Jeweller - December 2018

The debate has divided the industry for years. However, is the De Beers move to enter the lab-grown market simply a U-turn, a logical extension of its natural diamond business, or a strategic attempt to control its upstart synthetic competitors? It’s a new game with new rules. Are you ready?

The debate has divided the industry for years. However, is the De Beers move to enter the lab-grown market simply a U-turn, a logical extension of its natural diamond business, or a strategic attempt to control its upstart synthetic competitors? It’s a new game with new rules. Are you ready?


You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.


DECEMBER <strong>2018</strong><br />

The<br />

GREAT<br />

DEBATE<br />

it<br />

Natural Vs Synthetic<br />

The debate has divided the industry for years.However, is the De Beers move to<br />

enter the lab-grown market simply a U-turn, a logical extension of its natural<br />

diamond business, or a strategic attempt to control its upstart synthetic competitors?<br />

It’s a new game with new rules. Are you ready?

Made in France<br />

contactaus@lesgeorgettes.com - @lesgeorgettes_byaltesse


www.worldshiner.com<br />

Sydney Brisbane London<br />

New Zealand<br />

Melbourne<br />

Tokyo Mumbai Florence Stuttgart Chicago



WE’RE IN THE<br />




Contact us today<br />

We’re ready when you are. So if you think it’s time to get serious about where you’re going, email us today.<br />

Our team will be happy to show you how we can grow your business together.<br />

Email: enquiries@showcasejewellers.com.au<br />


Innovation Vs Disruption:<br />

Spectators don’t win games<br />

There are plenty of questions and theories concerning<br />

De Beers’ decision to enter the synthetic diamond market.<br />

Some believe synthetics are simply a logical extension of<br />

its existing business while others view it as monopolistic<br />

behaviour aimed at controlling the industry.<br />

For me, the only question is, “Why did it take so long?”<br />

It was 13 years ago in July 2005 when I wrote: “De Beers<br />

should begin manufacturing synthetic diamonds. Crazy,<br />

huh? Rather than fighting the inevitable, perhaps the<br />

company would be best to embrace it.”<br />

At the time I noted that De Beers was fully aware of the<br />

dire consequences synthetic diamonds could cause to<br />

the natural diamond market and that the company’s<br />

scientists were developing technology to accurately<br />

identify the lab-created ‘menace’.<br />

After all, the diamond behemoth had an enormous<br />

income stream to protect so, for me, it was not a matter<br />

of ‘if’ but ‘when’ it would begin selling lab-created stones.<br />

My reasoning was simple: you can’t win a game you’re<br />

not playing. Indeed, in 2005 I asked, “Have you ever seen<br />

a game won by a spectator?”<br />

As the synthetic diamond market expanded, bringing<br />

increased quality and production capacity, De Beers and,<br />

more importantly, the wider financial and investment<br />

industries would have wondered whether they were<br />

witnessing innovation or disruption. The sceptics or,<br />

more precisely, the nay-sayers probably viewed the<br />

expanding synthetic market as mere innovation,<br />

dismissing the slow advances as merely improvements<br />

in technology and therefore production.<br />

“Not much will change,” the nay-sayers would’ve said<br />

at the time”; Synthetic diamonds will not be a threat to<br />

natural diamonds!” To some extent, that was probably<br />

a reasonable position up until only a few years ago;<br />

however, at some point since, people have started<br />

realising that they aren’t witnessing innovation but<br />

instead witnessing full-scale disruption.<br />

Don’t be fooled; there’s a big difference between the two –<br />

innovation is the product of changes within a market while<br />

disruption is a change to the overall market itself, often<br />

significant enough to turn an entire industry on its head.<br />

Disruption changes how traditional business practices are<br />

viewed and transactions conducted. Consumer behaviour<br />

is altered forever, usually because the ‘new way’ is more<br />

efficient and valued by the consumer. Whereas innovation<br />

improves and advances, disruption often damages or<br />

destroys existing categories or markets.<br />

That’s the last thing De Beers wants, it would lose ‘control’!<br />

Not all innovation leads to disruption. Indeed, the majority<br />

doesn’t; you can have innovation without disruption<br />

but not vice versa. However, I’m guessing at some point<br />

De Beers had to consider the ramifications of not acting or,<br />

if you like, not reacting to the continuing innovation of the<br />

lab-grown diamond manufacturers and marketers.<br />

How can you win a game you’re not playing?<br />

Extending the sporting analogy to include basketball<br />

parlance, De Beers has always been seen as the jewellery<br />

industry’s ‘point guard’. All eyes are on point guards<br />

because they call the offence, direct the moves and control<br />

the speed of the game. Furthermore, as any basketball<br />

aficionado will tell you, the best point guards can control<br />

the opposition too, often without them even knowing it!<br />

Potentially confronted with a type of Moore’s Law,<br />

De Beers had to no choice but to start playing the synthetic<br />

game and it did exactly that on May 29, <strong>2018</strong>.<br />

Six months down the road we can ask: Was this decision a<br />

strategic move to ensure that competitor innovation did<br />

not become blanket disruption or was it because De Beers<br />

finally saw the light and realised lab-grown diamonds are<br />

not a menace after all?<br />

Perhaps it’s even a little bit of<br />

both, or perhaps it doesn’t<br />

really matter anyway!<br />

Our Great Diamond<br />

Debate might help<br />

you decide.<br />

Coleby Nicholson<br />

Managing Editor<br />



jewellermagazine.com<br />

Publisher & Editor<br />

Coleby Nicholson<br />

Associate Publisher<br />

Angela Han<br />

angela.han@gunnamattamedia.com<br />

Advertising Manager<br />

Julie-Anne Bosworth<br />

julieanne@jewellermagazine.com<br />

Production Manager<br />

& Graphic Design<br />

Jo De Bono<br />

art@gunnamattamedia.com<br />

Accounts<br />

Paul Blewitt<br />

finance@gunnamattamedia.com<br />

Subscriptions<br />

info@jewellermagazine.com<br />

<strong>Jeweller</strong> is published by:<br />

Gunnamatta Media Pty Ltd<br />

Locked Bag 26, South Melbourne,<br />

VIC 3205 AUSTRALIA<br />

ABN 64 930 790 434<br />

Phone: +61 3 9696 7200<br />

Fax: +61 3 9696 8313<br />

info@gunnamattamedia.com<br />

Copyright: All material appearing<br />

in <strong>Jeweller</strong> is subject to copyright.<br />

Reproduction in whole or in part is<br />

strictly forbidden without prior written<br />

consent of the publisher.<br />

Gunnamatta Media Pty Ltd strives to<br />

report accurately and fairly and it is<br />

our policy to correct significant errors<br />

of fact and misleading statements in<br />

the next available issue. All statements<br />

made, although based on information<br />

believed to be reliable and accurate at<br />

the time, cannot be guaranteed and<br />

no fault or liability can be accepted<br />

for error or omission. Any comment<br />

relating to subjective opinions should<br />

be addressed to the editor.<br />

Advertising: The publisher reserves<br />

the right to omit or alter any<br />

advertisement to comply with<br />

Australian law and the advertiser<br />

agrees to indemnify the publisher for<br />

all damages or liabilities arising from<br />

the published material.<br />

<strong>December</strong> <strong>2018</strong> <strong>Jeweller</strong> 5

Add Rapid to your Bench.<br />

Are you looking for a professional, reliable,<br />

fully trackable casting company?<br />

Traditional and Digital Casting Professionals!<br />

www.rapidcasting.com.au<br />

From CAD to Cast<br />

IN 3 DAYS<br />

Instant online quoting<br />

Overnight printing<br />

Overnight casting<br />

Fastest job turnaround in Australia<br />

Trackable casting and jewellery CAD/CAM services. Visit our website for instant quotes and ordering.<br />

C A D<br />

+61 2 9557 9468<br />

info@rapidcasting.com.au<br />


The Perfect Match Is<br />

VITAL<br />

Matching<br />

Pairs<br />

Rounds & Fancies<br />

In All Sizes<br />

Sets &<br />

Layouts<br />

Coloured<br />

Diamonds<br />

Old Cut<br />

Diamonds<br />

In-House<br />

Diamond Repairs<br />

Wales Corner<br />

Suite 1204, 227 Collins St<br />

Melbourne, Victoria 3000<br />

Australia<br />

Ph (03) 9639 1008<br />

Fax (03) 9639 0179<br />

E sales@vitaldiamonds.com.au<br />

www.vitaldiamonds.com.au<br />

For The Health<br />

Of Your Business<br />



AND YOUTH:<br />

Millennials and<br />

Gen Z drive sales<br />




ccording to data published in September,<br />

Millennials – consumers currently aged<br />

21 to 39 - accounted for almost 60 per<br />

cent of jewellery sales in the US last year and 80<br />

per cent in China .<br />

Gen Z – people aged 20 and under – represent<br />

35 per cent of the world’s population and are<br />

forecast to become the majority consumer group<br />

of diamond jewellery sales in coming decades,<br />

already representing 5 per cent of the<br />

US consumer market.<br />

De Beers Group CEO Bruce Cleaver stated: “The<br />

younger generations present wide-ranging<br />

opportunities for the diamond industry with the<br />

significant size and purchasing power of today’s<br />

Millennials and tomorrow’s Gen Z consumers.”<br />

“While both of these generations desire diamonds<br />

just as much as the generations that have<br />

come before them, there are undoubtedly new<br />

dynamics at play: those diamonds may now be in<br />

different product designs, used to symbolise new<br />

expressions of love and researched and purchased<br />

in different ways to mark different moments in life.”<br />

The report pointed to four major characteristics<br />

that can be attributed to both generations’<br />

buying habits: love is meaningful to them, they are<br />

digital natives, they value authenticity, individuality<br />

and self-expression, and they are engaged with<br />

social issues.<br />

Cleaver went on to acknowledge that both<br />

generations are influenced by social media and<br />

online shopping, utilising both to research the<br />

diamond market before investing in a product,<br />

noting that 98 per cent of Chinese Millennial and<br />

Gen Z consumers research purchases through one<br />

or more channels before buying.<br />

“The ‘always on/always connected’ nature of<br />

today’s consumers – buying what they want<br />

when they want it – is resulting in changes to the<br />

typical decision-making and purchasing approach.<br />

Retailers across a range of industries are finding<br />

they need to rewrite the rule book when it comes<br />

to forging and maintaining connections with<br />

consumers,” Cleaver said.<br />

Among the changing requirements for diamond<br />

marketing targeted to the younger generations,<br />

the report noted the use of ‘influencer marketing’<br />

as a key tool for engaging consumers. Digital<br />

marketing across Instagram, Snapchat and Youtube<br />

were considered top channels for social media<br />

engagement in the diamond sector.<br />

The report also recognised differing socio-political<br />



8 <strong>Jeweller</strong> <strong>December</strong> <strong>2018</strong>

ottom.pdf 1 15/10/<strong>2018</strong> 12:25 PM<br />

O’Neils Affiliated has an incredible new range of aquamarines in emerald cuts, ovals and cushions.<br />

<strong>Jeweller</strong>y worn by a certain duchess has increased demand for premium aquamarines in medium to large sizes.<br />

A selection of classic to very fine blues from 2cts to 15cts are in stock now.<br />

Fine, Round Ceylon Sapphires are always in high demand, and increasingly difficult to source,<br />

O’Neils Affiliated has a brand new premium parcel of 5.6 to 6.5mm round stones of extraordinary quality.<br />

Rich, fine colour, clean and perfect, precision cutting. Purchased in Sri Lanka and re-cut for the exacting<br />

demands of the Australian market. 22 stones in all, some matching pairs. Available while stocks last.<br />

Carved Lapis Lazuli Flowers<br />

5mm Square Cushion<br />

Australian Sapphires<br />

Fine Ceylon Sapphire<br />

8x6mmm Mixed Emerald Cut<br />

Art Deco London Blue Topaz<br />

All available stones listed on our website under ‘New Arrivals’<br />

Visit our website or call our Melbourne office for details:<br />

Room 405, 4th Floor, Wales Building, 227 Collins Street, Melbourne VIC 3000<br />

Ph: +61 (0) 3 9654 5200 / Interstate Orders 1300 843 141 E: sales@oagems.com www.oagems.com

