27.09.2018 Views

atw 2018-10

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>atw</strong> Vol. 63 (<strong>2018</strong>) | Issue <strong>10</strong> ı October<br />

| | Fig. 1.<br />

One of the 5 fuel segments with a spring covered by Zr cladding at the top.<br />

which covered the spring. The experimental<br />

rod was irradiated in the<br />

middle of a subassembly between<br />

1985 and 1989 in the Goesgen PWR.<br />

The Goesgen subassembly is a<br />

15 X 15 fuel rod configuration with<br />

20 water locations as can be seen in<br />

Figure 2. The burn-up measured<br />

segment was irradiated for 1226 EFPD<br />

(Effective Full Power Days). The<br />

average burn-up was 50.4 GWd/tHM.<br />

The average linear power of the<br />

segment was 260 W/cm [3].<br />

| | Fig. 2.<br />

The Goesgen Subassembly. The 4 bright blue<br />

fuel elements in the middle depict equivalent<br />

positions of the investigated fuel segment.<br />

The water holes are seen as to some extent<br />

enlarged red cycles within the dark blue color<br />

of the simulated water. The green and yellow<br />

pins are the rest fuel pins of the subassembly.<br />

The equivalent subassembly that<br />

was simulated is depicted in Figure 2.<br />

The underlying numerical concept<br />

was to meet the conditions as shown<br />

above to which the fuel segment is<br />

exposed to. In order to avoid statistical<br />

error and without violating the above<br />

mentioned constraints, 4 equivalent<br />

fuel segments were simulated in the<br />

center of the subassembly as can be<br />

seen in Figure 2.<br />

In Figure 2 the chosen option is<br />

shown, namely the yellow pins were<br />

considered as generating the power<br />

which exhibits the flux and the power<br />

defined for the fuel segments under<br />

investigation. The green pins in<br />

Figure 2 are also fuel pins, however<br />

they were only considered as far as<br />

their neutron generation was concerned.<br />

This kind of simulation leads<br />

to the requested linear power and<br />

total burn-up level for the 1226 EFPD<br />

irradiation period.<br />

The flux solver MCNPX-CINDER<br />

was used for the burn-up calculation.<br />

In this way the reaction rate data are<br />

transferred directly from the transport<br />

solver to the burn-up module.<br />

The burn up simulation of the<br />

subassembly, shown in Figure 2, was<br />

optimized to 5 steps. At the end of the<br />

1226 EFPD a decay period of 9,600<br />

days was considered. This is the period<br />

between the end of the irradiation at<br />

1,989 and the measurements of the<br />

sample which were recently performed.<br />

The radiochemical measurement<br />

technique is generally based on alpha<br />

spectrometry. α-particles, emitted<br />

from the analyzed radionuclide, transfer<br />

their energy to a semicon ductor,<br />

thus creating electron-hole pairs. The<br />

electron can be then detected to<br />

account for the existence of the specific<br />

radioactive nuclei under investigation.<br />

The measurements in this work were<br />

performed using the Canberra S<strong>10</strong>0<br />

(Canberra Industries Inc.) detector.<br />

For the MA isotopes with characteristic<br />

γ-rays e.g., Am-241, the<br />

quantification was performed in<br />

acidic digestion liquors obtained<br />

from dissolution experiments performed<br />

with irradiated Zry-4 using<br />

γ-spec troscopy. The measurements<br />

were performed by means of an extended<br />

range coaxial Ge detector<br />

(GX3018, Canberra Industries Inc.).<br />

Table 1 presents the reference<br />

results of the current study. It shows<br />

the comparison between the cal culated<br />

nuclides and combined measured isotopes<br />

which have close (α spectrometry<br />

based) peaks. The ratio of those results<br />

are considered to be a reference<br />

MAs 1) Pu-239 +<br />

Pu-240<br />

2) Pu-238 +<br />

Am-241<br />

as they exhibit the less statistical error<br />

which is con sidered to be below 5% for<br />

each α or γ type measurements. In particular<br />

the ratio of the second and third<br />

column is more reliable as the signal of<br />

counting is higher. Based on Table 1<br />

one can see that the comparison of calculated<br />

and measured ratios between<br />

the pairs “2” and “3” is very good. Using<br />

the ratio of “1” leads to difference<br />

of about 25 %. Further, the absolute<br />

counting shows a factor 50 for columns<br />

2 and 3 and factor 65 for column 1.<br />

In order to extract more information<br />

further measurements were<br />

performed based on alpha spectrometry<br />

for several Pu isotopes<br />

and γ-spectroscopy for Am-241 as<br />

mentioned above. Table 2 shows the<br />

obtained results.<br />

Analyzing the results in Tables 1<br />

and 2 and accounting for the statistical<br />

errors it can be seen that except<br />

for the Measurement of Pu-240 all<br />

results are consistent in a sense that<br />

the contribution of the inner surface<br />

of the cladding – which could not be<br />

accounted for by the calculations- is<br />

by about factor 50 higher than the<br />

traces within the material. The larger<br />

deviation due to the Pu-240 is consistent<br />

in both tables, suggesting that<br />

measurement of Pu-240 was counting<br />

signals which did not come from<br />

Pu-240 by about 40 %.<br />

Conclusions<br />

A burn-up simulation of a fuel rod<br />

sample, which was irradiated in the<br />

PWR Goesgen for 1,226 Effective Full<br />

Power Days, was performed. In this<br />

study the activity of several MA in the<br />

Zry-4 cladding, covering the spring on<br />

the tops of the sample, was measured<br />

3) Cm-243 +<br />

Cm-244<br />

Ratio 2/3<br />

Experimental 3.06 × <strong>10</strong> 4 2.29 × <strong>10</strong> 5 2.61 × <strong>10</strong> 5 0.877<br />

Calculated 4.57 × <strong>10</strong> 2 4.52 × <strong>10</strong> 3 5.26 × <strong>10</strong> 3 0.859<br />

| | Tab. 1.<br />

Comparison between the measured and the calculated activities of 3 pairs of MA isotopes within the<br />

Zircaloy of the fuel segment under investigation in unit Bq/(g Zry-4).<br />

MAs Measured Calculated Ratio<br />

measured/calculated<br />

Pu-239 1.2 × <strong>10</strong> 4 2.38 × <strong>10</strong> 2 50.4<br />

Pu-240 2.04 × <strong>10</strong> 4 2.19 × <strong>10</strong> 2 93<br />

Pu-241 2.06 × <strong>10</strong> 6 4.4 × <strong>10</strong> 4 47<br />

Pu-242 2.19 × <strong>10</strong> 2 4.1 × <strong>10</strong> 0 53<br />

Am-241 1.72 × <strong>10</strong> 5 3.76 × <strong>10</strong> 3 46<br />

| | Tab. 2.<br />

Comparison between the measured and calculated activities of isotopes, using alpha spectrometry<br />

for several Pu isotopes and γ-spectroscopy for Am241 within the Zircaloy of the fuel segment under<br />

investigation in unit Bq/(g Zry-4).<br />

DECOMMISSIONING AND WASTE MANAGEMENT 527<br />

Decommissioning and Waste Management<br />

Determination of Minor Actinides in Irradiated Fuel Rod Components ı Ron Dagan, Michel Herm, Volker Metz and Maarten Becker

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!