15.04.2020 Views

Water Unites

  • No tags were found...

Transform your PDFs into Flipbooks and boost your revenue!

Leverage SEO-optimized Flipbooks, powerful backlinks, and multimedia content to professionally showcase your products and significantly increase your reach.

Whose rights and which principle have priority? And what exactly is an equitable share?

Where is the borderline between a harm that has to be accepted and a significant harm?

These questions are not answered in detail by the conventions, which only provide for the

general principles and criteria. And this is very wise, because many of these questions can

only be answered specifically for each basin, rather than applying to all. In this respect, the

conventions provide a framework of joint principles on which regional agreements can be

negotiated, not a blueprint for all river basins.

But there is a binding regional convention for the European and Central Asian region

that made these two principles obligatory for its parties and provided a framework and

guidelines for their application in specific river basins: the UNECE 1992 Convention on the

Protection and Use of Transboundary Watercourses and International Lakes (the so-called

Helsinki Convention). The Convention obliges parties to prevent, control and reduce transboundary

impact, use transboundary waters in a reasonable and equitable way and ensure

their sustainable management. Parties bordering the same transboundary waters shall

cooperate by entering into specific agreements and establishing joint bodies. The Convention

includes provisions on monitoring, research and development, consultations, warning

and alarm systems, mutual assistance and exchange of information, as well as public access

to information.

In Central Asia, Kazakhstan and Uzbekistan have signed it and the other states,

though not formal members, are participating in some of its activities. Though the convention

is now only applicable to countries of the UNECE region, thus not Afghanistan, Iran or

China, an amendment intends to open it to others. As soon as this amendment is in force,

the Helsinki Convention could also be a basis for water cooperation between Central Asia

and its neighbouring states.

IFAS: organizational structure

After the collapse of the Soviet Union, the five newly independent Central Asian states

saw the need to cooperate on their shared water resources. In September 1991, their ministers

of water resources issued a statement in which they declared that joint management

of water was necessary to solve the region’s water problems and should be carried

out based on the principles of equality and mutual benefit.

On 18 February 1992, the five ministers signed the «Agreement on cooperation in

joint management, use and protection of interstate sources of water resources». It declared

that the quota system established by the Soviet Union (see page 22) should remain in

place until a new strategy was developed, and it founded a joint body, the Interstate Commission

for Water Coordination (ICWC). This agreement was followed by numerous

other ones, such as the 1993 presidential «Agreement on joint actions on resolving the

problems related to the Aral Sea and its coastal zone on environmental sanitation and

socioeconomic development in the Aral Sea region», the Nukus Declaration of 1995, the

1999 agreement «On the status of IFAS and its organizations», and others.

46 IFAS: organizational structure

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!