Article - Energy and environmental potential of solid waste in Brazil, Năng lượng và môi trường tiềm năng của chất thải rắn ở Brazil (Vietsub)
https://app.box.com/s/bnhgqo1t268amfvp2vwq88693u0kubw9
https://app.box.com/s/bnhgqo1t268amfvp2vwq88693u0kubw9
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
3500<br />
F.A.M. L<strong>in</strong>o, K.A.R. Ismail / <strong>Energy</strong> Policy 39 (2011) 3496–3502<br />
4%<br />
2%<br />
15%<br />
13%<br />
Camp<strong>in</strong>as - 1996<br />
46%<br />
Organic matter<br />
Paper <strong>and</strong> cardboard<br />
Plastics<br />
Glass<br />
Metal<br />
Others<br />
Table 2<br />
Recycl<strong>in</strong>g <strong>and</strong> its impacts <strong>in</strong> Camp<strong>in</strong>as <strong>and</strong> <strong>Brazil</strong>.<br />
Discription Camp<strong>in</strong>as <strong>Brazil</strong><br />
Useful collected recyclables (t/month) 279.0 101,673<br />
Avoided energy (GJ/month) a 9905 3,609,392<br />
Avoided CO 2 (tCO 2 /month) b 633 230.798<br />
a Assum<strong>in</strong>g that recycl<strong>in</strong>g economize 35.5 GJ/t <strong>of</strong> recyclables.<br />
b Consider<strong>in</strong>g an average <strong>of</strong> 2.27 tCO 2 /t <strong>of</strong> reused recyclables.<br />
20%<br />
2%<br />
2%<br />
3%<br />
25%<br />
16%<br />
Fig. 1. Solid <strong>waste</strong> composition <strong>in</strong> Camp<strong>in</strong>as.<br />
<strong>Brazil</strong> - 1990<br />
52%<br />
The rejection <strong>in</strong>dex for Camp<strong>in</strong>as was calculated us<strong>in</strong>g the<br />
primary data <strong>of</strong> the selective collection provided by the municipality<br />
public power. The <strong>in</strong>dex is found to be 21.7% <strong>and</strong> is adopted<br />
for <strong>Brazil</strong>. The total residential <strong>solid</strong> <strong>waste</strong> collected <strong>in</strong> Camp<strong>in</strong>as<br />
is 655 t/day. From this total the selective collection represents<br />
0.8%. The household <strong>solid</strong> <strong>waste</strong> collected <strong>in</strong> <strong>Brazil</strong> is about<br />
125,000 t/day <strong>and</strong> when apply<strong>in</strong>g the above rejection <strong>in</strong>dex, the<br />
selective collection becomes 2.7%.<br />
4.3. Recycl<strong>in</strong>g: energy <strong>and</strong> CO 2 emissions<br />
Organic matter<br />
Paper <strong>and</strong> cardboard<br />
Plastics<br />
Glass<br />
Metal<br />
Others<br />
Fig. 2. Solid <strong>waste</strong> composition <strong>in</strong> <strong>Brazil</strong>.<br />
The substitution <strong>of</strong> raw material by recycled one <strong>in</strong> the<br />
production processes leads to energy economy <strong>and</strong> reduce possible<br />
emissions <strong>of</strong> gases to the atmosphere. Based upon McDougall<br />
et al. (2001) <strong>and</strong> Hekkert et al. (2000a, b), the energy economy<br />
due recycl<strong>in</strong>g paper <strong>and</strong> cardboard is 32.9 GJ/t, plastic results <strong>in</strong><br />
87 GJ/t, while recycled glass leads to energy economy <strong>of</strong> 3.5 GJ/t<br />
<strong>and</strong> recycled ferrous metal results <strong>in</strong> energy economy <strong>of</strong> 18.6 GJ/t.<br />
It is important to mention that other recyclables such alum<strong>in</strong>um,<br />
copper, styr<strong>of</strong>oam were not <strong>in</strong>cluded <strong>in</strong> the present analysis.<br />
The term energy economy refers to difference between energy<br />
consumption <strong>in</strong> the production process when us<strong>in</strong>g raw material<br />
<strong>and</strong> the energy consumption when us<strong>in</strong>g recyclable material. The<br />
calculations <strong>in</strong>clude also the <strong>in</strong>herent energy content <strong>of</strong> the<br />
material substance. In case <strong>of</strong> plastics it is the energy content <strong>of</strong><br />
petroleum <strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong> case <strong>of</strong> paper <strong>and</strong> cardboard it is considered as<br />
wood energy content. Table 2 shows the estimates <strong>of</strong> energy<br />
economy <strong>and</strong> the quantity <strong>of</strong> CO 2 not emitted to the atmosphere<br />
due to recycl<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> Camp<strong>in</strong>as <strong>and</strong> <strong>Brazil</strong>.<br />
In the case <strong>of</strong> Camp<strong>in</strong>as, the energy consumption for transport<strong>in</strong>g<br />
the recyclables was measured <strong>and</strong> subtracted from the<br />
energy economized by recycl<strong>in</strong>g to determ<strong>in</strong>e the <strong>potential</strong><br />
effectively economized. The energy consumed <strong>in</strong> the transport<br />
<strong>of</strong> the selective collection <strong>in</strong> Camp<strong>in</strong>as corresponds to about 3% <strong>of</strong><br />
the energy economized by recycl<strong>in</strong>g (L<strong>in</strong>o et al., 2010).<br />
Hence the energy effectively economized due to recycl<strong>in</strong>g is<br />
about 9607 GJ/month. The energy sav<strong>in</strong>gs due to recycl<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> the<br />
