brozura-meranie-EN
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
IMPACT MEASUREM<strong>EN</strong>T<br />
of Generation 3.0 Awarded Projects
G<strong>EN</strong>ERATION 3.0 CYCLE<br />
System changes<br />
We communicate with<br />
stakeholders to integrate<br />
the verified educational<br />
approaches into<br />
the education system.<br />
Applying for<br />
Generation 3.0<br />
Evaluation<br />
committee<br />
The Lab<br />
The aim of the two-day<br />
bootcamp is to select the best<br />
projects led by motivated teams<br />
prepared to disseminate their<br />
approaches to Slovak schools.<br />
Awards<br />
Measurement<br />
We work with experts to<br />
monitor the effectiveness<br />
and dissemination<br />
of awarded projects.<br />
The best projects receive<br />
a financial grant of € 15,000<br />
and professional support<br />
in monitoring their impact.<br />
Personality Prepared for Changes<br />
Natural Sciences and Technology Knowledge<br />
EDUmap<br />
Educational<br />
approaches<br />
online map.<br />
Career and Entrepreneurial Skills<br />
Social and Civic Competences<br />
Innovations in the System of Education<br />
EDUpoints<br />
(Bratislava, Košice, Zvolen)<br />
EDUpoint is a place<br />
to educate teachers, school<br />
principals, and parents<br />
as well as to disseminate<br />
educational approaches.<br />
MentorExpres<br />
In a three-month accelerator<br />
programme, business experts advise<br />
the best organisations in the Lab<br />
on how to develop and disseminate<br />
their approaches most effectively.<br />
Give our children and young people<br />
the chance to develop their full potential<br />
and acquire the knowledge, values<br />
and skills necessary for the 21 st century.<br />
3
RESEARCH DESIGN<br />
In the first year of the Generation 3.0 programme, we monitored<br />
the effectiveness of awarded educational approaches. For each<br />
of them, we had designed a research project with its objectives,<br />
questions, and hypotheses which we were verifying during<br />
the entire school year. The results are in the report you hold in your<br />
hands. In it, we summarise the course of the research and show<br />
to what extent the projects develop young people’s skills,<br />
knowledge, and attitudes necessary for life in the 21 st century.<br />
In this second year, we are modifying the ways of monitoring<br />
the impact of awarded projects.<br />
In order to meet our goal – to reach 15,000 teachers and learning<br />
guides, it is not necessary for each project to carry out<br />
time-consuming and costly research. After all, even the most<br />
detailed analysis that confirms the impact of the educational<br />
approach does not automatically ensure its integration into<br />
the system. For that, the projects would have to be accepted<br />
by all stakeholders and as widely as possible.<br />
Through ongoing monitoring, we will be able to better advise<br />
the organisations on how to develop their projects so that they can<br />
be disseminated to schools as efficiently as possible. The evaluation<br />
and result monitoring must be flexible and show that the approach<br />
brings both changes in the education system and the potential<br />
for dissemination.<br />
We have modified the result evaluation strategy to gain answers<br />
to three basic questions:<br />
4
1. Is the educational approach effective?<br />
In the first step, researchers will use professional literature<br />
to find out whether such an educational approach already exists<br />
and works somewhere in the world. They will assess whether<br />
these conclusions suffice for the assessment of the effectiveness<br />
of the educational approach under the Slovak conditions.<br />
Consequently, they will prepare a research design and calculate<br />
its approximate costs. They will also prepare a short study<br />
with an estimate of the benefits and costs compared to similar<br />
projects implemented in Slovakia.<br />
2. Is the educational approach disseminatable?<br />
The researchers will assess whether the approach is disseminatable<br />
under the conditions of the Slovak education system<br />
and whether the organisation has sufficient capacities to do so.<br />
3. What are the lessons learnt for further dissemination,<br />
evaluation and research activities?<br />
We will use the feedback from people involved in the project<br />
implementation and dissemination of similar educational<br />
approaches.<br />
5
C. S. LEWIS BILINGUAL HIGH SCHOOL<br />
Personality Development Programme and the Transition of the C. S. Lewis Grammar<br />
High School to an Inclusive Community<br />
Education research expert: Martin Kuruc<br />
The goal of the school is to produce graduates with a solid character and high-quality<br />
education. That is why character education is a part of the school curriculum<br />
as a whole. It is applied across all subjects and at all levels – including all, the pupils,<br />
teachers, and the leadership. In the course of five years, the students are asked<br />
