Final 2020 NFL Draft Guide

A GUIDE TO THE

2020 NFL DRAFT

By Noah Sutton

THANK YOU SO MUCH FOR TAKING THE TJIME TO READ THROUGH THIS AND PLEASE LET ME KNOW WHAT YOU THINK!

I’M ALWAYS LOOKING TO IMPROVE MY WORK AND THIS IS ONLY THE BEGINNING. THE NFL DRAFT IS AN EXCITING TIME

AND I HOPE MY GUIDE GIVES YOU AN IDEA OF HOW TO VIEW THESE PROSPECTS. ENJOY AND LET ME KNOW IF YOU

HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR COMMENTS.

-NOAH SUTTON

TOP-100 Draft Board

1 JOE BURROW QB1 LSU

2 CHASE YOUNG EDGE1 Ohio St.

3 ISAIAH SIMMONS LB1 Clemson

4 JEFF OKUDAH CB1 Ohio St.

5 JEDRICK WILLS OT1 Alabama

6 TUA TAGOVAILOA QB2 Alabama

7 DERRICK BROWN DT1 Auburn

8 TRISTAN WIRFS OT2 Iowa

9 CEEDEE LAMB WR1 Oklahoma

10 JAVON KINLAW DT2 South Carolina

11 MEKHI BECTON OT3 Louisville

12 JERRY JEUDY WR2 Alabama

13 HENRY RUGGS III WR3 Alabama

14 C.J. HENDERSON CB2 Florida

15 ANDREW THOMAS OT4 Georgia

16 K’LAVON CHAISSON EDGE2 LSU

17 JUSTIN HERBERT QB3 Oregon

18 JEFF GLADNEY CB3 TCU

19 PATRICK QUEEN LB2 LSU

20 BRANDON AIYUK WR4 ASU

21 KENNETH MURRAY LB3 Oklahoma

22 JORDAN LOVE QB4 Utah State

23 A.J. TERRELL CB4 Clemson

24 J.K. DOBBINS RB1 Ohio State

25 JALEN REAGOR WR5 TCU

26 A.J. EPENESA EDGE3 Iowa

27 JUSTIN JEFFERSON WR6 LSU

28 XAVIER MCKINNEY S1 Alabama

29 DE’ANDRE SWIFT RB2 Georgia

30 JOSHUA JONES OT5 Houston

31 YETUR GROSS-MATOS EDGE4 Penn St.

32 ROSS BLACKLOCK DT3 TCU

33 MICHAEL PITTMAN JR. WR7 USC

34 TREVON DIGGS CB5 Alabama

35 EZRA CLEVELAND OT6 Boise St.

36 ZACH BAUN LB4 Wisconsin

37 CLYDE EDWARDS-HELAIRE RB3 LSU

38 DENZEL MIMS WR8 Baylor

39 LLOYD CUSHENBERRY IOL1 LSU

40 KRISTIAN FULTON CB6 LSU

41 ANTOINE WINFIELD JR. S2 Minnesota

42 LAVISKA SHENAULT JR. WR9 Colorado

43 TERRELL LEWIS EDGE5 Alabama

44 TEE HIGGINS WR10 Clemson

45 AUSTIN JACKSON OT7 USC

46 JONATHAN TAYLOR RB4 Wisconsin

47 CESAR RUIZ IOL2 Michigan

48 JEREMY CHINN S3 Southern Illinois

49 NOAH IGBINOGHENE CB7 Auburn

50 JOSH UCHE EDGE6 Michigan

51 GRANT DELPIT S4 LSU

52 BRYAN EDWARDS WR11 South Carolina

53 JUSTIN MADIBUIKE DT4 Texas A&M

54 MARLON DAVIDSON DT5 Auburn

55 JAYLON JOHNSON CB7 Utah

56 JAKE FROMM QB5 Georgia

57 ADAM TRAUTMAN TE1 Dayton

58 KYLE DUGGER S5 Lenoir Rhyne

59 JORDAN ELLIOTT DT6 Missouri

60 NEVILLE GALLIMORE DT7 Oklahoma

61 K.J. HAMLER WR12 Penn State

62 JONATHAN GREENARD EDGE7 Florida

63 DAMON ARNETTE CB8 Ohio State

64 VAN JEFFERSON WR13 Florida

65 COLE KMET TE2 Notre Dame

66 JONAH JACKSON IOL3 Ohio State

67 CURTIS WEAVER EDGE 8 Boise State

68 ZACH MOSS RB5 Utah

69 MATT HENNESSY IOL4 Temple

70 JORDAN BROOKS LB5 Teas Tech

71 CAMERON DANZLER CB9 Mississippi St.

72 CAM AKERS RB6 Florida State

73 JALEN HURTS QB6 Oklahoma

74 MALIK HARRISON LB6 Ohio State

75 CHASE CLAYPOOL WR14 Notre Dame

76 K’VON WALLACE S6 Clemson

77 JULIAN OKWARA EDGE9 Notre Dame

78 ISAIAH WILSON OT8 Georgia

79 LEKI FOTU DT8 Utah

80 JACOB EASON QB7 Washington

81 TERRELL BURGESS S7 Utah

82 ANTONIO GANDY-GOLDEN WR15 Liberty

83 AKEEM DAVIS-GAITHER LB7 Appalachian St.

84 JABARI ZUNIGA EDGE10 Florida

85 ROBERT HUNT OT9 Louisiana-L

86 ANTHONY MCFARLAND RB7 Maryland

87 BRYCE HALL CB10 Virginia

88 ASHTYN DAVIS S8 California

89 NETANE MUTI IOL5 Fresno St.

90 ENO BENJAMIN RB9 Arizona State

91 BRADLEE ANAE EDGE11 Utah

92 RAEKWON DAVIS DT9 Alabama

93 LA’MICAL PERINE RB10 Florida

94 JAMES PROCHE WR16 SMU

95 REGGIE ROBINSON II CB11 Tulsa

96 HARRISON BRYANT TE3 Florida Atlantic

97 DEVIN ASIASI TE4 UCLA

98 ANTHONY GORDON QB8 Wash St.

99 LYNN BOWDEN JR. WR17 Kentucky

100 LUCAS NIANG OT10 TCU

1. JOE BURROW LSU QB 6034 221

Player Comparison: TOM BRADY

SUMMARY: Most impressive is his development, completely different player from last season. This can also be a

negative given he had one year of success, but it was arguably the most successful in NCAA history. Great pocket

presence, especially when he needs to step up. Really good footwork, showed he could make throws from

different platforms. Never slowed down, got better and stepped up at every challenge he had. sneaky athlete with

good speed. QB1.