attitudes among Millennials and Gen Z to their parents’ generation<br />

(Baby Boomers) in relation to sexuality, stating: “The young<br />

generations’ liberal attitudes towards sexuality and gender identity<br />

require businesses in the diamond industry to move beyond binary<br />

approaches to these issues by avoiding gender stereotypes and<br />

venturing out of traditional relationship contexts.”<br />

Globally, Millennials represent 29 per cent of the total population<br />

equating to 2.1 billion people, while all older generations combined<br />

account for 36 per cent. In India, they account for 31 per cent of the<br />

population and outnumber all older generations put together.<br />

Millennials represent the “bridal generation” with the average age<br />

of marriage between 24-30 in main diamond-consuming countries.<br />

Bridal jewellery accounts for more than a quarter of diamond<br />

jewellery acquired by women in the US, China and Japan.<br />

According to the report, it is crucial that the diamond industry looks<br />

to the younger generations who are increasing spending while the<br />

Baby Boomers are decreasing their spending in the category.<br />

The World Bank forecasts Millennials’ total income will exceed<br />

US$4 trillion (AU$5.6 t) by 2030 and will have overtaken Gen X<br />

as soon as 2020.<br />

9kt and Silver Gents Rings<br />

Free in-store Displays<br />

Black Leatherette packaging<br />

Aside from the two younger generations, diamond jewellery<br />

demand as a whole increased last year, having reached US$82 billion<br />

(AU$115 b), up 2 per cent in 2017. Diamond demand in countries<br />

outside of Japan, China, India, US and Gulf (Saudi Arabia) – classed<br />

as ‘the rest of the world’ – includes Australia and European nations,<br />

which contributed a 2 per cent increase to US $18 billion (AU$25<br />

b) in the sector. This was “due to strengthening macro-economic<br />

performance and currency appreciation against the US dollar.<br />

With growth in both population and interest in consuming<br />

diamond jewellery, it is imperative that jewellers across the sector<br />

look to Millennials and Gen Z for a brilliant future. u<br />

Matching cufflinks and pendants<br />

Wholesale prices:<br />

Sliver from $29.00<br />

9kt from $240.00<br />

Special orders in any size or any<br />

metal within 2 weeks.<br />

paterson fine jewellery<br />

pfj.com.au (03) 9555 9344<br />


New product,<br />

new market<br />




he Lightbox brand is born from research<br />

conducted over the past couple of years<br />

by De Beers Group. We learned from<br />

consumers that there was great confusion about<br />

exactly what laboratory-grown diamonds were,<br />

and this was exacerbated by non-standardised<br />

nomenclature, pricing, and in some cases, concerns<br />

about non-disclosure of the product.<br />

Once they understood what laboratory-grown<br />

diamonds are, it became clear to us that the<br />

consumer interest in lab-grown product was<br />

for attractive, accessibly priced jewellery as a<br />

decorative accessory rather than a lasting symbol<br />

of a major milestone moment.<br />

After careful consideration and market analysis<br />

it was decided to launch a jewellery brand that<br />

would be transparent, made to the highest quality,<br />

and pitched to celebrate the multiple moments<br />

that happen with frequency in a woman’s life, but<br />

do not connote “forever”.<br />

This means that we are specifically not targeting<br />

the engagement market.<br />

Lightbox uses a US$800 a carat linear pricing<br />

model, regardless of whether this is a one carat<br />

stone, two half carats, or four quarter carat stones.<br />

To this we add a setting cost of US$100 for silver<br />

and US$200 for 10k gold.<br />

The De Beers’ name will not appear in Lightbox<br />

advertising and promotions, and the brand will not<br />

be marketed as conflict-free or eco-friendly.<br />

We are regularly asked why the pricing model is<br />

linear and not similar to natural diamond pricing?<br />

Our reasoning is simple: this is a manufactured<br />

product and we firmly believe lab-grown stones<br />

should be priced based on cost of manufacture,<br />

not as a discount from natural diamond pricing,<br />

which is defined by relative rarity.<br />

Our product is many things: sparkly, colourful and<br />

fun. However, by definition, it’s not rare.<br />

We can manufacture more of it every day.<br />

Lightbox diamonds will not be graded, as<br />

we do not believe grading is relevant for labgrown<br />

product because it can be manufactured<br />

consistently, over and over again. In order to<br />

ensure that our product is easily identifiable all<br />

stones above 0.2-carat will be laser inscribed using<br />

innovative new technology.<br />

Importantly, we believe that the Lightbox brand<br />

can help define and build a new market for the<br />

jewellery sector: and which will allow jewellery to<br />

compete with other products, including purses,<br />

shoes, and other accessories.<br />

It offers women the opportunity to buy themselves<br />

attractive and appealing jewellery that doesn’t<br />

have the deep emotional implication of natural<br />

diamonds, which we know has often been a barrier<br />

for self-purchases.<br />

For example, Lightbox can be offered for new<br />

occasions such as Galentine’s Day (Valentines Day<br />

celebration for single women), travel jewellery and<br />

can potentially re-invigorate existing celebrations<br />

such as Sweet Sixteen or Quinceanera (a<br />

celebration of a girl’s 15th birthday in Latin cultures)<br />

for a new generation of consumers.<br />

In a consumer category that has a constant need<br />

for ‘new news’ to invigorate sales, Lightbox offers<br />

an entirely new product: pink and blue laboratorygrown<br />

diamonds, which most of us have never<br />

seen, much less hoped to wear. And above all, it<br />

looks great.<br />

We have launched in the US via our own website<br />

selling direct to consumer, and for now that remains<br />

our focus. We plan to test the product in limited<br />

bricks and mortar stores in 2019 and beyond that,<br />

we’ll see! u<br />

Sally Morrison is Lightbox’s chief<br />

marketing officer and has previously held<br />

senior marketing roles at World Gold Council<br />

(LoveGold), Gemfields and Forevermark.<br />

12 <strong>Jeweller</strong> <strong>December</strong> <strong>2018</strong>


Bharat Diamond Bourse<br />





Coming April 2019<br />

Bharat Diamond Bourse Complex, Mumbai<br />


Connect to 4,000+ BDB Members with established international client base<br />

Complimentary hotel stay for select buyers*<br />

*Conditions apply<br />

Register at www.bharatdiamondweek.org | Email events@bdbindia.org

Don’t be fooled,<br />

real matters<br />





few years after the introduction of<br />

laboratory-grown diamonds in the<br />

US market, we can reflect on the<br />

strategies implemented by synthetic diamond<br />

manufacturers and marketers to assess the future<br />

of this ‘new’ category.<br />

From the outset lab-grown diamond marketers<br />

have attempted to position their product in the<br />

consumer’s mind as the equivalent of a natural<br />

diamond albeit at a 20 per cent price discount to<br />

the real thing.<br />

The product was said to be ‘identical to a diamond’<br />

because of its chemical properties, and in some cases<br />

synthetic diamonds have claimed to be ‘even more<br />

rare’ because they are produced in smaller quantities!<br />

Other claims included ‘equally precious’ because<br />

they are expensive to produce, ‘better value’ because<br />

producers work on lower mark-ups, ‘ethical’ because<br />

they are non-conflict and sourced responsibly and,<br />

finally, lab-grown diamonds have been said to be<br />

‘eco- friendly’ because they don’t involve mining.<br />

The terms used to promote lab-grown diamonds<br />

were, and still are attempting to obscure their<br />

industrial origin and worse, bestow some natural or<br />

organic qualities they do not have.<br />

Synthetic stones became ‘cultured’, ‘cultivated’,<br />

‘hot-forged’, ‘above-ground’, or even ‘above-earth’<br />

diamonds. The strategy was to take advantage of the<br />

mystique and esteem of natural diamonds, capture<br />

some of the extremely valuable heritage and equity<br />

of the category while, at the same time, denigrate<br />

the diamond industry and the very product it aimed<br />

to emulate. It is fair to say that this strategy was<br />

implemented with some success.<br />

The ethical and eco-friendly narrative struck a chord<br />

with the media, as did the idea of a new technology<br />

disrupting an established industry that some believe<br />

has been left unchallenged for too long.<br />

Scientists and experts were quick to claim that<br />

natural and synthetic diamonds are identical,<br />

the only difference being the origin, while some<br />

retailers viewed this as an opportunity to restore<br />

profitability by generating premium (larger) margins.<br />

As for consumers, they were – and still are – largely<br />

confused about the whole category: what is it really?<br />

Is it natural? Is it a diamond? What is it called? How<br />

much is it really worth?<br />

There is a great deal of confusion in consumer<br />

minds, largely driven by inconsistent and misleading<br />

terminology and claims used by many laboratorygrown<br />

diamond marketers. However, a number of<br />

things are gradually becoming clear to consumers<br />

and the trade alike.<br />

First, the category is here to stay. It is an attractive<br />

technology that has the potential to produce<br />

beautiful product in unlimited quantities at ever more<br />

attractive prices, which I am sure many brands will be<br />

able to use to their benefit.<br />

There is no escaping the fact that a synthetic<br />

diamond is an artificial product with no inherent or<br />

resale value. As production capacities are brought<br />

on-line in low-energy-cost locations, we will see<br />

prices fall accordingly. In 2017, the price differential<br />

of natural and synthetic diamonds has increased by<br />

70 per cent and, as we know, Element Six – De Beers’<br />

synthetic diamond company – launched its Lightbox<br />

Jewelry range at US$800 per carat .<br />

This pricing demonstrates that synthetic diamonds<br />

are around only 15 per cent of the value of a<br />

natural diamond.<br />

There is no doubt that as capacity grows, all synthetic<br />

diamond prices will converge towards Lightbox<br />

Jewelry prices or lower. It might take a little while and,<br />

in the meantime, competitors will no doubt argue<br />

that their products are different from Lightbox when<br />

really they are not, and will attempt to take advantage<br />

of the lack of volumes to charge a premium.<br />

However, in the end, just as surely as gravity exists,<br />

prices will meet at the marginal cost of production,<br />

unless supported by a strong consumer brand. This<br />

means that synthetic diamonds will serve a low-value,<br />

fashion jewellery category, clearly distinct from that<br />

filled by natural diamonds.<br />

When well-informed, consumers will have a much<br />

clearer understanding about the differences<br />

between natural diamonds and synthetic<br />

diamonds. A <strong>2018</strong> US Harris Poll Survey conducted<br />

for the Diamond Producers Association (DPA)<br />

shows that 68 per cent of consumers believe a<br />

‘real diamond’ is a diamond coming from the<br />

earth, a natural diamond. This speaks to the<br />

well-documented importance of authenticity for<br />

consumers when they consider a product.<br />

Whether it is an organic product (naturalness), a<br />

work of art, a collectable, a vintage piece of furniture,<br />

or a precious stone, consumers attribute value to<br />

the notion of authenticity and to the story of the<br />

product. This is on top of the rarity value associated<br />

with a finite resource. In other words, ‘real’ matters to<br />

consumers and they give it a clear meaning when it<br />

comes to diamonds.<br />

Numerous claims about ‘eco-friendliness’ made<br />

by synthetic diamond brands are now being<br />

challenged as unsubstantiated and in breach of the<br />

US Federal Trade Commission’s Green Guides. Some<br />

14 <strong>Jeweller</strong> <strong>December</strong> <strong>2018</strong>


for the modern man<br />

Zirconium is the perfect choice for the discerning modern man wanting a unique wedding ring.<br />

The strong, lightweight and hypoallergenic qualities of Zirconium allow us to produce the striking<br />

and lustrous appeal of Black.<br />

To view the entire Zirconium range, please contact the Marketing Department<br />

on (08) 8440 3371 to request a brochure.<br />

14 Duncan Court, Ottoway Park, SA, 5013 Australia<br />

Phone: +61 8 8447 1133 Fax: +61 8 8447 1144 Toll Free: 1800 888 528<br />

Email: contactus@pwbeck.com.au Web: www.pwbeck.com.au






well-advertised brands operating in high-electricitycost<br />

areas with no significant access to renewable<br />

energy claim a zero-carbon footprint through<br />

use of renewable energy, while in reality using<br />

questionable solar credits.<br />

It is easy to establish that the carbon footprint of<br />

a 1-carat CVD diamond (most larger diamonds<br />

will be CVD diamonds) produced in Singapore is<br />

approximately 40 per cent higher than that of the<br />

equivalent natural diamond. The questionable<br />

claims by synthetic diamond factories are being<br />

increasingly exposed and are starting to sink in<br />

with consumers.<br />

It is fair to say that while most lab-grown marketers<br />

AWJ_<strong>Jeweller</strong>HalfPage_Sept_235x144.pdf 1 19/7/18 2:53 pm<br />

claim a transparent, short supply chain, the original<br />

producer or even production origin is seldom<br />

disclosed to the consumer. This is not to say that<br />

the source is illegitimate, but it is clear that many<br />

synthetic diamond manufacturers and marketers<br />

are not being transparent, nor held to the same<br />

demanding standards as the highly scrutinised<br />

diamond industry.<br />

Of course, not everything is perfect in the diamond<br />

industry, despite the significant progresses made<br />

over the past 15 years, and we should demand that<br />

our industry be held up to the light and demonstrate<br />

continuous improvement. Consumers have the right<br />

to demand transparency and integrity and we have a<br />

duty to deliver on this expectation.<br />

While many in the industry work relentlessly on these<br />

issues, it is important for everyone to remember<br />

and remind our customers that the diamond sector<br />

directly and indirectly sustains about 10 million<br />

people worldwide in some of the most disadvantaged<br />

regions of the world. Entire regions and communities<br />

have been built, and become prosperous, thanks to<br />

the legitimate diamond trade. This is cause for much<br />

pride and satisfaction for the<br />

natural diamond industry<br />

because, in the end,<br />

Real Matters. u<br />

Jean-Marc Lieberherr is CEO Diamond<br />

Producers Association. He has held senior<br />

positions at Rio Tinto, LVMH and Unilever.

Lab-grown diamonds<br />

– 100 per cent diamond<br />



diamond is a diamond, whether extracted<br />

from the earth or grown above earth.<br />

This is a fact, a truth that is now accepted<br />

and recognised by experts and leading consumer<br />

bodies such as the US Federal Trade<br />

Commission (FTC).<br />

This was acknowledged in the latest revisions<br />

introduced by the FTC to its Jewelry Guides that<br />

are meant to assist in correctly marketing jewellery<br />

to consumers.<br />

The FTC not only revised its primary definition of<br />

diamond, making it clear that real diamonds could<br />

be from above earth or below, but it also removed<br />

the descriptor ‘synthetic’ from its list of prescribed<br />

terms for lab grown diamonds. The International<br />

Grown Diamond Association (IGDA) along with labgrown<br />

diamond manufacturers have long argued<br />

that the term ‘synthetic’ was inappropriate as it<br />

could confuse consumers about the real value and<br />

authenticity of the product.<br />

The FTC based its revisions on its own analysis of<br />

the diamond market, acknowledging technological<br />

advancements over the past 10–15 years in<br />

growing diamonds above ground, which are<br />

identical to diamonds extracted from ground. They<br />

rejected the suggestions from mined diamond<br />

trade organisations to align FTC’s revisions on<br />

the existing industry standards such as CIBJO’s<br />

guides or the International Organisation for<br />

Standardisation (ISO).<br />

FTC noted that these industry standards weren’t<br />

necessarily meant for consumer marketing and,<br />

in the end, the federal body developed an<br />

appropriate and, more importantly, a technically<br />

correct terminology. The IGDA believes the revised<br />

definitions are fair and inclusive, allowing<br />

both mined and grown diamonds to be marketed<br />

to customers.<br />

We believe that lab-grown diamonds offer<br />

a significant value and legitimate choice<br />

for consumers. Consumer confidence and<br />

communicating 21st Century facts when marketing<br />

are critical for the survival of any industry. IGDA<br />

advocates fair representation to consumers for<br />

both grown or mined diamonds, with the customer<br />

having the option and the right to choose.<br />

MVI Marketing, an independent market research<br />

firm, has been tracking the lab-grown market for<br />

years and reports that both consumer awareness<br />

and preference had been increasing by about 3–5<br />

per cent annually until 2016. However, around mid<br />

2017 the numbers jumped up by 12 per cent while<br />

one year later the research reported an 18 per cent<br />

increase. This is reflective of consumer preference<br />

and demonstrates future expectations.<br />

Writing for the Wall Street Journal, Paul Zimnisky,<br />

an independent diamond industry analyst, wrote<br />

an article on August 28, <strong>2018</strong> in which he stated:<br />

“At an estimated $US1.9 billion dollars today, the<br />

lab-grown diamond jewellery market is forecasted<br />

to grow at 22 per cent annually to $US5.2 billion by<br />

2023 and to $US14.9 billion by 2035, equating to a<br />

longer-term growth rate of about 9 per cent.”<br />

As consumer awareness for lab-grown diamonds<br />

accelerates (as research indicates), acceptance of<br />

the product has also climbed. In October <strong>2018</strong>, MVI<br />

conducted research about lab grown diamonds<br />

which found a whopping 81 per cent<br />

of respondents said they would definitely buy<br />

or consider a lab-grown diamond as a centre stone<br />

in jewellery.<br />

A 2016 report by Morgan Stanley titled Game of<br />

Stones – Lab vs Pipe, made it very clear that the cost<br />

of developing and producing lab-grown diamonds<br />

was basically the same as opening and producing<br />

from a new diamond mine. And, the report also<br />

highlighted the deep investments in technical<br />

process development required to produce good<br />

quality lab-grown diamond.<br />

Assuming Morgan Stanley’s manufacturing cost<br />

basis calculations, coupled with the increasing<br />

consumer demand for lab-grown diamonds, it is<br />

unlikely that there would be a downward price shift<br />

for grown diamonds, specifically for the high quality<br />

lab-grown diamonds typically chosen for centre<br />

stones (1-carat and up).<br />

The key to success within the lab-grown market<br />

has been the 1.0–3-carat, good quality stones for<br />

the bridal market. And we feel that this is where<br />

the lab-grown sector will continue to<br />

see positive growth. The IGDA believe that labgrown<br />

diamonds present an excellent growth<br />

opportunity for retailers to build a business today<br />

and for tomorrow!<br />

Not only is a lab-grown diamond 100 per cent<br />

genuine diamond, and has the exact characteristics<br />

of a diamond it is also graded to the same<br />

standards as mined diamonds.<br />

Very clearly, consumers accept this too!<br />

So we believe that when a consumer wants to<br />

compare lab-grown and mined diamonds to<br />

celebrate or mark an important milestone in<br />

their life, they will request an independently<br />

certified, lab-grown stone to be fully aware of<br />

what they’re buying.<br />

In conclusion, our entire industry of lab-grown<br />

diamond producers and supply chain<br />

partners anticipate and look<br />

forward to a very<br />

promising<br />

future. u<br />

Richard Garard is Secretary General,<br />

International Grown Diamond Association<br />

and CEO of CVD diamond equipment<br />

manufacturer, Microwave Enterprises.<br />

<strong>December</strong> <strong>2018</strong> <strong>Jeweller</strong> 17

Sorting through<br />

the fact and fiction<br />




he issue and debate surrounding natural<br />

diamonds and synthetic stones has increased<br />

in recent years due, in part, to improvements<br />

in the quality of lab-grown diamonds coupled with<br />

the large increase in production volume.<br />

We can expect the production of lab-grown<br />

diamonds to continually rise not only in higher<br />

production levels but also the number of<br />

manufacturers. We should always remember, and<br />

stress, however, that lab-grown diamonds are like<br />

any other manufactured product; their prices will fall<br />

as manufacturing processes improve and production<br />

costs decline.<br />

Unfortunately, I don’t believe that consumers fully<br />

understand this truism. Do jewellery buyers really<br />

want to buy a synthetic diamond today only to find<br />

that it has negligible or no re-sale value only a few<br />

years from now?<br />

This is why I believe the decision by De Beers to enter<br />

the lab-grown market by producing product for its<br />

Lightbox collection is so important. At US$800 for a<br />

one-carat diamond, it shows clearly the value of<br />

such stones.<br />

Another unfortunate side-effect of synthetic<br />

diamonds is that it is forcing midstream diamond<br />

suppliers/dealers to regularly examine their stocks at<br />

the time of buying to ensure they are not mistakenly<br />

passing on synthetic stones to their clients.<br />

This burden adds to the supplier’s administration<br />

costs as well as the need to purchase new testing<br />

equipment at a time when profit margins are already<br />

paper-thin. That said, I’m happy to report that the<br />

cost of lab-grown testing equipment and devices<br />

is reasonable, however it’s a constant battle to stay<br />

ahead of the curve.<br />

I would stress that the World Federation of Diamond<br />

Bourses (WFDB) does not object to the sale of<br />

synthetics diamonds as long as they are fully<br />

disclosed as lab-grown.<br />

Synthetic stones have their own niche in the market,<br />

as do diamonds, however; synthetics must be<br />

ethically traded and sold, and in this respect, I believe<br />

it is critical that synthetic manufacturers advertise<br />

their stones in an ethical manner, not at the expense<br />

of natural diamonds.<br />

It is unfortunate that synthetic diamond suppliers<br />

typically claim that their factories manufacturers<br />

product in an environmentally friendly way and<br />

it’s not tainted as conflict diamonds. This ignores<br />

the enormous efforts of the industry to stamp out<br />

conflict diamonds via the Kimberley Process, as<br />

well as the many corporate social responsibility<br />

and sustainability practices, which natural diamond<br />

suppliers and other members of the pipeline, have<br />

initiated over the past 15 years.<br />

We should also not ignore the enormous amount of<br />

power and energy used by the synthetic companies<br />

to keep their factories operating around the clock.<br />

That is not exactly environmentally friendly.<br />

It goes without saying that the synthetic stone<br />

manufacturers never mention the benefits that<br />

natural diamonds offer poor communities across<br />

the world. It is a fact that artisanal miners put food<br />

on the tables for millions of people across Africa<br />

which is certainly not the case concerning factorymade<br />

stones.<br />

It is disingenuous to promote one product by<br />

dubiously denigrating another.<br />

I would be more than happy to meet with the<br />

18 <strong>Jeweller</strong> <strong>December</strong> <strong>2018</strong>

producers of synthetics in order to create a healthy<br />

dialogue between us.<br />

We believe that diamonds can’t be made; you have<br />

to find them. Each one is unique and this sums up<br />

perfectly the difference between mined diamonds,<br />

and lab-grown stones manufactured in a factory<br />

production line.<br />

The former involves ancient history, uncertainty and<br />

fascination while the latter is akin to making widgets<br />

in a massive industrial plant.<br />

Unfortunately, we have witnessed a number of<br />

instances of deliberate and cynical mixing of<br />

undisclosed synthetic stones with natural diamonds<br />

and that is a major concern for the WFDB. We will<br />

have zero tolerance for this practice because the<br />

damage it could cause to consumer confidence in<br />

diamond jewellery is immense.<br />

The WFDB’s overriding concern is to ensure<br />

that synthetics suppliers do not cause damage<br />

confidence across the wider jewellery industry.<br />

They must be clearly marked, identified and sold<br />

as lab-grown stones. People and/or companies<br />

conducting themselves illegally will be removed as<br />

bourse members where it is found to be the case,<br />

and prosecuted for fraudulent activity.<br />

The WFDB’s Charter “on disclosure of synthetic,<br />

treated natural and natural diamonds” obliges<br />

traders to include a statement on their invoices<br />

providing a proper description and declaration<br />

attesting to the nature of the diamonds sold:<br />

namely, that all the goods sold are guaranteed to be<br />

natural and also untreated.<br />

The WFDB, as an organisation, does not hold a<br />

position on the policies of its affiliated bourses<br />

regarding the trading of lab-grown diamonds within<br />

their own bourses.<br />

For example, the Israel Diamond Exchange does not<br />

allow the trading of synthetic stones on its trading<br />

floor, while the Bharat Diamond Bourse forbids the<br />

trading of such stones anywhere on its premises.<br />

Each exchange is free to decide its own policy.<br />

In closing, I would like to sum up the arguments as I<br />

see them:<br />

We have a rare product that was created deep in the<br />

earth by Mother Nature billions of years ago<br />

It is an exceptional story of value and can be passed<br />

on across generations in the knowledge that it retains<br />

a high value<br />

Diamond mining puts food on the table for hundreds<br />

of thousands of people across Africa<br />

Do people really want<br />

to gift and pass on to<br />

family members a stone<br />

that was created in a<br />

factory and which is<br />

being made ever more<br />

cheaply and thus has<br />

little, if any, inherent<br />

value? u<br />

Ernie Blom is president World Federation<br />

of Diamond Bourses and chairman Diamond<br />

Dealers Club of South Africa.

