Sample Moisture Testing Report
Sample Moisture Testing Report
Sample Moisture Testing Report
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Moisture Testing Report
John Cementitious
Property Address:
12345 Stucco Clad Street
Maple Grove MN 55555
Structure Tech Home Inspections
Antonio Cedillo
4205 Raleigh Avenue South
Saint Louis Park, MN 55416
www.StructureTech1.com
612-387-8074
Structure Tech Home Inspections
Cementitious
Date: 4/24/2017
Property:
12345 Stucco Clad Street
Maple Grove MN 55555
Time: 01:00 PM
Customer:
John Cementitious
Overview
Real Estate Professional:
The purpose of this moisture testing inspection was to determine if moisture intrusion has occurred at the exterior wall
cladding. Your moisture analysis is intended to be the first step in protecting your home. The knowledge you gain from this
analysis is the percentage of moisture in your home and exactly where that moisture is located. We do not offer an opinion
about the structural integrity of your home. In some cases, the removal of stucco or siding from wet areas may be required to
check the structural integrity of your home. In this case, a contractor should be consulted.
All moisture readings recorded in this report are the numbers displayed by the moisture meter used, set to the scale for
wood. The sheathing on this building may not be wood or a wood product. All moisture readings in this report indicate the
percentage of weight of the tested material due to water, assuming the material is a wood product. While the readings in this
report may not accurately reflect the moisture content by weight of this sheathing, all readings over 20% should still be
considered to be unacceptably wet and requiring attention. Moisture readings and substrate condition can be affected by a
number of things which are beyond our control including, but not limited to: recent weather conditions, type of substrate or
framing material, location within the substrate or framing the probes contacted, unknown materials contacted such as wire
mesh or metal flashing. We make every effort to provide the most accurate readings possible; however it is possible that
readings taken in the same area on a different day will not be the same. Contact with unknown materials such as wire mesh
or flashing can result in a false high reading.
Because our inspection is limited to probe testing or surface scanning, it is up to the homeowner to verify any high readings
by having those areas opened up for a visual inspection of possible moisture related damage.
This report is limited to the specific locations listed. We tested those areas which have a high probability for moisture
intrusion and are reasonably accessible for testing. This report makes no judgment for any areas not tested and reported.
Suggestions for repairs are based on our experience and industry practices and are intended to provide you with a general
idea of what type of repairs may be necessary. You will need to consult with your builder or repair person and your City
Building Code Official to devise an actual repair strategy for your house. We can not be responsible for the success or failure
of your repairs. If any part of this report is not understandable to you it is your responsibility to contact us for clarification.
General Property Information
Style Of Building:
Single Family
Number of Stories:
One
Home Faces:
East
Year Built:
1992
Square Feet:
4500
Weather:
Partly Cloudy
Temperature:
60 Degrees
Last Precipitation:
3, Days
Exterior Wall Cladding:
Traditional Stucco, Stone / Adhered Concrete
Masonry Veneer
Substrate:
Unknown
Lowest Level:
Full Basement
Window Material:
Vinyl
Window Type:
Casement, Fixed
12345 Stucco Clad Street Page 2 of 18
Structure Tech Home Inspections
Cementitious
1. Stucco
What is stucco?
There are two types of commonly used stucco. They are traditional, Portland cement stucco and synthetic stucco, also known as EIFS or Exterior Insulation
and Finishing System. Sometimes we see a combination of these systems into a hybrid stucco system, sometimes referred to as a Hardcoat system.
Stucco has been used for hundreds of years and was applied to concrete or masonry surfaces, which are not susceptible to water damage. Wood frame
houses are at risk for damage when moisture enters behind the stucco.
Traditional stucco is applied by using wire mesh, which is attached to the home. Stucco at this stage resembles cement and is applied by using a trowel.
One or two colored finish coats are then applied over the stucco base.
Synthetic stucco, also known as EIFS (Exterior Insulation and Finishing System) has been in use in the United States since the 1960’s. The most common
type of EIFS is called PB EIFS. PB stands for polymer based. Dryvit is one popular name brand EIFS system.
PB stucco is made up of three layers: Insulation, base coat, and finish coat. The insulation is made of expanded polystyrene about ¾ to 1” thick. The base
coat is applied over a layer of fiberglass mesh that strengthens the coating. The finish coat is applied last and contains the color.
Hybrid systems may utilize various combinations of both EIFS and traditional systems.
What causes problems with stucco?
When joints and breaches in the stucco allow moisture to leak in, there is no way for this moisture to escape due to the sealant qualities of stucco. Easily
remedied problems such as missing or poorly installed caulking or missing flashing will often be the cause of moisture entering your home. Windows are
also a major source of moisture penetration, due to gaps or cracks in construction.
Because stucco was designed to keep moisture out, moisture that does penetrate the wall can present a substantial risk because it can take months to
dissipate. Often moisture will continue to leak behind the stucco before the existing moisture has had a chance to dry out. When structural wood is exposed
continuously to moisture it will rot.
Testing Method
The moisture testing performed on the stucco wall covering at this building was an invasive moisture test performed from the exterior. This test was
conducted by drilling 3/16" holes in the siding, inserting a pin-probe moisture meter to take a moisture reading of the substrate, then filling the holes with a
caulk of matching color.
