18.09.2019 Views

Movement 105

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Iternatlue<br />

ruorlds<br />

Gendered agenda<br />

TYPE lN the words 'women' and 'web' into a<br />

search engine, and you'll be confronted with<br />

a stark illustration of the two polar<br />

presences women have on the web:<br />

interspersed with sites promising FREE<br />

SEXY NAKED PICTURES OF SEXY NAKED<br />

WOMEN one finds a whole range of web<br />

sites dedicated to women's issues. The<br />

man's man's man's world of the web has a<br />

small corner which distinctly belongs to<br />

women, if you only look hard enough.<br />

I started with WorldWoman www.world<br />

woman.net, a Scottish site that promises<br />

'you make the news as well as read it!' This<br />

site is a spin-off from the wildly successful<br />

Scotswoman experiment. ln lnternational<br />

Women's Day in 1995, female staff on fhe<br />

Scotsman produced an edition of the<br />

newspaper that was commissioned, written,<br />

and edited by women; the paper sold out by<br />

8:30 a.m. The site offers a range of news<br />

and political updates of particular concern<br />

for women, including an exposri on the<br />

chemicals in tampons and a brief<br />

discussion of the persecution of women in<br />

Malawi. ln the 'not women' section<br />

(presumably their equivalent to the small<br />

'woman' section in most dailies) there's a<br />

solitary article by a man on a subject I can't<br />

recall. The paper has definite potential -<br />

provided they keep updating the news<br />

stories, and get a broader readership/ writer<br />

base. Worth a look.<br />

A more unusual site is the one run by the<br />

Network of East West Women, www.neww<br />

org. lt claims to link 'women across national<br />

and regional boundaries to share resources,<br />

knowledge, and skills' and also to 'empower<br />

women and girls throughout Eastern and<br />

Central Europe and Russia.' That's a tall<br />

order. lt includes job and fellowship listings<br />

and a calendar of'conferences and events.<br />

Most intriguing is a database of<br />

commentary by women in Kosovo and<br />

Serbia dating from the 1999 NATO bombing<br />

campaign.<br />

As is typical with web searches, I ran into a<br />

few duds - sites no longer maintained or simply<br />

not there. One of them was the Global Community<br />

of Women, which is alas 'no longer<br />

maintained' by one Katrina MoonDance.<br />

Fortunately, the final two sites I found<br />

were excel I ent. At www.igc.o r g/ igc/ gatew ay,<br />

I found a site dedicated to a wide range of<br />

activism. lt lists 'action alerts' - currently<br />

xj.rElolttrlr4<br />

t'/<br />

EtI!--,a--<br />

\\i rt'lt ht'rut tiu rt<br />

lhrrtr l? t.r F rdiltlrn h clwtl l*ntllth<br />

Itillarl<br />

rpahsrtuI<br />

urr lrish<br />

intrriurtit.r<br />

E^t<br />

b-&fdrtitlierrs<br />

/i!1 1 r/r611:|.a.1.r,r<br />

f tltrrl;,tilJ lt ,r,tl<br />

ff<br />

s.<br />

concerning timber sales in the US and the<br />

preparations for AIDS Watch 2000. More<br />

helpfully, it provides a link to 'womens.net'<br />

that includes interviews with women<br />

activists, and a clip about the 'Virtual March'<br />

on October 17th. Activists around the globe<br />

will show their support for women's rights (l<br />

take it by logging on but I'm not sure how)'<br />

Finally, www.iwhc.org, the site of the<br />

lnternational Women's Health Coalition,<br />

gives enlightening updates on its sexual<br />

health programs in Latin America, Asia, and<br />

Africa, and explains how these projects are<br />

established and maintained.<br />

I'm still an e-sceptic, and not wholly<br />

convinced by the wondrous world wide web,<br />

but I did find out more than I expected in a<br />

short trawl through the ether. Who knows,<br />

maybe I'll be one of those people who goes<br />

on line on October 17th, to virtually march<br />

for women's rights. See You there.<br />

(KATY GORDON)<br />

$<br />

World wide ebb?<br />

STANFORD UNIVERSITY claim the internet<br />

makes us lonely. They recently released a<br />

study showing that the internet causes<br />

social isolation and increases workload; but<br />

does it? Has Stanford missed the point?<br />

Being a geek (and reasonably heavy internet<br />

user) myself I see flaws in their argument.<br />

Amongst their assumptions, they appear<br />

to class the telephone as a superior form of<br />

communication to the lnternet. I agree that<br />

the current text-based chats and e-mail are<br />

pitiful, but so is the telephone. I imagine<br />

when first introduced people claimed it<br />

would replace more traditional forms of<br />

communication such as the letter and<br />

visiting for tea.<br />

The lnternet can provide much richer,<br />

faster communication than anything<br />

previous. Would my mother, for example,<br />

prefer an e-mail every few days to a phone<br />

call once a month? I can spend five minutes<br />

here and there scribbling an e-mail when<br />

there is no hope of me picking up a phone.<br />

The lnternet is richer because I can quickly<br />

and easily make copies of my first baby's<br />

ultrasounds available to all my friends and<br />

family by popping it In my 5Mb of free<br />

webspace. Later we'll add baby's first<br />

footprints, drawings and so on. I could never<br />

have done this over the phone and would<br />

probably never have bothered by post - so<br />

the web has increased the level of family<br />

contact and i nvolvement signif icantly.<br />

They also miss the fact that when 13% of<br />

heavy internet users say they spend less<br />

time attending events outside of the house<br />

that means 87% don't spend any less time<br />

socialising. Also, because this figure is<br />

derived by survey, it is based on what<br />

people think is happening, this is known to<br />

be unreliable. lf we assume that this 13%<br />

do genuinely feel that they do 'get out less',<br />

we have to ask ourselves who this group is'<br />

Based on personal experience I would<br />

imagine this 13% is made up of the circle of<br />

friends around me on my Computer Science<br />

degree and while they are all great people,<br />

'getting out' was never their fort6.<br />

So, Stanford have missed the Point<br />

because the lnternet doesn't replace the<br />

forms of social contact we have now, it<br />

enables more and better ways of sharing<br />

information and experience with groups of<br />

people you could never otherwise have<br />

known.<br />

(ROB STYLES)<br />

Stanford's report can be found at<br />

www.sta nford.ed u,/grou P/siqss/<br />

And coverage from the American press at<br />

www.wash i ngtonpost.com/wpsrv/busi ness<br />

/teed/ a56927-2000feb16.htm a n d<br />

www. usatoday.com/ lit e / cybey'techlcth381<br />

.htm<br />

I<br />

movement 12

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!