Synthetic diamonds legitimate<br />

but different product category<br />



he CIBJO Congress, the annual gathering<br />

of national associations and other major<br />

jewellery industry bodies, closed its<br />

proceedings in Bogotá, Colombia, on October 17.<br />

Developments that have taken place over the past<br />

year usually crowd the Congress’s agenda, and one<br />

that received considerable attention during the <strong>2018</strong><br />

event was the publication in June by the US Federal<br />

Trade Commission (FTC) of its Guides for the <strong>Jeweller</strong>y,<br />

Precious Metals and Pewter Industries.<br />

In particular, the decision by the FTC to remove the<br />

word ‘natural’ from its diamond definition generated a<br />

great deal of discussion.<br />

The FTC’s release of the revised Guides five months<br />

earlier had caught many in the industry off guard,<br />

and the initial reaction of some was almost of<br />

disbelief. However, a careful examination of the<br />

document revealed that, in practical terms, very<br />

little had changed, and the apparent victory of the<br />

synthetic diamond manufacturers may well prove to<br />

be a pyrrhic one.<br />

Readers will note that I just used the adjective<br />

‘synthetic’ as a descriptor, which is not<br />

recommended but, nonetheless, also not prohibited<br />

under the FTC’s new regime.<br />

Two observations made during the CIBJO Congress<br />

by Tiffany Stevens, president and CEO of the Jewelers’<br />

Vigilance Committee in the United States, and Sara<br />

Yood, JVC’s senior counsel, are worth noting.<br />

The first is that the FTC Guides are not a set of<br />

professional industry standards on a par with the<br />

CIBJO Blue Books and the 2015 ISO (International<br />

Organisation for Standardisation) diamond definition.<br />

They primarily are designed to protect the American<br />

consumer from misleading or confusing marketing<br />

information, and as such may sometimes deviate<br />

from what would seem scientific fact.<br />

This could be a way of explaining why the more<br />

broadly characterised diamond is still referred to as<br />

a mineral, even though a mineral, by definition, can<br />

only have been mined from the earth.<br />

The second observation is that, had the FTC not<br />

removed the word ‘natural’ from its diamond<br />

definition, synthetic diamond manufacturers could<br />

have claimed that the Guides do not pertain to them.<br />

Consequently, now that they are clearly included in<br />

the document, synthetic diamond manufacturers<br />

have no choice but to abide by its rulings.<br />

These include not being able to refer to their product<br />

as diamonds, without clearly specifying that they<br />

are man-made, nor use such terms as ‘real’, ‘genuine’,<br />

‘precious’, ‘semi-precious’ and, of course, ‘natural’. It is<br />

for this reason that the man-man diamond suppliers<br />

eventually may come to consider the cost of their<br />

apparent accomplishment to be considerably more<br />

than they originally had assumed.<br />

Already before the start of the <strong>2018</strong> Congress, the<br />

CIBJO Diamond Commission had decided the best<br />

reaction to the new FTC Guides was no reaction at<br />

all. Our diamond definition has not been changed,<br />

and indeed the possibility of change was not even<br />

put up for debate. According to the CIBJO Blue Book,<br />

the “diamond is a mineral which has been formed<br />

completely by nature without human interference<br />

during its formation.”<br />

This is not to say that we deny or even question<br />

the legitimacy or viability of synthetic diamonds, or<br />

whatever the term is that they legally are referred<br />

to. In fact, our stated intention is to provide an equal<br />

place at the table for them, as a separate product<br />

category.<br />

Recent moves by De Beers, and particularly<br />

those related to its Lightbox Jewelry man-made<br />

diamond collection will, I believe, lead to synthetic<br />

diamonds becoming a sizeable market segment<br />

catering predominantly to the high-end fashion<br />

jewellery market.<br />

In the meantime, our primary strategy should not be<br />

to fight the synthetic diamond manufacturers, but<br />

rather to differentiate their products from natural<br />

diamonds. It will require the proper use of industry<br />

nomenclature, the development of inexpensive<br />

detection technology or procedures, the cooperation<br />

of government, and a<br />

good deal of marketing<br />

and public information.<br />

Our industry is a big<br />

tent. There is room<br />

for all of us. u<br />

Gaetano Cavalieri is president CIBJO<br />

(Confédération Internationale de la Bijouterie,<br />

Joaillerie, Orfèvrerie des Diamants) the body<br />

that unites national jewellery and gemstone<br />

associations from more than 40 countries<br />

around the world.<br />

<strong>December</strong> <strong>2018</strong> <strong>Jeweller</strong> 21

Natural diamonds<br />

are the natural choice<br />





he Israeli diamond industry is one of the<br />

strongest and most respected industries<br />

in the world. With more than 80 years<br />

behind us, we build upon a tradition that goes<br />

back generations. We respect our heritage, our<br />

longstanding experience and our commitment<br />

to excellence.<br />

These are the components of our international<br />

reputation for excellence and reliability, and the<br />

building blocks of our industry. While history<br />

and tradition are important, the Israel Diamond<br />

Institute (IDI) also embraces market change in<br />

the form of innovation, technology and internet<br />

trading platforms.<br />

Together with the Israel Diamond Exchange, IDI has<br />

entered into partnerships with forward thinking<br />

organisations and we have also established our own<br />

technological incubator.<br />

I mention the above to demonstrate our<br />

commitment to natural diamonds in the Natural<br />

vs Synthetic debate. We love diamonds and we<br />

appreciate their beauty. Diamonds are a gift of<br />

nature, created in the depths of the earth over<br />

many millions of years. We believe that, for most<br />

consumers, only natural diamonds symbolise<br />

eternity, commitment and love.<br />

No product, as shiny and sparkly as it may be, can<br />

take the place of a natural diamond.<br />

Our commitment to natural diamonds has meant<br />

that the Israeli diamond industry has barred<br />

synthetics. The Israel Diamond Exchange (IDE)<br />

issued a regulation prohibiting the trade in synthetic<br />

diamonds on the bourse floor. It has also conducted<br />

an educational campaign to increase awareness of<br />

the dangers of illegal trade in synthetics amongst its<br />

3,500 members.<br />

Synthetic, or what are now called ‘lab-grown’ or<br />

‘man-made’ diamonds, have created challenges for<br />

the traditional diamond industry. However this is not<br />

because synthetic stones threaten to replace natural<br />

diamonds, since we are convinced, and research<br />

confirms, that consumers want their significant<br />

jewellery pieces to feature only natural, not manmade<br />

diamonds.<br />

Some people may be willing to buy lab-grown<br />

diamonds for, what De Beers calls, ‘affordable fashion<br />

jewellery’, no different to buying cubic zirconia<br />

jewellery as a low-cost alternative. This is simply<br />

consumer choice. However, the greater problem<br />

that synthetics have caused is the penetration of<br />

man-made diamonds into the legitimate natural<br />

trade without disclosure.<br />

The diamond trade is based on a long tradition<br />

of honesty and mutual trust that is essential to<br />

the industry. Unfortunately, as the technology for<br />

creating man-made diamonds advances it becomes<br />

increasingly difficult to identify them.<br />

There have been many cases reported where<br />

duplicitous traders have mixed undisclosed<br />

synthetic and natural diamonds, or have passed off<br />

synthetic solitaires as natural diamonds.<br />

These have eventually been detected and the<br />

offenders prosecuted, however there must be many<br />

more such transactions that are never discovered.<br />

If undisclosed synthetic stones are set in jewellery<br />

and sold as natural diamonds, this may cause a<br />

huge disruption to consumer confidence. We<br />

cannot allow the criminal activities of a minority of<br />

dishonest dealers who choose to fraudulently sell<br />

lab-grown diamonds as natural to taint and severely<br />

damage the entire diamond and jewellery industry.<br />

The solution lies in clearly distinguishing between<br />

the two distinct products – natural and lab-grown.<br />

The good news is that awareness within the<br />

global diamond industry is high. Our international<br />

organisations are demanding full disclosure<br />

of synthetics diamonds and there is improved<br />

equipment for detecting this product.<br />

Clear terminology is being created and standards are<br />

being set to protect consumers, including sanctions<br />

for non-compliance. It is still early days but the<br />

process has been set in motion.<br />

The IDI sees a successful future for the natural<br />

diamond industry. We are confident that natural<br />

diamonds will continue to capture the imagination<br />

of consumers in years to come and will remain the<br />

precious gem of choice to celebrate love<br />

and commitment.<br />

As for synthetic diamonds, they are a separate and<br />

distinct product category and may well offer a<br />

cheap solution for fashion jewellery, just as CZs have<br />

for many years. The vital issue for everyone in the<br />

trade – supplier through to retailer - is to be honest,<br />

fully transparent and<br />

to clearly explain and<br />

educate the consumer<br />

about the difference<br />

between natural<br />

diamonds and the<br />

mass-manufactured,<br />

cheaper ‘cousin’. u<br />

Boaz Moldawsky is chairman Israel<br />

Diamond Institute, a non-profit, public<br />

interest company acting to promote and<br />

advance the Israel diamond industry which<br />

helps Israeli diamantaires execute tasks<br />

and projects that a single company cannot<br />

usually manage itself.<br />

22 <strong>Jeweller</strong> <strong>December</strong> <strong>2018</strong>

Present and future challenges<br />

for natural coloured diamonds<br />



t’s difficult to predict the future for any topic,<br />

however; it is reasonable to refer to the past<br />

as a potential guide to what may eventuate.<br />

For example, over the past 40 years there have been<br />

many technological advances in the creation of lower<br />

cost ‘substitutes’ for natural coloured diamonds.<br />

Witness radiation treated diamonds; cubic zirconia,<br />

moissanite and now we have man-made diamonds<br />

created to challenge nature’s most unique gem<br />

creation. As each one was launched many in the<br />

industry feared how these low-cost challengers<br />

could affect the consumer’s perception and love of<br />

nature’s creation.<br />

Ultimately, on each occasion, these fears were<br />

unwarranted as people are innately attracted to<br />

‘The Real Thing’. The romance surrounding natural<br />

diamonds was unwavering.<br />

Therefore, while all artificially created gem substitutes<br />

may appear to be the perfect way for consumers to<br />

purchase what they want, past trends have indicated<br />

that there has been no long-term effect on the<br />

interest and desire for the most beautiful and rare<br />

natural colour diamonds.<br />

Today we are faced with the latest challenge –<br />

synthetic diamonds grown in factories – which<br />

simulate all the characteristics of diamonds mined<br />

from the earth. These lab-grown stones were not<br />

created to compete with natural colour diamonds,<br />

rather they are created to offer a lower cost alternative<br />

for someone who desires to own something that they<br />

might otherwise find too expensive.<br />

All too often marketers use negativity to attract<br />

customers by presenting untrue and obsolete<br />

concepts, and the messages about man-made<br />

diamonds are no different. The trade is working<br />

very hard to make the industry more transparent<br />

and remove the, so-called, objections. All mined<br />

diamonds, including natural coloured diamonds,<br />

are a rapidly depleting resource so it’s not unusual<br />

to see these substitutes appearing on the market as<br />

alternatives to nature.<br />

Does this mean synthetic diamonds are a threat? Only<br />

if there is no disclosure or transparency and we know<br />

there are always dishonest people and fraudsters who<br />

seek to profit by lying to the public.<br />

This is the largest threat to our segment of the<br />

jewellery industry, however; leading international<br />

scientists and gemmologists are quickly addressing<br />

this issue. Natural diamonds have been treasured<br />

since they were first discovered in India thousands<br />

of years ago. For the people who acquired them,<br />

coloured diamonds had magical powers and were<br />

symbols of positive dreams and concepts. To this day,<br />

we project our innermost emotions from the colours<br />

that inspire good thoughts associated with natural<br />

coloured diamonds.<br />

Our favourite colours are metaphors for prior<br />

experiences, emotions and relationships. This<br />

personal connection cannot be replaced by synthetic<br />

substitutes. Therefore, we believe that the beauty,<br />

rarity and individuality of nature are unbreakable<br />

bonds, which is the inexplicable and subconscious<br />

desire for nature’s creation.<br />

Quality natural diamonds have exponentially<br />

appreciated in value over the years, which is clearly<br />

evident in recent and past auction results.<br />

The existence of the alternatives, which includes<br />

man-made diamonds, has a wonderful purpose and<br />

appeal. It provides an opportunity for consumers<br />

to afford the beauty of nature by mimicking the<br />

appearance, but not the essence, of the evolution of<br />

carbon to diamonds. This is the force that will bind<br />

mankind to always desire what is earth-born.<br />

While there may come a time when natural colour<br />

diamonds can no longer be found in the ground,<br />

the demand for substitutes will increase because of<br />

our desire to be inspired by adornment and beauty.<br />

However, for the moment, all alternatives are just an<br />

affordable opportunity to obtain a symbol and assist<br />

in the memory of a special moment in life.<br />

We both have confidence in the natural objects as<br />

they have, and still are, the major object of human<br />

desire. We believe that DeBeers’ main objective in<br />

launching lab-grown diamonds – via its new business<br />

Lightbox – is to create market awareness and protect<br />

consumers by disclosing the actual value of these<br />

synthetic products - which is a fraction of the cost<br />

that some wholesalers and retailers were selling them<br />

before De Beers’ move into the market.<br />

The subsequent industry-wide price fall since the<br />

announcement has been notable and we believe<br />

prices will further drop with advancements in<br />

technology and manufacturing processes.<br />

DeBeers and its Lightbox brand is no threat to ‘the<br />

real thing’. It simply provides consumers with a<br />

lower cost option so more people can participate in<br />

the jewellery market.<br />

While consumer choice is important to all industries,<br />

mankind may have developed great knowledge in this<br />

re-creation process, but for us, nature is the ultimate<br />

creator of beautiful and naturally occurring coloured<br />

diamonds and gemstones. u<br />

Alan Bronstein is president Natural<br />

Colored Diamond Industry Association and<br />

Nilesh Sheth is president Indian Diamond<br />

and Colorstone Association.<br />

Diamonds from the Aurora Pyramid of Hope/ Copyright<br />

Photo:Robert Weldon<br />

24 <strong>Jeweller</strong> <strong>December</strong> <strong>2018</strong>

A truly unique collection<br />

Designed by owner Carola Eckrodt<br />

Made by hand in Germany in the Stuttgart studios<br />

Modelled by daughter Greta Eckrodt<br />

Timesupply<br />

jewellery + watches<br />

p +61 (0)8 8221 5580<br />

sales@timesupply.com.au<br />

coeurdelionjewellery.com.au<br />

exclusive distributor AU & NZ

Zero tolerance for deceptive<br />

diamond trading<br />




he Bharat Diamond Bourse (BDB) is the<br />

world’s largest diamond trading hub and,<br />

in accordance with accepted industry<br />

terminology, the BDB adheres to the definition of a<br />

diamond as being ‘natural’ or ‘mined’.<br />

We do not consider synthetic stones to be real<br />

diamonds and for that reason the BDB has banned<br />

the trading of synthetic stones. It is the only bourse<br />

in the world to prohibit such trading from the<br />

bourse’s 20-acre complex.<br />

Some synthetic diamond manufacturers may<br />

be using misleading marketing and advertising<br />

methods to promote synthetics stones, however<br />

consumer awareness has increased a great deal<br />

in recent years and buyers know what is real and<br />

what is man-made.<br />

The BDB provides detection facilities for its<br />

members who can use the hi-tech equipment to<br />

ensure the ongoing success of our transparent<br />

diamond trading.<br />

Any person caught illegally mixing synthetic stones<br />

with natural diamonds will be suspended from<br />

entering the BDB complex.<br />

The International Natural Diamond Monitoring<br />

Committee (INDMC) was formed in July 2017 to<br />

tackle the issue of mixing undisclosed synthetic<br />

stones with natural stones, among other<br />

objectives. The Committee consists of the major<br />

Indian trade bodies; the Diamond Producers<br />

Association (DPA) and other international trade<br />

organisations, all of which have done excellent<br />

work in raising consumer awareness as well as<br />

increasing the marketing of natural diamonds.<br />

All diamond businesses in the pipeline – from<br />

mine to market – support full transparency, respect<br />

human rights and ensure the laws of the land are<br />

fully maintained. Thanks must go to the World<br />

Diamond Council (WDC) and the World Federation<br />

of Diamond Bourses (WFDB) which have done a lot<br />

of work in this field.<br />


It’s not widely known by consumers that around<br />

one million Indian families earn their livelihood<br />

thanks to the diamond industry which is one of<br />

the reasons why the INDMC is concerned about<br />

the danger to consumer confidence that can be<br />

caused when synthetic diamonds are sneakily<br />

mixed into packages of natural diamonds – mainly<br />

in smaller goods – or diamond set jewellery.<br />

The Indian industry has also commissioned a<br />

great deal of research into the issue of lab-grown<br />

diamonds and has prepared extensive information<br />

on synthetic diamonds. Indian diamond dealers<br />

all over the world can learn about the methods<br />

used to make such stones – High Pressure<br />

High Temperature (HPHT) and Chemical Vapor<br />

Deposition (CVD).<br />

In addition, the Diamond Producers Association<br />

has created Project Assure, which is an ongoing<br />

industry-wide project to objectively establish<br />

industry standards regarding the performance<br />

of Diamond Verification Instruments (DVI) and/<br />

or synthetic detection machines. The objective is<br />

to support the diamond and jewellery trades to<br />

make informed decisions and acquire the right<br />

equipment for their operations.<br />

Currently about 13 detection equipment<br />

manufacturers have signed up to the project.<br />

These companies have developed 21 instruments<br />

designed to identify synthetic stones. For example,<br />

the Gemmological Institute of India has designed<br />

and developed a detection device, which sells for<br />

only US$7,000.<br />

At the time of publication, Project ASSURE was<br />

due to report its results and aims to have an online<br />

industry directory.<br />

I would like to conclude by emphasising the<br />

position of the WFDB, of which the Bharat<br />

Diamond Bourse is a leading member: undisclosed<br />

mixing of synthetic, or lab-grown, diamonds<br />

with parcels of natural diamonds is illegal and<br />

transgressors should be prosecuted. We have zero<br />

tolerance for whoever is caught in this<br />

illegal activity.<br />

Any member found to be trading or mixing<br />

synthetic stones will be ejected from the bourse<br />

and lose their membership and may also be<br />

prosecuted for fraudulent activity.<br />

The WFDB’s Charter on the disclosure of synthetic,<br />

treated natural and natural diamonds demands<br />

that companies print a statement on their invoices<br />

providing a proper description and<br />

declaration attesting to the<br />

nature of the diamonds<br />

sold: namely, that all<br />

goods are guaranteed<br />

to be untreated, natural<br />

diamonds. u<br />

Mehul N. Shah is vice president Bharat<br />

Diamond Bourse and is on the board of Indian<br />

Customs Valuation Panel as well as chairman<br />

of the Santacruz Electronics Export Processing<br />

Zone (SEEPZ) in Mumbai. He is chairperson<br />

of the Star Brillant Group and on the board of<br />

Diamond India Limited.<br />

26 <strong>Jeweller</strong> <strong>December</strong> <strong>2018</strong>

Predicting a synthetic future<br />




t was more than a decade ago when I forecast<br />

that De Beers would one day sell its own manmade<br />

diamonds.<br />

In a 2008 letter to the editor to Rapaport I wrote:<br />

“There is no reason why synthetic diamonds can’t<br />

develop strong market positions given time and<br />

investment in branding. Some well-informed<br />

consumers have already found appealing attributes<br />

over natural diamonds.”<br />

