03.07.2020 Views

July-September 2020: Planting to Processing (Formerly West Coast Industrial Solutions Magazine)

The content in the third quarter is focused on risk reduction through: HACCP plans, packaging, and digital traceability. Along with ways to respond to the changes that the pandemic has made to everyones’ operations: like Paycheck Protection Program loan forgiveness. You will also meet MycoKind, a group of fungi fun-guys adapting science and tradition to change the food industry.

The content in the third quarter is focused on risk reduction through: HACCP plans, packaging, and digital traceability. Along with ways to respond to the changes that the pandemic has made to everyones’ operations: like Paycheck Protection Program loan forgiveness. You will also meet MycoKind, a group of fungi fun-guys adapting science and tradition to change the food industry.

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

July - September 2020

Planting to Processing

In this issue:

Responding to and

Reducing Risk

Formerly

Cultivate Knowledge. Feed the World.


CONTENTS

July - September 2020

PAGE 1

Letter from the Editor

PAGE 3

Innovation: Digital Traceability:

Reducing Risks and

Finding Efficiencies

PAGE 6

Safety: Contents of a Good HACCP Plan

& Manual

PAGE 10

Company Profile: MycoKind LLC

PAGE 12

Ethics: Mitigating Risk through Food

Packaging

PAGE 20

Explore: The Case For a Makerspace in

Downtown Fresno

Advertise with Us!

Contact Information

Tara Sweeney, Marketing Director

tara@wcismag.com

559.999.6637

PO Box 7864, Fresno CA 93747

Staff

Sheri McClure, Content and Sales

Tara Sweeney, Sales and Marketing

Trevor Merrow, Layout and Design

Visit us at wcismag.com


LETTER FROM THE EDITOR

Thank you for reading the July edition of Planting to Processing magazine--

formerly West Coast Industrial Solutions magazine. You voted on our social

media, and we listened; the final votes were 42.1% for “Planting to Processing,”

26.3% for “Cultivate,” 21.1% for “Food & Facilities,” and 10.5% for “Facilities &

Food.”

A

B

C

Now that you have helped us choose a new name, we need your help choosing a new logo! Please vote

through our website or our social media channels to let us know what name you think our logo should be.

The content in the third quarter is focused on risk reduction through: HACCP plans, packaging, and digital

traceability. Along with ways to respond to the changes that the pandemic has made to everyones’ operations:

like Paycheck Protection Program loan forgiveness. You will also meet MycoKind, a group of fungi fun-guys

adapting science and tradition to change the food industry.

We only have to be socially distant with in-person interaction! Feel free to connect with us on social media,

where we give updates on industry events--we attend over 20 trade shows and local events a year! Or browse

our website, where we host these articles as blog posts with more behind the scenes photos and video.

We’re starting an online show through Central Valley Talk and plan to revisit and expand on subjects we have

covered, watch us the first and third Saturday of each month at 11am PST for the live showing or follow us on

social media to stay up to date.

If you missed our past event in October 2019, we will be hosting our second annual trade show: 2020 Safety

Expo in Food & Facilities, May 11th, 2021 at the Clovis Veterans Memorial District in Clovis, CA. Speaking slots

are open if you would like to provide training to industry professionals in agriculture, food and beverage, food

processing, and manufacturing.

Join us as an exhibitor. Contact us today (tara@wcismag.com, (559) 999-6637) if you are interested or browse

our advertising options on our website. wcismag.com/advertise/

-Tara Sweeney

West Coast Industrial Solutions Magazine

West Coast Industrial Solutions Magazine

@wcismag

@wcismag

Planting to Processing | July 2020 1


The Must-Attend Live Facilities Industry

Events in California

Facilities Expo annually hosts five regional expos and conferences

directed to the interests of facilities engineers and managers,

maintenance managers, and energy managers who work in

commercial, industrial, government and institutional facilities.

• Large, User-Friendly Expo Hall • Hands-on Equipment Demos

• Educational Seminars by Experts • Special Green Buildings Section

• Exhibits of Innovative Products • Network with Your Peers

www.FacilitiesExpo.com

FREE EXHIBIT HALL AND CONFERENCES | REGISTER ONLINE

October 28 & 29, 2020

Anaheim Convention Center

Anaheim, CA

November 18 & 19, 2020

Santa Clara Convention Center

Santa Clara, CA

For Questions or Exhibiting Information:

Lisa Nagle | LNagle@FacilitiesExpo.com | 408-829-5111

2 Planting to Processing | July 2020


Innovation

Digital Traceability: Reducing Risks and

Finding Efficiencies

Written by Alex Lewis, Parity Factory Corp.