GRADE: 1 st

2. CHASE YOUNG OHIO STATE EDGE 6047 267

Player Comparison: JULIUS PEPPERS

SUMMARY: Such a dynamic athlete. Teams game plan against him, running plays directly to the opposite side of

the field. Needs to develop his pass-rush moves a little more, but even with that still had 16.5 sacks this year. Best

defensive, maybe overall, player in the draft.

GRADE: 1 st

3. ISAIAH SIMMONS CLEMSON LB 6035 238

Player Comparison: THOMAS DAVIS

SUMMARY: Special player. So versatile, played down in the box as a pass rusher and even played free safety.

Freaky athlete that fits the mold of the modern NFL defender. There isn't much to dislike, he is a very clean

prospect. Has the potential to really develop into a star. Overall, Simmons is a really solid prospect with high

upside. Super smart player that will be a great fit everywhere.

GRADE: 1 st

4. JEFF OKUDAH OHIO STATE CB 6011 205

Player Comparison: PATRICK PETERSON

SUMMARY: Finding a weakness for Okudah is tough, from the aggressive tackling to the lights out covering, he is

so smooth and natural it's not fair. Footwork is phenomenal and he does a great job at positioning himself in front

of the receiver. Love his physicality and play-style. Overall, stud cover corner with the traits and IQ to be a

potential All-Pro.

GRADE: 1 st

5. JEDRICK WILLS ALABAMA OT 6042 312

Player Comparison: JOE STALEY

SUMMARY: Played RT his last year, which for a left-handed quarterback will be similar to LT in the NFL. Has a great

kick back step at the snap and does a good job getting his hands on the DE. Can get heavy hands at times and gets

*Play Comparisons are based on style of play, not level of ability or prediction of career.

caught, but does a great job controlling the line. good pulling in the run game and stout in the pass. OT1 in a solid

top class.

GRADE: 1 st

6. TUA TAGOVAILOA ALABAMA QB 6000 217

Player Comparison: DREW BREES

SUMMARY: Injuries are the biggest concerns, but if the hip and ankles check out, there is no reason to pass on this

guy. Tua has this energy in the pocket that brings on the Drew Brees comparisons, but it makes sense. He is

extremely accurate, especially outside the pocket, and does a great job at getting the football out early. But he has

had multiple serious injuries in college which could hurt his stock with some teams, but I think he is a top 5 player

in this draft; healthy.

GRADE: 1 st

7. DERRICK BROWN AUBURN DT 6045 326

Player Comparison: NDAMUKONG SUH

SUMMARY: STUD. great first step for such a big guy. generates pressure consistently; double-teamed a lot. gamechanger

in the run and pass game. Sometimes has the tendency to get too vertical, but when he stays low he's too

much for college guards and centers.

GRADE: 1 st

8. TRISTAN WIRFS IOWA OT 6047 320

Player Comparison: JOE THOMAS

SUMMARY: Monster at the point of attack. Whether in the pass game or in the run game, does a really good job of

getting his hands on the pass rusher. Pretty good feet for such a big guy. Initial step could be quicker, tends to rely

on strength to make up for it. Really big frame, could see him sliding inside at the next level, but I loev him as a OT

too. I have questions about his athleticism, so we will see at the combine.

GRADE: 1 st

9. CEEDEE LAMB OKLAHOMA WR 6015 198

Player Comparison: DEZ BRYANT

SUMMARY: Elite run after catch ability. When he's got the ball in his hands he is DANGEROUS. Really good routerunner

with amazing hands. Best tracker of the football and ball skills in the class. Only real concern is how fast is

he. He can break away, but will he be able to do that at the next level consistently? Great blocker.

GRADE: 1 st

10. JAVON KINLAW SOUTH CAROLINA DT 6051 324


Player Comparison: CHRIS JONES

SUMMARY: Natural pass-rusher with an arsenal of weapons to choose from. has the strength to get off blocks and

the motor to finish and chase down backs. Super lean too for a DT. can sometimes be taken out during run plays or

even double-teams on passing plays. Love his story and his tape.

GRADE: 1 st

11. MEKHI BECTON LOUISVILLE OT 6073 364

Player Comparison: ORLANDO PACE

SUMMARY: Monster of a human being. On tape looks like a man amongst boys. Looks best in pass protection with

a good first step and huge frame. In the run game he can struggle at times, but this could also be a result of the

Louisville o-line as a unit. Very strong and forceful at the point of attack. Fast for his size with some good twitch to

him.

GRADE: 1 st

12. JERRY JEUDY ALABAMA WR 6010 193

Player Comparison: REGGIE WAYNE

SUMMARY: Best route-runner in the class. His twitch is elite. Good blocker. Although his best trait is his route

running, his speed and ball skills are not far behind. For a leaner frame he plays big and more often than not comes

down with the ball. Didn't have the best production, however a lot of that is there were too many mouths to feed.

Strong player with all-pro potential.

GRADE: 1 st

13. HENRY RUGGS III ALABAMA WR 5110 188

Player Comparison: TYREEK HILL

SUMMARY: SPEED. enough said. No, he has rare speed, but his quickness is just as impressive. does a good job at

the line of scrimmage getting off the line. Measurements are good for him, would like him to be a bit heavier, but

5-11 is a solid height for him. Route-running is strong. doesn't have the best ball skills, specifically with contested

catches, but that’s probably not his calling card. Overall, lots to love about Ruggs, with his combination of speed

and clean routes.

GRADE: 1 st

14. C.J. HENDERSON FLORIDA CB 6006 204

Player Comparison: BYRON JONES

SUMMARY: Stud cover guy especially in man, with good length and speed. Biggest questions surround his tacking

ability, big worry head into the draft but it’s hard not to love what he can bring to your team in coverage.


GRADE: 1 st

15. ANDREW THOMAS GEORGIA OT 6051 315

Player Comparison: JASON PETERS

SUMMARY: A really consistent player. He won't wow you with his athleticism or great play on a regular basis, but

gets the job and does it at a high level. Thomas would be more towards the top in a normal OT class, but this class

is very top heavy which could cause him to slide a bit. But, there is a lot to like with his footwork and his ability to

mirror the defender. Strong case he is OT1 and strong case he is OT4. Good player.

GRADE: 1 st

16. K’LAVON CHAISSON LSU EDGE 6030 254

Player Comparison: DEMARCUS WARE

SUMMARY: Really good athlete. His production wasn’t always there, but finished the season strong, especially in

the CFP. Hard-worker, never gives up on a play. Has really good bend on the outside and has experience dropping

into coverage, which helps him out. Projects as a 4-3 left defensive end or a 3-4 outside linebacker. Overall, I love

his confidence and physicality, along with his ability to rush with speed, but still needs some time to develop into

the possible pro-bowl player he could become.