My reasoning came about when I discovered that<br />

De Beers had patented a way to ‘grow’ synthetic<br />

diamonds with a logo inside the stone. De Beers<br />

had many other patents where it was trying<br />

to make it difficult for other manufacturers to<br />

grow diamonds as quickly and cheaper as it<br />

could but this was an instance where the patent<br />

was registered to insert a logo during the<br />

growing process.<br />

It has been 10 years since my prediction, which<br />

came to fruition in late May when De Beers<br />

blindsided the industry by announcing it would<br />

offer its debut synthetics range at what many<br />

people believe is below manufacturing cost.<br />


Of the 1,000 loose diamond and diamond<br />

jewellery exhibitors at this year’s JCK Las Vegas,<br />

there were perhaps a dozen or so companies<br />

selling synthetic diamonds.<br />

The synthetic diamond manufacturers at JCK<br />

were selling stones at half the price of a natural<br />

diamond. In doing so, they were saying, “Natural<br />

diamonds are 30 per cent off the Rapaport price list<br />

so we are going to sell 60 per cent off the list.”<br />

However, out of the blue De Beers came along and<br />

announced it was going to take 90 per cent off the<br />

Rapaport prices, completely pulling the rug out<br />

from under man-made diamond competitors.<br />

Using the high-pressure, high-temperature (HPHT)<br />

method of making diamonds made in presses, it is<br />

very expensive to make larger sizes; however, with<br />

the advent of chemical vapour deposition (CVD),<br />

a technology developed mainly for high-speed<br />

computer cooling chips and weapons systems,<br />

equipment became cheaper and growing a<br />

diamond twice the size simply required machines<br />

to run twice as long.<br />

It’s important to note that generally speaking<br />

the price of a natural diamond rises fourfold<br />

when it doubles in weight. Therefore, a one-carat<br />

diamond costs four times as much as a 0.50-carat<br />

one. Larger crystals are genuinely rare despite what<br />

people tell you, and this is consistent with the<br />

Rapaport price list.<br />

The cost to manufacture a large diamond is far<br />

less than to mine one. If all a company has to<br />

do to double the size of a diamond is leave the<br />

machines running, the attitude of De Beers is that<br />

it can do just that and bank a fortune by trading off<br />

the rarity of larger natural stones. In addition, the<br />

restriction on CVD diamonds is the depth whereas<br />

the diameter is the restriction on natural and<br />

HPHT diamonds; 90 per cent of natural and HPHT<br />

diamonds are cut too deeply reducing brilliance<br />

and perceived size. CVD diamonds will prove to be<br />

better cut and look bigger for their carat weight.<br />

When De Beers entered the man-made<br />

diamond market and announced its pricing<br />

strategy at US$800 per carat, investors were<br />

shocked to find that the ‘rarity factor’ does not<br />

apply to man-made diamonds.<br />

<strong>December</strong> <strong>2018</strong> <strong>Jeweller</strong> 27








Semi Precious Diamond Set <strong>Jeweller</strong>y<br />

A delicious range of natural semi-precious<br />

gemstone jewellery set with sparkling white<br />

diamonds, available in every colour of the<br />

rainbow. Beautifully crafted in 18ct gold.<br />

E pink@samsgroup.com.au<br />

W samsgroup.com.au<br />

P 02 9290 2199<br />

If a natural, one-carat diamond were to<br />

sell for US$10,000 then the man-made<br />

diamond companies believed that they<br />

could offer it for sale, with a good margin<br />

at US$5,000 but what De Beers has chosen<br />

to do with Lightbox Jewelry is sell its<br />

one-carat lab-grown diamonds at US$800,<br />

regardless of rarity-based industry price<br />

listings and competitors.<br />

If De Beers can indeed manufacture clean,<br />

colourless and attractive pink and blue<br />

diamonds, all with great eye-clean clarity,<br />

and if it isn’t even going to bother to certify<br />

or grade these stones, it’s easy to see why<br />

this could be a most profound effect the<br />

diamond giant has on the market.<br />

The strategy is both a pro and a con for<br />

the wider industry, including business for<br />

natural diamond companies.<br />


What few people have understood is<br />

that the US Federal Trade Commission’s<br />

(FTC) recent decision to amend the<br />

definition of diamonds was most likely in<br />

the best interest of the American economy<br />

and government.<br />

De Beers registered its patent back in 2008<br />

and in the time since, it’s generally believed<br />

that the company would have been in<br />

talks with the US Government to secure<br />

sponsorship for its Element Six Factory,<br />

which is currently under construction<br />

in Portland, Oregon. The factory is set<br />

to produce upwards of 500,000 carats<br />

annually and will bring the manufacturing<br />

process to the US.<br />

President Donald Trump has spoken<br />

about wanting to reduce imports and<br />

increase exports. Given the US does not<br />

mine diamonds commercially – it has a<br />

recreational diamond mine – Lightbox<br />

Jewelry offers an inroad into a new<br />

diamond-manufacturing sector with<br />

enormous export potential. If Trump<br />

wanted America to enter the hightech<br />

diamond manufacturing business,<br />

who would be better placed than the<br />

company that conducts the most industrial<br />

diamond manufacturing in the world<br />

and manufactures and sells diamonds at<br />

US$800 per carat?!<br />

CIBJO diamond nomenclature in the Blue<br />

Books originally states, “A diamond is a<br />

natural mineral consisting essentially of<br />

pure carbon crystallised in the isometric<br />

system.”<br />

This conflicts with the new US FTC ruling<br />

that does not require the word ‘natural’.<br />

The ruling provides man-made diamond<br />

manufacturers with the opportunity to<br />

change their marketing tactics, only in the

smaller print clarifying to consumers that their products<br />

are synthetic.<br />

Detection is getting much easier for all man-made diamonds,<br />

whether they are HPHT or CVD stones. All synthetic diamonds<br />

are type II whereas only a small percentage of natural diamonds<br />

are type II.<br />

GIA has released a device for less than $AUD10,000 that reportedly<br />

identifies type II set or loose diamonds in a few seconds from large<br />

sizes down to stones of one point or less. If a piece of jewellery<br />

contains more than five per cent type II diamonds, it is very likely<br />

that the stones will be synthetic and should be removed for further<br />

spectrographic testing under liquid nitrogen conditions.<br />

Twenty years ago nobody had the techniques to be able to verify<br />

whether or not diamonds were possibly synthetic and it won’t be<br />

long now until all of the ‘crooks’ attempting to hide synthetics in<br />

diamond parcels will inevitably be caught.<br />


Another recurring pattern we have seen in our industry is the<br />

rise in popularity of coloured gemstones in spite of synthetic<br />

counterparts.<br />

When companies introduced synthetic emeralds to the market<br />

in the 1950s, it was argued that it would reduce the demand for<br />

natural emeralds. In fact, some people will argue that emerald<br />

demand increased across the sector for both synthetics and natural<br />

stones because more people were wearing emeralds<br />

We have seen this trend repeated countless times; entry-level<br />

jewellery consumers purchase a synthetic gemstone, develop<br />

an appreciation for its appearance and then want to purchase<br />

the real thing.<br />

In terms of Lightbox Jewelry, the notion that it is being marketed<br />

to Millennials may also be a misconception – I know people aged<br />

in their 50s, 60s and 70s who own many natural diamonds yet<br />

these same consumers are buying Lightbox diamonds cheaply and<br />

having them re-set in ‘fun’ pieces.<br />

The <strong>Jeweller</strong>y Manufacture and Design<br />

qualifications are made up of unique<br />

skills and techniques that are offered to<br />

students and tradesperson Australiawide<br />

who are wishing to enter the trade,<br />

or are currently in the jewellery industry.<br />

Full time courses in:<br />

Certificate II in Engineering<br />

(MEM20105)<br />

RTO 40727<br />

Australia’s leading RTO run by<br />

jewellers for jewellers!<br />

We nurture beginners and recognise<br />

prior learning of master jewellers.<br />

Certificate III in <strong>Jeweller</strong>y Manufacture<br />

(MEM30605)<br />

Certificate IV in Advanced <strong>Jeweller</strong>y Manufacture<br />

(MEM40311)<br />

Diploma of <strong>Jeweller</strong>y and Object Design<br />

(MEM50311)<br />



Advanced Diploma of <strong>Jeweller</strong>y and Object Design<br />

(MEM60211)<br />

PHONE: 1800 MINRES<br />

WEBSITE: www.minres.com.au<br />

Brisbane | Adelaide | Sydney | Perth | Melbourne




Blush Pink Diamond jewellery is<br />

inspired by the spirit of Australia. Each<br />

piece is crafted using natural<br />

Australian Argyle pink diamonds.<br />

www.BlushPink.com.au<br />

E pink@samsgroup.com.au<br />

W samsgroup.com.au<br />

P 02 9290 2199<br />

God forbid any husband or partner who<br />

gifts these ladies anything other than ‘the<br />

real thing’!<br />

Don’t think for a second that this brand is<br />

only for Millennials; that’s absolutely untrue.<br />

Another consumer group who will be<br />

attracted to lab-created diamonds will be<br />

‘tech heads’, mostly because they love the<br />

science behind it. This is also a consumer<br />

group that hates the idea of visiting a real<br />

store and talking to real people only to be<br />

‘ripped off by jewellers’.<br />

They loathe shopping and I estimate<br />

50 per cent of tech heads buy their<br />

diamonds online to avoid the bricks-andmortar<br />

stores.<br />

Will lab-created diamonds reduce mining<br />

and monopolise the sector? Only time<br />

will tell. In fact, they may even increase<br />

demand. Lab-created diamonds are gaining<br />

popularity at the same time as moissanite,<br />

a stone that would have otherwise taken<br />

over as the most preferred substitute for<br />

lower-priced diamonds.<br />

Charles & Colvard first introduced<br />

moissanite, regarded as a diamond<br />

alternative to the jewellery market in 1998,<br />

with some optical properties exceeding<br />

those of diamond. The company controlled<br />

the use of moissanite in jewellery by<br />

patents; however the worldwide IP began<br />

expiring in August 2015.<br />

Therefore, it is the moissanite market<br />

that is probably going to be hit harder by<br />

Lightbox Jewelry than anything else, just<br />

as far better and much cheaper moissanite<br />

is available now that the Charles & Colvard<br />

patent has expired.<br />


It is often said that synthetic diamonds will<br />

appeal to ethically-conscious consumers<br />

such as those people who are attracted to<br />

fair-trade-coffee.<br />

These consumers are said to be concerned<br />

for the welfare of miners in African<br />

countries where purported exploitation<br />

occurs and ‘blood’ or ‘conflict’ diamonds<br />

are mined.<br />

However, the problems associated with<br />

conflict diamonds are now confined to the<br />

Democratic Republic of Congo as a result of<br />

the successful Kimberely Process.<br />

Even NGOs like Global Witness, who blew<br />

the whistle on the conflict diamond scene<br />

in West Africa, would agree.<br />

An alternative view to this takes into<br />

account the livelihood of the more than<br />

one-million artisanal diamond miners<br />

in the world, according to the Diamond<br />

Development Initiative. As a result, the rise<br />

of man-made diamonds – purchased by<br />

consumers who feel no blood is spilled in<br />

the synthetic process – could result in the<br />

starving of thousands of artisanal miners<br />

who won’t have demand for their product,<br />

let alone the chance to receive a premium<br />

price, as do the fair-trade coffee growers.<br />

Man-made diamond manufacturers<br />

also appear to promote their factories<br />

as ‘green’ or environmentally-friendly by<br />

using electricity or wind power rather<br />

than coal. These claims appear to be<br />

unsubstantiated at best and the locations<br />

of these factories are often not even close<br />

to wind power stations.<br />

One US company, Diamond Foundry, claims<br />

Leonardo DiCaprio as an investor; however<br />

a friend who is close to the company told<br />

me the shares were gifted/donated to the<br />

star of the ‘Blood Diamond’ movie in return<br />

for international publicity.<br />

If true, it’s another example of the skewed<br />

ethics of ‘do-gooders’ where millionaire<br />

celebrities are given more ‘money’ to<br />

promote man-made diamonds than what<br />

we are willing to give to starving Africans.<br />

These lab-created manufacturers clearly<br />

recognise that their products are marketed<br />

to consumers who want the satisfaction of<br />

purchasing seemingly ethical products and<br />

want to appear to fulfil those aspirations in<br />

all aspects of their production.<br />

It’s a noble cause but the benefits are, as<br />

yet, unsubstantiated and which could have<br />

more negative ramifications than benefits.<br />


Production of man-made diamonds equals<br />

less than 1 per cent of total worldwide<br />

mined diamond production, however De<br />

Beer’s entry into the synthetic diamond<br />

market may impact the industry in<br />

unexpected ways.

Most pundits have analysed the strategy from the consumer’s<br />

perspective however, few have taken into account the affect<br />

on investor confidence. If Lightbox Jewelry is selling its manmade<br />

diamonds below the cost price of other manufacturers/<br />

competitors, then synthetic diamond manufacturing investors will<br />

now question the return on investment.<br />



In truth, the synthetic diamond market is in its infancy and<br />

therefore relies heavily on improvements in manufacturing<br />

processes along with advances in technology and equipment. Both<br />

of these require deep pockets with the funding being provided by<br />

long-term investors.<br />

Furthermore, by selling diamonds at US$800 per-carat, the market<br />

has already had to suffer a sudden and unexpected a 60 per cent<br />

price drop in one hit. This price decline, along with crippling<br />

investments, means that the value of man-made diamond product<br />

depreciates rapidly and instantly – consumers cannot sell their<br />

man-made diamond rings for even a quarter of the price they paid.<br />

In fact, at this very moment they may be lucky to get $10 for a<br />

synthetic stone that cost $2,000.<br />

Another price reducing influence is that there are engineers in<br />

China, Russia and India who are without jobs and it would not<br />

be far-fetched to consider that it will only be a matter of time<br />

until they also build their own backyard CVD machines. Faced<br />

with unemployment and the poverty that comes with it, these<br />

engineers probably won’t care too much about cheating on<br />

De Beers patents, which outline in detail how to best<br />

manufacture diamonds.<br />

Maybe soon those engineers will start ionising carbon and<br />

methane, and Bob’s your uncle – we will have another 100<br />

companies in the market manufacturing synthetics!<br />

De Beers’ decision to enter and control the man-made<br />

diamond market is really one without<br />

precedent and no one can possibly<br />

foretell precisely how the diamond<br />

industry will be affected. The<br />

only sure thing is that any impact<br />

will bring large and probably<br />

permanent changes. u<br />

Garry Holloway is a self-confessed ‘cut nut’. He graduated<br />

as a geologist in 1973 and in 1975 he established two<br />

fine jewellery stores in Melbourne. While studying for the<br />

Diamond Diploma in 1984, Holloway became obsessed<br />

with diamond cut research; he invented the Ideal-Scope<br />

and Patented Holloway Cut Advisor on pricescope.com. He<br />

lectured at the Gemmological Association of Australia and<br />

National Council <strong>Jeweller</strong>y Valuers and works with a group of<br />

Russian and Indian researchers known as The Cut Group.<br />



PO Box 866, Tullamarine, VIC 3043<br />

(03) 9338 0091 / 1800 006 388<br />

sales@worthdouglas.com.au<br />


Lab-created diamond jewellery<br />

market to grow to US$15B by 2035<br />




t’s been five short years since the jewellery<br />

industry saw the first gem-quality lab-created<br />

diamond larger than one carat polished. Today,<br />

varieties in sizes larger than 10 carats are now being<br />

produced in even better qualities and in colours<br />

such as vivid pinks and blues.<br />

Gem-quality lab-created diamond production for<br />

use in jewellery now exceeds 1.5-million carats of<br />

polished annually.<br />

On a relative basis, gem-quality lab-created<br />

diamonds sold as jewellery have dropped in price<br />

30-40 per cent over the last three years. Further,<br />

De Beers announced in late May that the company<br />

would be entering the lab-created diamond<br />

jewellery space from September <strong>2018</strong>, offering<br />

product to consumers at as much as an estimated<br />

65-80 per cent discount to current generic labdiamond<br />

market prices in sizes up to one-carat.<br />

The lab-grown diamond jewellery market is<br />

estimated to be worth US$1.9 billion dollars today<br />

and it is expected to grow at 22 per cent annually<br />

to US$5.2 billion by 2023 and to US$14.9 billion by<br />

2035. This equates to a longer-term growth rate<br />

of about 9 per cent. The growth is estimated to be<br />

driven by the continued advancement in labdiamond<br />

production technologies, which should<br />

improve production economics and further push<br />

down prices, in turn taking market share from<br />

both the natural-diamond and fashion-jewellery<br />

industries.<br />

Excluding watches, the global jewellery industry is<br />

estimated to be worth estimated US$270 billion.<br />

This can be segmented into diamond jewellery,<br />

fashion jewellery and non-diamond fine jewellery.<br />

For purposes of this analysis, diamond jewellery can<br />

be defined as diamond jewellery selling for greater<br />

than US$250, typically gem-quality stones set in<br />

gold or platinum.<br />

Forecasted Lab-Created Diamond Jewelry Market Penetration<br />

Estimated Size of Global Markets (on an annual consumer sales basis)<br />

In billions of USD, all figures nominal <strong>2018</strong> 2023 2035<br />

Total Jewelry Market 1 271 340 645<br />

Lab-created diamond % of Market 1% 2% 2%<br />

Diamond Jewelry Market 2 87 108 173<br />

Lab-created diamond % of Market 2% 3% 5%<br />

Fashion Jewelry Market 3 40 52 110<br />

Lab-created diamond % of Market

also reminding consumers of the value inherent<br />

in the rarity of its non-renewable resource,<br />

a characteristic that lab-created diamonds<br />

don’t share.<br />

The Diamond Producers Association, an<br />

organisation financed by the industry’s largest<br />

miners, is leading the effort to return to generic<br />

marketing for diamonds in the post ‘A Diamond<br />

is Forever’ era.<br />

While production of higher-quality lab-created<br />

diamonds is still in its early stages, there has been<br />

significant investment to improve the quality of<br />

output and the economics of production.<br />

New producers are focused on improving<br />

production capabilities using the chemical vapor<br />

deposition (CVD) method with a longer-term<br />

goal to supply high-quality diamond for industrial<br />

and technological uses, like semiconductors,<br />

quantum-computing components, lasers and<br />

optic equipment, an industry that could be worth<br />

hundreds of billions of dollars one day.<br />

Others are prioritising scaling production to take<br />

advantage of the high margins the lab-created<br />

diamond jewellery market currently has to offer.<br />

To highlight the demand, the world’s largest<br />

supplier of off-the-shelf CVD reactors currently has a<br />

backlog on orders approaching one year.<br />

Synthetic producers using the high-pressure, high<br />

temperature (HPHT) method – the original method<br />

of production – are also improving production<br />

capabilities. In China alone, HPHT presses produce<br />

an estimated 10-billion carats of industrial-grade<br />

diamond annually; however some producers are<br />

upgrading their equipment to produce larger<br />

diamonds in near-gem quality grades and better.<br />

HPHT presses are also being used to enhance<br />

the quality of lab-created diamonds produced<br />

using CVD, a practice that is typically considered<br />

unacceptable with natural diamonds.<br />

Given the scale of production capability, it is<br />

reasonable to assume that the supply of lab-created<br />

diamonds is boundless long term and that the<br />

lowest-cost producer, ideally fit for the fashion<br />

jewellery market, will set the price of generic<br />

goods. The lab-created diamonds most likely to<br />

compete with the natural diamond<br />

jewellery industry will be<br />

higher-priced diamonds<br />

built around successful<br />

brands or unique<br />

jewellery designs. u<br />

Paul Zimnisky is an independent diamond<br />

industry analyst and consultant covering<br />

the natural diamond and the lab-created<br />

diamond industry. He can be reached at<br />

paul@paulzimnisky.com and followed on<br />

Twitter @paulzimnisky.<br />

Disclosure: at the time of writing, the author held a long<br />

position in Lucara Diamond Corp, Stornoway Diamond<br />

Corp, Mountain Province Diamonds Inc, Diamcor<br />

Mining Inc, North Arrow Minerals Inc and Signet<br />

Jewelers Ltd.

