29.12.2018 Views

January 2019

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

“Skipping these<br />

important control<br />

checks is equally likely<br />

when there is a<br />

collective focus to<br />

achieve maximum<br />

productivity in<br />

anticipation of a<br />

looming valuation<br />

date”<br />

Above: A primed roof and air and vapour control layer installation.<br />

Whilst it may seem that the most organised<br />

approach is to schedule all materials and labour<br />

resources before the bond tests have been<br />

completed, there is a risk that works may proceed<br />

without the proper checks being undertaken. We<br />

have seen this happen when labour resources<br />

have targets to meet, or presume that pre-checks<br />

have already been completed by others. However,<br />

skipping these important control checks is equally<br />

likely when there is a collective focus to achieve<br />

maximum productivity in anticipation of a looming<br />

valuation date.<br />

If for any reason a problem with the attachment<br />

to a structural deck is discovered during the<br />

installation, inevitably there is a strong pressure<br />

to attempt to continue with the same materials<br />

and / or primers already on site, which may not<br />

be suitable. It could be reasonably argued that<br />

whilst changing materials at this stage may<br />

introduce delays, those delays are likely to be a<br />

lot shorter (and less costly), than having to<br />

resolve the problem post-handover.<br />

So what are the risk conditions? Is it only in the<br />

winter time that bond tests are required before<br />

commencing? No. This should be standard<br />

practise so that everyone involved can be<br />

assured that the appropriate application method<br />

has been determined. For those using structural<br />

hot melt products, this practise of bond tests<br />

before commencement of the work appears<br />

engrained in our culture. It is commonplace to<br />

arrive at most sites and see test patches of<br />

structural hot melt systems accompanied with<br />

detailed records of the tests completed. But, why<br />

is this practise not as engrained with other<br />

technologies? It should be standard practise<br />

across the board.<br />

By progressing your installation without these<br />

bond tests it is often viewed by main contractors<br />

that you are accepting the condition of the deck.<br />

And they may have a point.<br />

Beyond simply waiting for the deck to fully cure<br />

(which is another topic in itself), here are few<br />

other conditions to consider:<br />

Sub 5°C Conditions: During these lowtemperature<br />

conditions, there is a risk that surface<br />

condensation may exist on the structural deck. This<br />

is one of the reasons why many products advise<br />

that they should only be applied in greater than 5°C<br />

conditions, despite the products themselves<br />

functioning in sub-5°C temperatures.<br />

Screeds: Sand-cement screeds are often used for<br />

levelling purposes or providing a suitable roof fall.<br />

The problem is that these products are like<br />

sponges and absorb water every time it rains.<br />

Interestingly, whilst it may seem more expensive<br />

on paper to consider tapered insulation, there may<br />

be a saving on the overall project package if you’re<br />

able to get your waterproofing completed quicker,<br />

allowing internal works to proceed and scaffolding<br />

and other attendances to be struck earlier.<br />

Zero Falls (less than 1:80): A minimum fall on<br />

your roof will ensure that it drains and BS 6229<br />

advises that to achieve a minimum 1:80 finished<br />

“It is important to<br />

ensure that the deck is<br />

fully dried so that you<br />

are bonding to the<br />

concrete deck itself,<br />

not a layer of water”<br />

fall, you should design at either 1:60 or 1:40 to<br />

allow for tolerances during the construction<br />

(depending on how much information is available).<br />

However, how often do we see zero-falls designs<br />

which are designed at zero falls, rather than say<br />

1:80 to achieve a close to zero fall (after<br />

tolerances)? In these conditions both the drying<br />

time of the structural deck, and keeping the deck<br />

dry after rainfall, are likely to be troublesome.<br />

However, in the condition of a zero-fall design it is<br />

likely that this problem may be further<br />

exaggerated, due to the formation of back-falls.<br />

In all of these conditions, it is important to ensure<br />

that the deck is fully dried so that you are bonding<br />

to the concrete deck itself, not a layer of water,<br />

which is not known for its adhesive properties.<br />

If utilising a traditional gas-torch to dry your roof<br />

deck, check the NFRC Safe2Torch guidance<br />

document: www.nfrc.co.uk/Safe2Torch.<br />

Contact Danosa<br />

0845 074 0553<br />

www.danosa.co.uk<br />

@DANOSAUK<br />

JANUARY <strong>2019</strong> TC 41

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!