in different ways about their motivation (how do I define success?), identity (who am<br />
I?), mission (why was I born?), faith (what are my beliefs?), and the use of acquired skills<br />
and attitudes in the future (what will I do with all these in the next 50 years?). Together<br />
with their mentors – teachers, the students look for answers to these questions.<br />
What We Measured<br />
Hypothesis 1 (hereafter H): We assume that teachers show a significantly higher<br />
proportion of positive than negative attitudes towards the inclusion<br />
of disadvantaged pupils.<br />
H2: We assume that in students of higher grades there is a significantly higher<br />
proportion of positive attitudes towards inclusion of disadvantaged students<br />
than in first-year students.<br />
H3: We assume that the first-year students will show a smaller share of positive<br />
attitudes towards inclusion of disadvantaged students at the beginning<br />
of the school year than at the end of the school year.<br />
Research question (focus groups): What are the elements of inclusion in social<br />
relationships in the school?<br />
Impact Measurement<br />
There were 253 pupils and 19 out of 50 teachers participated in the research. Data<br />
were obtained through a quantitative method using questionnaires and a qualitative<br />
method through focus groups. In the case of H3 and focus groups, data were collected<br />
at the beginning and at the end of the school year.<br />
6
Research Results<br />
H1: Following from the analysis of collected data, we can state that the H1 has<br />
been confirmed. When there are 14 teachers in a school, all of whose attitudes<br />
are pro-inclusive, and 5 whose attitudes are at least partially pro-inclusive,<br />
it provides a good prerequisite for a gradual creation of pro-inclusive<br />
atmosphere throughout the school.<br />
H2: Following from the analysis of the collected data we can say that<br />
H2 has not been confirmed. In the higher grades, there was not a significantly<br />
higher proportion of positive attitudes towards inclusion of disadvantaged<br />
students than in first-year students. A possible explanation may be that pupils<br />
concentrate on mastering their quite demanding studies and have no internal<br />
capacity to address these issues. It can also be related to the issue<br />
of development. During this period, the students still need to cope with their own<br />
changes. The adolescent children tend to close up so that they can find stability<br />
within themselves and then open up to the world.<br />
Still, based on the overall data, we can consider pupils’ attitudes<br />
to be significantly pro-inclusive. 95% of students had a positive mindset<br />
in all three components of attitudes – affective, behavioral, and cognitive.<br />
H3: Following from the analysis of the collected data, we can claim that<br />
H3 has not been confirmed, which means that the first-year students did not<br />
show a smaller share of positive attitudes towards inclusion of disadvantaged<br />
students at the beginning of the school year than at the end of the school year.<br />
(To see the explanation of this result, please see H2.)<br />
Focus groups: Elements of inclusion are manifested by the development<br />
of informal relationships between students and teachers based on partnership<br />
and helpfulness, which have been differentiated by mutual sympathy during<br />
the school year. The informal atmosphere of the school, the opportunity to join<br />
various activities and engage publically contribute to inclusion. However, the<br />
amount of activities also brings the burden (sometimes, it seems to be excessive).<br />
7
EDUMA<br />
Online Live Library<br />
Education research expert: Ivan Lukšík<br />
The online live library is a video portal that uses storytelling to show children<br />
and young people what it feels like to live with certain disadvantages and obstacles.<br />
Storytelling is the best way of introducing any topic to children. There are dozens<br />
of personal testimonies of “living books” at the onlinezivakniznica.sk website, which<br />
can be used in teaching multiple subjects. Thanks to the encounters with the stories,<br />
children can better empathise with other people and their situations, look<br />
at things from another point of view, and learn to be empathetic. The online live library<br />
strengthens students’ critical thinking and helps prevent prejudices against diversity.<br />
What We Measured<br />
Research Question 1: How have teachers who participated in EDUMA education<br />
“Through Storytelling to Inclusion” changed their thinking and attitudes towards<br />
inclusion? Has there been a shift towards critical thinking?<br />
Research Question 2: How have the pupils with whom these teachers<br />
subsequently worked using the “Through Storytelling to Inclusion” programme<br />
changed their thinking? Has there been a shift towards critical thinking?<br />
Impact Measurement<br />