GRADE: 1 st

17. JUSTIN HERBERT OREGON QB 6062 236

Player Comparison: JOE FLACCO

SUMMARY: Herbert has that big arm, but has trouble controlling it sometimes. I really like his potential as an NFL

QB, especially in the right system with the right team fit. He has great potential, but wasn't asked to throw much

downfield so it is hard at time to gauge how that will translate, but there is a lot to like.

GRADE: 1 st -2 nd

18. JEFF GLADNEY TCU CB 5101 191

Player Comparison: JANORIS JENKINS

SUMMARY: Overall solid game; got beat a few times by a bigger Collin Johnson, but also got him a few times.

Played mostly man and traveled with Collin Johnson. Strong tackler, twitchy feet. his footwork is impressive,

should impress at combine. Overall has some concerns with bigger receivers downfield but is relentless in coverage

and very physical.

GRADE: 1 st -2 nd

19. PATRICK QUEEN LSU LB 6002 229

Player Comparison: DEION JONES


SUMMARY: Pretty solid in coverage, wasn't the best in the run game, chose the wrong gap at times. Very twitchy

and athletic, which shows up on tape. played inside a lot, but could easily make the transition to outside if needed.

Solid prospect with a high ceiling.

GRADE: 1 st -2 nd

20. BRANDON AIYUK ARIZONA STATE WR 5115 205

Player Comparison: GOLDEN TATE

SUMMARY: Long and really good speed. Really solid quickness and twitchy route-runner. Could look to really

improve his blocking, but there is a lot to like about Aiyuk. Lined up outside and in the slot and had success in both.

Would love to see him put on some more weight, small frames are more susceptible to injury. He flies though and

is a true downfield threat with strong hands and good routes.

GRADE: 1 st -2 nd

21. KENNETH MURRAY OKLAHOMA LB 6024 241

Player Comparison: PATRICK WILLIS

SUMMARY: Great speed that you'd want in a LB, three years of starting experience and really one of the few

consistent bright spots on some bad defenses. Good pursuit of the ball. inconsistent ability to choose the right gap

in the run game. sometimes gets in there and makes the tackle and other times he takes himself out of the play.

Pretty strong tackler, with good traits ability to run with RBs and TEs in coverage.

GRADE: 1 st -2 nd

22. JORDAN LOVE UTAH STATE QB 6035 198

Player Comparison: MATT RYAN

SUMMARY: Love is polarizing for sure. The great arm and the control he has from different platforms. But he is still

raw in a bunch of areas, especially his accuracy and anticipation, he would benefit from taking the Mahomes route,

and sitting a year. Overall, he has all the tools to be a great NFL QB, but needs the right coaching, and time to

develop in order to reach that potential.

GRADE: 1 st -2 nd

23. A.J. TERRELL CLEMSON CB 6011 195

Player Comparison: PRINCE AMUKAMARA

SUMMARY: Very fluid player. looks comfortable in coverage and twitchy. does a good job turning his hips. Not the

fastest or greatest athlete, but has enough to get the job done. premier program with good coaching, there is a lot

to like with Terrell. Overall, his tape is solid and in the right system could thrive right away. The learning curve may

be a bit much for him, but I love his competitiveness and aggressiveness at the line.

GRADE: 1 st -2 nd


24. J.K. DOBBINS OHIO STATE RB 5094 209

Player Comparison: DALVIN COOK





GRADE: 1 st -2 nd

25. JALEN REAGOR TCU WR 5105 206

Player Comparison: BRANDIN COOKS

SUMMARY: Unreal speed. On tape you see him exposing corners with his speed. But, he also has that twitchy

change of direction you look for in fast receivers. he's not just a burner, he does a great job of getting open with

his route-running. has some problems with drops, but he is dynamic and explosive. want to see how big he is.

GRADE: 1 st -2 nd

26. A.J. EPENESA IOWA EDGE 6051 275

Player Comparison: DEMARCUS LAWERENCE

SUMMARY: Typical 4-3 DE with some potential. Not the best athlete and seems stiff on tape. But, he has some

decent pass rush moves that flash. Needs to be more consistent. taken out of plays because OT/OG beats him

outside and isn't quick enough to change direction quickly. needs to loosen those hips but has some starting

potential.

GRADE: 1 st -2 nd

27. JUSTIN JEFFERSON LSU WR 6012 202

Player Comparison: ROBERT WOODS

SUMMARY: Really sold route-runner with a knack for catching the football. Led in receptions this year. Had

questions about his speed, but ran a 4.44 at the combine. Didn't fully see that on tape, but there is a lot to like. Has

above average tracking ability and good ball skills. Needs to become more refined in his cuts, but overall a solid day

2 prospect.

GRADE: 1 st -2 nd

28. XAVIER MCKINNEY ALABAMA S 6003 201

Player Comparison: MALCOLM JENKINS

SUMMARY: Has all the traits you'd want in a SS, very physical, good against the run/diagnosing plays, pretty good

blitzer. Struggles most with trusting his instincts, that subtle hesitation hurts him at times but he is all over the

field. Played box, free, and strong safety at the line and very well could do either of those at the next level.


GRADE: 1 st -2 nd

29. DE’ANDRE SWIFT GEORGIA RB 5082 212

Player Comparison: DOUG MARTIN

SUMMARY: His shiftiness and twitch jump out right away. Isn't afraid to take on blocks. Biggest questions come

from injuries. Can he stay healthy at the next level. Had a bit of a down year because of injuries and some

inconsistent play. But there is so much you love, his quickness and vision. Underrated trait is decisiveness. He

makes cuts strong and with ease. For a smaller guy he has a strong build. Home run speed with good balance.

Want to see how he runs. Overall strong prospect with smaller health concerns, but projects as a strong starter.

GRADE: 1 st -2 nd

30. JOSHUA JONES HOUSTON OT 6050 319

Player Comparison: RUSSELL OKUNG

SUMMARY: Jones seemed to be the only bright spot on an otherwise abysmal Houston offensive line. The thing

that jumps out on tape is his athleticism. he is so quick when pulling in the run game and you can really see his

speed on screens. Gets pushed back on some passing downs, needs to be stronger at the point of attack. Has a

really good first step back and usually is able to keep guys in front of him. Definitely still needs some refinement,

but is a solid prospect.

GRADE: 2 nd

31. YETUR GROSS-MATOS PENN STATE EDGE 6050 266

Player Comparison: CLELIN FERRELL

SUMMARY: Isn't super developed as a pass rusher, but has shown some flashes of development, solid against the

run at times, but can struggle to diagnose runs. can be taken out one on one, but when he has space can work

make a tackle work. needs to stay low and turn that strength into more power.

