atw - International Journal for Nuclear Power | 04.2019
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
<strong>atw</strong> Vol. 64 (2019) | Issue 4 ı April<br />
ENERGY POLICY, ECONOMY AND LAW 198<br />
model. The 2014 survey in Slovenia<br />
confirmed that the external stakeholders<br />
of NPP had high expectations<br />
of accessible, comprehensive, real and<br />
timely in<strong>for</strong>mation on the operation<br />
and impacts of the NPPs and their<br />
short-term and long-term activities<br />
[Simončič & Žurga, 2016].<br />
Stakeholder involvement in nuclear<br />
safety issues requires established communication<br />
mechanisms and channels<br />
<strong>for</strong> discussions between the interested<br />
parties and those responsible <strong>for</strong><br />
decision- making. It should be an<br />
integral part of the management of<br />
nuclear facilities from their conception<br />
through final closure and decommissioning.<br />
Thus, implementation of<br />
managerial plan will need to include<br />
mechanisms to continually monitor<br />
the effectiveness of the program and<br />
make changes and improvements<br />
based upon the results of this evaluation.<br />
[IAEA, 2011]<br />
Purpose and hypothesis<br />
of the research<br />
In the research we examined the hypothesis<br />
that respecting the interests<br />
of stakeholders is a prere quisite <strong>for</strong><br />
the acceptability of the NPPs in society<br />
and the environment and strengthens<br />
quality of their coexistence. We<br />
demonstrated and proved that NPPs<br />
are aware of their impact and that<br />
they want to satisfy the interests of<br />
their stakeholders. Considering importance<br />
of effective stakeholder<br />
strategy <strong>for</strong> respect of their interests,<br />
we developed and presented the<br />
optimal model <strong>for</strong> involving external<br />
stakeholders in the NPPs.<br />
2 Research methodology<br />
Questionnaires<br />
For the purpose of the research, two<br />
questionnaires with closed type<br />
questions (statements) were developed,<br />
one <strong>for</strong> external stakeholders<br />
and another <strong>for</strong> NPPs. Respondents<br />
expressed level of their agreement<br />
with statements by: 1 – Completely<br />
disagree, 2 – Disagree, 3 – Undecided,<br />
4 – Agree, 5 – Fully agree. For basic<br />
analysis, descriptive statistics methods<br />
were used. For analyzing the completed<br />
questionnaires, we used frequency<br />
statistics, Cronbach Alpha<br />
Test, Exploratory Factorial Analysis<br />
of Ordinal Variables, Structured Equation<br />
Modelling (SEM) with Lisrel,<br />
Mann-Whitney and Kruskal- Wallis<br />
test.<br />
Sample and timeframe,<br />
data collecting<br />
External stakeholders of the only<br />
Slovenian NPP included in the<br />
research were:<br />
pp<br />
Representatives of local com munities,<br />
namely 432 randomly<br />
selected citizens from the Posavje<br />
region in which the NPP is located<br />
and, in the sample of “other<br />
Slovenian regions”, four randomly<br />
selected statistical units were<br />
included, i.e. the Jugovzhodna<br />
Slovenija region, the Obalno-kraška<br />
region, the Savinjska region<br />
and the Zasavska region (488 persons);<br />
pp<br />
Suppliers of goods and service<br />
providers of the NPP that are<br />
registered in the Republic of<br />
Slovenia. This stakeholders group<br />
comprised of companies that<br />
supplied goods or services in the<br />
years 2012–2017. We randomly<br />
selected 110 suppliers;<br />
pp<br />
<strong>Journal</strong>ists: invitations <strong>for</strong> journalists<br />
were sent to 177 addresses;<br />
pp<br />
Non-governmental organizatios. In<br />
June 2017, thirty non-government<br />
organizations (NGOs) were registered<br />
in Slovenia with the status of<br />
acting in the public interest in the<br />
field of environmental protection<br />
and 36 associations operating in<br />
public interest in nature conservation.<br />
They were all included in<br />
the research;<br />
pp<br />
Political public. Slovenian political<br />
public represented by the President<br />
of the Republic of Slovenia, the<br />
Prime Minister, ministers, members<br />
of the National Council, members<br />
of the National Assembly, constitutional<br />
judges and mayors of<br />
Slovenian municipalities elected in<br />
the 2014–2018 term was included<br />
in the research. We sent invitations<br />
to co-operate in the survey to e-mail<br />
addresses of all official representatives<br />
(offices, cabinets), that are<br />
listed on their official websites,<br />
except municipalities. Concerning<br />
mayors, 22 municipalities (approximately<br />
10 % of all) were randomly<br />
selected.<br />
As representatives of NPPs, we invited<br />
members of World Association of<br />
<strong>Nuclear</strong> Operators (WANO), Paris<br />
centre to co-operate in the research.<br />
At the time of the research, the<br />
regional Paris centre represented 147<br />
nuclear reactors from 13 countries.<br />
The WANO organization allowed us to<br />
invite the power plants to participate<br />
in the research through their internal<br />
in<strong>for</strong>mation system. In this way, we<br />
have ensured good responsiveness.<br />
Representatives of NPPs were invited<br />
to indicate whether they were operators<br />
or owners of their respective NPP.<br />
Web based surveys were con ducted<br />
in October 2017. The research was<br />
carried out at a time when the next<br />
European concept of electricity supply<br />
was primarily oriented towards lowcarbon<br />
sources what included nuclear<br />
power, as an important part of the<br />
solution in the long-term supply of<br />
electricity in many countries.<br />
3 Results and hypothesis<br />
testing<br />
Responsiveness and<br />
characteristics of the sample<br />
Almost 36 % of respondents live up to<br />
30 km from the NPP, app. 12 % of<br />
them are up to 10 km from the NPP.<br />
Invited<br />
Group of<br />
stakeholders<br />
Number of<br />
participant (N)<br />
Response<br />
(%)<br />
432 Local communities – Posavje 95 22.0<br />
488<br />
110<br />
Local communities –<br />
other Slovenian regions<br />
Suppliers of goods and service<br />
providers of NPP<br />
91 18.6<br />
21 19.1<br />
66 NGOs 17 25.8<br />
124 Slovenian political public 21 16.9<br />
177 <strong>Journal</strong>ists 23 13.0<br />
Others 24<br />
1397 292 20.9<br />
| | Tab. 1.<br />
Response and number of participating stakeholders of NPP.<br />
Function in the organization: operators of NPPs (N)<br />
Top management 23<br />
Representative in organization WANO 17<br />
Public relations of NPPs 5<br />
NPPs together 45<br />
Function in the organization: owners of NPPs (N)<br />
Top management 1<br />
Representative in the WANO 1<br />
Public relations of owner 1<br />
Owners together 3<br />
| | Tab. 2.<br />
Number of participating NPPs, and organizational function of respondents.<br />
Energy Policy, Economy and Law<br />
Successful Co-Existance of <strong>Nuclear</strong> <strong>Power</strong> Plants with Their External Stakeholders ı Milan Simončič and Gordana Žurga