DON’T<br />

poke the bear!<br />



he first text came in at 3:43am Las Vegas<br />

time. It was a press release from De Beers<br />

announcing the launch of Lightbox<br />

Jewelry, the company’s new collection of synthetic<br />

diamonds. The irony is so thick in that I was at<br />

Newark airport fewer than 24 hours earlier, where<br />

someone who works for one of the laboratorygrown<br />

companies was telling me they now own<br />

200 reactors and that business was great.<br />

The discussion motivated me to become more<br />

knowledgeable about what synthetic diamonds<br />

actually cost to grow and I had been researching<br />

the costs. How expensive is a reactor? What are their<br />

growth rates and labour costs?<br />

I concluded that the cost to produce these goods<br />

is far below what the current sellers are claiming.<br />

In fact, my friend at the airport told me the cost of<br />

their laboratory-grown crystals was twice what it<br />

cost them for mined diamonds.<br />

“So let me get this straight,” I said. “The goods cost<br />

twice as much yet you’re able to sell them for 30 per<br />

cent less than natural diamonds?!” I told him that<br />

prices would eventually drop because the goods<br />

aren’t worth what the trade is asking. I added that<br />

retailers would get hurt in the process. He told me I<br />

didn’t know what I was talking about.<br />

Then at 3:43am the announcement came that De<br />

Beers was going to start selling one-carat synthetic<br />

diamonds for US$800 retail … Mic Drop!<br />

There are three things that have irked me about<br />

the emergence of the man-made diamond<br />

market. Firstly, manufacturers and wholesalers<br />

have refused to label them as what they truly are<br />

– synthetic diamonds. Secondly, the industry has<br />

not found a way to easily differentiate synthetic<br />

product from natural diamonds. Thirdly, these same<br />

manufacturers have priced their goods at a discount<br />

from natural diamonds.<br />

While De Beers has opted to label its brand as<br />

laboratory-grown rather than synthetic, it is putting<br />

an easy identifier inside the stones that can be seen<br />

with an eye-loupe and are pricing the goods as a<br />

stand-alone product based on their value and not<br />

as a discounted competitor of natural diamond.<br />

Despite what sellers of synthetic diamonds say,<br />

there is no difference in rarity between a halfcarat<br />

and a two-carat laboratory-grown synthetic<br />

diamond; the cost to produce them is simply a<br />

linear equation where time in the reactor equals<br />

the size of the cube.<br />

So now what?<br />

Unfortunately, retailers are already entrenched<br />

in the laboratory-grown category at very high<br />

prices. As the news spreads – and this is very<br />

newsworthy given the hype that other laboratorygrown<br />

companies have generated over the past<br />

year – consumers are going to be very angry about<br />

the prices they paid for their synthetic stones. I<br />

don’t have any wisdom for how to address these<br />

conversations and I’m concerned about how it will<br />

affect reputations, especially at retail level.<br />


Some of the retailers and suppliers think De Beers is<br />

cannibalising its own product – natural diamonds.<br />

Others think De Beers is screwing the industry by<br />

selling directly to consumers as the first step in its<br />

omni-channel distribution plans – one woman<br />

even shouted this out during the De Beers<br />

presentation at JCK.<br />

Let me say that those companies that have gone<br />

‘all-in’ on synthetics and are understandably upset<br />

that their world has been rocked should have seen<br />

this coming. This is especially true of the growers<br />

who know what synthetic diamonds cost to<br />

produce and have dug their own holes regarding<br />

the wholesale and retail ‘value’ of their goods.<br />


To the manufacturers of synthetic diamonds, who<br />

tied their wholesale prices to the prices of natural<br />

diamonds, this is your fault.<br />

For those of you who have had your synthetic<br />

diamonds graded as if they deserve the same<br />

value determinations as a natural diamond, this<br />

is your fault.<br />

For those of you who have told your customers that<br />

lab-grown diamonds are a) not synthetic, and b)<br />

identical to natural diamonds, this is your fault.<br />

Through its Element Six division, De Beers knows<br />

more about growing synthetic diamonds than<br />

anyone else in the world but I don’t believe it even<br />

considered producing this material for jewellery<br />

until the synthetic manufacturers entered the<br />

marketplace with your bogus claims and<br />

overpriced product.<br />

34 <strong>Jeweller</strong> <strong>December</strong> <strong>2018</strong>

You have no one else to blame but yourselves so stop it already.<br />

Stop telling the jewellers that Lightbox diamonds are brown, that<br />

Lightbox won’t be able to keep up with production and that<br />

De Beers is running out of diamonds.<br />

Stop telling consumers that Lightbox won’t be able to consistently<br />

produce the qualities it has already demonstrated, that this is a<br />

publicity stunt and that De Beers has opted against providing<br />

grading reports because of poor quality.<br />


I have been writing about synthetic diamonds over the past few<br />

years and, although I had no idea that De Beers would use an<br />

all-out assault on the rhetoric spewed by synthetic growers and<br />

sellers, the result is the battle should be over.<br />

This was simply a rout on all fronts but instead of hearing that the<br />

synthetic diamond companies will lower their prices immediately<br />

and stop the nonsense that they are the same as natural diamonds,<br />

they appear to be doubling down.<br />

Denials about the quality of Lightbox goods and the scope<br />

of Lightbox’s production capabilities are as embarrassing as<br />

declarations that De Beers is selling directly to consumers to<br />

screw the industry… and retailers are parroting this drivel.<br />


The new market will be pink, blue and white CVD lab-grown<br />

diamonds up to one carat at US$800 retail plus setting. Any<br />

consumer looking for an alternative to a natural diamond will be<br />

aware of these goods and their prices.<br />

I am hoping Lightbox is made available to retailers offering labgrown<br />

diamonds at realistic prices. Anyone selling lab-grown<br />

diamonds today must take this information into consideration<br />

regarding how they represent the goods they are selling and how<br />

much they are selling for.<br />

The introduction of lab-grown diamonds has forced US retailers<br />

to purchase expensive testing equipment to check every item of<br />

diamond jewellery that passes through their inventory and also<br />

each item coming in for repair. The burden of testing for lab-grown<br />

goods has fallen on the retail jeweller<br />

who must protect themselves and<br />

their customers.<br />

As for how to deal with customers<br />

who have already purchased labgrown<br />

at high prices, I remain<br />

opento ideas. u<br />

Abe Sherman is CEO Buyers Intelligence Group, a<br />

jewellery buying group, merchandising consulting and<br />

market-research firm that supports retailers and suppliers.<br />

He writes extensively on developments within the jewellery<br />

and diamond industries. Visit: bigjewelers.com<br />


Synthetic diamonds call<br />

for retailer awareness and caution<br />




s synthetic diamonds gain a larger foothold<br />

in the marketpace the overriding issue<br />

for retailers is the need to be vigilant and<br />

aware. Man-made diamonds are here to stay,<br />

and they’re not going away. We’ve got to know<br />

what they are.<br />

They are not an imitation like cubic zirconia and<br />

moissanite - they are diamonds and because of that,<br />

we must be more educated and a lot more aware.<br />

Diamond imitations such as synthetic moissanite<br />

and synthetic cubic zirconia can be accurately<br />

identified by a trained jeweller or gemmologist using<br />

a 10x loupe and testing instruments.<br />

However, the new synthetic (or man-made)<br />

diamonds are impossible to identify with a 10x<br />

loupe or normal equipment that is used for the<br />

CZ and moissanite. They are diamonds, so look<br />

like diamonds with a loupe and are identified as<br />

diamonds with the normal instruments.<br />

We’ve made the decision to invest in the high-tech<br />

equipment necessary to be able to positively identify<br />

a suspect stone as a high pressure/high temperature<br />

(HPHT) or chemical vapour deposition (CVD)<br />

diamond. We have also built a reference collection<br />

of about 30 CVD and HPHT man-made diamonds<br />

ranging melée size to half carat for comparison and<br />

study purposes. Over the last year we have been<br />

asked to test parcels of melée purchased at very low<br />

prices and unfortunately we discovered CVD stones.<br />

We’ve had one case where five stones were identifed<br />

as man-made. We have had other instances where<br />

small stones turned out to be ‘suspect’. We’ve also<br />

had stones submitted for diamond certification<br />

without disclosure that turned out to be man-made.<br />

If a large diamond submitted for certification is<br />

identified as a man-made diamond we will laser<br />

inscribe the girdle with a unique identification<br />

number and add it to the certificate registry and the<br />

‘certificate check’ section on our website.<br />

There are a number of concerns for retail jewellers<br />

arising from the advent of the latest synthetic<br />

diamonds.<br />

These include;<br />

• Whether a large diamond purchased overseas<br />

without a recognised certificate submitted<br />

for a ring design might be man-made with<br />

the ramifications of being later identified as a<br />

synthetic after it’s left your premises.<br />

• Whether diamonds set in jewellery purchased ad<br />

stock purchases at overseas fairs where the prices<br />

are extremely competitive include synthetic<br />

diamonds,<br />

• Whether a piece of jewellery submitted for repair<br />

or valuation contains synthetic diamonds,<br />

• Whether a piece of jewellery being pawned or<br />

sold second hand contains synthetic diamonds<br />

If the jeweller has suspiciouns, it’s not the end of<br />

the world because there are some very affordable<br />

safeguards they can take.<br />

There are now inexpensive testing devices for only<br />

a few hundred dollars which can test both set and<br />

un-set stones and which provide the retailer a first<br />

warning to say there is something wrong with the<br />

stones and they need to be examined further.<br />

These devices give you a red flag by identifying the<br />

diamond as a Type II diamond.<br />

Currently all white synthetic diamonds are Type II, so<br />

if the stone does not pass this first test it’s rejected<br />

or should be sent to a well-equipped laboratory for<br />

further testing.<br />

All white diamonds that are mined except for a very<br />

tiny percentage (less than 2 per cent) are Type I<br />

diamonds. So, if a diamond passes the first screen it<br />

can only be natural.<br />

But there is a remote possibility that initial testing<br />

identifies a Type II diamond as synthetic even though<br />

it’s a natural diamond. CVD man-made diamonds<br />

are often brown out of the manufacturing chamber<br />

and are post treated with HPHT to make them white.<br />

There are rare occasions where natural brownish<br />

Type II diamonds are whitened by the same process to<br />

make them “D, E or F.”<br />

However, because they are Type II diamonds, these<br />

stones can also be flagged by using the same very<br />

affordable instruments mentioned above before<br />

further testing is done. So, there’s quite a bit of<br />

safeguard that the jeweller can take for a relatively<br />

small investment in equipment and which is very<br />

easy to use.<br />

Another issue concerning man-made diamonds<br />

is that there’s a perception that because they’re<br />

manufactured in a factory, they are all equal or<br />

identical. We’re starting to learn all man-made<br />

diamonds are not equal, they’re not the same quality,<br />

even within the same factory, let alone from different<br />

factories using different equipment. This makes them<br />

more believable because they have different levels of<br />

inclusions that differ from one stone to another, much<br />

like mined diamonds.<br />

So, consumer education around this is very important.<br />

<strong>Jeweller</strong>s need to understand this themselves so they<br />

can discuss it with customers. It’s intersting that De<br />

Beers’ advertising sounds like the stones they release<br />

– as opposed to manufacture – will all be of the same<br />

or similar quaility. De Beers is promoting a consistent<br />

quality, almost identical for all their stones which is<br />

why they won’t need to be graded.<br />

It’s early days and the<br />

steps De Beer’s has<br />

taken to enter the<br />

synthetic market are very<br />

significant and we don’t<br />

know what sort of impact<br />

it will have in the industry<br />

until it gains a bigger<br />

foothold. u<br />

Bill Sechos is managing director of<br />

Sydney-based Gem Studies Laboratory, the<br />

Gemmological Association of Australia’s (GAA)<br />

endorsed diamond grading laboratory. He<br />

holds a science degree from the University of<br />

Sydney and has served as the GAA president<br />

and chairman of the GAA Board of Studies and<br />

Examinations.<br />

36 <strong>Jeweller</strong> <strong>December</strong> <strong>2018</strong>

De Beers<br />

“Fire in the Hole”<br />




n the mining business, shouts of “fire in<br />

the hole” are warnings that an explosive<br />

detonation in a confined space is imminent.<br />

They warn of a dynamite charge that has been set.<br />

Depending on where you are positioned, ignoring<br />

it can be hazardous or even lethal.<br />

The Lightbox Jewelry announcement of De<br />

Beers, signaling its policy U-turn of moving into<br />

the gem-quality synthetic diamond business, is<br />

a comparable ‘fire’ warning to the industry. This<br />

explosion may be foreshadowing the eventual end<br />

of natural diamond mining.<br />

This U-turn by De Beers has always been a question<br />

of ‘when’ and not ‘whether’. The introduction<br />

of the Lightbox lab-grown diamond jewellery<br />

lines, coming on top of several other lab-grown<br />

diamond collections, symbolises another light<br />

pole on the edge of the road towards a rapidly<br />

growing global diamond jewellery market in<br />

which, eventually, any dissimilarity (differentiation)<br />

between lab-grown and naturally mined diamonds<br />

will evaporate. Product differentiation will not<br />

be sustainable – except, maybe, for some very<br />

exceptionally large natural stones ‘with a history’.<br />

In the long term, there will be only one diamond<br />

price, one product, without premiums for naturals.<br />

However, we aren’t there yet – and it might take<br />

anywhere between five to 15 years to get to this<br />

point. The Lightbox announcement, however, will<br />

unquestionably fast-track this process.<br />

De Beers has now taken ownership (or rather<br />

macro-management) of a most uncomfortable<br />

transition period marked by accelerated<br />

disruptions brought about by new technologies,<br />

by new entrants into the diamond business and<br />

new business models. It may delay, frustrate, or<br />

otherwise impact the timeline – but the end<br />

result is inevitable.<br />

The diamond jewellery market, as we know it<br />

today, has lost its ability to grow – for the simple<br />

reason that it will be running out of its natural<br />

product. As it has matured, it will now only<br />

stagnate and decline. However, the diamond<br />

jewellery market of tomorrow – in which the<br />

principal growth driver will consist of lab-grown<br />

diamonds – can become a global market worth<br />

hundreds of billions of dollars. The Lightbox entry<br />

must be seen as positive for the midstream and<br />

downstream. The pain suffered by the midstream<br />

in the transition period can be mitigated through<br />

responsible management – especially when<br />

restocking decisions are made. For the natural<br />

diamond miners, it is unequivocally bad news.<br />


Well over a decade ago, we publicly went on<br />

record that gem-quality lab-grown diamonds will<br />

become ‘the future’ – and that De Beers will join<br />

and lead this endeavor. It has made enormous<br />

investments in the technology – and it didn’t do<br />

so without intention to capitalise on it. Polishing<br />

lab-grown diamonds will deliver colossal benefits<br />

to the Indian diamond jewellery-manufacturing<br />

centres. If once upon a time the Indian cutting<br />

industry employed more than 800,000 workers, this<br />

number now could multiply. The added value will<br />

be considerably greater, while the working capital<br />

required for acquiring rough will be much lower –<br />

and will continue to decline.<br />

<strong>December</strong> <strong>2018</strong> <strong>Jeweller</strong> 37

Historically, diamond traders (erroneously) believed<br />

that diamonds were a good investment that prices<br />

would always go up and that if there were no<br />

money to be made in the manufacturing, there<br />

would be earnings through appreciation<br />

of inventory values. That’s not true anymore (if<br />

it ever was). Diamond manufacturers only make<br />

money on the added value – on the difference<br />

between the raw material costs and the resultant<br />

polished product.<br />

Today, the added value to be made in polishing<br />

small synthetics is higher than working in naturals<br />

– and the resultant synthetic polished product<br />

(parcels of smalls) often looks better. The diamond<br />

producers (miners) led by De Beers have abused<br />

their oligopolistic market positions by denying,<br />

year after year, any meaningful returns to their<br />

rough diamond clients. Whether done deliberately<br />

or unwittingly De Beers themselves may have<br />

stimulated the move towards gem-quality<br />

synthetic diamond.<br />

Let’s not belittle the Lightbox announcement. All<br />

the evidence points to a well considered strategy<br />

by De Beers, which was put into motion in the<br />

fourth quarter of 2017 (including the copyright<br />

registration of the brand name). Clearly, decisions<br />

and debates would have preceded that. What it<br />

also means is that De Beers has had six months to<br />

fine-tune the messaging and communication to<br />

the industry. This is why almost all the De Beers<br />

spokespersons seem to parrot the same script. This<br />

is not a knee-jerk reaction to lab-grown diamonds<br />

and an industry savior appearing at the last minute.<br />

The significance of this move is light-years greater<br />

than (ill-fated) strategies such as Supplier of<br />

Choice. In Supplier of Choice, clients were required<br />