GRADE: 2 nd

32. ROSS BLACKLOCK TCU DT 6031 290

Player Comparison: JAVON HARGRAVE

SUMMARY: Takes on double teams and shows the effort. his motor is awesome. good against the run and

generates some strong pressure up the middle. has a tendency to be taken out if the play. Played mostly 1-tech

but O can see him as a 3 at the next level.

GRADE: 2 nd

33. MICHAEL PITTMAN JR. USC WR 6040 223


Player Comparison: MIKE EVANS

SUMMARY: His ability to track the ball downfield is as good as anyone in this class. Big fan of pittman. Has big

strong hands, and for a big receiver has pretty quick feet and is decently polished as a route runner. Solid blocker.

Can struggle at times to get separation, especially on shorter route concepts, but consistently makes contested

catches. I don't think he is really elite in multiple areas, but is damn good in every category that matters. Really

solid day two option.

GRADE: 2 nd

34. TREVON DIGGS ALABAMA CB 6013 205

Player Comparison: MORRIS CLAIBORNE

SUMMARY: Has all the traits you would want in an NFL corner, but is pretty raw. You see good speed and twitch in

coverage which is good, but struggles to track the ball at times. Physical, strong tackler, not afraid of contact, just

not the most consistent in coverage. Overall, He is truly a high ceiling-low floor guy that could really be something

special, solid prospect with tons of room to grow.

GRADE: 2 nd

35. EZRA CLEVELAND BOISE STATE OT 6060 311

Player Comparison: NATE SOLDER

SUMMARY: Cleveland is a freaky athlete. He has a great get off and does a great job using his hands and footwork

to create leverage. He suffered a turf toe injury early on in the year and played through it, so his 2019 tape has

some sloppy plays, but overall, when healthy, this guy is a good football player with a really high IQ and physically

tough athletic OT.

GRADE: 2 nd

36. ZACH BAUN WISCONSIN LB 6023 238

Player Comparison: BRANDON GRAHAM

SUMMARY: Played strictly outside, rushed the passer a lot, but also dropped into coverage. Played a lot of zone.

Could see him as 3-4 OLB or playing Will in a 4-3. Quick feet and strong player. Really good at reading the QB.

Overall really good player who needs to improve his consistency as a run defender.

GRADE: 2 nd

37. CLYDE EDWARDS-HELAIRE LSU RB 5072 207

Player Comparison: MAURICE JONES-DREW

SUMMARY: Great balance and very underrated receiving ability. unbelievably shifty for such a bulky guy. doesn't

have a ton of experience in pass protection, but has the frame to do it well. Overall has the strength, vision, and

balance to be a starter at the next level.


GRADE: 2 nd

38. DENZEL MIMS BAYLOR WR 6027 207

Player Comparison: A.J. GREEN

SUMMARY: Really strong hands. This is what you want to see from a bigger receiver. Unbelievable blocker too.

Baylor had some big time runs this season and you constantly see Mims downfield shoving someone to the turf.

Tends to round off some routes. Doesn't have the sharpest cuts but with his speed and toughness at the point of

the catch, that doesn't scare me too much, want to see his 40 and 3-cone.

GRADE: 2 nd

39. LLOYD CUSHENBERRY II LSU IOL 6031 312

Player Comparison: MARSHALL YANDA

SUMMARY: Good power from the lower body. does a good job at getting off his first block and getting to the

second level. Can be inconsistent at times. Needs to work on his hand usage in the passing game, can be

inconsistent. sometimes gets caught leaning forward, needs to be more grounded. Overall, Cushenberry has great

potential to be a starter in this league. He has all the tools, but is still raw in some areas. Has center/guard flex,

which will help him.

GRADE: 2 nd

40. KRISTIAN FULTON LSU CB 5115 197

Player Comparison: JOE HADEN

SUMMARY: Really, really good in man coverage. Not the best athlete, but everything seems natural to him.

Physical player, sometimes to a fault and a really good mirror guy. Has struggles playing the ball at times, but was

thrown at a lot with such a stacked DB group. Overall a solid top prospect with good traits and intelligence, but has

to work on his ball skills and tracking ability.

GRADE: 2 nd

41. ANTOINE WINFIELD JR. MINNESOTA S 5091 203

Player Comparison: LAMARCUS JOYNER

SUMMARY: Two picks vs. Penn State!! very instinctual player who probably translates best as a FS in the NFL. Has

the range and ball skills. As a tackler, physical and typically has the right angle in pursuit. Isn't the best in man

coverage, probably best in a deep zone where he can use his range. Also played strong in the box. Somewhat

worried about how big he is.

GRADE: 2 nd

42. LAVISKA SHENAULT JR. COLORADO WR 6005 227


Player Comparison: DEEBO SAMUEL

SUMMARY: This guy does everything. He catches the ball and ran it a ton too for a team that wanted to get the

ball into his hands all game. He is still pretty raw, but how can you not love the traits. He has great speed and

quickness, especially for his size. Once he gets the ball, he turns into a running back and is super hard to get down.

Biggest question is where do you see him at the next level. He has all the traits to be a WR1. strong prospect with

super high ceiling.

GRADE: 2 nd

43. TERRELL LEWIS ALABAMA EDGE 6052 262

Player Comparison: JASON PIERRE-PAUL

SUMMARY: Strong, twitchy pass rusher. Played primarily standing up, but also played a decent amount in a 3-point

stance. Without injury history, this guy would be close to the top of the draft board, but has had 2 major injuries in

college. Great player with great risk.

GRADE: 2 nd

44. TEE HIGGINS CLEMSON WR 6035 216

Player Comparison: LARRY FITZGERALD

SUMMARY: Big target with really strong hands. Uses his body to create space. Curious how fast he runs. He has

underrated change of direction. savvy route runner but isn't the fastest. Typical big catch radius with amazing ball

skills. Biggest questions are if he can consistently win at that speed and/or will his play strength hold up against

NFL corners.

GRADE: 2 nd

45. AUSTIN JACKSON USC OT 6047 322

Player Comparison: DAVID BAKHTIARI

SUMMARY: Very light on his feet for such a big guy. Still very raw, but shows the lateral quickness to pull in the run

game. Not the strongest guy, but does a good job of keeping the pass rusher in front of him. His lateral movement

is so smooth and effortless. inconsistent first step, step-back movement is a little slow, can struggle against speed

rush. Overall raw but strong prospect. He needs to develop more in the run game and work on his first-step.