The ongoing crisis has shed light on the need for

innovation in the food space, even in the most

fundamental processes.

If someone were to ask you which industries were

most important to our daily lives, what would you say?

Along with things like communications, construction,

and clothing, one of the first things that likely comes

to mind is also one of the most basic: food. The

agricultural and food processing industries provide

for our most key needs and enables our continued

growth. It is unlikely anyone would argue against the

importance of the food and beverage industry to our

society, however 2020 has brought us a loud and

clear reminder of just how crucial it is, in the form of

the COVID-19 pandemic.

In just a few short months, food and beverage

manufacturers saw demand increases that haven’t

been seen in a lifetime. At the time of writing, sectors

of the food industry have experienced spikes in

volume ranging from 32% in milk, 30-47% across

the snack sector, and a staggering 77% increase in

demand for meat, and this trend holds true for nearly

every vertical within the industry.

The stay-at-home orders announced by most

governments have sent consumers rushing to the

store, clearing shelves and placing new strain on food

and beverage processors. As they struggle to keep

up with their order volume, many manufacturers are

looking for new ways to improve their efficiency and

reduce their liabilities. As it turns out, one of the most

effective methods may also be the simplest: digitizing

their lot tracing.

What is digital lot tracing?

All food and beverage manufacturers track their lots.

In fact, it is one of the basic requirements for running a

food processing business, with the specific standards

and protocols defined at the federal level by

organizations such as the FDA. By requiring tracking

of all material that is involved in making a product,

down to the packaging used, it ensures that recalls

can be performed swiftly and protects the health of

the public. Manufacturers manage their tracing using

a variety of methods, from pen and paper, to Microsoft

Excel, to fully integrated traceability software, with

many using a combination of methods. Digital lot

tracing simply means that a company is capturing

Planting to Processing | July 2020 3


and managing their tracing data on a digital platform,

often integrating scanning and barcoding into the

process. This approach has a drastically lower error

rate than more traditional methods and tends to be

significantly more efficient.

Despite tracing being a common daily task that all

processors contend with, there has been surprisingly

little momentum towards automated lot tracing in

food. By some metrics, only 1 in 5 operations have

fully automated their lot data capture, with a bit more

having partially implemented the process. The food

industry has always been slow to adopt new processes,

but as demand and competition skyrockets, many are

finally feeling the need for an upgrade.

The risks of a recall

Executing recalls, specifically executing them quickly

and efficiently, is one of the biggest challenges

that food and beverage manufacturers face.

Under current FDA guidelines, food and beverage

processors need to be able to perform a recall within

four hours. Many of the major retailers demand even

more of their suppliers; if you want your product on

the shelves in a Walmart or Costco, you must be able

to perform the same process in as little as two hours.

The unfortunate reality is that for processors tracing

on paper, particularly those producing at scale, these

targets are difficult to hit. Also, the human element

involved in manual tracing can allow errors to find

their way into data, and this has become especially

true for those who are dramatically increasing their

throughput to keep up with new demand caused by

COVID-19. Without true, reliable data, a recall can

quickly go from difficult to impossible.

The consequences of a botched recall can be dire:

the average recall costs a manufacturer $10 million,

not including possible fines from regulators, or losing

the aforementioned Walmart or Costco contract.

One of the biggest losses is one that may not be

immediately obvious: consumer confidence. Over

half of consumers will quit purchasing a product once

it has been recalled, and studies have shown that a

company’s stock price will typically drop as much as

22% following a major recall. Once that confidence is

gone, it can take months or even years to get it back,

if it can be regained at all.

All these problems can be mitigated, if not

completely prevented, through digital lot tracing.

