16.10.2019 Views

HR3 Letter to NJ Congressional Delegation

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Because Patients Can’t Wait ®<br />

Oc<strong>to</strong>ber 15, 2019<br />

To Whom It May Concern:<br />

As you know, New Jersey is home <strong>to</strong> nearly 1.5 million seniors who count on Medicare<br />

<strong>to</strong> receive safe, reliable and effective health care services. That number will continue <strong>to</strong><br />

grow, making the improvement and preservation of Medicare critical. Unfortunately, the<br />

recently introduced Lower Drug Costs Now Act (H.R. 3) makes sweeping changes <strong>to</strong><br />

the Medicare program – as well as our larger private health care system – by granting<br />

the government authority <strong>to</strong> set medicine prices in public and private markets that may<br />

have a detrimental impact on future medical innovation.<br />

We are deeply concerned that the proposed changes will significantly destabilize<br />

incentives <strong>to</strong> invest in research and development of new medicines, with no assurances<br />

that coverage of medicines would improve. Furthermore, this proposal would upend the<br />

successful Medicare Part D program that over 45 million people rely on <strong>to</strong>day. Rather<br />

than supporting this short-sighted proposal, we believe Congress should focus on<br />

changes that prioritize patient-driven care and affordability, like requiring rebates and<br />

discounts on drugs <strong>to</strong> be shared with patients at the pharmacy counter, increasing<br />

transparency on costs for patients, and promoting value-based payment.<br />

Patients who receive their health care through Medicare and the commercial market<br />

enjoy a wide-range of treatment options and personalized care based on decisions<br />

made between the patient, their family and their doc<strong>to</strong>r. Policies that allow the<br />

government <strong>to</strong> dictate prices based on international references could lead <strong>to</strong> the same<br />

access restrictions seen in countries like the United Kingdom or Canada. Reduced<br />

availability of certain drugs will limit a doc<strong>to</strong>r’s ability <strong>to</strong> offer the best treatment for each<br />

patient’s individual needs. By importing other countries’ prices, policymakers would also<br />

be importing their flawed, government-decided methods for assessing the value of<br />

medicines, which could further restrict access and worsen health outcomes for<br />

American patients.<br />

Additionally, these policies would undermine America’s edge in research and<br />

development. Next generation scientific research continues <strong>to</strong> yield breakthrough<br />

results for our nation’s most vulnerable patients, in areas like cancer and Hepatitis C.<br />

Policies that threaten the market-based system for medicine development in the U.S.<br />

could eliminate hope for patients waiting for new cures and treatments. With the<br />

biopharmaceutical sec<strong>to</strong>r responsible for 376,507 direct and indirect jobs and an


economic impact of $104.7 billion, decreased investment in medical advancement could<br />

significantly hinder our state’s economy.<br />

Access <strong>to</strong> the most innovative, high quality health care choices must remain at the<br />

forefront of any reform <strong>to</strong> the Medicare program. Policymakers should reject the H.R. 3<br />

drug pricing package and instead pursue proposals that would focus on direct,<br />

immediate benefits <strong>to</strong> patients: an out-of-pocket cap in Medicare Part D and an<br />

assurance that rebates given by manufacturers <strong>to</strong> Pharmacy Benefit Managers actually<br />

make their way <strong>to</strong> the patient. Beneficiaries deserve <strong>to</strong> see more money in their pockets<br />

and lower prices at the pharmacy.<br />

Our goal must be <strong>to</strong> address affordability challenges for New Jersey seniors <strong>to</strong><br />

guarantee they are able <strong>to</strong> access the treatments their doc<strong>to</strong>rs have determined is best<br />

for them. Government-imposed price controls that import flawed value assessments<br />

from foreign systems are the wrong approach <strong>to</strong> health care reform and we sincerely<br />

urge you and your colleagues <strong>to</strong> vote against this misguided policy. Only then can we<br />

focus our full efforts <strong>to</strong> directly address out-of-pocket concerns while also preserving the<br />

program’s integrity and promoting future medical progress.<br />

Sincerely,<br />

Action CF<br />

Bio<strong>NJ</strong><br />

Chemistry Council of New Jersey<br />

Commerce and Industry Association of New Jersey<br />

The Family Resource Network<br />

The HealthCare Institute of New Jersey<br />

Mayors Committee on Life Sciences<br />

We Work for Health New Jersey

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!