GRADE: 2 nd

46. JONATHAN TAYLOR WISCONSIN RB 5102 226

Player Comparison: DEMARCO MURRAY

SUMMARY: Has that homerun ability which is rare for how big he is. He seems a little tight in the hips, no super

twitchy, but does a good job at changing direction. ran from I-formation and a lot of single back sets, a lot of

potential NFL style running. Extremely hard to bring down, runs through arm tackles. Experience is a good and bad


thing. Good because he has been consistently great on the field for 3 years, but also has put a lot of miles on those

wheels. Overall, love his tape and traits, but there are some concerns with him long-term.

GRADE: 1 st -2 nd

47. CESAR RUIZ MICHIGAN IOL 6026 307

Player Comparison: RONALD LEARY

SUMMARY: Good size for the position and has really good movement skills. Struggles at times getting to the

second level and getting to his second block. Does a nice job keeping guys in front of him and mirroring their

movement. Doesn't have elite awareness, can sometimes get caught watching a rusher go by. Overall, Ruiz is a

solid prospect, but has some developing to do. His size and quick footwork project him as a solid starter in time,

but will need to be coached up to reach his full potential.

GRADE: 2 nd

48. JEREMEY CHINN SOUTHERN ILLINOIS S 6030 221

Player Comparison: HARRISON SMITH

SUMMARY: Looks really big on film which could be a result of his competition. Has really good pursuit in the

screen game, knows how to navigate through blockers and find the ball-carrier. Great close-out speed and is

aggressive. strong tackler, especially in the open field. Big concern is his level of competition. Also i have questions

about his processing speed. Sometimes it takes an extra second for him to diagnose a play, and at times his pursuit

angles of the ball carrier are off. Overall, there is a lot to like about Chinn, he is long athletic and aggressive with

strong instincts. But, there are questions about his competition and pursuit of ball carriers.

GRADE: 2 nd

49. NOAH IGBINOGHENE AUBURN CB 5103 198

Player Comparison: JASON VERRETT

SUMMARY: Played a lot of man-to-man at auburn, primarily on the left side, with good length and speed. I love

how his hips flip, seems natural and smooth. plays a lot of bump and run man, probably his best, can be caught

sleeping a bit in off coverage. Good at playing the ball, not afraid to get physical and go through the receiver to

break up. Overall, really good smart player with upside. No huge weaknesses, but tackling at times is not the best.

Needs to get better at getting his head turned around.

GRADE: 2 nd

50. JOSH UCHE MICHIGAN EDGE 6012 245

Player Comparison: VON MILLER

SUMMARY: Surprisingly strong for a smaller guy. Going against bigger tackles, has great push back and hand

usage. Doesn't have the great production you would want, but his combination of speed and power is very

intriguing. Needs to become more of a factor in the run game. showed some ability to drop into coverage.


GRADE: 2 nd

51. GRANT DELPIT LSU S 6024 213

Player Comparison: ERIC REID

SUMMARY: A lot you like and some you don't like. Freak athlete with good cover skills and high football IQ. But

really struggles with tackling. Since he burst onto the scene as a freshman he has had a problem with missing

tackles. He flashes with some really hard hits and good pursuit angles, but the tape shows more of the story.

Overall really solid option, with a ridiculous ceiling but needs to trust himself and wrap up.

GRADE: 2 nd

52. BRYAN EDWARDS SOUTH CAROLINA WR 6026 212

Player Comparison: MARVIN JONES JR.

SUMMARY: Doesn't always have the cleanest release off the line of scrimmage, but after that he is dynamic. Crisp

in and out of routes and does a really good job at finding space in his routes. His yards after catch are awesome.

Super physical and shifty in the open field, there is a lot to like. Overall, Edwards is a physical receiver who is an

underrated route runner. His ability to get open and the way he plays with the ball in his hands will translate well

to the next level. The main issue is his injury history. He has also missed much of the draft process, senior bowl and

combine, due to injury.

GRADE: 2 nd -3 rd

53. JUSTIN MADIBUIKE TEXAS A&M DT 6025 293

Player Comparison: GRADY JARRETT





GRADE: 2 nd -3 rd

54. MARLON DAVIDSON AUBURN DT/DE 6033 303

Player Comparison: SHELDON RANKINS

SUMMARY: Strong bill rush, bigger thicker guy with the ability to be a factor in the rush and passing game. He is

not the fastest guy, so I worry about his ability to bend around NFL OTs. Very physical, has good balance. Not sure

where he projects at the next level. 4-3 DE/3-tech or 3-4 DE. Overall, good prospect with a strong bull rush but

struggles with his speed to get around the edge.

GRADE: 2 nd -3 rd

55. JAYLON JOHNSON UTAH CB 5117 193


Player Comparison: CASEY HAYWARD

SUMMARY: Bigger guy, kind of tight in his hips, not a bad mirror guy, played a lot f man and off at Utah, really

good awareness, jumps on routes quickly and tackling after the catch. Footwork needs some work, doesn't look

very fluid or natural, but his size tends to make up for it. Overall, he has the make-up of a typical long corner, but

has some issues to work on, in a deep class like this, he could slide some.

GRADE: 2 nd -3 rd

56. JAKE FROMM GEORGIA QB 6017 219

Player Comparison: ANDY DALTON

SUMMARY: Best characteristic is his accuracy, but this wasn't his best year as a whole. Struggled throughout the

season. wasn't as accurate and seemed to be off with his targets. He is a winner though, and a smart good football

player. Needs to work on his presence in the pocket and to step up and into the throw. In the right system, could

be a solid starter, but doesn't have a high ceiling.

GRADE: 2 nd -3 rd

57. ADAM TRAUTMAN DAYTON TE 6050 255

Player Comparison: ZACH ERTZ

SUMMARY: Looks huge compared to the competition he faced. strong blocker in-line but struggled some at the

second level. Has a good amount of experience both in the slot and in-line. For as big as he is, he is a pretty smooth

route-runner. sometimes has a hard time getting off the line. Want to see what he runs at the combine, but this is

a mid-round guy I would take a chance on.

GRADE: 2 nd -3 rd

58. KYLE DUGGER LENOIRE-RHYNE S 6007 217

Player Comparison: ROY WILLIAMS

SUMMARY: Looks big on tape, interested to see how big he is at the combine. Quick processing jumps out on tape.

trusts his instincts and goes. Does this to a fault at times, but is aggressive and a nonstop motor. plays hard until

the whistle. needs to be more disciplined in the run game. Has potential, but much more unknown because of

competition. Had a really good senior bowl, so should be interesting how he does at the combine.

GRADE: 2 nd -3 rd

59. JORDAN ELLIOTT MISSOURI DT 6037 302

Player Comparison: JEFFERY SIMMONS

SUMMARY: Gets strong pressure up the middle, but isn't always consistent. needs to improve hand usage, tends

to win by force and quickness. motor is strong. Played 1-tech and 3-tech could see him at both in the NFL.