The penetrating probe has an effective range from 0 to 40%. Readings of 40% or greater register as either 40% or 99% depending on the meter used for
your analysis. This is the number that will be recorded on your report.
A Delmhorst Moisture Check Moisture Meter set to the wood scale was used. All readings are adjusted for temperature. Since wood materials are
considered to be saturated at about 40%, all readings of 40% or higher should be considered as saturated.
Occasionally the penetrating probe may contact the wire mesh behind the stucco, or other metal objects. This can cause a false reading of 40 or 99%. We
make every effort to double-check all high readings. Any readings in this range indicate a potential high moisture area and possible structural damage. It
may be necessary to remove the stucco or interior wall covering to examine these areas more closely.
6% - 15%: Moisture reading currently acceptable.
16% - 19%: Elevated moisture reading or possible substrate damage.
20% - 39% Moisture high enough for mold or wood rot if sustained, or substrate damage.
99%: Wood is saturated at 40% moisture content; these readings are reported as 99.
S: Soft wall sheathing detected. This typically indicates damaged sheathing.
KEY
X: No wall sheathing detected. This typically indicates damaged sheathing.
Any circled areas showed large areas with elevated moisture levels. All sheathing probed was firm unless noted otherwise.
Items
1.0 Elevation
Acceptable Moisture Readings
There were no elevated moisture readings, and the wall sheathing was firm at all of the areas tested below.
12345 Stucco Clad Street Page 3 of 18
Structure Tech Home Inspections
Cementitious
12345 Stucco Clad Street Page 4 of 18
Structure Tech Home Inspections
Cementitious
1.1 Elevation
Acceptable Moisture Readings
(1) The moisture readings in red were at 20% or higher indicating active leaking and possible structural damage. These
areas should be opened up for further evaluation.
(2) Kickout flashings were installed and appeared to be functioning as intended.
12345 Stucco Clad Street Page 5 of 18
Structure Tech Home Inspections
Cementitious
1.2 Elevation
Acceptable Moisture Readings
(1) There were no elevated moisture readings, and the wall sheathing was firm at all of the areas tested below.
(2) Kickout flashings were installed and appeared to be functioning as intended.
12345 Stucco Clad Street Page 6 of 18
Structure Tech Home Inspections
Cementitious
1.3 Elevation
Acceptable Moisture Readings
There were no elevated moisture readings, and the wall sheathing was firm at all of the areas tested below.
12345 Stucco Clad Street Page 7 of 18
Structure Tech Home Inspections
Cementitious
1.4 Elevation
Acceptable Moisture Readings
(1) There were no elevated moisture readings, and the wall sheathing was firm at all of the areas tested below.
(2) There were no elevated moisture readings, and the wall sheathing was firm at all of the areas tested below.
12345 Stucco Clad Street Page 8 of 18
Structure Tech Home Inspections
Cementitious
1.5 Elevation
Acceptable Moisture Readings
There were no elevated moisture readings, and the wall sheathing was firm at all of the areas tested below.
12345 Stucco Clad Street Page 9 of 18
Structure Tech Home Inspections
Cementitious
1.6 Elevation
Acceptable Moisture Readings
(1) There were no elevated moisture readings, and the wall sheathing was firm at all of the areas tested below.
12345 Stucco Clad Street Page 10 of 18
Structure Tech Home Inspections
Cementitious
(2) There were no elevated moisture readings, and the wall sheathing was firm at all of the areas tested below.
(3) Kickout flashings were installed and appeared to be functioning as intended.
12345 Stucco Clad Street Page 11 of 18
Structure Tech Home Inspections
Cementitious
1.7 Elevation
Acceptable Moisture Readings
There were no elevated moisture readings, and the wall sheathing was firm at all of the areas tested below.
12345 Stucco Clad Street Page 12 of 18
Structure Tech Home Inspections
Cementitious
1.8 Elevation
Acceptable Moisture Readings
There were no elevated moisture readings, and the wall sheathing was firm at all of the areas tested below.
12345 Stucco Clad Street Page 13 of 18
Structure Tech Home Inspections
Cementitious
1.9 Elevation
Acceptable Moisture Readings
There were no elevated moisture readings, and the wall sheathing was firm at all of the areas tested below.
12345 Stucco Clad Street Page 14 of 18
Structure Tech Home Inspections
Cementitious
1.10 Elevation
Acceptable Moisture Readings
There were no elevated moisture readings, and the wall sheathing was firm at all of the areas tested below.
12345 Stucco Clad Street Page 15 of 18
Structure Tech Home Inspections
Cementitious
1.11 Elevation
One or more high moisture readings
The moisture readings in red were at 20% or higher indicating active leaking and possible structural damage. These
areas should be opened up for further evaluation.
The moisture readings in orange were between 16% and 19%, which indicates elevated moisture readings but without
signs of structural damage. The cause of the elevated moisture levels should be identified and corrected.
12345 Stucco Clad Street Page 16 of 18
Structure Tech Home Inspections
Cementitious
1.12 Elevation
Acceptable Moisture Readings
(1) There were no elevated moisture readings, and the wall sheathing was firm at all of the areas tested below.
(2) Kickout flashings were installed and appeared to be functioning as intended.
12345 Stucco Clad Street Page 17 of 18
Structure Tech Home Inspections
Cementitious
12345 Stucco Clad Street Page 18 of 18