16.12.2012 Views

How Things Work - Doha Academy of Tertiary Studies

How Things Work - Doha Academy of Tertiary Studies

How Things Work - Doha Academy of Tertiary Studies

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>How</strong> things <strong>Work</strong> 25<br />

large, and we would like to promise that we will find causes, but we cannot,<br />

neither with certainty nor even with a high degree <strong>of</strong> confidence.<br />

We seek to understand how something works. Whether we are<br />

quantitative or qualitative researchers, we do need to search for causes,<br />

for influences, for preconditions, for correspondences. Our findings and<br />

stories can enlighten those seeking to understand the history or the problem<br />

or seeking to change the policy. But the data, however analyzed, do<br />

not themselves resolve the problem. It is the interpretation <strong>of</strong> the data,<br />

<strong>of</strong> the observations and measurements, that will stand, not as pro<strong>of</strong> but<br />

as persuasion <strong>of</strong> one meaning more than another. We think about causes<br />

because it helps discipline our research. But we should keep in mind<br />

Tolstoy’s obsession with the idea <strong>of</strong> countless multiple causes.<br />

Still, we work with people who think <strong>of</strong> simple cause and effect. It<br />

is clear to them that things are caused. It seldom will be useful for us to<br />

preach to them Tolstoy’s religion <strong>of</strong> multiple concurrences. We should<br />

try to minimize overexpectations <strong>of</strong> causality, but we sometimes have to<br />

talk their language.<br />

For the more immediate future, we should edit our sentences carefully<br />

to diminish the “attribution to cause.” We should not say, “The<br />

director terminated the policy because he was upset.” but “The director<br />

terminated the policy. He said that he was upset.” We should not<br />

say, “The River Dnieper froze because the temperature dropped below<br />

zero Celsius,” but “The River Dnieper froze as the temperature dropped<br />

below zero Celsius.” We should not say, “The disability program was<br />

stopped because the bond issue failed,” but “After the bond issue failed,<br />

the disability program was stopped.”—Or is it important to reduce the<br />

implications we make about causality? You have to decide. (So, in my<br />

view, the section wasn’t so boring after all.)<br />

1.6. the thiNG<br />

The word thing isn’t a technical word. But we need it as a technical word<br />

for the best use <strong>of</strong> this book. Let’s use the word thing to identify the<br />

target <strong>of</strong> the research project. There isn’t a technical word for the target,<br />

and there needs to be. So what researchers are studying is “the thing.”<br />

The thing could be an organization, such as an employment bureau or a<br />

child-care center. The thing could be a policy, such as a triage policy or<br />

a civil rights policy. It could be a relationship between the churches <strong>of</strong> a

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!