DelegatePack_DroughtConference_20-21March2019
Transform your PDFs into Flipbooks and boost your revenue!
Leverage SEO-optimized Flipbooks, powerful backlinks, and multimedia content to professionally showcase your products and significantly increase your reach.
Speakers<br />
Day 2: Plenary – The Pichette Auditorium<br />
Kerstin Stahl University of Freiburg<br />
Customising drought indices to improve drought impact monitoring and prediction<br />
Drought risk management, including monitoring and early warning, still relies primarily on drought indicators selected<br />
or combined from hydro-meteorological variables, such as precipitation, and in fewer cases on modelled soil moisture,<br />
observed or modelled streamflow, or remotely sensed vegetation health. To guide the selection and give more<br />
meaning for drought management decisions, a number of studies have investigated empirically the linkage between<br />
these indices and records of drought impact occurrence. These studies have been inspired by the damage function<br />
approach employed in risk assessments of other natural hazards. Based on studies in Europe and the USA this<br />
contribution illustrates challenges and potentials of validating the suitability of indices with impact information,<br />
customizing thresholds for warnings and finding impact-indicator link functions that may be suitable for a prediction of<br />
the probability of impact occurrence. Impact information was derived from large archives of text-based, coded impact<br />
reports, such as the European Drought Impact report Inventory and the US Drought Impact Reporter and links and<br />
link functions were analysed at various spatial scales for various subsets of impact types and drought events. The<br />
identified challenges include the rapid decrease of data when subsetting for specific impact sectors or smaller spatial<br />
areas, the choice of the link model, and a variety of potential dynamic changes to the underlying conditions between<br />
and even during drought events. Based on the assessment, recommendations for a successful and applicable link model<br />
include in particular a careful pre-processing of index and impact data and more systematic impact data collection in<br />
the future.<br />
Mike Morecroft Natural England<br />
Drought impacts on the natural environment and lessons for climate change adaptation<br />
The Earth’s climate has changed as a result of greenhouse gas emissions and will continue to change, even if emissions<br />
are successfully and quickly reduced. Adaptation to climate change is therefore essential and an increasingly<br />
recognised priority in environmental management and policy. An increased risk of drought, especially during hot, dry<br />
summers is one of the key aspects of climate change that we need to adapt to in the UK. Over the last few decades<br />
there have been a number of periods of drought and we can look at how these affected the natural environment to<br />
get a better understanding of the threats we face. This shows that drought affects a wide range of ecosystems and<br />
species. Amongst species some are adversely affected but others can benefit. The risks are greatest when a dry<br />
summer follows a dry winter as soil water and flow in rivers is already low at the start of the summer. The Impacts<br />
are however modified by soil type, catchment and management. The indirect effects of drought, such as increased<br />
abstraction and, as graphically shown in the summer of <strong>20</strong>18, increased wildfire risk, can be just as important at the<br />
drought itself. Looking to the future, there are a range of potential adaptation measures including: wetland<br />
restoration, reducing abstraction, better control of water levels in protected sites and diversification of tree species to<br />
decrease risks to woodland. Climate change adaptation can’t be a stand-alone activity, it needs to be thoroughly<br />
integrated into the way organisations operate and I will illustrate this from our work in Natural England.<br />
Ian Holman Cranfield University<br />
Taking lessons from the <strong>20</strong>18 drought forward into increased drought resilience in the agricultural<br />
sector<br />
The <strong>20</strong>18 drought had widespread and varied consequences for all parts of the agricultural sector in the UK. This<br />
presentation looking back at <strong>20</strong>18 will cover four main components. Firstly, the unusual meteorological characteristics<br />
of <strong>20</strong>18 that proved so challenging for UK agriculture will be described. Secondly, a quantitative analysis of the wide<br />
range of impacts of the <strong>20</strong>18 drought on the livestock, rainfed and irrigated agricultural systems will be described,<br />
based on reporting within specialist sector publications, identifying both negative and positive impacts of the drought.<br />
Thirdly, the range of short-term coping and longer term strategic reported responses to the drought will be<br />
described. Finally, building on the preceding analyses and recent interviews with farmers, the presentation will reflect<br />
on three lessons from the <strong>20</strong>18 drought and how they might be taken forward to support increased drought resilience<br />
in the agricultural sector: (1) the need for improved strategic planning at all levels and scales, from farm to catchment<br />
to supply chain; (2) the need to enable best use of licenced water during drought through improved forecasting,<br />
monitoring and evidence-based decision making; and (3) the need to enable the continuing de-synchronisation of<br />
irrigation demand and irrigation abstraction through investment in winter storage.