24.02.2020 Views

Credit Management March 2020

The CICM magazine for consumer and commercial credit professionals

The CICM magazine for consumer and commercial credit professionals

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

CMNEWS<br />

A round-up of news stories from the<br />

world of consumer and commercial credit.<br />

Written by – Sean Feast FCICM<br />

Defence businesses highlighted<br />

for failing to pay suppliers on time<br />

ELEVEN firms – including several<br />

big names within the military,<br />

aerospace and defence sectors<br />

– have been suspended from the<br />

Prompt Payment Code for failing to pay<br />

suppliers on time.<br />

BAE Systems (Operations) Limited,<br />

Leonardo MW Limited, and Smiths<br />

Detection are among those who have<br />

failed to honour their Code commitment<br />

to pay 95 percent of all supplier invoices<br />

within 60 days. The Code is administered<br />

by the Chartered Institute of <strong>Credit</strong><br />

<strong>Management</strong> (CICM) on behalf of the<br />

Department for Business, Energy and<br />

Industrial Strategy (BEIS). Signatories<br />

pledge to uphold its best practice for<br />

payment standards to end the culture of<br />

late payment.<br />

Shell U.K. Limited and Bottomline<br />

Technologies Limited are also on the list,<br />

and both failed to engage with the CICM<br />

within the deadline set and submit action<br />

plans towards achieving compliance.<br />

Fourteen businesses have been<br />

re-instated to the Code since the last<br />

announcement in November 2019, which<br />

CICM Chief Executive Philip King FCICM<br />

says proves the effectiveness of the<br />

PPC in positively changing payment<br />

behaviours. “All 14 businesses have<br />

demonstrated a substantial improvement<br />

in payment performance that warrants<br />

re-instatement to the Code. Since the<br />

policy was changed in 2019 to begin<br />

naming those who had failed to honour<br />

their Code commitments, 55 businesses<br />

have been suspended and 26 re-instated.”<br />

Philip King, who chairs the Prompt<br />

Payment Code’s Compliance Board, and<br />

was recently appointed to the role of<br />

interim Small Business Commissioner,<br />

added: “We will continue to challenge<br />

signatories to the Code if the obligatory<br />

Payment Practice Reporting data<br />

suggests that their practices are not<br />

compliant. We are encouraged by those<br />

who have already submitted action plans<br />

to achieve future compliance, and we are<br />

working closely with those businesses to<br />

support a better payment culture.”<br />

Businesses suspended in<br />

January <strong>2020</strong> and no action<br />

plan received within the<br />

deadline:<br />

• Bottomline Technologies Limited<br />

• Shell U.K. Limited<br />

Businesses suspended in<br />

January <strong>2020</strong> and action plan<br />

received<br />

• BAE Systems (Military Air)<br />

Overseas Limited<br />

• BAE Systems (Operations)<br />

Limited<br />

• Cereform Limited<br />

• F M Conway Limited<br />

• Leonardo MW Limited<br />

• Macdonald Humfrey (Automation)<br />

Limited<br />

• Rhodar Limited<br />

• Sita Information Networking<br />

Computing UK Limited<br />

• Smiths Detection<br />

Small Business Minister Kelly Tolhurst<br />

said that with a growing number of<br />

businesses signing up to the Code, the<br />

Government is helping to change the<br />

culture of late payments: “It’s encouraging<br />

to see businesses reinstated after<br />

improving their practices, but we’ll<br />

continue to clamp down on late payment<br />

to support small businesses that are<br />

exploited by their larger partners.”<br />

Businesses re-instated<br />

to the Code since the<br />

last announcement in<br />

November 2019.<br />

• British Sugar Plc<br />

• Balfour Beatty Group Limited<br />

• Engie Services Limited<br />

• Ferrovial Agroman (UK) Limited<br />

• Fujitsu Services Limited<br />

• John Sisk & Son Limited<br />

• Kier Construction Limited<br />

• Kier Infrastructure and Overseas<br />

Limited<br />

• Galliford Try Plc<br />

• Laing O’Rourke<br />

• Persimmon Homes Limited<br />

• Smith & Nephew UK Limited<br />

• T.J. Smith & Nephew Limited<br />

• Vodafone Limited<br />

‘‘We will continue to<br />

challenge signatories to<br />

the Code if the obligatory<br />

Payment Practice Reporting<br />

data suggests that their<br />

practices are not compliant.’’<br />

Advancing the credit profession / www.cicm.com / <strong>March</strong> <strong>2020</strong> / PAGE 6

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!