With a capable solution in place, recall times can

be measured in minutes, not hours, as a few quick

searches replaces shuffling through endless forms to

find the lot in question (if it was recorded correctly at

all). This guarantees compliance with even the most

demanding of rules and regulations and eliminates

all fear when inspectors and auditors show up for

routine recall tests. In addition, the ability to execute

a speedy yet thorough recall when problems arise

minimizes the risk to both consumers, and the

manufacturer’s reputation. The bottom line: most

food manufacturers are going to face a recall at some

point. It is crucial to have the systems in place to react

appropriately when that time comes.

How does it increase efficiency?

Due to the huge importance of lot tracing,

manufacturers using manual systems often have some

of their most competent and experienced employees

devoted to the task. Even if these staff would be better

suited to other areas, it’s just not worth taking the risk

of assigning less experienced employees to the job.

Digital lot tracing solves this by drastically simplifying

the tracing process. Scanning a barcode and letting

software do the rest is far quicker, easier, and less

error-prone than meticulously creating and tracking

hundreds of lot codes by hand. Meaning that you end

up spending less time on tracing, and therefore less

money, while winding up with data that is significantly

more reliable. This both frees up an operation’s most

capable employees to pursue new opportunities and

allows anyone in the operation to take part in the

tracing process. New employees can be trained and

onboarded quickly, which is particularly useful for

processors hiring huge amounts of new labor in the

wake of COVID-19.

All of this allows for greatly increased flexibility

when it comes to staffing, and as COVID-19 turns

the industry on its head the value of that flexibility

has become crystal clear. While many of us have

had the luxury to transition into working from home,

that’s just not an option for many working in the food

space. When employees are unable to attend work,

for example if they are sick, someone else must step

in. This can be a major threat to efficiency when the

few people in your operation qualified to handle lot

tracking are missing. In dealing with turnover and

staff redistribution, there’s tangible benefit to having

a system that allows employees to be effective,

regardless of their experience level.

4 Planting to Processing | July 2020


For those looking to digitize their lot tracing, there

is no shortage of solutions to accomplish that task.

However, a sufficiently robust solution should go

beyond just traceability. If you are tracking each lot as it

moves through your facility, it creates great possibility

to capture additional data such as yields, storage

locations, and quality information. In this way, digital

lot tracing can be viewed as a foundation on which to

build even more extensive efficiency improvements.

These additional features are some of the most

important considerations for any manufacturer to

make when choosing between available systems.

Preparing for an uncertain future

COVID-19 has proven that swift, unpredictable

changes can happen in any industry, even one as

foundational as food and beverage. With new issues

such as shifting demographics, climate change, and

the variable nature of trade on the horizon, it is likely

that changes will become more frequent and even

the smallest efficiencies will be essential to thrive.

Demetrekakes, Pam. “How the Coronavirus Is

Affecting Food Processing.” Foodprocessing.

com, Food Processing Magazine, 2020, www.

foodprocessing.com/articles/2020/how-thecoronavirus-is-affecting-food-processing/.

Lelieveld, H. L. M. Hygiene in Food Processing.

Woodhead, 2017.

Stier, Richard F. “How Food Processors Can Create a

Plan for Traceability and Recalls.” Food Engineering

RSS, Food Engineering, 11 May 2020, www.

foodengineeringmag.com/articles/98026-how-foodprocessors-can-create-a-plan-for-traceability-andrecalls.

Torero, Maximo. “How to Stop a Looming Food

Crisis.” Foreign Policy, 14 Apr. 2020, foreignpolicy.

com/2020/04/14/how-to-stop-food-crisiscoronavirus-economy-trade/.

Customer consciousness is also changing rapidly,

and businesses that want to stay competitive have

no choice but to change with it. As consumers and

regulators demand ever more transparency and

accountability from the food industry, reliable tracing

data is becoming ever more crucial.

Concrete Restoration Products & Services

Floor Patching Kits

®

Manufacturers will undoubtedly rise to these new

challenges in the future, just as they are rising to the

challenges of today. And along the way, many will

find a comprehensive digital lot tracing system to be

one of their most valuable tools.

Sources/Further Reading:

Breaux, Randy. “COVID-19 Shows the Need for

Automation.” Foodprocessing.com, Food Processing

Magazine, 2020, www.foodprocessing.com/

articles/2020/power-lunch-covid-19-shows-theneed-for-automation/.