GRADE: 2 nd -3 rd


60. NEVILLE GALLIMORE OKLAHOMA DT 6020 304

Player Comparison: TIM SETTLE

SUMMARY: There is a lot to like with Gallimore. His quickness is elite and he has some pretty strong pass rush

moves, but his biggest problem is consistency. His flashes are strong and eye popping, but then he disappears at

times. Really good hand use when rushing the passer, but struggles against the run. The inconsistencies are

worrisome, but you cannot manufacture traits. Great motor and never gives up on the play. Typical 3-tech at the

next level.

GRADE: 2 nd -3 rd

61. K.J. HAMLER PENN STATE WR 5085 178

Player Comparison: TAYLOR GABRIEL

SUMMARY: Feisty, amazing short-yardage quickness and speed. He is a blur, when he has the ball in his hands.

Biggest problem is drops led the country in drops with 12 this year. Size is somewhat a concern, but if used the

right way, he could be a nice addition to any team.

GRADE: 2 nd -3 rd

62. JONATHAN GREENARD FLORIDA EDGE 6033 263

Player Comparison: EVERSON GRIFFEN

SUMMARY: Twitchy as hell. quick around the edge with some solid pass rush moves. can commit too hard at time

so can be nonexistent in the running game at times. biggest concern is health, couldn't stay on the field, but shows

a lot of promise. would be a 1-2 without injury concern.

GRADE: 2 nd -3 rd

63. DAMON ARNETTE OHIO STATE CB 5115 195

Player Comparison: STEPHON GILMORE

SUMMARY: Great footwork and mirroring ability. Was targeted a lot in CFP with Okudah on the other side and

held his own. Was strong in man and was pretty good in zone. Seems to have a little delayed reaction in coverage

sometimes. Needs to stay committed to play. Could have been a late-1st early 2nd round pick, but will slide

because of character concerns.

GRADE: 2 nd -3 rd

64. VAN JEFFERSON FLORIDA WR 6014 200

Player Comparison: MOHAMMAD SANU

SUMMARY: He is a route technician. A transfer from Ole Miss, he is one of the better route-runners in the class

and arguably one of the most NFL ready in this class. Although he doesn't have great speed, his ability to separate


with his routes translates immediately. Also has good hands and does a nice job adjusting to the ball. There isn't

much room for him to grow, meaning you know what you're getting with him, which can be good or bad. Low

ceiling and high floor type of prospect.

GRADE: 2 nd -3 rd

65. COLE KMET NOTRE DAME TE 6056 262

Player Comparison: KYLE RUDOLPH

SUMMARY: Not the best blocker in-line, but has a ton of experience. I do have questions about his route-running,

when he makes plays, they seem to be getting him the ball in space and he's making the most of it. would love to

see him become more polished as a route-runner. He's not going to wow you with any one thing, but he's pretty

strong in all categories. Best trait is catching ability. Overall, solid prospect with a medium level ceiling where you

know what you're getting.

GRADE: 2 nd -3 rd

66. JONAH JACKSON OHIO STATE IOL 6034 306

Player Comparison: JOSH SITTON

SUMMARY: Jackson has some decent tape, but one of his bigger issues is that he gets too vertical consistently,

which causes him to lose leverage. He isn’t the best mover, but seems to more often than not do enough to get

the job done. Improving his footwork will be key to his development, but there are many things to like about

Jackson. Projected as a middle-tier starter, with upper-tier potential.

GRADE: 2 nd -3 rd

67. CURTIS WEAVER BOISE STATE QB 6023 265

Player Comparison: MICHAEL BENNETT

SUMMARY: For a guy with these types of measurables, you’d expect him to be this freak athlete with a great

frame. This isn’t quite the case with Weaver, which could scare some teams. But, his ability to rush is without

question, he has a great mix between power and hand usage, but occasionally gets slowed down and the

athleticism catches up with him. Overall, I love his potential, especially with some time in an NFL strength and

conditioning program.

GRADE: 2 nd -3 rd

68. ZACH MOSS UTAH RB 5093 223

Player Comparison: JAY AJAYI

SUMMARY: Very strong back who somehow falls forward on every play. Vision is a question at times, where he

seems to choose the wrong whole or doesn't show the most patience. But, vision is only so important when you

just run through tacklers on every play. For a bruiser has good speed and an underrated receiving ability. Overall,

solid prospect with SOME upside, but has limited athleticism. Could see him as a competent starter, or at worst

strictly a short-yardage back. (Also had some nagging injuries) I-Form experience.


GRADE: 2 nd -3 rd

69. MATT HENNESSY TEMPLE IOL 6037 307

Player Comparison: KEVIN ZEITLER

SUMMARY: Pretty solid in coverage, wasn't the best in the run game, chose the wrong gap at times. Very twitchy

and athletic, which shows up on tape. played inside a lot, but could easily make the transition to outside if needed.

Solid prospect with a high ceiling.

GRADE: 2 nd -3 rd

70. JORDAN BROOKS TEXAS TECH LB 6000 240

Player Comparison: TELVIN SMITH

SUMMARY: For a smaller guy, he shows his strength with his tackling. Some will question the defense he was a

part of, the big 12 level of competition, but he shows a lot you like. He is quick sideline to sideline and does a nice

job blitzing the QB. Questions about his decisiveness in the run game could push him down the board, but I think

he shows the potential to be a good NFL starter, with great special teams ability.

GRADE: 3 rd

71. CAMERON DANZLER MISSISSIPPI STATE CB 6022 188

Player Comparison: RICHARD SHERMAN

SUMMARY: Incredible game against LSU. Good mix of Man and zone. got beat a few times against ole miss, but

overall good player. Is aggressive, sometimes to a fault, but showed some flashes of really good open field tackling.

Want to see how big he is.

GRADE: 3 rd

72. CAM AKERS FLORIDA STATE RB 5103 217

Player Comparison: DARREN MCFADDEN

SUMMARY: Really good cutting ability. Can change directions naturally and very smooth. Biggest problem was just

how bad that offensive line has played. He has had a decent amount of exposure to pass protection and still needs

some work, but is getting better. Overall, this is a hard eval. With a half-decent o-line or QB play, we could be

talking about him as a top 50 guy, but the flashes aren't enough for comfort; even if they aren't his fault.

GRADE: 3 rd

73. JALEN HURTS OKLAHOMA QB 6010 222

Player Comparison: DAK PRESCOTT


SUMMARY: Hurts is a winner, from the start of his collegiate career to the end. But, there are still questions about

his play on the field. He has the athleticism and drive to be a great QB in the NFL, but his accuracy and pocket

presence are inconsistent. As a Heisman finalist, there needs to be a ton of credit given, especially for his growth.

