

analysis of low enriched U-Mo/Al

dispersion fuel miniplate tests, RERTR

4&5, in: Proceedings of the 26.

Inter national Meeting on Reduced

Enrichment for Research and Test

Reactors (RERTR), 2004.

[4] A. Leenaers, Surface-engineered

low-enriched Uranium-Molybdenum

fuel for research reactors, PhD thesis,

University of Ghent, 2014

[5] A. Leenaers et. al., Fuel swelling and

interaction layer formation in the

SELENIUM Si and ZrN coated U(Mo)

dispersion fuel plates irradiated at high

power in BR2, Journal of Nuclear

Material, 458 (2015) p. 380-393

[6] A. Leenaers et. Al.: Irradiation behaviour

of ground U(Mo) fuel with and

without Si added to the matrix, Journal

of Nuclear Materials 412 (2011) 41-52

[7] S. van den Berghe et. Al.: Swelling of

U(Mo)-Al(Si) dispersion fuel under

irradiation – Non-destructive analyses of

the LEONIDAS E-FUTURE plates, Journal

of Nuclear Materials 430 (2012)

246–258.

[8] R. Jungwirth, Irradiation behavior of

modified high-performance nuclear

fuels, Ph.D. thesis, Technische

Universität München (2011).

[9] T. Zweifel et. Al.: Kr implantation into

heavy ion irradiated monolithic

U-Mo/Al systems: SIMS and SEM

investigations, Journal of Nuclear

Materials 470 (2016) 251–257.

[10] T. Zweifel, Fission gas behaviour and

interdiffusion layer growth in inpile and

out-of-pile irradiated u-mo/al nuclear

fuels, Ph.D. thesis, Technische

Universität München (2014).

[11] Y. Kim et. Al.: Modeling of interaction

layer growth between U-Mo particles

and an Al matrix, Nuclear Engineering

and Technology 45 (2013) 827–837.

[12] J. Ziegler, SRIM, http://www.srim.org

(2010).

[13] P. Lemoine et. Al.: UMo dispersion fuel

results and status of qualification

programs, in: Proceedings of the 8 th

International Topical Meeting on

Research Reactor Fuel Management

(RRFM), Munich, 2004.

[14] Y. Kim et. Al.: Irradiation-enhanced

interdiffusion in the diffusion zone of

U-Mo dispersion fuel in Al, Journal of

Phase Equilibria and Diffusion, 27

(2006) 614–621.

[15] D. Wachs et. Al.: Modeling the

integrated performance of dispersion

and monolithic U-Mo based fuels, in:

Proceedings of the International

Meeting on Reduced Enrichment for

Research and Test Reactors (RERTR),

Cape Town, South Africa, 2006.

[16] Y. Kim et. Al.: Post irradiation analysis

and performance modeling of

dispersion and monolithic U-Mo fuels,

in: Proceedings of the International

Meeting on Reduced Enrichment for

Research and Test Reactors (RERTR),

Prague, Czech Republic, 2007.

[17] H. Breitkreutz et. Al.: Quantitative

comparability of heavy ion and in-pile

irradiations on UMo fuel systems,

submitted to Journal of Nuclear

Materials, 2018

[18] H. Breitkreutz et. Al.: Quantitative

comparability of heavy ion and in-pile

induced IDL growth in UMo/Al fuels, in:

Proceedings of the 37 th International

Meeting on Reduced Enrichment for

Research and Test Reactors (RERTR),

2016.

[19] H.-Y. Chiang et. Al.: Evidence of

amorphous interdiffusion layer in heavy

ion irradiated U-8 wt %Mo/Al interfaces,

Journal of Nuclear Materials 440

(2013) 117–123.

[20] H.-Y. Chiang, Material selection of UMo

fuel for research reactors: Swift heavy

ion irradiation studies, Ph.D. thesis,

Technische Universität München

(2014).

[21] D.D. Keiser et. Al.: Microstructural

Characterization of a Mg Matrix U-Mo

Dispersion Fuel Plate Irradiated in the

Advanced Test Reactor to High Fission

Density: SEM Results; Metallurgical and

Materials Transactions 3E (2016) 71-89

[22] J. Hingerl, Evolution of the Inter

Diffusion Layer of UMo/Al Nuclear Fuel

during Heavy Ion Irradiation, Bachelor

thesis, Technische Universität

München, 2016

[23] S. van den Berghe et. Al., Transmission

electron microscopy investigations of

irradiated U-7 wt % Mo dispersion fuel,

Journal of Nuclear Materials 375

(2008) p. 340

[24] M.I. Mirandou et. Al.: Characterization

of the reaction layer in U-7 wt %Mo/Al

diffusion couples, Journal of Nuclear

Materials 323 (2003) 29-35

[25] H. Palancher et. Al.: Evidence for the

presence of UMoAl ternary compounds

in the UMo/Al interaction layer grown

by thermal annealing: A couple micro

X-ray diffraction and micro X-ray

absorption spectroscopy study, Journal

of Applied Crystallography, 40 (2007)

1064-1075

[26] D.D. Keiser, Private communication.

Publication in preparation.

Research and Innovation

Heavy Ions Irradiation as a Tool to Minimize the Number of In-Pile Tests in UMo Fuel Development ı H. Breitkreutz, J. Shi, R. Jungwirth, T. Zweifel, H.-Y. Chiang and W. Petry

More magazines by this user
Similar magazines