city <strong>of</strong> Camp<strong>in</strong>as represents per month the equivalent electric<br />
energy consumption <strong>of</strong> 3200 average class residences or 11.700<br />
Table 3<br />
Recycl<strong>in</strong>g <strong>potential</strong> <strong>and</strong> its impacts.<br />
Description Camp<strong>in</strong>as <strong>Brazil</strong><br />
Estimated <strong>potential</strong> <strong>of</strong> collected recyclables 8057 1,173,750<br />
(t/month)<br />
Estimated <strong>potential</strong> <strong>of</strong> economized energy<br />
286,006 41,668,125<br />
(GJ/month)<br />
Estimated <strong>potential</strong> <strong>of</strong> avoided CO 2 (tCO 2 /month) 18,288 230.798<br />
Quantity <strong>of</strong> CER 4983 62,888<br />
<strong>in</strong>habitants consider<strong>in</strong>g 3.7 persons/household an average class<br />
residence consumption <strong>of</strong> about 0.9 GJ/month <strong>and</strong> a thermal to<br />
electric energy conversion efficiency <strong>of</strong> 30%.<br />
It is worth mention<strong>in</strong>g that the data presented <strong>in</strong> Table 2<br />
corresponds to the energy economized from recycl<strong>in</strong>g only 8.6% <strong>of</strong><br />
the recyclables <strong>potential</strong>ly collected <strong>in</strong> <strong>Brazil</strong> as <strong>in</strong> Table 3.<br />
In the <strong>environmental</strong> aspect, the quantity <strong>of</strong> economized<br />
energy due to recycl<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> <strong>Brazil</strong> can avail to the carbon market<br />
a big number <strong>of</strong> CER as <strong>in</strong> Table 3. These CERs can be converted to<br />
funds to be used for f<strong>in</strong>anc<strong>in</strong>g pro ambient projects <strong>and</strong> for<br />
<strong>in</strong>tensify selective collection <strong>and</strong> recycl<strong>in</strong>g activities.<br />
In order to demonstrate to the Public Adm<strong>in</strong>istrator the<br />
implicit <strong>potential</strong> <strong>and</strong> capacity <strong>of</strong> recycl<strong>in</strong>g as an effective tool<br />
for ambient susta<strong>in</strong>ability <strong>and</strong> the necessity to create <strong>in</strong>centives<br />
<strong>and</strong> adequate public policies, calculations were realized to estimate<br />
the <strong>potential</strong> <strong>of</strong> CO 2e avoided due to recycl<strong>in</strong>g all the<br />
<strong>potential</strong>ly available recyclables <strong>in</strong> <strong>Brazil</strong>, as <strong>in</strong> Table 3.<br />
If all the <strong>potential</strong> <strong>of</strong> generated recyclables is used, this<br />
quantity <strong>of</strong> energy corresponds to more than half the <strong>in</strong>stalled<br />
capacity <strong>of</strong> the biggest hydroelectric power station <strong>in</strong> <strong>Brazil</strong>, that<br />
is, Itaipu. The same quantity <strong>of</strong> energy corresponds to the electric<br />
energy consumption <strong>of</strong> 12,963,420 residences or 47,575,740<br />
<strong>in</strong>habitants.<br />
To achieve this <strong>Brazil</strong> has to establish policies which permit<br />
the optimization <strong>of</strong> energy use, <strong>in</strong>crease the recycl<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>dex,<br />
objectives which can only be achieved by the society <strong>and</strong> the<br />
government comb<strong>in</strong>ed efforts <strong>and</strong> by the adoption <strong>of</strong> highly<br />
objective public policies.<br />
Issues associated with the climate changes are widely discussed<br />
<strong>and</strong> cont<strong>in</strong>uously <strong>in</strong>vestigated s<strong>in</strong>ce 1990 when the first<br />
report <strong>of</strong> the Intergovernmental Panel for Climatic Changes, IPCC.<br />
In a sequence <strong>of</strong> four successive reports, the last <strong>of</strong> which<br />
published <strong>in</strong> 2007, shows that man aggressive <strong>in</strong>terference <strong>in</strong><br />
the ambient contributed <strong>and</strong> still contribut<strong>in</strong>g to the <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>of</strong><br />
the planet average temperature, estimated for the next hundred<br />
years to raise from 1.4 to 5.8 1C. Both heat<strong>in</strong>g <strong>and</strong> cool<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> the<br />
global climate are related with the concentration <strong>of</strong> the greenhouse<br />
effects which are the CO 2 ,CH 4 <strong>and</strong> NO x (IPCC, 2007).<br />
The climate changes are observed all over the planet <strong>in</strong> the<br />
cont<strong>in</strong>ents <strong>and</strong> the oceans together with ambient temperature<br />
changes, ice <strong>in</strong> Artics, changes <strong>in</strong> precipitation everywhere,<br />
changes <strong>in</strong> the ocean sal<strong>in</strong>ity, w<strong>in</strong>d patterns, <strong>and</strong> extreme<br />
ambient aspects such strong precipitation, extreme heat <strong>and</strong><br />
coolness <strong>and</strong> strong tropical cyclones (IPCC, 2007).