21.12.2012 Views

Refractive Lens Surgery

Refractive Lens Surgery

Refractive Lens Surgery

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Preface<br />

The first recorded time a human lens was<br />

removed for the purpose of addressing a<br />

refractive error was by an ophthalmologist<br />

named Fukala in 1890. We do not know<br />

what type of criticism he experienced, but<br />

we know that today he is a forgotten man in<br />

ophthalmology. The introduction of this as<br />

a concept in the late 1980s by both Drs. Paul<br />

Koch and Robert Osher’s manuscripts, resulted<br />

in considerable disdain and some<br />

condemnation by some of their colleagues<br />

and peers. At the time, refractive surgery in<br />

the United States was limited to radial keratotomy.<br />

With the development of excimer<br />

lasers came a very marked change in the attitude<br />

of eye surgeons internationally regarding<br />

the concept of invading “healthy”<br />

tissue for refractive purposes and within a<br />

relatively short period of time, LASIK was a<br />

firmly established procedure as were other<br />

modalities of corneal refractive surgery.<br />

However, we have come to recognize that<br />

corneal refractive surgery, and especially<br />

LASIK, has limitations. We have also<br />

learned much in the recent past about<br />

functional vision through the use of contrast<br />

sensitivity and an analysis of higher<br />

order optical aberrations. We have also<br />

learned that the cornea has constant spherical<br />

aberration but the lens has changing<br />

spherical aberrations. In the young, the human<br />

lens compensates for the cornea’s positive<br />

spherical aberration, but as we age the<br />

changing spherical aberration within the<br />

lens exacerbates corneal spherical aberra-<br />

tion. Because of the changing spherical<br />

aberration in the lens, no matter what is<br />

done to the cornea as a refractive surgery<br />

modality, including the most sophisticated<br />

custom corneal shaping, functional vision<br />

is going to be degraded by changing spherical<br />

aberration in the lens over time.<br />

This coupled with the fact that higher<br />

myopes and hyperopes, patients with early<br />

cataracts, and presbyopes are not necessarily<br />

good candidates for LASIK has resulted<br />

in a fresh look at lens-based refractive surgery.<br />

We have seen recent improvements in<br />

phakic IOL technology and utilization and<br />

we ourselves have been increasingly motivated<br />

to work with lens related refractive<br />

surgery modalities.<br />

Our own work with power modulations,<br />

the IOL Master, and wavefront technology<br />

IOLs has convinced us that lens-related refractive<br />

surgery can give superior results.<br />

Stephen Klyce, MD, the developer of<br />

corneal topography has demonstrated,<br />

using topographical and wavefront analysis<br />

methods, that IOL intraocular optics are<br />

far superior to the optics of the most sophisticated,<br />

customized wavefront treated<br />

cornea. We have also seen the development<br />

of new lens technologies including improved<br />

multifocal IOLs, improved accommodative<br />

IOLs, light adjustable IOLs, injectable<br />

IOLs, and a variety of other<br />

investigational IOL technologies that suggest<br />

unimaginable possibilities. Our own<br />

results with the Array and Crystalens have<br />

VII

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!