Movement 105
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Iternatlue<br />
ruorlds<br />
Gendered agenda<br />
TYPE lN the words 'women' and 'web' into a<br />
search engine, and you'll be confronted with<br />
a stark illustration of the two polar<br />
presences women have on the web:<br />
interspersed with sites promising FREE<br />
SEXY NAKED PICTURES OF SEXY NAKED<br />
WOMEN one finds a whole range of web<br />
sites dedicated to women's issues. The<br />
man's man's man's world of the web has a<br />
small corner which distinctly belongs to<br />
women, if you only look hard enough.<br />
I started with WorldWoman www.world<br />
woman.net, a Scottish site that promises<br />
'you make the news as well as read it!' This<br />
site is a spin-off from the wildly successful<br />
Scotswoman experiment. ln lnternational<br />
Women's Day in 1995, female staff on fhe<br />
Scotsman produced an edition of the<br />
newspaper that was commissioned, written,<br />
and edited by women; the paper sold out by<br />
8:30 a.m. The site offers a range of news<br />
and political updates of particular concern<br />
for women, including an exposri on the<br />
chemicals in tampons and a brief<br />
discussion of the persecution of women in<br />
Malawi. ln the 'not women' section<br />
(presumably their equivalent to the small<br />
'woman' section in most dailies) there's a<br />
solitary article by a man on a subject I can't<br />
recall. The paper has definite potential -<br />
provided they keep updating the news<br />
stories, and get a broader readership/ writer<br />
base. Worth a look.<br />
A more unusual site is the one run by the<br />
Network of East West Women, www.neww<br />
org. lt claims to link 'women across national<br />
and regional boundaries to share resources,<br />
knowledge, and skills' and also to 'empower<br />
women and girls throughout Eastern and<br />
Central Europe and Russia.' That's a tall<br />
order. lt includes job and fellowship listings<br />
and a calendar of'conferences and events.<br />
Most intriguing is a database of<br />
commentary by women in Kosovo and<br />
Serbia dating from the 1999 NATO bombing<br />
campaign.<br />
As is typical with web searches, I ran into a<br />
few duds - sites no longer maintained or simply<br />
not there. One of them was the Global Community<br />
of Women, which is alas 'no longer<br />
maintained' by one Katrina MoonDance.<br />
Fortunately, the final two sites I found<br />
were excel I ent. At www.igc.o r g/ igc/ gatew ay,<br />
I found a site dedicated to a wide range of<br />
activism. lt lists 'action alerts' - currently<br />
xj.rElolttrlr4<br />
t'/<br />
EtI!--,a--<br />
\\i rt'lt ht'rut tiu rt<br />
lhrrtr l? t.r F rdiltlrn h clwtl l*ntllth<br />
Itillarl<br />
rpahsrtuI<br />
urr lrish<br />
intrriurtit.r<br />
E^t<br />
b-&fdrtitlierrs<br />
/i!1 1 r/r611:|.a.1.r,r<br />
f tltrrl;,tilJ lt ,r,tl<br />
ff<br />
s.<br />
concerning timber sales in the US and the<br />
preparations for AIDS Watch 2000. More<br />
helpfully, it provides a link to 'womens.net'<br />
that includes interviews with women<br />
activists, and a clip about the 'Virtual March'<br />
on October 17th. Activists around the globe<br />
will show their support for women's rights (l<br />
take it by logging on but I'm not sure how)'<br />
Finally, www.iwhc.org, the site of the<br />
lnternational Women's Health Coalition,<br />
gives enlightening updates on its sexual<br />
health programs in Latin America, Asia, and<br />
Africa, and explains how these projects are<br />
established and maintained.<br />
I'm still an e-sceptic, and not wholly<br />
convinced by the wondrous world wide web,<br />
but I did find out more than I expected in a<br />
short trawl through the ether. Who knows,<br />
maybe I'll be one of those people who goes<br />
on line on October 17th, to virtually march<br />
for women's rights. See You there.<br />
(KATY GORDON)<br />
$<br />
World wide ebb?<br />
STANFORD UNIVERSITY claim the internet<br />
makes us lonely. They recently released a<br />
study showing that the internet causes<br />
social isolation and increases workload; but<br />
does it? Has Stanford missed the point?<br />
Being a geek (and reasonably heavy internet<br />
user) myself I see flaws in their argument.<br />
Amongst their assumptions, they appear<br />
to class the telephone as a superior form of<br />
communication to the lnternet. I agree that<br />
the current text-based chats and e-mail are<br />
pitiful, but so is the telephone. I imagine<br />
when first introduced people claimed it<br />
would replace more traditional forms of<br />
communication such as the letter and<br />
visiting for tea.<br />
The lnternet can provide much richer,<br />
faster communication than anything<br />
previous. Would my mother, for example,<br />
prefer an e-mail every few days to a phone<br />
call once a month? I can spend five minutes<br />
here and there scribbling an e-mail when<br />
there is no hope of me picking up a phone.<br />
The lnternet is richer because I can quickly<br />
and easily make copies of my first baby's<br />
ultrasounds available to all my friends and<br />
family by popping it In my 5Mb of free<br />
webspace. Later we'll add baby's first<br />
footprints, drawings and so on. I could never<br />
have done this over the phone and would<br />
probably never have bothered by post - so<br />
the web has increased the level of family<br />
contact and i nvolvement signif icantly.<br />
They also miss the fact that when 13% of<br />
heavy internet users say they spend less<br />
time attending events outside of the house<br />
that means 87% don't spend any less time<br />
socialising. Also, because this figure is<br />
derived by survey, it is based on what<br />
people think is happening, this is known to<br />
be unreliable. lf we assume that this 13%<br />
do genuinely feel that they do 'get out less',<br />
we have to ask ourselves who this group is'<br />
Based on personal experience I would<br />
imagine this 13% is made up of the circle of<br />
friends around me on my Computer Science<br />
degree and while they are all great people,<br />
'getting out' was never their fort6.<br />
So, Stanford have missed the Point<br />
because the lnternet doesn't replace the<br />
forms of social contact we have now, it<br />
enables more and better ways of sharing<br />
information and experience with groups of<br />
people you could never otherwise have<br />
known.<br />
(ROB STYLES)<br />
Stanford's report can be found at<br />
www.sta nford.ed u,/grou P/siqss/<br />
And coverage from the American press at<br />
www.wash i ngtonpost.com/wpsrv/busi ness<br />
/teed/ a56927-2000feb16.htm a n d<br />
www. usatoday.com/ lit e / cybey'techlcth381<br />
.htm<br />
I<br />
movement 12