to make major investments in advertising, jewellery<br />

ventures, and so on, which, at the end, did not<br />

serve the clients – except for eroding their equity.<br />

De Beers honestly believed in the correctness of<br />

that strategy and it didn’t intentionally deceive<br />

anyone. The clients made the mistake of ‘not<br />

thinking it through’, sufficiently trusting that De<br />

Beers knows what is best – for itself and for them. It<br />

cannot afford to make that error again.<br />

In all fairness, the policy enunciated by the<br />

Lightbox announcement, from a De Beers<br />

perspective, seems like a brilliant move.<br />

Undoubtedly, brilliant for De Beers and its<br />

shareholders!<br />

One can argue with the ways - and the timing<br />

before the JCK show - the announcement was<br />

made. In spite of many months of preparation, the<br />

credibility of De Beers has taken a serious knock.<br />

Seasoned politicians and business executives<br />

know that the perception of a leader’s intentions<br />

is always more important than their ineptitude/<br />

actual delivery. What is De Beers’ ultimate<br />

intention? How can midstream and downstream,<br />

the manufacturers and retailers, make it a win-win<br />

for them as well? Can they?<br />

As De Beers now plays on both sides of the playing<br />

field, from now on, one can never be certain of<br />

De Beers’ intention when it takes any action in the<br />

future. That’s reality; this must be recognised and<br />

not be lamented. Every action by them can be<br />

questioned as to whether it is really meant to help<br />

the diamond business or the lab-grown business,<br />

especially when it calls for sightholders to take on<br />

significant additional costs. For example, one can<br />

question whether other unilateral action, like, say,<br />

the blockchain initiative, is really meant to help the<br />

diamond industry or whether it will simply add to<br />

its costs without too much benefit.<br />

Everyone will need to make his or her own call on<br />

this. Lightbox is a game changer – but the new<br />

game hasn’t started yet, and the new rules haven’t<br />

been set. It might become a win-win for both<br />

De Beers and downstream – depending how the<br />

game evolves. In the disruptive years, ahead of us,<br />

midstream and downstream company heads must<br />

become, as McKinsey calls them, ‘transformational<br />

leaders’ to navigate effectively through a turbulent<br />

transition.<br />


Policy U-turns require extraordinary public relations<br />

skills. While maintaining propaganda slogans<br />

for many years and unfounded theories that<br />

diamond consumers only want the ‘real thing’,<br />

and by threatening clients to stay away from ‘near<br />

worthless synthetic pebbles’, the natural diamond<br />

producers led their clients to believe that labgrown<br />

diamonds were not a ‘legitimate’ diamond<br />

jewellery product. They felt that lab-grown<br />

diamond producers must, at all costs, be denied<br />

participation in industry conferences, congresses,<br />

and bodies; they were also presented as the<br />

industry’s pariahs. Millions of dollars was spent on<br />

having regulators adopt unfriendly ‘derogatory’<br />

language for usage in nomenclature describing<br />

lab-grown diamonds.<br />

Diamond-terminology guidelines ostensibly meant<br />

to encourage full, fair and effective use of a clear<br />

and accessible terminology for diamonds and<br />

synthetic diamonds were embraced by virtually<br />

all sector bodies, organisations and traders .1 The<br />

term ‘cultured diamond’ was prohibited and the<br />

unfriendly name ‘synthetics’ was to be used – until,<br />

after court cases in the US – the Federal Trade<br />

Commission (FTC) had second thoughts about it.<br />

De Beers Best Practice Principles (BPP) does not<br />

sanction the abbreviated term ‘LGD’ (lab-grown<br />

diamonds), until the present policy U-turn. The<br />

head of BPP uses the term in her own published<br />

letters. [A US industry leader marveled recently<br />

that the term LGD so quickly gained acceptance in<br />

the market.] Well over US$100 million was poured<br />

in the Diamond Producers Association to fight<br />

synthetics. And, absurdly, synthetic diamonds<br />

were kept out of the specific diamond antimoney-laundering<br />

(AML/CFT) regimes because<br />

of the argument that these are ‘not diamonds’.<br />

Meanwhile, not a single customs officer could<br />

see the difference. Clearly, the natural diamond<br />

producers led a war against the gem quality<br />

synthetic producers.<br />

The leader of the pariahs<br />

In fact, De Beers invested directly and indirectly<br />

in great efforts to make these synthetic diamond<br />

producers viewed as some kind of industry<br />

pariahs. DTC sightholders would conduct synthetic<br />

diamond activities through non-group companies,<br />

with the lowest of visibility. Now, De Beers has<br />

unashamedly and unapologetically crowned itself<br />

as the leader of these pariahs. It has, overnight,<br />

legitimised a business whose legitimacy it had<br />

been fighting tooth and nail against, for decades.<br />

This is a level of arrogance only De Beers can<br />

display – and can also get away with. One cannot<br />

help but admire them.<br />

To avoid losing its market credibility forever, De<br />

Beers has launched a sophisticated information<br />

campaign to minimise the impact of its Lightbox<br />

synthetic brand on the natural diamond business.<br />

Totally ignoring what its lab-grown diamonds will<br />

do to the natural diamond world, it claims that “the<br />

38 <strong>Jeweller</strong> <strong>December</strong> <strong>2018</strong>

Lightbox will transform the lab-grown diamond sector by offering<br />

consumers a lab-grown product they have told us they want but<br />

aren’t getting: affordable fashion jewellery that may not be forever,<br />

but is perfect for right now.”<br />

First of all, if a diamond lasts forever, it doesn’t matter whether it<br />

was mined or laboratory created. It’s the same product. To claim<br />

that it discovered that “consumers regard lab-grown diamonds – as<br />

a fun, pretty product that shouldn’t cost that much – so we see<br />

an opportunity here that’s been missed by lab-grown diamond<br />

producers” is taking a swipe at other lab-grown producers and<br />

hundreds of retailers selling successfully lab-grown diamond<br />

jewellery. It’s more than a swipe —its “transformation of LGD<br />

market” is a euphemism for ‘regime change’. Here we are; we<br />

shall take over!<br />

To claim that teenagers had hitherto been left out and this<br />

‘untapped’ market provided the opportunity – or the trigger – for<br />

De Beers to make a U-turn on synthetics seems like alternative facts<br />

creation. Yesterday’s truth is today’s fake news.<br />

De Beers wants us to believe that just because consumers asked for<br />

the affordable jewellery product, De Beers will now create a new<br />

market that all of the ill-informed existing lab-grown producers<br />

never realised could exist. This is rubbish.<br />

Any way one looks at it, every sale of a quality lab-grown diamond<br />

in a diamond jewellery retail store represents a natural diamond<br />

that was left unsold. Natural producers, including the mining<br />

partners of De Beers, know that. At a meeting in Mumbai, De Beers<br />

said it had a study showing that currently some 500 stores are<br />

carrying lab-grown diamonds. This is a figure, it said, that could<br />

reach 1,000 by the end of the year. These stores embraced the labgrown<br />

product even without the existence of this so-called, new<br />

untapped market De Beers will create.<br />

The Lightbox launch illustrates that the ferocious fights by the<br />

natural producers to marginalise, delegitimise, or even ostracise the<br />

lab-grown producers have dismally failed. In an odd twist of history,<br />

the end-consumers who desire synthetics are the very same<br />

consumers who, we were always told, would ‘lose its confidence in<br />

diamonds’ if synthetics were to allowed to make an inroad into the<br />

diamond jewellery market.<br />


Historically, De Beers optimised its profits when it held a solid<br />

monopoly over its product. It has lost that position – or is in the<br />

process of losing it – in natural diamonds. This is the case in both in<br />

diamond mining and marketing. Undoubtedly, getting a monopoly<br />

position has now also become its long-term strategy in lab-grown<br />

diamonds. De Beers, having superior technology and hundreds of<br />

patents to help it exclude others out of the lab-grown market, will<br />

try to corner the lab-grown business in the decade ahead. Most<br />

likely, it will become successful.<br />

De Beers must be careful in its narrative – one doesn’t want<br />

to wake up the US Federal Trade Commission or European<br />

Competition Authorities too early. Setting up a lab-grown<br />

diamonds factory in Oregon is a brilliant move: By undercutting<br />

Share our success<br />

Become one of our<br />

exclusive retailers<br />

1018 High Street, Armadale 3143, Melbourne<br />

Exclusive Distributor & Importer | T: +61-3-9500 8894

most protracted of several separate law suits. De<br />

Beers challenged the originality of GE’s discovery<br />

and the accuracy with which they had described it.<br />

To make their case, De Beers engaged a number of<br />

expert witnesses to discredit General Electric in the<br />

eyes of South African law.”² At the end, the parties<br />

settled (they agreed on some royalty regime), but<br />

essentially De Beers won.<br />

Fast forward to today. De Beers, in 2016, filed a<br />

number of patent infringement cases in the<br />

High Court of Singapore against IIa Technologies<br />

Pte Ltd, which is currently the dominant market<br />

player in gem-quality lab-grown diamond<br />

production. IIa Technologies markets its lab-grown<br />

polished output under the brand name of Pure<br />

Grown Diamonds.<br />


the prices of competitors within the US, De Beers<br />

won’t be seen as ‘dumping’ from an overseas lowlabour-cost<br />

country, but rather serving the very<br />

best interest of American consumers by forcing<br />

down consumer prices. The very same company<br />

that for well over a century has espoused the<br />

virtues of ever-higher values of diamonds will now<br />

simultaneously espouse the virtues of the very<br />

lowest possible prices!<br />

De Beers CEO Bruce Cleaver justifies this<br />

expected near-collapse of current lab-grown<br />

prices by arguing that they discovered that<br />

consumers want “affordable fashion jewellery that<br />

may not be forever, but is perfect for right now.”<br />

We would argue that a lab-grown diamond will<br />

undoubtedly have the same life span as a natural<br />

diamond, either both are forever, or both are not…<br />

Actually, when one comes to think of it, if the wife<br />

doesn’t last forever, why buy her a natural stone?<br />

Lightbox will ‘just do’ – and there is money left for<br />

the honeymoon.<br />

Though one would suspect that De Beers has<br />

done extensive modeling and simulations, no<br />

one truly knows how this Lightbox launch will<br />

impact the prices of natural diamonds. Anyone’s<br />

forecast depends on one’s faith in the various<br />

product differentiation strategies. A DTC broker in<br />

a report cautiously noted his clients’ concerns that<br />

Lightbox “may [have] unintended consequences,<br />

such as loss of share of wallet for natural, or at least<br />

cannibalisation of that market” and that it may<br />

have “an impact on the price of small, coloured and<br />

brown goods.” That’s just one reaction for starters –<br />

and is still fully based on faith in successful product<br />

differentiation strategies. In that strange belief,<br />

I am an atheist.<br />


Essentially, De Beers has a proven record in fighting<br />

defections from cartels or forcing adherence<br />

to its policies mostly in two ways: by spending<br />

literally billions to undermine competitors’<br />

prices (i.e., prevent defections from the cartel –<br />

remember Argyle? Remember Zaire?) or if that fails,<br />

bankrupting the competitors in other ways. (Bain<br />

& Co. found the decision to fight Argyle one of the<br />

company’s gravest mistakes.)<br />

Any student of De Beers’ history will recognise<br />

that the company only truly flourishes when it is<br />

the dominant player in the market and can carve<br />

for itself the role of price-setter. As much as the<br />

law will allow, it excels when it can function as a<br />

monopoly. They have now publicly embarked on<br />

a policy – and displayed the audacity to publicly<br />

imply so – to force the other lab-grown producers<br />

into near-bankruptcy.<br />

Actually, in the synthetics business, De Beers has<br />

done this before. In its press releases, De Beers<br />

proudly (and rightfully) calls Element Six “a world<br />

leader in lab-grown diamond technology for more<br />

than 50 years.” What it doesn’t say is that some 50<br />

years ago, it actually had ‘missed the boat’ when<br />

General Electric had beaten it in filing patents for<br />

its gem-quality diamond synthetic invention.<br />

Recalls diamond historian Robert Hazen: “In<br />

the early 1960s De Beers and General Electric<br />

commenced a mammoth six-year legal battle<br />

costing many millions of dollars – at the time the<br />

Just as it did 50 years ago, De Beers is again<br />

investing millions of dollars in synthetic patent<br />

litigation. If it wins or makes some kind of<br />

settlement – which is kind of expected – it might<br />

force this competitor out of the market. Doing so<br />

would establish Element Six unchallenged as the<br />

dominant player in the lab-grown gem-diamond<br />

business. This would also put other lab-grown<br />

companies on notice. No one has as many<br />

CVD and HPHT gem-diamond related patents,<br />

registered in so many national jurisdictions, or has<br />

as much experience in successfully arguing these<br />

extremely complex issues before a judge or jury<br />

as De Beers. What patent-owners will learn the<br />

hard way, in these wars, at the end of the day, it is<br />

quite irrelevant who is right but rather who is left<br />

standing.<br />


And the betting is solidly on De Beers for being<br />

the one ‘left standing’. Noted mining analyst Des<br />

Kilalea sums it up as follows: “Some manufacturers<br />

of lab-grown diamonds have suggested that it is<br />

not possible to make a return [on consumer sales]<br />

at US$800 per carat, suggesting that the business<br />

will be a loss leader to damage the lab-grown<br />

diamond market. De Beers says it will make a ‘good<br />

return’ on the US$94 million that it is investing<br />

in Lightbox [factory] in Portland. Our view is that<br />

other lab-grown diamond makers may well not be<br />

able to compete on cost, as they do not operate<br />

on the scale which Lightbox proposes (500,000<br />

carats of lab-grown rough converted into 200,000<br />

of polished),” concludes Kilalea, who is apparently<br />

unaware of the output levels and efficiency of<br />

some of the other lab-grown producers.<br />

“Besides,” says Kilalea, “competitors do not have the<br />

diverse product range of E6 (products supplied<br />

40 <strong>Jeweller</strong> <strong>December</strong> <strong>2018</strong>

to military, high tech and other sectors) over which to amortise<br />

development costs and overheads. So, we believe the marginal<br />

cost of making lab-grown diamonds is likely to be significantly<br />

lower than for other lab-grown diamond makers, and improving<br />

technology should see further reductions. It is worth noting that<br />

BHP Billiton investigated entering the lab-grown market and one<br />

of its executives told us several years ago they declined because<br />

barriers to entry were likely to fall, which did not justify investment.”<br />

We are not now arguing the point made by Kilalea, though we<br />

don’t underestimate the resiliency of some of the lab-grown<br />

competitors, but we are thinking about the ‘morning after’. What<br />

will De Beers do when it has secured its monopoly position? When<br />

it becomes the lab-grown diamond price setter? Will it suddenly<br />

move the lab-grown price up to the natural price? Will it produce<br />

also ever larger lab-grown diamonds? Have one price? Or may it<br />

withhold the lab-grown diamonds from the market to support the<br />

natural product? The answers are far beyond me – and it may take<br />

still a few years to get there.<br />


The Lightbox announcement came at the end of May. Around<br />

the same time a few CVD-related patents, which Element Six had<br />

applied for in late 2017, were published. Removing all the scientific<br />

language, it shows that Element Six has the know-how to grow<br />

CVD layer on layer. In this process, the very thick (high) stone is<br />

synthetised as one diamond and, apparently, no ‘dividing lines’<br />

are visible. This literally means that, in terms of size potential of<br />

stones, the sky has become the limit, subject to available capacity<br />

of the growers.<br />

Many producers, not only Element Six, possess know-how that<br />

they keep to themselves, and patent it only at the last moment,<br />

only when the product hits the market. This is done to prevent<br />

patent theft – as it is impossible to take a CVD diamond and ‘back<br />

engineer it’ to arrive at how the processes work. On the other hand,<br />

the main advantage of patenting the technology is to be able to<br />

go after other CVD producers accusing them of infringing your<br />

patent. De Beers has done that before, it is doing it now, and may<br />

well do so in the future.<br />

Though the market reacted sceptically to statements about<br />

Element Six’s ability to sell at discounts of 75 per cent to the<br />

prices of other lab-grown producers, and below 90 per cent<br />

of comparable natural stones, my scientist friends tell me that<br />

these figures are attainable. Element Six would not be ‘dumping,<br />

i.e., selling at prices below production cost. But the issue for the<br />

diamond market is sizes.<br />

Somehow, Element Six is suggesting jewellery with anywhere<br />

between 0.25 carats to 1-carat sizes. But Element Six has the knowhow<br />

to grow large or even very large stones. One of my friends<br />

says: “Once certain barriers were overcome in CVD, the sky has<br />

always been the limit. Given the size and power of your growth<br />

chambers. Crystals don’t have a ‘memory’ per se, so growing on a<br />

substrate 1mm thick is no different than one of 20mm. It’s just a<br />

matter of feeding gases into the growers.” If Element Six can make<br />

good money producing beautiful fancy coloured or pure white

large stones, will it leave that part of the<br />

market to other lab-grown producers?<br />

Don’t bet on it.”<br />

De Beers has, over many years, prepared<br />

itself for the day it would join – and<br />

ultimately lead. When announcing its<br />

Lightbox branded line of lab-grown<br />

