- Page 1 and 2: MODIFICATIONS TO THE HARBOR PORPOIS
- Page 3 and 4: 4.2.1.3 Closed Area Model (CAM)....
- Page 5 and 6: Table 4-7: Percent of vessel affect
- Page 7 and 8: 1.0 INTRODUCTION This Environmental
- Page 9 and 10: The proposed modifications to the H
- Page 11 and 12: fishery through the Magnuson-Steven
- Page 13 and 14: information if two separate meeting
- Page 15 and 16: term “management” in both New E
- Page 17 and 18: small mesh nets, although 35% of th
- Page 19 and 20: In New England, as Figure 1-2 shows
- Page 21 and 22: 2.0 SUMMARY OF MANAGEMENT ALTERNATI
- Page 23 and 24: Additionally, a provision will be i
- Page 25 and 26: � Tie-Downs: Spaced not more than
- Page 27 and 28: Figure 2-1: Alternative 1 (No Actio
- Page 29 and 30: 2.2.2 Alternative 2: Closures Alter
- Page 31 and 32: Figure 2-3: Alternative 2 - Immedia
- Page 33 and 34: 2.2.3 Alternative 3: Pingers This a
- Page 35: Figure 2-5: Alternative 3 - Expande
- Page 39 and 40: modifications to this FMP are being
- Page 41 and 42: takes/mtons of landings, with an an
- Page 43 and 44: ycatch rate reflecting compliance w
- Page 45 and 46: Figure 2-8: Alternative 4 (Preferre
- Page 47 and 48: Figure 2-9: Alternative 4 (Preferre
- Page 49 and 50: closure period in 2007. This sugges
- Page 51 and 52: Figure 2-10: Alternative 5 - Modifi
- Page 53 and 54: Figure 2-12: Alternative 5 - Modifi
- Page 55 and 56: South of Cape Hatteras, North Carol
- Page 57 and 58: would adversely affect EFH, HAPC, r
- Page 59 and 60: 3.2.2.1 Marine Mammals The followin
- Page 61 and 62: the region during the peak feeding
- Page 63 and 64: Decomposed and/or unexamined animal
- Page 65 and 66: esulted in mortality. The other occ
- Page 67 and 68: Table 3-4: U.S. Fishery-Related Mor
- Page 69 and 70: The coastal morphotype of bottlenos
- Page 71 and 72: annual surveys conducted in August
- Page 73 and 74: Whitman and Payne, 1990; Barlas, 19
- Page 75 and 76: Caribbean. Although the population
- Page 77 and 78: Kemp’s ridleys occur primarily in
- Page 79 and 80: 3.2.2.3 Protected Fish Two listed s
- Page 81 and 82: The Mid-Atlantic gillnet fishery, a
- Page 83 and 84: Table 3-8: Percentage of Northeast
- Page 85 and 86: the largest declines in total reven
- Page 87 and 88:
Table 3-14: Average (2002-2006) dis
- Page 89 and 90:
Table 4-1: A summary of average byc
- Page 91 and 92:
4.1.1.2 Biological Effects of Alter
- Page 93 and 94:
Closure Areas in New England, and t
- Page 95 and 96:
which both closures and more string
- Page 97 and 98:
The predicted bycatch rate ranges f
- Page 99 and 100:
calculated based on the estimated b
- Page 101 and 102:
Atlantic. If compliance is high, ha
- Page 103 and 104:
of the OMA and SMA closure as well
- Page 105 and 106:
However, a cost-effectiveness analy
- Page 107 and 108:
The recent major changes implemente
- Page 109 and 110:
To estimate the cost-effectiveness
- Page 111 and 112:
Table 4-5: Percent change in profit
- Page 113 and 114:
Table 4-7: Percent of vessel affect
- Page 115 and 116:
Alt. 4-Both, Alt. 5-Both), a large
- Page 117 and 118:
per year for Alt. 5-Pre to around $
- Page 119 and 120:
(Table 4-12). However, for the alte
- Page 121 and 122:
4.3 Cumulative Effects Analysis 4.3
- Page 123 and 124:
also include disturbances to riveri
- Page 125 and 126:
The past, present and reasonably fo
- Page 127 and 128:
Carolina through Florida’s east c
- Page 129 and 130:
ebuilding programs remained on trac
- Page 131 and 132:
Amendment 5 to the Monkfish FMP is
- Page 133 and 134:
Herring FMP Herring is an important
- Page 135 and 136:
Cumulative Effects on Harbor Porpoi
- Page 137 and 138:
effort reduction affects gillnet fi
- Page 139 and 140:
Table 4-14: Summary of the effects
- Page 141 and 142:
5.0 REGULATORY IMPACT REVIEW/ FINAL
- Page 143 and 144:
The following alternatives are prop
- Page 145 and 146:
Under Alternative 1 (No Action), th
- Page 147 and 148:
6.3 Paperwork Reduction Act This ac
- Page 149 and 150:
upon scientific information, analys
- Page 151 and 152:
Proposed Action is significant unde
- Page 153 and 154:
Although concerns have been express
- Page 155 and 156:
2004). Additionally, the structures
- Page 157 and 158:
suggesting the proposed changes to
- Page 159 and 160:
Cox, T.M., A.J. Read, D. Swanner, K
- Page 161 and 162:
Jacobs, S.R. and J.M. Terhune. 2000
- Page 163 and 164:
Prepared by the New England Fishery
- Page 165 and 166:
phocoena) bycatch and levels of com
- Page 167 and 168:
Swingle, W.M., S.G. Barco, T.D. Pit
- Page 169 and 170:
8.0 LIST OF ACRONYMS ALWTRP Atlanti
- Page 171 and 172:
9.0 LIST OF PREPARERS AND CONTRIBUT
- Page 173 and 174:
David Stevenson Marine Habitat Reso
- Page 175 and 176:
Vicki Cornish The Ocean Conservancy