Deloitte. Recall Execution Effectiveness:

Collaborative Approaches to Improving Consumer

Safety and Confidence. 2010.

gos:

ows SealTight

Polyuria Crack Repair

559.724.9940

www.acornsurfaces.com

sales@acornsurfaces.com

Synthetics International

Concrete Moisture Specialists

• Chemical Resistant

• Antimicrobial

• Flexible

• Cures in Low Temperatures

• Fast Cure

• Nonslip

AMERICAN MADE

thetics International up to center and put Versaflex and Nilfisk under.

res of product patching kits "Concrete Restoration" and buzz words: "."

Planting to Processing | July 2020 5


safety

Contents of a Good HACCP Plan & Manual

Written by Safe Food Alliance Team

Originally Published in Food Safety, HACCP, Starter Series

In today’s food manufacturing environment, basic

food safety principles are no longer enough to meet

customer and regulatory requirements. The rules

have changed, in large part due to the Food Safety

Modernization Act (FSMA). In addition to new laws

from legislators, the standards and demands of

customers now far surpass regulatory requirements.

What this means is there is now an expectation to not

only master Hazard Analysis Critical Control Points

(HACCP) but to go one step further and become

Global Food Safety Initiative (GFSI) certified. To gain

certification with any of these programs, you need to

start in the same place. You start with a HACCP plan.

12 Steps to a Good HACCP Plan

When building out your HACCP plan, follow this

specific methodology involving 12 steps. If you

are having trouble, just reach out to your friendly

neighborhood Safe Food Alliance team.

One thing to remember as you build out your plan

– a HACCP Plan is a living document, and as such,

should be revisited often as your processes change,

your company grows, and you discover better ways

to produce your product. Now that we have that

covered, let’s begin.

1. Assemble the HACCP Team

Your plan will typically include a table where all the

names of the HACCP Team members are written and

signed, and the team leader is clearly designated. The

team functions best when it’s highly cross-functional

and includes members of various departments such

as sanitation, maintenance, production, and quality.

It’s essential to have these varied perspectives and

background knowledge.

In this section, you should include a brief description

of each member’s current position, background,

and experience. You’ll also need to have a copy of

6 Planting to Processing | July 2020


a HACCP formal training certificate for the HACCP

coordinator, from an accredited two-day HACCP

course. There should be some sort of documented

HACCP training for the rest of the team as well,

whether conducted internally or by someone like us.

The more knowledgeable the team, the better the

plan will be.

2. Describe the Product

This section should include a full description of each

product or family of products within the scope of the

plan. Product descriptions should consist of details

that impact the food safety of the product, including

(as applicable):

• the recipe or formulation

• the packing materials and any other information

such as the modified atmosphere

• the conditions in which the product is to be stored

(e.g., temperature, light, humidity)

• the shelf life

• distribution conditions

• any potential for abuse in the distribution chain or

by consumers, which may put the product at risk.

The better you define the product before starting the

hazard analysis, the more thorough the review will be.

3. Identify the Intended Use

The intended use is based on the usual consumption

of the commodity by the final consumer or user. Again,

defining intended use helps ensure a more thorough

hazard analysis later. This section includes both your

company’s intended purpose based on product

design, as well as potential other applications. The

more you know your consumers, the better you can

take care of them. A classic example, in this case, is

cookie dough: it’s a product you typically cook before

consumption, but in some cases, it’s eaten raw. For

this reason, several companies have had recalls on

their cookie dough due to consumer illness.

4. Construct the Flow Diagram

The process flow diagram must be clear and detailed

to describe all process steps. Use this diagram to help

ensure the hazard analysis is thorough and as a visual

reference as your team considers potential hazards

to the consumer. The flow diagram must include

every process step that occurs on-site, from the very

beginning (e.g., receiving and preparing ingredients,

storing packing materials, etc.) to the very end

(shipping, warehousing, etc.) The clearer the diagram

is to the viewer, the easier to understand the process.

Others may also use the table during site visits (e.g.,

customers, auditors, consultants, regulatory officials).

Hence, it’s wise to design it in a way that it’s relatively

clear to others who don’t know the process as well as

you do.

5. On-Site Verification of the Flow Diagram

On-site verification of the diagram helps ensure its

accuracy. Again, the purpose of this is primarily to

ensure a thorough hazard analysis. The site will need

to provide proof that the HACCP Team has verified

the flow diagram. Some companies like to keep the

first version of the diagram with hand-written notes on

it, indicating changes made and initialed and dated

by the participants. Ultimately, however, proof of the

verification is best done with a final, updated copy that

is signed; or meeting minutes indicating approval of

the final version and signatures of participants.