jewellery, whose registered trademark it<br />

interestingly applied for only in late 2017,<br />

De Beers observed that “any Lightbox labgrown<br />

diamonds of 0.2 carats or above will<br />

carry a permanent Lightbox logo inside<br />

the stone.”<br />

Let’s again turn the clock back some 14<br />

years. Diamond Intelligence Briefs reported<br />

that Element Six had just (2004) applied<br />

for a patent registration for “a method of<br />

incorporating a mark of origin, such as a<br />

brand mark, or fingerprint in a CVD single<br />

crystal diamond material.” Much of the<br />

research, and many of the patents, had no<br />

use for industrial diamonds. However, the<br />

gem-quality CVD market was always<br />

on its mind.<br />

One of the recently published patents also<br />

indicates methods to grow stones that<br />

can be converted into blues and pinks at a<br />

much faster rate. In these Lightbox colours,<br />

Element Six may indeed have a lower cost<br />

advantage over other producers.<br />

As a matter of fact, Element Six has<br />

patented ways of colouring the lab-grown<br />

diamonds to brown, pink, blue, yellow<br />

and more. These are all quite different and<br />

complicated processes, and enormous<br />

resources have been invested getting<br />

to this technology. One of Element Six’s<br />

recently published patents also indicates<br />

methods to grow these coloured stones<br />

at a much faster rate, giving it a lower cost<br />

advantage over other producers. These<br />

patents weren’t needed for industrial<br />

applications – this was mostly done to ‘get<br />

ready’ for the inevitable day. That day has<br />

now arrived.<br />


Though the eventual entry of De Beers<br />

into the lab-grown diamond business<br />

was never doubted, the timing caught<br />

most of us by surprise. Maybe it shouldn’t<br />

have. The parent company of De Beers,<br />

Anglo American (85 per cent owner),<br />

had identified synthetics as a “principal<br />

risk to our natural diamond business.”<br />

Anglo American, in its 2016 annual<br />

report, concluded that “technological<br />

developments are making the production<br />

of man-made gem synthetics commercially<br />

viable and there are increased distribution<br />

sources. The marketing of synthetics seeks<br />

to place them as being environmentally or<br />

socially superior”.<br />

Anglo American summarises the impact<br />

of synthetics on the natural diamond<br />

business as representing a “potential loss<br />

of polished and rough diamond sales<br />

leading to a negative impact on revenue,

cash flow, profitability and value.” Anglo<br />

American realised that, at the end of the<br />

day, any consumer buying a lab-grown<br />

diamond is a consumer who did not buy<br />

a natural diamond. It is as simple as that<br />

– and it isn’t without solid reasons that in<br />

our annual Tacy Diamond Pipeline we have<br />

incorporated the lab-grown production<br />

on the supply side and thus also on the<br />

polished demand equations. It is not that<br />

the threat materialised out of thin air. It was<br />

incorporated into the pipeline quite a few<br />

years ago. So, what made Anglo suddenly<br />

recognise the threat and then for De Beers<br />

to rapidly act on it?<br />


We think the credit should go to Cleaver.<br />

It is probably no surprise that the strategic<br />

‘threat’ was recognised by Anglo American<br />

Cleaver, who has a legal background and<br />

is an outsider to the industry, took over<br />

the reins at De Beers. Many of the current<br />

executives ‘don’t come from diamonds’.<br />

They don’t have the emotional attachment<br />

to the product. They have one task: deliver<br />

return for shareholders. Other stakeholders<br />

are less important. De Beers, in the last few<br />

years, noticeably relied on the strategic<br />

advice of the Boston Consulting Group<br />

(BCG). It was BCG that designed the<br />

blockchain strategy for De Beers. Some<br />

Forevermark executives occupied positions<br />

at BCG before joining De Beers.<br />

The group is also famous for the BCG matrix<br />

that helps companies to analyse their<br />

portfolio of specific products based on the<br />

market share and growth rate. At De Beers,<br />

lab-grown diamonds for the jewellery<br />

market can quickly capture a high market<br />

share in an otherwise slow-growing and<br />

grow the product industry demand.<br />

Such products are called by the BCGmatrix<br />

‘Stars’.<br />

Natural diamonds represent an industry<br />

where they currently have a high market<br />

share, but it is a low growing or stagnating<br />

market. BCG views these as ‘cash-cows’<br />

which typically generate cash in excess of<br />

the amount of cash needed to maintain the<br />

business. According to the BCG matrix, ‘cash<br />

cows’ are to be ‘milked’ continuously with as<br />

little investment as possible. (Investments<br />

would be wasted in an industry with low<br />

growth; they are worth it if high growth<br />

and high market-share are assured, since<br />

such investment would be wasted in an<br />

industry with low growth.) Classic strategy<br />

talks about ‘milking’ the cows and feeding<br />

the ‘stars’.<br />


Following the BCG logic, Lightbox wouldn’t<br />

have been done just to remain a fringe<br />

product serving the ‘fun jewellery’ teenager<br />

market. In the BCG matrix Lightbox is a ‘star’.<br />

It can gain quickly enormous market share<br />

in the still-infant gem quality synthetic<br />

diamond market. Therefore, it had to be<br />

linked to an ‘undercutting competitors’<br />

pricing strategy that would force other<br />

producers out of the market. De Beers<br />

expects its lab-grown business to go from<br />

strength to strength. Lightbox is the least<br />

‘painful’ way to communicate the U-turn to<br />

the market. Lab-grown diamonds are ‘stars’<br />

that will lighten the De Beers firmament.<br />

With the almost hysterical efforts to<br />

convince the trade that through product<br />

differentiation the industry can sustain<br />

two ‘different’ markets, at the end of<br />

the day, and with due respect to all the<br />

sophisticated detection equipment, it<br />

doesn’t make a difference to the consumer.<br />

Consequently, it doesn’t make a difference<br />

to the retailer either. The retailer will sell<br />

the product on which it makes the highest<br />

profits. It can sell the ‘diamond dream’ just<br />

as easily with lab-grown diamonds as with<br />

natural diamonds. Have no illusions: they<br />

will and they do.<br />

Pranay Narvekar and I visited a jewellery<br />

store in the US that only sold lab-grown<br />

diamonds. On the walls of the store there<br />

were huge posters depicting pictures from<br />

satellites showing the massive disruptive<br />

environmental footprint of the Jwaneng<br />

mine in Botswana. There were also pictures<br />

of child labour involved with mining and<br />

manufacturing natural diamonds. Actually,<br />

all the materials produced by the natural<br />

diamond NGOs (Global Witness, or what<br />

was Partnership Africa-Canada) were<br />

thoroughly put to good use by this store’s<br />

lab-grown promotion efforts.<br />

However, what was most impressive<br />

was that over 95 per cent of this store’s<br />

lab-grown diamonds were sold to young<br />

Exclusive Distribution by hiPP.com.au<br />

in AU & NZ<br />

info@hiPP.com.au | 1300 132 522<br />

(NZ 0800 65 4477)

couples, as wedding and engagement symbols.<br />

The soon-to-be newlyweds were actually seeking<br />

these lab-grown diamonds and they were willing<br />

to pay top dollar, as well. They saw it has an<br />

‘American-made’ product, as an ecologically green<br />

product, American labor, American love! This is<br />

not what De Beers has been telling us – emotional<br />

wedding jewellery was supposed to be only for<br />

natural diamonds. With the Millennials, this is<br />

wishful thinking, bordering on self-delusion.<br />

Back to the Anglo American corporation: Risk<br />

management is a continuous process, conducted<br />

on top corporate levels. Strategic decisions are<br />

made on levels beyond that of De Beers. The term<br />

used is ‘risk appetite’. Whether the company can<br />

carry the risk, whether the risk mitigation efforts are<br />

working, or not. If the principal risk in any business<br />

cannot be addressed, such business would either<br />

be closed or disposed. I am not privy to internal<br />

Anglo American discussions, but if the company<br />

would control the gem-quality synthetic business,<br />

it surely could mitigate the damage to the mining<br />

business, but only up to a point.<br />


Narvekar and I are quite tuned-in to the sentiments<br />

of mining community. What we discovered in<br />

recent years at the world’s largest mining and<br />

exploration show in Canada (PDAC) was that<br />

money for diamond exploration is drying up.<br />

Why spend tens or hundreds of millions of dollars<br />

searching for new deposits, while – after finding<br />

a deposit – more millions would be needed on<br />

resources estimation, getting bankable feasibility<br />

studies, getting environmental approvals for<br />

developing a mine, permitting, licensing, if you don’t<br />

know what the price and demand for the product<br />

will be 10 years or more down the road?<br />

It’s a vicious circle. When existing deposits are<br />

depleted, when mines close, when no new mines<br />

are put into production, the further growth of the<br />

industry will solely come from lab-grown diamonds.<br />

Kilalea observed that following the Lightbox<br />

announcement, existing mines may well increase<br />

their cut-off sizes, they will not bother to mine<br />

rough in sizes of less than a few millimetres, as<br />

there won’t be demand for these smalls. That part<br />

of the market will be taken over by synthetics - if it<br />

hasn’t been already.<br />

That by itself would trigger a reduced volume<br />

production of natural diamonds. This would<br />

greatly impact Russia. In a private communication,<br />

we learned that Alrosa, at the highest levels, was<br />

furious with the De Beers Lightbox announcement.<br />

Alrosa consciously decided to show constraint in<br />

its public utterances, so as not to upset the market<br />

too much, but it is fuming. It probably realises what<br />

is happening here. It may herald the beginning of<br />

the end to natural diamond mining. If mining cost<br />

exceeds achievable market price, mines are closed. It’s<br />

that simple.<br />


Alrosa is quite different from De Beers. Alrosa is a<br />

pure diamond mining company, with almost no<br />

midstream or downstream exposure. It owns its own<br />

mines (with exception of an Angola joint venture).<br />

De Beers ceased to be a true diamond miner a long<br />

time ago and is more of a trader. In Botswana, it owns<br />

50 per cent of the Debswana mines, and it earns<br />

a margin as a trader of most of the output. It’s the<br />

same story in Namibia and South Africa, where it has<br />

few remaining mines; these are also joint ventures.<br />

It owns mines in Canada – and I am sure there are<br />

many executives at De Beers who wished they had<br />

never touched that continent. Billions of dollars was<br />

wasted there.<br />

In contrast, De Beers has become a fully vertically<br />

structured diamond trader – except for polishing,<br />

because there is no money to be made in the<br />

midstream sector. (It knows that better than anyone<br />

else – after all, they are sector’s main rough supplier.)<br />

Even for Lightbox jewellery, it has already announced<br />

plans to outsource the polishing in India – as if to<br />

support my views that lab-grown diamonds are truly<br />

good news for this manufacturing country. De Beers<br />

is involved in polished recycling, polished grading,<br />

franchising its Forever brand, and operating its own<br />

jewellery stores. In none of these areas does it hold a<br />

competitive advantage or is it particularly successful.<br />

But, looking at their activities, they can hardly still be<br />

viewed as a true mining company.<br />

For now, De Beers is playing down the Lightbox<br />

impact. It says it will only start producing in Oregon,<br />

US by 2020 and will produce 500,000 carats of<br />

rough (generating 200,000 carats of polished). There<br />

are currently some 15 lab-grown gem diamond<br />

producers in the world and their output is limited.<br />

(We are not talking about the billions of carats of<br />

mainly Chinese made industrial synthetics, which is<br />

increasingly having an overspill into the gem market.)<br />

Only Singapore’s IIA Technologies is producing<br />

significant volumes, which we currently estimate<br />

at around 400,000 carats annually – and increasing.<br />

The present sales of Lightbox lab-grown diamonds<br />

will come from De Beers’ UK production and from<br />

its stockpile. Nobody knows how much there is out<br />

there. As it will start selling shortly, it must have the<br />

critical mass to sustain an effective launch.<br />

To sooth the industry’s anxieties, De Beers says that<br />

“this Lightbox is just a US$200 million business;<br />

our natural business is US$6 billion.” First of all, that<br />

statement isn’t accurate – it views joint ventures’<br />

output as part of their own. On the sales to the<br />

sightholders, they are allowed a certain margin. It’s<br />

not the turnover that is relevant – but rather the<br />

margins realised. That is as true for De Beers as it is<br />

for Indian traders. De Beers will earn 100 per cent of<br />

the Lightbox profits – at margins it can, eventually,<br />

fully control. Moreover, if it can produce US$200<br />

million, it can also produce US$2 billion or more.<br />


One of the more predictable spillover effects of<br />

the trade war announced by De Beers against the<br />

other lab-grown producers is for the endangered<br />

companies to resort to – or condone their clients<br />

to – selling undisclosed synthetics. The fact that De<br />

Beers has ‘legitimised’ lab-grown diamonds in a big<br />

way may makes it easier to ‘forget’ the origins of the<br />

stone. It doesn’t really matter. Or does it?<br />

What it does illustrate is that if and when De Beers<br />

becomes the dominant producer and the pricesetter<br />

of the lab-grown market, it will undoubtedly<br />

capture the monopoly of profits such production<br />

allows. Bankrupting the smaller players may not<br />

be as easy as one might think. The Lightbox<br />

promotions of the lab-grown product will, in fact, be<br />

beneficial for all lab-grown producers.<br />

What seems certain is that for quite a while,<br />

consumers and traders will be confused. The<br />

Lightbox entry offers challenges and opportunities –<br />

and was unavoidable in any event. In the short run,<br />

De Beers will be seen by its own clients as unreliable,<br />

disloyal and untruthful suppliers, however few<br />

clients will say so aloud.<br />


While most of my observations for this article were<br />

formulated in July (shortly after De Beer’s May<br />

announcement) now, six months later, we review<br />

some of the subsequent industry.<br />

For example, one well-established labgrown<br />

supplier confided that “after De Beers<br />

announcement in late May, days before the JCK<br />

show, this caused serious disruption among our<br />

customers, to wit: ‘unless you drop your prices to<br />

$800/carat, cancel my orders’. The following week<br />

I pre-ordered a 1-carat pendant from Lightbox.<br />

Nothing. After their belated roll out in mid-<br />

September, I again ordered a 1-carat white<br />

44 <strong>Jeweller</strong> <strong>December</strong> <strong>2018</strong>

stone in a pendant... Lightbox informed me<br />

“sold out”. In October I tried again to order<br />

a 1-carat stone pendant, again ‘sold out’. I<br />

wrote to them under a fake name asking<br />

why I could not get my order filled, “new<br />

stock coming in every day”...was the reply.<br />

I tried to reorder...’sold out’, was the<br />

Lightbox reaction….”<br />

One must pay De Beers their dues! This<br />

is simply genius; De Beers seems to<br />

have its cake and is eating it too. By their<br />

very announcement, it has succeeded<br />

in disrupting the market of the existing<br />

lab-grown diamond suppliers forcing their<br />

prices down – and then Lightbox seems to<br />

be ‘slow’ on delivering its own product –<br />

while protecting their natural business at the<br />

same time. Maybe it is planning a campaign<br />

saying Lightbox diamonds are rare? Just as<br />

natural diamonds?<br />


In any event, many diamantaires (and De<br />

Beers’ clients and partners) suffer from<br />

selective amnesia in anything involving<br />

De Beers, and disloyal acts will be quickly<br />

forgotten. They will swallow their pride and<br />

set aside their anger and happily apply for<br />

even more natural rough – maybe in the<br />

hope to get a Lightbox franchise as well. “De<br />

Beers still does continue to try and ‘appear’<br />

like a custodian, even when it is not. [It<br />

prefers to be seen as the industry’s ‘leader’.] It<br />

is like an overprotective mother who wants<br />

the child to be a ‘mama’s boy’ while also<br />

complaining about the son not moving out,”<br />

concludes an astute industry observer.<br />

Kilalea stresses that De Beers had no choice<br />

– it had to do this to protect the natural<br />

diamond business: “De Beers has been<br />

considering and developing this strategy for<br />

several years and the inroads of lab-grown<br />

diamonds into the market for natural stones<br />

made this move inevitable,” he notes. Here,<br />

I totally disagree. De Beers had to do this to<br />

protect its own business. It made a brilliant<br />

move, as we said already, for its own benefit.<br />

All others, including mining companies,<br />

must now consider their own responses<br />

to the challenge; it goes beyond that.<br />

Strategically, this little Lightbox ‘dynamite’<br />

explosion heralds the renewed lease on life<br />

for De Beers – it will probably still be the<br />

world’s leading diamond supplier long after<br />

all of its natural diamond deposits have been<br />

exhausted. De Beers will adapt and reinvent<br />

itself – forever. u<br />

Footnotes<br />

1 The nomenclature guidelines are built on<br />

two internationally accepted standards: the<br />

ISO 18323 Standard (“<strong>Jeweller</strong>y – Consumer<br />

confidence in the diamond industry”) and the<br />

CIBJO Diamond Blue Book.<br />

2 See: Robert M. Hazen, “The Diamond<br />

Makers: A Compelling Drama of Scientific<br />

Discovery,” Cambrdige University Press,<br />

Cambridge, UK, 1999. Page 172<br />

In his 45 years as diamond trade journalist and industry consultant, Chaim Even-<br />

Zohar has now retired. He is an Honorary Life Time Member of the diamond<br />

bourses in Israel, South Africa, Dubai and New York in recognition of his service to<br />

the industry. He has authored several books, published magazines and served as<br />

