atw - International Journal for Nuclear Power | 04.2019
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
<strong>atw</strong> Vol. 64 (2019) | Issue 4 ı April<br />
Operating Results December 2018<br />
Plant name Country Nominal<br />
capacity<br />
Type<br />
gross<br />
[MW]<br />
net<br />
[MW]<br />
Operating<br />
time<br />
generator<br />
[h]<br />
Energy generated, gross<br />
[MWh]<br />
Month Year Since<br />
commissioning<br />
Time availability<br />
[%]<br />
Energy availability<br />
[%] *) Energy utilisation<br />
[%] *)<br />
Month Year Month Year Month Year<br />
OL1 Olkiluoto BWR FI 910 880 744 680 983 7 001 022 261 655 208 100.00 88.25 99.05 87.24 100.58 87.82<br />
OL2 Olkiluoto BWR FI 910 880 744 686 482 7 597 361 251 896 543 100.00 95.31 100.00 94.58 100.29 94.27<br />
KCB Borssele PWR NL 512 484 744 379 826 3 514 770 161 721 689 99.47 79.32 99.46 79.00 100.03 78.49<br />
KKB 1 Beznau 7) PWR CH 380 365 744 286 584 2 588 023 127 334 110 100.00 78.73 100.00 78.26 101.43 77.68<br />
KKB 2 Beznau 7) PWR CH 380 365 744 285 074 3 185 534 134 350 407 100.00 96.40 100.00 96.28 100.84 95.62<br />
KKG Gösgen 7) PWR CH 1060 1010 744 794 572 8 680 941 313 875 528 100.00 94.10 99.99 93.77 100.75 93.49<br />
KKM Mühleberg BWR CH 390 373 744 283 870 3 066 170 127 404 315 100.00 92.84 98.80 92.01 97.83 89.75<br />
CNT-I Trillo PWR ES 1066 1003 744 789 917 8 267 245 247 291 669 100.00 89.51 100.00 89.26 99.16 88.00<br />
Dukovany B1 PWR CZ 500 473 729 362 664 3 599 011 112 229 493 97.98 83.36 97.06 82.84 97.49 82.17<br />
Dukovany B2 2) PWR CZ 500 473 744 370 524 3 611 634 108 234 171 100.00 84.01 99.98 83.55 99.60 82.46<br />
Dukovany B3 PWR CZ 500 473 161 70 038 3 875 614 106 498 041 21.64 90.72 21.25 90.37 18.83 88.48<br />
Dukovany B4 PWR CZ 500 473 744 376 529 3 171 527 106 443 269 100.00 74.18 99.99 72.99 101.22 72.41<br />
Temelin B1 PWR CZ 1080 1030 744 809 838 7 879 748 114 361 042 100.00 83.58 99.94 83.33 100.60 83.18<br />
Temelin B2 PWR CZ 1080 1030 744 816 260 7 782 571 109 272 517 100.00 82.29 99.99 82.14 101.40 82.21<br />
Doel 1 2) PWR BE 454 433 0 0 1 229 715 135 444 462 0 30.83 0 30.81 0 30.91<br />
Doel 2 2) PWR BE 454 433 0 0 1 549 672 133 801 939 0 38.82 0 38.70 0 38.89<br />
Doel 3 PWR BE 1056 1006 744 804 825 3 963 264 255 132 485 100.00 42.82 100.00 42.19 101.82 42.62<br />
Doel 4 2) PWR BE 1084 1033 292 188 760 5 827 569 260 373 410 39.24 62.54 22.26 60.98 22.26 60.65<br />
Tihange 1 PWR BE 1009 962 744 760 609 7 991 982 298 830 858 100.00 91.59 100.00 91.05 101.61 90.59<br />
Tihange 2 3) PWR BE 1055 1008 0 0 5 702 393 254 651 930 0 62.33 0 61.67 0 62.04<br />
Tihange 3 3) PWR BE 1089 1038 0 0 2 332 443 271 227 273 0 24.40 0 24.37 0 24.43<br />
233<br />
NEWS<br />
Plant name<br />
Type<br />
Nominal<br />
capacity<br />
gross<br />
[MW]<br />
net<br />
[MW]<br />
Operating<br />
time<br />
generator<br />
[h]<br />
Energy generated, gross<br />
[MWh]<br />
Time availability<br />
[%]<br />
Energy availability<br />
[%] *) Energy utilisation<br />
[%] *)<br />
Month Year Since Month Year Month Year Month Year<br />
commissioning<br />
KBR Brokdorf DWR 1480 1410 744 952 106 10 375 751 350 567 810 100.00 90.60 94.33 84.72 86.08 79.65<br />
KKE Emsland 4) DWR 1406 1335 744 1 007 298 11 495 686 346 818 969 100.00 94.78 100.00 94.67 96.21 93.33<br />
KWG Grohnde DWR 1430 1360 744 1 013 399 10 946 635 377 574 214 100.00 92.82 99.98 91.61 94.60 86.79<br />
KRB C Gundremmingen SWR 1344 1288 744 1 005 494 10 361 862 330 941 755 100.00 90.41 100.00 89.85 99.93 87.51<br />
KKI-2 Isar DWR 1485 1410 744 1 084 754 12 127 490 353 725 813 100.00 95.46 100.00 95.24 97.90 92.92<br />
KKP-2 Philippsburg DWR 1468 1402 744 1 068 384 10 993 639 366 161 155 100.00 90.63 100.00 90.47 96.33 84.05<br />