He is a completely different player, and is still growing. Within the right system for him to grow, Hurts has the

potential to be a starter in this league, however lacks the anticipation and vision of the field that warrants early

round consideration.

GRADE: 3 rd

74. MALIK HARRISON OHIO STATE LB 6025 247

Player Comparison: DAMIEN WILSON

SUMMARY: Played both Will and Sam in a 4-3 defense. Probably will be better on the weakside iin the NFL. Has a

tendency to miss some tackles and isn't quite the thumper you would want on the strong side. shows some good

reading ability in coverage.

GRADE: 3 rd

75. CHASE CLAYPOOL NOTRE DAME WR 6042 238

Player Comparison: MIKE WILLIAMS

SUMMARY: Has some really good speed for a bigger receiver. I have questions though about his route-running.

doesn't have a ton of decisive cuts, doesn't look like he has full control of his body. But, i love the traits. I think he

has some potential, but needs to become more of a solid route-runner. The right team using him the right way

could be a steal on day 2 or 3.

GRADE: 3 rd

76. K’VON WALLACE CLEMSON S 5110 206

Player Comparison: ANTOINE BETHEA

SUMMARY: Has really good speed and ball skills. has a really solid back pedal with fluid hips. Has experience

playing man in the slot and playing zone coverage. He has done well and could trust him in both roles. smart

player. Struggles at time with his positioning, in particular changing direction. He also is inconsistent at times with

his pursuit angles. This was exposed by some big runs in the CFP against Ohio State. Overall, he is a smart player

with good coverage skills, but struggles in the open field at times, but when decisive, lays the wood on them.

GRADE: 3 rd

77. JULIAN OKWARA NOTRE DAME EDGE 6042 252

Player Comparison: MATT JUDON

SUMMARY: I like Okwara and what he could potentially be at the next level, but there are so many questions. The

biggest of which is why wasn’t there consistent production. He has the size, strength, and bend to be a really good

rusher in the NFL, but was never consistent enough on the field. His flashes are special, but I worry about his ability

to consistently make an impact.


GRADE: 3 rd

78. ISAIAH WILSON GEORGIA OT 6064 350

Player Comparison: ORLANDO BROWN JR.

SUMMARY: Has all the traits you'd want in a SS, very physical, good against the run/diagnosing plays, pretty good

blitzer. Struggles most with trusting his instincts, that subtle hesitation hurts him at times but he is all over the

field. Played box, free, and strong safety at the line and very well could do either of those at the next level.

GRADE: 3 rd

79. LEKI FOTU UTAH DT 6053 330

Player Comparison: DAMON HARRISON

SUMMARY: Great quickness for as big as he is. needs some work as a pass rusher. easily taken out of plays by

double teams and still has some struggles when one on one. Relies on strength. If able to develop some stronger

pass rush moves, could develop into a strong NFL starter.

GRADE: 3 rd -4 th

80. JACOB EASON WASHINGTON QB 6057 231

Player Comparison: CARSON PALMER

SUMMARY: One of if not the biggest arms in the class. But distance doesn’t always matter if placement is an issue.

I like Eason’s potential, he has a great frame, powerful arm, and the mobility at times, to be a quality starter, but

his football IQ, and accuracy would have benefited from another year in college. Overall, someone could strike

gold if they draft Eason and let him sit, but could also run into some issues if they expect too much too soon.

GRADE: 3 rd

81. TERRELL BURGESS UTAH S 5113 202

Player Comparison: ERIC WEDDLE

SUMMARY: Strong and physical player. has good vision and does a really good job at pursuing the football. he is a

very decisive player and has a good processor mid-play. strong motor that shows on tape. typical box safety

though, which can limit his ability in coverage. gets swallowed up by blockers at times in the run game, struggles to

shed. Overall, he is physical and tough, and pursues the ball-carrier well. But, i do have questions about zone

coverage and trust.

GRADE: 3 rd

82. ANTONIO GANDY-GOLDEN LIBERTY WR 6040 223

Player Comparison: DEMARYIUS THOMAS


SUMMARY: Elite stop and start quickness. Level of competition will be a question, but there is a lot to like. He has

a really great first step, however needs to develop more as a route-runner, when it comes to route tree. Solid

routes for what he knows, but will have to learn a more diverse tree. He has the tools, but wasn't really asked to

do to much at Liberty. Also had very questionable QB play.

GRADE: 3 rd

83. AKEEM DAVIS-GAITHER APPALACHIAN STATE LB 6014 224

Player Comparison: JALEN REEVES-MAYBIN

SUMMARY: Really good player. I love how Appalachian State, is how they tested his versatility. He lines up and

blitzes the QB, but also dropped back into coverage in man-to-man in the slot. Now, the jump of competition will

be on a huge learning curve for him, but I really like his potential long-term. Needs to do better job diagnosing

plays and being decisive, but that could come with good coaching and more experience. Overall, Davis-Gaither has

a promising outlook as a starter in the NFL.

GRADE: 3 rd

84. BRADLEE ANAE UTAH EDGE 6033 257

Player Comparison: VINNY CURRY

SUMMARY: Decent first step with some pass rush moves (spin move and decent hand use) and power, not the

best athlete or twitchy. Strong motor, good at keeping contain but not great in pursuit. Not the fastest or very

bendy, but shows potential in the little things. Strong player overall, who needs to work on his play in the run

game.

GRADE: 3 rd -4 th

85. ROBERT HUNT LOUISIANA LAFAYETTE OT 6051 323

Player Comparison: DONALD PENN

SUMMARY: Hunt has a very compact frame. This leads some scouts to project him as a guard at the next level, but

I like his potential at OT as well. The level of competition cannot be overlooked, but he shows some flashes of a

strong developmental tackle. He can get pushed back at times, which leads to some closure of the pocket, but

shows some good footwork, and quickness in the run game. I see Hunt as a project, but in a few years could be a

solid starter for an organization.

GRADE: 3 rd -4 th

86. ANTHONY MCFARLAND WISCONSIN RB 5081 208

Player Comparison: CHRIS JOHNSON

SUMMARY: has special change of direction ability. He is your typical homerun hitter. Has great speed and he's one

cut and gone. Isn't the strongest back, but fights for yards after contact. Surprised he wasn't used as much as a

pass catcher. This Maryland team as a whole was spaz. But, he was the one bright spot. There are some injury

concerns, but this is a mid-round guy who is ready to explode at the next level.