6. Conduct a Hazard Analysis

The hazard analysis is part of the plan that typically

takes the most time to review and update. Here the

team collects and examines all relevant data to the

product’s safety, including process performance,

product defects, customer complaints, results of

internal and third-party audits, and various other

relevant information. The team must take the proper

time to conduct a thorough analysis.

A Hazard analysis can vary in format, but needs to

include these common elements:

• List of all process steps and ingredients

• Identification of potential hazards

• Assessment of each hazard, with consideration of

both severity and likelihood

• Identification of ‘significant’ hazards

• Justification of the assessment (detailed

explanation as to the team’s reasoning)

• Identification of appropriate controls for each

hazard

• Now, under FSMA, the identification of any

Preventive Controls as well. For more information on

this subject, take a look at this article. For training,

refer to the PCQI course.

Planting to Processing | July 2020 7


7. Determine Critical Control Points (CCP’s)

This one is a simple concept. Based on the hazard

analysis described above, you can quickly identify

all significant hazards and CCPs. Critical Control

Points are those essential steps designed to control

a specific hazard so that the product will be safe to

consume. The team should use a decision tree like

this one when determining CCPs.

8. Establish Critical Limits for Each CCP

A critical limit is a critical control point’s “go/no go”

or “acceptable/unacceptable” criteria. For some

processes, such as metal detection, it is as simple

as testing with certified metal test pieces to ensure

proper function. For other types of CCPs, it can be

much more complex and include parameters such as

temperature, humidity, product viscosity, or chemical

concentration. All these variables and values have to

be clearly defined, including both lower and upper

limits, as applicable.

Documents related to the process and relevant

sources used to establish the critical limits must be

available to support the limits. These documents

could be regulatory standards, guidelines, internal or

third-party validation, experimental results, literature

surveys, and expert guidance. The stricter the

validated limits, the higher the potential efficacy.

9. Establish a Monitoring System

This step is where we define the monitoring method

for each CCP. Monitoring is how we ensure the

process has met the critical limit, so the product is

safe. The monitoring procedure should contain the

following:

• What will you monitor?

• How often shall it be monitored?

• Who is responsible for performing the task?

• What instruments will you use?

• How will you monitor? (method)

The clearer the instructions, the fewer chances of

failure.

10. Establish Corrective Actions

Each CCP is required to have predetermined and

documented corrective actions for deviations that may

occur. The corrective actions plan should comprise

at least the following elements: the responsibility

for each action, disposition of the non-complying

product, the correction of the cause of failure, and

recording the event. Keep records of activities readily

available. If you need help with conducting root

cause analysis for your corrective actions, check out

our quick root cause analysis course.

11. Establish Verification Procedures

Much of the discussion in our HACCP courses end up

centering around how to conduct verification in the

context of HACCP properly. Verification procedures

should be activities designed to confirm that the plan

is: 1) being followed; 2) effective for its intended use,

and 3) adequately maintained. We are looking for

defined procedures here, indicating how we conduct

routine verification activities like the sign-off of the

CCP monitoring records, as well as how you complete

the less-frequent validation. The more exhaustive

the verification is, the more confident we can be of

the plan. For more on verification, take a look at our

article “The 6th Principle of HACCP: Verification”.

12. Establish Documentation and Record-keeping

This final step includes establishing both recordkeeping

processes and the company’s documentation

system (establishing defined procedures, the

company’s methods of document control, etc.).

Consider:

• How will you document your system?

• What should you include?

• Who is responsible for doing it?

• How long are you keeping records? Where are you

saving them?

• Who needs to have access to what documents and

how are documents controlled?

A better-documented plan helps ensure better

execution.

As you may realize by now, developing and

documenting an effective HACCP plan is not an easy

task. Training on the methodology, experience, and

technical elements are essential aspects of effective

HACCP Plan implementation. If you need guidance

with training or consultation, Safe Food Alliance is

here to help.

8 Planting to Processing | July 2020


When it comes to food safety,

we’ve got you covered.