GKN-II Neckarwestheim 2) DWR 1400 1310 744 1 025 400 9 703 700 329 826 834 100.00 81.35 100.00 81.00 98.80 79.29<br />
groups stand behind carbon-free<br />
nuclear energy, the support <strong>for</strong> nuclear<br />
has never been so vast and varied.<br />
Some of the smartest thinkers of<br />
our time are calling on us to see<br />
nuclear energy <strong>for</strong> its potential to<br />
change the world.<br />
It’s time we listen.<br />
| | www.nei.org<br />
EU needs all low-carbon<br />
sources to achieve its 2050<br />
decarbonisation goals<br />
(<strong>for</strong>atom) Reflecting on how low-carbon<br />
technologies can help the European<br />
Union achieve its 2050 decarbonisation<br />
objectives and what the needs of the<br />
industrial sector are when it comes to<br />
increased electrification were the main<br />
topics discussed during an event hosted<br />
in Brussels by the Permanent Representation<br />
of Romania to the EU and<br />
organised in the context of the country’s<br />
Presidency of the Council.<br />
The event “Solutions <strong>for</strong> a 2050<br />
Carbon- free Europe”, organised by the<br />
Romanian Ministry of Energy in cooperation<br />
with FORATOM and the Romanian<br />
Atomic Forum (ROMATOM),<br />
gathered together more than 100 representatives<br />
of EU Member States, EU<br />
institutions and power industries. The<br />
conference provided participants with a<br />
plat<strong>for</strong>m to exchange views on how<br />
low-carbon technologies can together<br />
contribute to reaching EU climate goals.<br />
During his keynote speech, EU Commissioner<br />
<strong>for</strong> Climate Action & Energy<br />
Miguel Arias Cañete stated that by 2050<br />
the deployment of renewables and a<br />
stable share of nuclear energy is the solution<br />
to make the European power sector<br />
carbon- free. He also underlined that the<br />
role of low-carbon technologies is essential<br />
in reaching carbon-neutrality.<br />
This approach was echoed by the<br />
Ro manian Minister of Energy Anton<br />
Anton, who – in his introductory speech<br />
– reiterated that all low-carbon energy<br />
sources need to be explored in the<br />
future in order to ensure a sustainable<br />
development of economy. He also stated<br />
that Europe has already managed to<br />
achieve a lot in this field, also thanks to<br />
the contribution of nuclear energy.<br />
Fabien Roques, Executive Vice President<br />
of FTI Compass Lexecon Energy<br />
presented in detail a recent study<br />
entitled “Pathways to 2050: role of<br />
nuclear in a low-carbon Europe”, commissioned<br />
by FORATOM pro viding the<br />
vision <strong>for</strong> the nuclear sector by midcentury.<br />
According to the study,<br />
nuclear energy provides an important<br />
contribution to an efficient transition<br />
towards a decarbonised European<br />
power system as it can help ensure<br />
compliance with EU emissions targets,<br />
avoid temporary increase of emissions<br />
and locking in fossil fuels investments.<br />
The complementarity role of nuclear<br />
<strong>for</strong> renewables was also emphasised.<br />
*)<br />
Net-based values<br />
(Czech and Swiss<br />
nuclear power<br />
plants gross-based)<br />
1)<br />
Refueling<br />
2)<br />
Inspection<br />
3)<br />
Repair<br />
4)<br />
Stretch-out-operation<br />
5)<br />
Stretch-in-operation<br />
6)<br />
Hereof traction supply<br />
7)<br />
Incl. steam supply<br />
8)<br />
New nominal<br />
capacity since<br />
January 2016<br />
9)<br />
Data <strong>for</strong> the Leibstadt<br />
(CH) NPP will<br />
be published in a<br />
further issue of <strong>atw</strong><br />
BWR: Boiling<br />
Water Reactor<br />
PWR: Pressurised<br />
Water Reactor<br />
Source: VGB<br />
News