GRADE: 3 rd -4 th

87. BRYCE HALL VIRGINIA CB 6012 202

Player Comparison: AQIB TALIB

SUMMARY: Really good prospect with some injury history. Hall would be higher up my board, and could go a lot

higher, if it weren’t for the injuries. He has great production at Virginia and has the length and the quickness you’d

want in a corner. The injuries make him a discount in the mid rounds and someone is going to get a steal if he can

stay healthy.

GRADE: 3 rd -4 th

88. ASHTYN DAVIS CALIFORNIA S 6007 202

Player Comparison: PATRICK CHUNG

SUMMARY: Really, really strong tackler. I have questions about his athleticism, but had success playing cover 2 ,

down in the box and at free. Not sure if his speed could translate to the next level as a FS, but he's a hard hitting,

good open-field tackling safety with good instincts.

GRADE: 3 rd -4 th

89. NETANE MUTI FRESNO STATE IOL 6027 315

Player Comparison: RICHIE INCOGNITO

SUMMARY: Really strong interior offensive lineman, with good footwork. The biggest question with Muti is going

to be the injuries. Especially with most teams not being able to bring any prospects into their facilities, Muti may

slide. Does a good job moving to the next level in the run game and using his hands to create leverage. Overall, if

the medicals check out, Muti is one to look out for in the mid-rounds.

GRADE: 3 rd -4 th

90. ENO BENJAMIN ARIZONA STATE RB 5087 207

Player Comparison: CLINTON PORTS

SUMMARY: Plays big and with toughness. Hasn't been super consistent due to injuries and inconsistent o-line play.

has pretty good vision but is very hard to get a hand on, let alone, bring down. Overall, hard to project him, but

there is a lot to like about Eno. He has the traits and the vision you'd like, but there are some bigger questions.

GRADE: 3 rd -4 th

91. JABARI ZUNIGA FLORIDA EDGE 6033 264

Player Comparison: VIC BEASELY


SUMMARY: Explosive of the line of scrimmage. Very bendy as a player. Isn’t the strongest guy, and this shows on

tape with his inability to get off blocks at times. He also has some position flexibility, he played 3-tech defensive

tackle at times, although projects as a 4-3 left defensive end. Overall, Zuniga has a lot of good traits, but couldn’t

always put that into production. He could develop into a strong contributor on a team, but will need to get

stronger and develop some pass-rush counters.

GRADE: 3 rd -4 th

92. RAEKWON DAVIS ALABAMA DT/DE 6061 311

Player Comparison: DEFOREST BUCKNER

SUMMARY: For a few year now, scouts have been talking about Davis, and the potential. That potential never

developed into consistency at the collegiate level. He has the length and size of a monster who can wreck the line

of scrimmage, but could never do that consistently. Overall, Davis has not shown the development that would

warrant an early pick, however his traits, and spectacular flashes will get him over drafted. Has the potential to be

a game-changer if he develops.

GRADE: 3 rd -4 th

93. LA’MICAL PERINE FLORIDA RB 5106 216

Player Comparison: FRANK GORE

SUMMARY: Strong, twitchy pass rusher. Played primarily standing up, but also played a decent amount in a 3-point

stance. Without injury history, this guy would be close to the top of the draft board, but has had 2 major injuries in

college. Great player with great risk.

GRADE: 3 rd -4 th

94. JAMES PROCHE SOUTHERN METHODIST WR 5105 201

Player Comparison: TYLER LOCKETT

SUMMARY: This guy is clean. In and out of breaks he is quick and twitchy. Great hands. Really tough player, makes

everything look easy. Not the best blocker, and can get out jumped/played for the ball. But I like his potential at

the next level. He projects as a slot receiver, where he took most of his snaps at SMU, which will hurt his stock. But

in a deep class like this, he will be a steal.

GRADE: 3 rd -4 th

95. REGGIE ROBINSON II TULSA CB 6007 205

Player Comparison: DRE KIRKPATRICK

SUMMARY: Played some on the outside, but played a lot of corner inside the slot. Good player overall, with solid

technique, but could be smother in and out of brakes with the receiver. Overall, I like Robinson’s potential in the

slot for some teams, but doubt his ability to be a long-term solution outside as a CB1 or CB2 on a team.

GRADE: 3 rd -4 th


96. HARRISON BRYANT FLORIDA ATLANTIC TE 6046 243

Player Comparison: HEATH MILLER

SUMMARY: Want to see how big he is, doesn't look that big on tape. Pretty good blocker, didn't line up in line very

much, typically in the slot with some snaps outside as well. Really good route runner. had some drops, FAU should

have made it more of a priority to get him the ball. Overall good prospect with some potential upside, i just have

questions about his size and strength holding up at the next level.

GRADE: 3 rd -4 th

97. DEVIN ASIASI UCLA TE 6030 257

Player Comparison: DELANIE WALKER

SUMMARY: Athleticism jumps off the tape. explosive get off and strong route-running ability. Decent blocker in

the run game. good contact ion blocks. There are times you see him wide open downfield but either the QB

doesn't see him or doesn't have time to see him. Production would have been way higher. Has some problems

with drops but this is also a result of late throws into tight coverage. Overall, big fan of asiasi.

GRADE: 3 rd -4 th

98. ANTHONY GORDON WASHINGTON STATE QB 6023 205

Player Comparison: GARDNER MINSHEW

SUMMARY: Gunslinger at heart. Gordon was the last QB for Washington State under Mike Leach, and they threw

the ball; a lot. Gordon has a lot to work with and I like him as a potential late day two pick, but it is hard to project

where these QBs will go. Overall, he is a developmental prospect, but shows some potential in the mid rounds.

GRADE: 3 rd -4 th

99. LYNN BOWDEN JR. KENTUCKY WR 5105 204

Player Comparison: RANDALL COBB

SUMMARY: Versatile player. Took snaps at WR, RB, and even QB where he had a few TD passes. What jumps out

with Bowden is his speed and quickness in the open field. He is a capable route-runner with good instincts. He is

not the most natural catcher of the football, can see some body catches/the ball just doesn't stick to him. Overall,

love his versatility and quickness and I think he could be a really good slot player in the NFL.

GRADE: 3 rd -4 th

100. LUCAS NIANG TCU OT 6060 315

Player Comparison: TRENT WILLIAMS

SUMMARY: Lucas Niang is a really strong, and sometimes forgotten prospect. Another player flagged for injuries,

Niang has all the traits and potential to be a starting NFL left tackle. But, the injuries scare me. His history is not


forgiving, and that is why he comes up this low. Frankly, if healthy, he could be a first round player. Overall, the

traits, his physicality and footwork, give you reason to take him early, but buyers beware of the potential risks.

GRADE: 3 rd -4 th


Final 2020 NFL Draft Guide

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?