Drop in and see us at our Food Safety Center in

Kingsburg, CA or visit us online at safefoodalliance.com

Planting to Processing | July 2020 9


Company profile

MycoKind LLC

MycoKind LLC was incorporated in 2018 when two

PhDs talked about changing the world through

fungi. A food scientist, a plant pathologist, and a

food systems analyst ate dinner over Korean BBQ

and the kindness that grows by culturing community

kickstarted the fungal venture.

They wanted to take a look into changing the food

industry by tapping into novel methods of growing

products. “We are not trying to create new supply

chains or build completely new infrastructures. Rather,

we intend to tap into science and tradition to slightly

adapt something that exists (ie fermentation).”

The most significant milestone up to date was having

a five course four beverage mushroom themed

popup dinner with more than 50 guests and some

VIPs. Some of their favorite accomplishments are

different conversations and interviews among their

colleagues including Daryl of BeerTalkNow, Ilona of

Ktchnrebel, Lichen of Asians in America, Adam of My

Food Job Rocks, Chef Gigi of Sunday Suppers, Lana

of Food Tank, Alex of Cultured Meats and The Future

of Food, and Leneia of Artisan Restaurant Collection.

Each conversation was fun and engaging.

Some challenges that they face are that they “have a

lot of capabilities that are within [their] company and

that means a lot of IP. It is just difficult to figure out

where to start and which idea is fitting for product

market fit.”

Their future plans are to be able to collaborate

with more brands, organizations, institutions, and

communities to increase the accessibility of fungal

knowledge. “Through culturing community, we hope

that our kindness grows too.”

Something they wish more people knew about their

industry: “Fungi have a lot of applications that we

are starting explore in more novel methods. The

possibilities have opened up more discussions on

fermentation, mycoremediation, health and wellness.“

Check them out on social media @mycokindllc on

Facebook or Instagram, @mycokind on Twitter and

LinkedIn, or their website: https://mycokind.com/

as they plan to figure out how to host forays, popup

meals, and classes.

10 Planting to Processing | July 2020


Northern CA (707) 540-4199 Central Valley (559) 323-8147

Wineries & Breweries

Experience

You Can Trust

With 32 years in business, chances

are we’re doing something right.

Jeremiah Terron

jeremiah@proteccoatings.com

Cell: (559) 974-3972

• 1/4” Trowel Flooring

• Urethane Flooring

• Floor Grinding & Coating

• Slope to Drain Floors

• Drain Installation

• Expansion & Control Joint Caulking

• Seamless Wall Systems

• USDA / FDA / OSHA Compliant

Joe Aceves

joe@proteccoatings.com

Central Coast: (805) 455-3343

2615 N. Business Park | Fresno, CA 93727 | ProTecCoatings.com

Planting to Processing | July 2020 11


ethics

Mitigating Risk through Food Packaging

By George G. Misko and Natalie E. Rainer

ethylene scavengers, time-temperature sensors, and

biosensors that can help to prolong shelf life and/

or monitor the condition of food. In fact, it is clear

that over the past 100 years or more, packaging

technology and food processing equipment has

been a major contributor to the manner in which

food products of all sorts safely reach the dinner

tables of Americans and people throughout the

world, while lessening the environmental footprint

of this industry. Indeed, even in these days of the

coronavirus pandemic, the U.S. Food and Drug

Administration (FDA) has stated that “[T]here is no

evidence of food packaging being associated with

the transmission of COVID-19.” 1

Historically, the main function of food packaging

has been to safeguard food by providing a physical

barrier to help maintain food and beverages in a

sanitary condition. Over the years, advances in food

packaging technology have resulted in packaging

that provides additional protection and other

benefits. These more recent innovations include

susceptors to aid in the browning of foods cooked

in microwave ovens, oxygen scavengers/emitters,

The U.S. and other jurisdictions around the world

have implemented food packaging regulations

to assure that packaging materials are safe for

use and that no off-odors or tastes are imparted

from the packaging to food or beverages. And as

technological advances in food packaging provide

improvements in food quality and safety, some of

the regulations governing the composition and use

of food packaging regulations have been changed

to accommodate these advances. This article will

focus on U.S. food laws governing food packaging

materials and revisions to those laws necessitated

by technological advances. First, though, we provide

a brief description of the manner in which food

packaging is regulated in the U.S. and the information

that is required to assure the safety of food contact

materials.