The research sample consisted of 12 teachers, 26 pupils in the experimental group<br />
and 29 pupils in the control group. We used a questionnaire method. Teachers were<br />
supposed to comment on the claims about Roma children, migrants, and so on before<br />
and after the educational programme “Through Storytelling to Inclusion”. Then, they<br />
used the programme as part of their teaching. Their pupils were tested before and after<br />
the programme.<br />
8
Research Results<br />
Research Question 1: The results of the evaluation show that the teachers<br />
who participated in the programme are able to work with their prejudices.<br />
They take a critical look at their own prejudices, for doing which pro-inclusion<br />
attitudes and critical thinking are essential. Teachers use inclusive elements<br />
in the learning process and create conditions for the critical thinking of pupils.<br />
Research Question 2: The results show that after completing the programme,<br />
pupils take a critical look at their own ethnic stereotypes and start thinking<br />
in a broader context. In relation to migrants, there has been a shift from rejection<br />
and fear of diversity towards help in need, empathy, and consideration<br />
of political contexts.<br />
CIVIC ASSOCIATION OWL<br />
ChemPlay - Advancement<br />
Education research expert: Romana Kanovská<br />
ChemPlay is a board game that introduces players to inorganic chemistry, its logic<br />
and laws, and helps develop analytical thinking, critical thinking, and teamwork.<br />
Its inventors are Ivana Kravárova and Adrián Hegedűš. During their studies<br />
at a grammar school, they noticed that their classmates were not used to think<br />
creatively. The students also did not know how to use theoretical knowledge<br />
in practice even though chemistry provides loads of scope for creativity. The game<br />
has become popular at schools and is available for sale to anyone who wants to learn<br />
about the beauty of chemistry in a fun and effective way. Civic Association OWL is now<br />
creating a mobile app as an advancement of the board game.<br />
What We Measured<br />
H1: We assume that pupils taught using the ChemPlay board game will show<br />
a higher level of knowledge than the pupils taught frontally.<br />
H2: We assume that students taught using the ChemPlay board game will show<br />
a higher degree of internal motivation than the pupils taught frontally.<br />
H3: We assume that pupils taught using the ChemPlay board game will show more<br />
positive attitudes towards their teacher than pupils taught frontally.<br />
9
Impact Measurement<br />
There were 10 selected Slovak grammar schools (an experimental group of 5 schools<br />
+ a control group of 5 schools) were involved in the research. The experimental group<br />
consisted of 67 pupils, the control group had 65 pupils.<br />
Data collection took place through a quantitative method in the form of questionnaires<br />
at the beginning and at the end of the school year.<br />
Research Results<br />
H1: In the experimental group (schools using ChemPlay), the difference<br />
in the level of knowledge between the entry and end results of the first year<br />
pupils was moderately better (entry level of knowledge: 69.1%, end level: 79.5%).<br />
In the control group (schools without ChemPlay), the difference in the level<br />
of knowledge between entry and exit results of the first year pupils was<br />
slightly better (entry level of knowledge: 69.4%, exit level: 76.9%)<br />
It follows that the schools which used ChemPlay during the school year show<br />
somewhat better results than the schools that did not use this board game.<br />
Given that the board game has only been used rarely in schools, we can assume<br />
that regular playing would lead to even more significant results.<br />
H2 + H3: In pupils’ attitudes towards their teachers and their motivation to learn<br />
chemistry, we did not record any significant differences between the control<br />
and experimental group. This is probably due to the fact that the two selected<br />
groups were very balanced and made up of very clever and motivated pupils.<br />
Romana Kanovská<br />
Director of the<br />
National Institute<br />
for Certified Educational<br />
Measurements<br />
Martin Kuruc<br />
Researcher at the<br />
Faculty of Education,<br />
the Comenius University<br />
Ivan Lukšík<br />
Social and pedagogical<br />
psychologist and lecturer<br />
at the Faculty of Education,<br />
the University of Trnava<br />
10
WE WOULD LIKE TO THANK<br />
The Generation 3.0 programme is funded from individual, corporate, and institutional<br />
donors. Without listing their names upon their request, we would like to say a sincere<br />
thank you to all individual philanthropists. By dedicating their time, know-how,<br />
and finances, they contribute to the long-term sustainability and progress of the<br />
programme.<br />
Significant partners<br />
Main partners Partners With support<br />
11
generacia30.sk<br />
nadaciapontis.sk