editor of the Diamond Intelligence Briefs.<br />

Pranay Narvekar is an independent consultant who focuses on demand and<br />

supply, strategic, financial, and structural problems of the diamond industry


India International <strong>Jeweller</strong>y Show<br />





his year’s India International <strong>Jeweller</strong>y Show<br />

(IIJS) reported a 14 per cent increase in<br />

traffic from 2017, welcoming over 40,000<br />

registered visitors from 80 countries.<br />

Announced by official organiser the Gem and<br />

<strong>Jeweller</strong>y Export Promotion Council (GJEPC), the<br />

attendance is an all-time visitor record for the<br />

five-day event, which took place at the Bombay<br />

Exhibition and Convention Centre from August 9<br />

to August 13.<br />

A Preview Day was held before the opening<br />

for select international buyers, leading retailers,<br />

chains and industry leaders to conduct priority<br />

business and experience the new layout of the floor<br />

where over 1,800 exhibitors presented across the<br />

62,000sqm trading space.<br />

To accommodate the size of the growing show, the<br />

GJEPC increased the total trading floor with Hall 7A,<br />

10,800sqm of additional space that accommodated<br />

800 more exhibitors and multi-storey booths. As a<br />

result of a bigger show, tighter security checks and<br />

measures increased, which created unintended<br />

bottleneck traffic when visitors transitioned<br />

between halls.<br />

In his opening address, GJEPC chairman Pramod<br />

Agrawal explained why he believes there’s<br />

been an increase in traffic: “India is the leading<br />

diamond manufacturing centre; the fourth largest<br />

jewellery supplier to the world and a renowned<br />

centre for coloured gemstones,” he said. “[The IIJS]<br />

flagship show demonstrates that India’s jewellery<br />

manufacturing has come of age and is widely<br />

acclaimed as a reliable and competitive source for<br />

retailers and consumers from across the world.”<br />

Agrawal stated that the gem and jewellery<br />

export contributes seven per cent to India’s<br />

GDP, which totals $US41 billion with over five<br />

million people currently employed in the sector.<br />

The Council predicts that exports of completed<br />

jewellery and loose stones and diamonds will grow<br />

46 <strong>Jeweller</strong> <strong>December</strong> <strong>2018</strong>

etween 15 and 20 per cent by end of <strong>2018</strong>.<br />

He also highlighted that the Council was working<br />

closely with the government to achieve its vision of<br />

adding two-million jobs in the sector and increasing<br />

exports by six to seven per cent each year to reach<br />

$US70 billion by 2022.<br />


Earlier this year the GJEPC predicted that a 10<br />

per cent decline in bank finance to the gem and<br />

jewellery sector would adversely impact industry<br />

exports, highlighting that exports in the April/June<br />

<strong>2018</strong> quarter stood at $US10.1 billion as compared<br />

to $US11.1 billion in the same period in 2017, an 8.8<br />

per cent decline.<br />

“Bank finance is the lifeline of the industry and any<br />

decrease would see a decrease in gem and jewellery<br />

exports as well,” GJEPC vice chairman Colin Shah said<br />

in a statement back in July. “Post the recent incident,<br />

banks and other financial institutions have become<br />

stringent and are insisting on much higher collateral<br />

security against bank finance.”<br />

Since the show, however, Shah has been more<br />

upbeat, describing the event as a reflection of “the<br />

definite vibrancy in the market at present”.<br />

“With the Indian economy performing well, there is<br />

a strong hope that the industry is entering a period<br />

of prosperity,” he said at the event.<br />

When asked about whether banks are less willing<br />

to finance the diamond sector since the Modi<br />

scandal, Dharmanandan Diamonds sales director<br />

Vipul Sutariya told <strong>Jeweller</strong>, “The banking problem<br />

primarily affects smaller and newer players with<br />

little financial history or time in the market. On the<br />

other hand, it improves long-term prospecting since<br />

banks will be more honed to finance businesses on<br />

profitability. So in the longer term, it is a good move.”<br />

Sutariya believes a weaker rupee to the dollar has<br />

helped stimulate export adding, “If you see the<br />

export figures, the market growth is not bad. We<br />

export 90 percent of our production – less than ten<br />

per cent is consumed locally. In these terms, it’d<br />

favour us if the rupee goes down since local labour<br />

is paid in rupees. A weaker rupee could be seen as<br />

an opportunity for both the local and global market.”<br />

While the local industry might still be recovering, its<br />

consumers are on the rise, with the reported growth<br />

of India’s middle-class. The Diamond Producers<br />

Association (DPA), an international organisation<br />

aiming to maintain and enhance consumer demand<br />

and confidence in natural diamonds, has recognised<br />

this as an opportunity and launched a $US70 million<br />

global marketing campaign targeting India, China<br />

and the US as its main strategic markets.<br />

Working with the GJEPC to launch the DPA’s most<br />

recent diamond campaign in India is DPA CEO Jean-<br />

Marc Lieberherr.<br />

“Our role is to make everyone’s investment [into<br />

these campaigns] work a lot harder,” he said in a<br />

press conference at the event. “It’s not the amount<br />

[of money] in itself but it’s also our ability to amplify<br />

everything that we’re doing and to speak with one<br />

voice with retailers.”<br />

According to the DPA, fewer than ten per cent of<br />

women in India own a diamond compared to 20 per<br />

cent of Chinese and 70 per cent in the US. Owing to<br />

a recovering economy and a growing Indian middle<br />

class , the DPA remains confident it can increase the<br />

local diamond market over the next decade. Given<br />

India’s history as the first place of diamond discovery<br />

and central point of diamond manufacturing,<br />

Lieberherr believes that the time for this<br />

opportunity is right.<br />

“Polished prices are growing,” he added. “If we look at<br />

India specifically, the best possible proxy is the share<br />

of India as part of the total market, which is seven<br />

per cent today. We know that emerging markets are<br />

usually going to become the price leaders.”<br />


With the global trade still suspended in uncertainty<br />

and India’s domestic diamond trade stabilising, the<br />

GJEPC has focused on cultivating local industry and<br />

talent. At the IIJS, the Council designated exhibition<br />

space for start-ups and local female entrepreneurs,<br />

including an area to celebrating the history and<br />

heritage of jewellery artistry in India.<br />

Colin Shah said, “GJEPC is poised to give and sustain<br />

a positive momentum that the gem and jewellery<br />

sector is in need of at this point of time. We are<br />

launching an international campaign, featuring<br />

India’s skills and capabilities in manufacturing world<br />

class jewellery.”<br />

He unveiled the GJEPC’s new promotional campaign<br />

featuring images of people in the jewellery<br />

workforce and key facts about the local trade such<br />

as its contribution to the GDP, employment rate<br />

and welfare schemes. This initiative was designed to<br />

communicate lesser known but important aspects<br />

of the industry.<br />

Recently the GJEPC surveyed its local industry<br />

to better understand the workforce across key<br />

jewellery and gemstone manufacturing districts<br />

across India. The aim was to develop action<br />

plans to stimulate the industry. The Council has<br />

now taken steps to enhance the educational<br />

infrastructure by developing a chain of training<br />

institutions, participating in a global campaign for<br />

the promotion of natural diamonds and engaging in<br />

extending invitations for trade.<br />

Agarwal shared a larger vision to establish common<br />

facility centres and jewellery parks at all major gem<br />

and jewellery districts throughout India, which<br />

would help boost export trade and improve the<br />

living standards of workers within the industry.<br />

Rong Julius Zheng, vice president of the Shenzen<br />

Rough Diamond Exchange, signed an MoU with<br />

GJEPC announcing that it will also set up an office<br />

in Shenzen. Zheng emphasised that China, as the<br />

second largest consumer of diamond jewellery,<br />

looked to India to source a lot of products<br />

of the industry.<br />

GJEPC’s executive director Sabyasachi Ray<br />

provided some insight into how he hopes they’ll<br />

work together: “India and China have a very close<br />

relationship in the diamonds and jewellery areas. In<br />

diamonds, India and China complement each other;<br />

we are not competing with each other in the kind of<br />

product being worked in the two centres.”<br />

The GJEPC also organised the fourth <strong>Jeweller</strong>s for<br />

Hope charity dinner in association with De Beers<br />

and the Gemological Institute of America (GIA),<br />

donating a total of Rs 1 crore ($US143,000) to three<br />

not-for-profit organisations that have served social<br />

justice causes in India. Fund recipients include<br />

Nobel Prize winner Kailash Satyarthi for his work to<br />

<strong>December</strong> <strong>2018</strong> <strong>Jeweller</strong> 47


end child exploitation and trafficking in India and<br />

surrounding regions.<br />

Gaetano Cavalieri, president of World <strong>Jeweller</strong>y<br />

Foundation CIBJO, acknowledged the efforts<br />

of the GJEPC on opening day and affirmed that the<br />

organisations would continue working<br />

closely together.<br />

“[The Council’s] activities are very central to<br />

India’s unique position globally in the business of<br />

gem and jewellery,” Cavalieri said. “We cannot go<br />

forward without India and hence look forward to<br />

fostering and maintaining a deep engagement with<br />

the GJEPC.”<br />


Only a week before IIJS, the US Federal Trade Council<br />

(FTC) stated that a diamond was a diamond whether<br />

it had developed naturally in the earth’s crust or<br />

was created in a lab. Lieberherr told reporters at the<br />

show that he disagreed with the FTC guidelines.<br />

“We just asked for clarity because we saw that<br />

there was a lot of confusion and the limit between<br />

confusion and deception sometimes very thin. We<br />

got the opposite of clarity; we now have potentially<br />

a lot more confusion and that is what is concerning,”<br />

he said, adding that the ruling would “give marketers<br />

the opportunity to test the limits”.<br />

“These kind of decisions like the one from FTC just<br />

reinforce the need for us to communicate effectively.<br />

A diamond is not just a molecular composition; it is<br />

billions of years in the making. Billions of years have<br />

meaning, especially in a time where we exist in a<br />

world where all we want is instant gratification and<br />

replication of everything, be it artificial intelligence<br />

or virtual reality.”<br />

Lieberherr emphasised that the guidelines should<br />

be considered a loose framework that is meant to<br />

guide marketers with two primary objectives: to<br />

prevent consumer deception and to promote a<br />

competitive landscape.<br />

“We think that it is not correct to say that they<br />

[natural and lab-created diamonds] are identical<br />

products. The fact that they can be distinguished<br />

with the right equipment, by looking at the growth<br />

structures and the nature of the inclusions make<br />

them inherently different products,” he added.<br />

Liebherr believes there are bigger issues<br />

surrounding retail diamond sales, since luxury items<br />

are now competing with holidays and electronics.<br />

The main challenge remains how retailers can create<br />

a sensory experience around diamonds that appeals<br />

to all of a client’s senses.<br />

“The biggest challenge for jewellery is that<br />

you’ve got a product that is small and expensive,<br />

and you’ve got to put it in a case,” he explained.<br />

“Diamonds are transparent, and the same colour<br />

as the glass that’s on it. Unless you find a way to<br />

create a retail environment that really magnifies it,<br />

you’re separated by these blockades so the sensorial<br />

experience is very limited.”<br />

When asked if Dharmanandan Diamonds plans to<br />

enter the lab-created diamond market, Sutariya<br />

strongly declined but understands that there is a<br />

market in the future for lab-created diamonds in<br />

India and sees that the two will exist alongside<br />

each other for different markets: “We are more<br />

concerned about our people – there are about<br />

one-million people dependent on the current<br />

natural-diamond industry.”<br />

In a volatile market with uncontrollable obstacles<br />

in the way of global trade and a hard-to-read<br />

projection for the future of the diamond industry,<br />

the GJEPC appears to be gauging problems as<br />

opportunities and focusing on strengthening India’s<br />

local industry, using the IIJS event to leverage<br />

momentum.<br />

The next IIJS show will be held in February 2019. u<br />

Angela Han attended the fair courtesy of GJEPC as an<br />

accredited media representative.<br />

48 <strong>Jeweller</strong> <strong>December</strong> <strong>2018</strong>



Diamond Awards<br />

showcase brilliant design<br />

he Diamond Guild Australia <strong>Jeweller</strong>y Awards<br />

celebrated “exemplary workmanship and<br />

creative integrity of Australian jewellery<br />

design” at its Gala in October.<br />

Finalists from six categories had their work showcased<br />

at the event with winners selected by the esteemed<br />

judging panel comprising interior designer Greg<br />

Natale, actress April Rose Pengilly, Good Design<br />

Australia general manager Rachel Wye and jewellery<br />

designer John Calleija.<br />

Musson <strong>Jeweller</strong>s designer Olivar Musson took out<br />

the Supreme Award, which is selected from winners<br />

of each category. His ‘Aella’ earrings featured 36<br />

Forevermark Black Label ideal square cut diamonds,<br />

totalling more than 32 carats set in 18-carat white<br />

and rose gold.<br />

No stranger to the Awards, Musson said he was<br />

pleased to take home his first Supreme win: “I was<br />

first a finalist in 2005 when I was a very young chap,<br />

I missed out on the win then. I have been a finalist<br />

quite a few times before but in the 2015 awards I was<br />

very fortunate to win two categories; I won fancy<br />

colour and fancy shape with two quite avant-garde<br />

pieces,” he said.<br />

“This year I won the Red Carpet and the Supreme<br />

Award, so it was a nice big step up.”<br />

Musson has been heavily involved with Diamond<br />

Guild Australia over the years and has sat as chairman<br />

for more than six years.<br />

“What I love about the Diamond Guild Australia<br />

<strong>Jeweller</strong>y Awards is they’re geared to promotion to<br />

the end consumer. So in previous years we’ve been<br />

aligned with Harpers Bazaar and Qantas, national<br />

publications with amazing coverage. This year saw us<br />

aligned with the Australian Financial Review. So the<br />

finalists were featured in a 14 page in the AFR, which<br />

is absolutely phenomenal,” Musson said.<br />

“All of the finalists and winners will get promotion<br />

and credibility to the end consumer. And for retailers,<br />

that’s what everyone looks for. I mean it’s great to win<br />

an award and get a pat on the back from your peers,<br />

but to be able to get cut through to a consumer<br />

marketplace and hopefully get clients to come in the<br />

door is why we always enter.”<br />

The Awards, established in 2005, were hosted<br />

in Melbourne for the first time with television<br />

host Jessica Rowe the master of ceremonies for<br />

the evening.<br />


Ben Preston-Black of Creations <strong>Jeweller</strong>s took home<br />

the Solitaire Award with his ‘Brilliant’ ring, a handmade<br />

platinum diamond set ring inspired by the shape of<br />

the round cut brilliant diamond.<br />

Jeff Einstein from Jeff Einstein <strong>Jeweller</strong>y and Athena<br />

X Levendi from Levendi were also finalists for the<br />

Solitaire Prize.<br />

Black also won the Fancy Colour Award for “Fanciful”<br />

with Wisan Sarji. The sculptural ring “takes the<br />

eye on a visual journey across the swirls of metal<br />

interweaved with alluring colourful diamonds”<br />

and featured brilliant cut natural punk, white and<br />

champagne diamonds.<br />

Jake Coughlan from Refraction Manufacturing<br />

<strong>Jeweller</strong>s and Jewels of the Kimberley’s Jodi Penfold<br />

were recognised for their respective Fancy entries and<br />

were also named finalists in the category.<br />

MJS <strong>Jeweller</strong>y’s Matthew Staff took out The Diamonds<br />

for Everyday category with his ‘Flame’ drop earrings;<br />

pair of black rhodium and rose gold earrings with a<br />

single diamond in each. Miraj <strong>Jeweller</strong>y’s Matthew<br />

Townsley and Creation’s Preston-Black and Sarji were<br />

recognised for their designs and were named finalists<br />

for the section.<br />

Brett Wood of Brett’s <strong>Jeweller</strong>s won the gong for the<br />

Diamonds For Men award with ‘Grill’ ring, a yellow<br />

gold and platinum grill design featuring a central<br />

baguette cut diamond creating a stylish balance of<br />

masculinity and extravagance.” J Farren-Price designer<br />

Niki Jackson was runner up for the award with her<br />

“Night and Day” necklace.<br />

<strong>December</strong> <strong>2018</strong> <strong>Jeweller</strong> 49


Wood’s entry was his first into the Awards and the<br />

Geelong jeweller said he was thrilled with his “100 per<br />

cent hit rate”.<br />

“The inspiration came from the baguette cut<br />

diamond. I’d bought it a while ago and it appealed to<br />

me so much I had to have it,” he said.<br />

“To win a category in this award thrills me to core.<br />

Being alongside some very inspirational jewellers<br />

is such an honour and in turn I hope I will be an<br />

inspiration to someone in return one day.”<br />

The Emerging Talent prize recognised the work of<br />

up-and-coming young designers and showcased the<br />

work of MDT Design’s Leah Straughair and Stephen<br />

Dibb <strong>Jeweller</strong>y’s Brock Hodgson. It was Jewels of the<br />

Kimberley’s Hannah Alexander who won the award<br />

with ‘Vogue’, a ring featuring coloured diamonds<br />

and pearls, encasing several small round cut brilliant<br />

diamonds “in a refined cocktail ring design.”<br />

Alexander said the win was her first entry into the<br />

awards and “will definitely be doing so again in the<br />

future, although this year will be pretty hard to top.”<br />

“This win means everything to me, it’s a reward and<br />



WINNER<br />



reassurance that all of the hard work, training and<br />

dedication over the past years has put me at the<br />

top of my field. It wasn’t just a win for me but also<br />

for my family, friends and most importantly my<br />

teacher, Jodi Penfold, who have all supported me<br />

throughout my journey in the jewellery industry,”<br />

Alexander said.<br />

“It has been such a confidence booster and is<br />

affirmation that the sacrifices I have made to pursue<br />

my career path in the industry has all been worth it. I<br />

am still on cloud nine and can’t believe I won.”<br />

The aforementioned ‘Aella’ earrings was awarded the<br />

Red Carpet prize which also celebrated the works<br />

of Rohan Milne from Rohan <strong>Jeweller</strong>y and Levendi’s<br />

Mike Levendi and Burt Muller.<br />

Musson’s prize-winning earrings were sold prior<br />

to the event and were displayed in Sydney for<br />

the weeks following. The designer said he was<br />

“heavily influenced by architecture and sculpture” in<br />

designing the shield-like earrings.<br />

“The placement of the diamonds and the studs<br />

that fix them in place was inspired by a commercial<br />

building with massive oversized panels of glass fixed<br />

in their corners with heavy fixtures,” Musson said of<br />

the rose gold stud setting.<br />

“The diamonds are very unique; they’re Forevermark<br />

Black Label ideal squares. This is a diamond brand<br />

and cutting style that we’ve been associated with<br />

for half a dozen years or so. They’re absolutely<br />

extraordinary and when I first saw this octagonal<br />

shaped diamond, I had heard about it but I hadn’t<br />

seen one, the brilliance of them is just incredible. To<br />

have Forevermark and the Black Label team to be<br />

able to put 32 carats for me is something I’m<br />

very thankful for.”<br />

Diamonds bring<br />

At the conclusion of the event, Diamond Guild Australia executive officer Melissa James<br />

announced the launch of a charitable project in support of mental health awareness.<br />

The Hope Will Catch Our Tears Initiative<br />

will produce 100 specially created pendant<br />

necklaces, which will be sold by Guild<br />

members to raise funds for Beyond Blue<br />

Australia and advocate for mental health<br />

resources and support.<br />

James unveiled the ‘Hope Will Catch the Tears’<br />

pendant designed by Niki Jackson from J Farren-<br />

Price; $2,000 from every one sold will go directly<br />

to Beyond Blue.<br />

“The pendant features a single pear-shaped<br />

diamond ‘tear drop’ below which two curved<br />

gold sections represent a pair of hands.<br />

This reflects the idea of being supported<br />

through depression and anxiety, the idea of<br />

acknowledging the difficulty for those who<br />

suffer from mental health challenges but also the<br />

importance of those around them that are their<br />

support network,” James announced at the Gala.<br />

“We will be offering a limited edition of 100 of<br />

these pendants through our Guild members<br />

stores over the next 12 months and hope to<br />

generate a $200,000 donation Beyond Blue to<br />

support their much needed work, but also to<br />

honour the many individuals and families<br />

that have suffered the effects of depression<br />

and suicide.”<br />

James Thredgold of James Thredgold <strong>Jeweller</strong><br />

inspired the campaign through his mental health<br />

advocacy efforts. Thredgold lost his wife Holly to<br />

depression in 2016 at the age of 42 and said she<br />

was “amazing and wanted to be an advocate for<br />

mental health.”<br />

“While I was on holidays my amazing kids,<br />

Melissa and the team had come up with the idea<br />

which almost brought me to tears,” he said.<br />

Thredgold has been a long-time supporter of<br />

mental health resources and is a Breakthrough<br />

Mental Health<br />

Research<br />

Foundation<br />

ambassador where<br />

he gives presentations<br />

about destigmatising the<br />

conversation surrounding mental<br />

health and provides advice for seeking support<br />

based in his 15 years with Holly.<br />

“I think if we see people talking about it in all<br />

different walks of life and they see that just like<br />

cancer or any other disease, it doesn’t choose<br />

people according to race colour or wealth,<br />

then we can raise funds to find triggers,”<br />

Thredgold said.<br />

“One day I hope that we can at least help reduce<br />

the number of people who suffer form it. If we<br />

can raise awareness for mental health I think<br />

people will listen.” u<br />

50 <strong>Jeweller</strong> <strong>December</strong> <strong>2018</strong>

Where passion meets creativity<br />

Immerse yourself in a world of spectacular, original jewellery at the 2019 International <strong>Jeweller</strong>y & Watch Fair.<br />

Be inspired by excellence in creativity of the latest designs and the passion in workmanship. See the latest global<br />

trends, seek new business opportunities and gain knowledge from industry insights. Talk with the experts and<br />

select from thousands of stunning pieces, just right for your business. Save the date.<br />



August 24 > 26, 2019<br />

ICC Sydney > Exhibition Centre > Darling Harbour<br />

Organised by<br />





www.PinkKimberley.com.au<br />

E pink@samsgroup.com.au W samsgroup.com.au P 02 9290 2199

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!