U.S. Food Packaging Laws

The history of formal regulation of food packaging

in the U.S. began with the passage of the Food

Additives Amendment of 1958. Prior to 1958,

customers sometimes insisted on being assured of

1

See the FDA information sheet, titled, “Shopping for Food During the COVID-19 Pandemic – Information for

Consumers.”

12 Planting to Processing | July 2020


a package’s safety and utility by asking to see some

documentation from FDA or the U. S. Department of

Agriculture (USDA) indicating that it had reviewed

and found that the intended use of the materials

would not adulterate food or, put another way, were

safe for their intended use.

The Food Additives Amendment of 1958 added, in

part, a new section to the Federal Food, Drug, and

Cosmetic Act (FD&C Act) that defined the term “food

additive” as “any substance the intended use of which

results or may reasonably be expected to result,

directly or indirectly, in its becoming a component or

otherwise affecting the characteristics of any food”

unless that substance is Generally Recognized as Safe

(GRAS) or subject to one of a number of exceptions

or exclusions listed in the Act.” 2 As a result, all food

contact substances that may reasonably be expected

to migrate to food are regulated as food additives.

Conversely, food packaging substances that are not

reasonably expected to become components of food

are not by definition “food additives” and may be

used without prior authorization or clearance by FDA.

Food contact substances (FCSs) that are considered

food additives must be authorized for use in food

packaging by FDA through a food additive regulation

or a Food Contact Notification (FCN). The food additive

petition process entails clearing food additives

(including food packaging materials that meet the

definition of a food additive) through a notice-andcomment

rulemaking process. Information required

to submit a food additive petition for packaging

materials includes: the identity and composition

of the substance of interest; a description of the

manufacturing process; information on its intended

use (such as food types, temperature conditions at the

time of packaging and during use, and the expected

duration of contact with food); and chemistry and

toxicology data supporting the safety of that food

additive for its intended use. The petition should also

include test methods used to verify specifications

for the raw materials and the finished products.

Finally, the petitioner must include an environmental

assessment to established whether the manufacture

or use of the substance as intended will likely result

in any undue impact that will require further study.

Once a food additive is cleared through this process,

FDA publishes a regulation, which can be relied upon

by the petitioner as well as other manufacturers and

users of the additive provided any limitations and

specifications listed in the regulation are met.

The FCN process largely supplanted the petitioning

process with passage of the FDA Modernization Act

of 1997. Data requirements for an FCN are about the

same as those for a food additive petition with respect

to the need to estimate dietary intake for an additive

and establish safety through the provision of toxicity

data adequate to support the estimated exposure. In

addition, data identifying the FCS, its intended use

manufacturing process and the like are very much

required as in the petition process. The primary

difference between the FCN and FAP process is that

FCNs are proprietary, i.e., they can only be relied upon

by the manufacturer of the FCS identified in the FCN

and by its customers. Third parties who manufacture

the same substance are required to submit their own

FCN to be enabled to reach the same market. The

other major difference is that where it could take

literally years for FDA to grant a petition, an FCN

automatically becomes effective 120 days after it has

been accepted for filing by the Agency, unless FDA

objects in writing prior to the effective date.

Assuring Safety

FDA applies a tiered approach to the toxicity data

needed to support safety of food-contact materials.

That is, the higher the level of estimated dietary intake

to a substance, the greater the toxicity data needed

to support safety.

Another important consideration with respect to

safety is the statutory and regulatory requirement

that food contact materials be manufactured in such

a way as not to result in the adulteration of food,

i.e., be of a purity suitable for the intended use, as

required by FDA’s Good Manufacturing Practices

(GMP) regulation for food packaging materials. 3

The suitable purity requirement dictates that FCSs

may not impart anything to food that may cause it to

be harmful or deleterious to health or result in an offtaste

or -odor in food. To meet this requirement, the

manufacturer must consider the safety of foreseeable

2

See Section 201(s) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act.

Planting to Processing | July 2020 13


impurities in the FCS, including residual monomers,

starting reactants, catalysts, and reaction byproducts

and degradation products.

New Technologies

As new types of food packaging are developed based

on technological advances, the safety of the materials

used in these packages need to be evaluated. In

some cases, revisions in food packaging regulations

were made to assure the safety of the food in contact

with new technology. We will examine some of these

technologies and what new requirements, if any, were

implemented to assure their safety.

