modifications to the harbor porpoise take reduction plan - Northeast ...
modifications to the harbor porpoise take reduction plan - Northeast ...
modifications to the harbor porpoise take reduction plan - Northeast ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
LIST OF TABLES<br />
Table 1-1: U.S. Fishery-Related Mortality Estimates for <strong>the</strong> GOM/BOF S<strong>to</strong>ck of Harbor Porpoises ........2<br />
Table 3-1: Protected Species Found in New England and Mid-Atlantic Waters .......................................52<br />
Table 3-2: Estimated Marine Mammal Mortalities in Nor<strong>the</strong>ast Sink Gillnet Fishery ..............................53<br />
Table 3-3: Estimated Marine Mammal Mortalities in Mid-Atlantic Gillnet Fishery .................................53<br />
Table 3-4: U.S. Fishery-Related Mortality Estimates for <strong>the</strong> GOM/BOF S<strong>to</strong>ck of Harbor Porpoises ......61<br />
Table 3-5: Estimates of abundance and <strong>the</strong> associated CV, minimum estimate, and PBR for <strong>the</strong> coastal<br />
and offshore bottlenose dolphin management units ...........................................................................63<br />
Table 3-6: Observed Sea Turtle Bycatch 1995 – 2006 in Mid-Atlantic Gillnet Fishery (all mesh sizes)<br />
from January – April ..........................................................................................................................70<br />
Table 3-7: Number of vessels using sink or anchored gillnet gear <strong>to</strong> land seafood in a given port group..<br />
............................................................................................................................................................76<br />
Table 3-8: Percentage of Nor<strong>the</strong>ast fisheries vessels, live weight landings and value accounted for by<br />
gillnet vessels, by port group, average for 2002-2006 .......................................................................77<br />
Table 3-9: Number of gillnet vessels by principle port, based on port with highest portion of annual<br />
revenues..............................................................................................................................................78<br />
Table 3-10: Total live weight landings (m<strong>to</strong>ns) by port group for gillnet vessels .....................................78<br />
Table 3-11: Total revenues (in thousands of constant 2002 dollars) by port group for gillnet gear ..........79<br />
Table 3-12: Average price per metric <strong>to</strong>n (in constant 2002 dollars) by port group, for landings by gillnet<br />
gear.....................................................................................................................................................79<br />
Table 3-13: Average (2002-2006) distribution of monetary value within a port group by species ...........80<br />
Table 3-14: Average (2002-2006) distribution of live weight landings within a port group by species....81<br />
Table 4-1: A summary of average bycatch estimates, by season and fishery (Nor<strong>the</strong>ast and Mid-Atlantic<br />
gillnets), under <strong>the</strong> actual conditions data were collected during 2005 and 2006 and under <strong>the</strong><br />
average situations for each alternative as reported in Palka and Orphanides (2008b).. .....................83<br />
Table 4-2: Maximum number of nets fished and <strong>to</strong>tal pinger cost by vessel type and fishing location. ...98<br />
Table 4-3: Total number of potentially affected gillnets vessels by port group and size class, and<br />
percentage included in CAM model.................................................................................................100<br />
Table 4-4: Average revenues per vessel for status quo (2006) and percent change in revenues by<br />
alternative compared <strong>to</strong> Alternative 1 by port and vessel size .........................................................104<br />
Table 4-5: Percent change in profits for affected vessels by port, vessel length and alternative .............105<br />
Table 4-6: The percent of a port’s landings caught in <strong>the</strong> Gulf of Maine (GOM), Georges Bank (GB),<br />
sou<strong>the</strong>rn New England Management Area (SNE), south of sou<strong>the</strong>rn New England (SSNE), Waters<br />
Off New Jersey (WONJ), and <strong>the</strong> Mid-Atlantic (MA) under Alternative 1 (No Action). ...............106<br />
iv