Extended Essay Supervisor Student Guide
- No tags were found...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
<strong>Supervisor</strong>/<strong>Student</strong> <strong>Guide</strong>lines and Due Dates for <strong>Extended</strong> <strong>Essay</strong><br />
<strong>Student</strong>s:<br />
It is in your best interest to keep a process journal during the experience. Not only will it make your<br />
reflections stronger, but it will give your supervisors more evidence for their own reflections.<br />
It is your responsibility to meet with your supervisors and add your own reflections<br />
All drafts and outlines will be turned into me. I will then put them in your supervisor’s mailbox.<br />
This will help make sure that there is no miscommunication about transfer of drafts. This will also<br />
help me be able to support the supervisor’s ability to judge the authenticity of the work.<br />
Interim Interview: The IB suggests this reflection after you have “changed course” or had time to<br />
reflect on the process. At this point, you have done some research and writing. The IB would love it<br />
if you could highlight your problems and reflect on that.<br />
Final Interview/Viva Voce: This interview cannot be done until the Final Copy is graded by<br />
supervisor. It is a time to celebrate, reflect, and authenticate. How have you grown through the<br />
process?<br />
Reminder: For all <strong>Extended</strong> <strong>Essay</strong> due dates, late work will earn a zero.<br />
<strong>Supervisor</strong>s:<br />
I have already started the supervisor process with each of the students, but now they are<br />
transferring to you.<br />
I will collect the work from the students and turn it in to your mailbox by the end of the day.<br />
You must have two formal interviews with the students. One interview is in the middle of the<br />
process and one is at the very end of the process. For supervisors, you should average 3-5 hours of<br />
work with the student during this process. Therefore, you will need more than the two formal<br />
interviews. However, only the two formal interviews need to be face to face.<br />
You need to grade the FINAL COPY of the draft for a predicted grade that will be submitted to IB.<br />
Prior to that, you may give the students formal feedback on the entire draft once. I recommend<br />
reading the Final Draft and grading it with the rubric.<br />
We will offer support systems and workshops to help with grading and supervising if interested.<br />
Check email for dates.<br />
You are required to write a supervisor’s report. Use the Viva Voce interview to help with the<br />
reflections on your student. Also, you will be required to authenticate the final copy at this time.
Deadlines (Northern Hemisphere)<br />
• October 10: Outline is Due<br />
o <strong>Student</strong>s: Make sure typed outlines are submitted at the start of class.<br />
o <strong>Supervisor</strong>s: Please make sure you meet with the student to discuss the outline by<br />
October 17 th<br />
• November 3: 1,000 Words Due<br />
o <strong>Student</strong>s: Make sure typed drafts are submitted at the start of class. Make sure that<br />
the outline is stapled to the front. Please make sure this is also submitted to<br />
Turnitin.com by 8am.<br />
o <strong>Supervisor</strong>s: Please make sure that you meet with the student to discuss the draft by<br />
November 10 th .<br />
• December 1: 2,000 Words Due<br />
o <strong>Student</strong>s: Make sure typed drafts are submitted at the start of class. Make sure that<br />
the outline is stapled to the front. Please make sure this is also submitted to a<br />
plagiarism checker like Turnitin.com by.<br />
o <strong>Supervisor</strong>s: Please make sure to meet and discuss with student by December 8 th .<br />
• January 10: Final Draft Due<br />
o <strong>Student</strong>s: Make sure the final draft is submitted at the start of class. Please make<br />
sure this is also submitted to Turnitin.com<br />
o <strong>Supervisor</strong>s: Please go through the rubric and prepare formal feedback for the<br />
students. Please make sure the feedback is based on the rubric. Please have the<br />
meeting with the student by January 20 th .<br />
• February 2: Final Copy Due<br />
o <strong>Student</strong>s: You need to submit an electronic and paper version of your final draft.<br />
THERE CAN BE NO DIFFERENCES BETWEEN THE DRAFTS. Please make sure the<br />
paper draft is given to me at the start of class..<br />
o <strong>Supervisor</strong>s: Please submit predicted grades and completed rubric to me by<br />
February 12 th .<br />
• Viva Voce Interview (Final Interview)<br />
o <strong>Student</strong>s: Please make sure this formal interview and reflection is completed by<br />
February 9th. Please email potential interview questions by February 2nd to your<br />
supervisor.<br />
o <strong>Supervisor</strong>s: Expect potential interview questions by February 2nd Please make<br />
sure the interview is completed by February 9th.
Rubric Notes<br />
Criterion A: Focus and Method<br />
• Out of 6 points<br />
• Is the topic communicated accurately and effectively?<br />
o Identified research topic<br />
o Explained research topic<br />
o Purpose and focus are clear and appropriate<br />
• Is the research question clearly stated and focused?<br />
o Research question clear?<br />
o Is there research necessary that is appropriately connected to discussion of essay?<br />
• Is the methodology of the research complete?<br />
o Appropriate range of relevant sources?<br />
o Evidence of an effective selection of sources?<br />
o Evidence of an informed selection of sources?<br />
Criterion B: Knowledge and Understanding<br />
• Out of 6 points<br />
• Does the student demonstrate excellent knowledge and understanding?<br />
o Are sources used effectively AND with understanding?<br />
o Is the knowledge of the topic clear and coherent?<br />
o Selection of sources – are they relevant and appropriate?<br />
• Terminology and concepts – are they used well?<br />
o Subject specific concepts and terminology – are they accurate and<br />
consistent?<br />
Criterion C: Critical Thinking<br />
• Out of 12 points<br />
• Demonstrated excellent research skills?<br />
o Research appropriate to question?<br />
o Application of research consistently relevant?<br />
• Demonstrated excellent analytical skills?<br />
o Research analyzed effectively?<br />
o Research remained focused?<br />
o Is there less relevant research? If so, did it not detract from overall quality?<br />
o Are conclusions effectively supported by evidence?<br />
• Is the discussion/evaluation excellent?<br />
o Is there an effective argument developed from research?<br />
o Is there a reasoned argument developed from research?<br />
o Is the conclusion reflective of what was presented?<br />
o Is the argument well-structured?<br />
o Is the argument coherent?<br />
o Has the research been critically evaluated?
Criterion D: Presentation<br />
• Out of 4 points<br />
• Is the presentation good?<br />
o Structure: Is it clearly appropriate?<br />
o Layout? Does it support reading and understanding?<br />
• Does it follow guidelines?<br />
o 12 point font?<br />
o Double spaced?<br />
o Numbered pages?<br />
o Within 4000 word limit?<br />
o No footnotes?<br />
o APA?<br />
o Labeled all illustrations?<br />
o Must leave out: name, school’s name, candidate number<br />
Criterion E: Engagement<br />
• Out of 6 points<br />
• Evaluates decision-making?<br />
• Evaluates planning?<br />
• Written in student’s own voice?<br />
• Demonstrate a creative approach?<br />
• Demonstrate authenticity?<br />
• Communicate high degree of personal engagement?<br />
• High degree of intellectual engagement?<br />
• Response to setbacks?<br />
Academic Honesty<br />
• Single referencing and citation?<br />
• In-text citations are accurate<br />
• Reference page?<br />
• Fully and accurately acknowledged words, graphics, and ideas that are not your<br />
own?<br />
• ABSOLUTELY CERTAIN there are ZERO instances of academic infringement and<br />
misconduct?