Microwave Susceptors. The introduction of susceptors

in microwave packaging resulted in higher cooking

temperatures, which could be used to crisp and

brown food by cooking it in a microwave oven. FDA

food packaging regulations use the term “Conditions

of Use” to describe the typical temperature conditions

under which food products may be used in contact

with packaging materials or articles intended to

process or hold food. In April 2006, FDA expanded

its list of Conditions of Use to include two additional

categories. One of the new categories, Condition

of Use J (“Cooking at temperatures exceeding

250°F”), is applicable to microwave heat susceptor

materials. The following year, in December 2007, FDA

updated its chemistry guidance for preparing FCN

submissions. The new chemistry guidance includes

specific protocols on testing for dual ovenable,

microwaveable, and microwave heat susceptor

materials.

Antimicrobial Agents. The safety of antimicrobials

used in food packaging is regulated by FDA similar

to other food additives; however, they may also

require registration with the U.S. Environmental

Protection Agency (EPA) under Federal Insecticide,

Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA). Additionally,

antimicrobials used in or on permanent or semipermanent

food contact surfaces, which are not

intended to have an ongoing effect on the food

contact surface, are regulated by FDA as food

additives. If, however, the intended effect is ongoing,

that is, intended to preserve the article from microbes

or the protection of the user, EPA exercises jurisdiction

over the use and food safety issue.

In all cases, except those involving processed food,

the antimicrobial used will be considered a pesticide

for purposes of FIFRA and will require registration with

EPA regardless of FDA’s jurisdiction over the matter.

In addition, antimicrobials added to packaging

materials with the expressed intent of migrating into

the food to increase its shelf life by retarding spoilage

may be considered food preservatives by FDA or

USDA, if meat or poultry, and require labeling of the

food product.

Biobased and Biodegradable Plastics. As interest

in sustainability has increased, the use of biobased

and biodegradable plastics in food packaging is

expanding. “Biobased” means related to or based

out of natural, renewable, or living sources, while

“biodegradable” means capable of being broken

down naturally to basic elemental components (water,

biomass, and gas) with the aid of microorganisms.

“Biobased plastics” are plastics manufactured from

renewable biomass, such as vegetable oil, cornstarch,

pea starch, and microbiota. Biobased plastics can

also be biodegradable.

While biobased plastics are required to comply with

the same regulations with respect to food safety as

fossil-based plastics, there are several regulatory

issues that need to be considered for new biobased

material or new applications for existing materials.

These include determining the appropriate food

simulants to be used to estimate the potential for

migration and demonstrating that the substance

is stable for its intended use. In addition, it may be

necessary to consider the suitable purity of the finished

product with respect to the potential presence of

organic matter, such as cellular debris, and naturally

occurring contaminants (e.g., mycotoxins and algal

biotoxins).

Recycled Materials. The growing interest in

sustainability is also behind recent initiatives by a

number of food companies to increase the use of

recyclable packaging and the use of post-consumer

recycled plastic content in food packaging. Recycled

plastic in food packaging must meet the same safety

standards as virgin plastic.

Companies may independently evaluate the status

and safety of a polymer produced through a recycling

process. However, many companies will submit

3

See Title 21 of the Code of Federal Regulations, Section 174.5.

14 Planting to Processing | July 2020


their determinations to FDA for review through a

voluntary program. If FDA agrees with the company’s

determination that a given recycling process is

adequate to produce suitably pure recycled foodcontact

material, it will issue a no objection letter

(NOL). To assist recyclers, FDA has issued guidance

on recycled plastics for use in food packaging, which

provides information on how to establish the safety of

recycled polymers for food packaging. With respect

to secondary (physical reprocessing) and tertiary

recycling (regeneration of purified starting materials),

FDA stresses the importance of demonstrating

that possible contaminants from prior use of the

plastic are sufficiently removed by the recycling

process. To accomplish this, FDA provides specific

recommendation on contaminant testing.

Conclusion

We have provided several examples of new

innovations incorporated into food packaging. The

use of antimicrobial is just one example of active and

intelligent packaging, or packaging that interacts

with food or its surroundings to prolong shelf life or

monitor the condition of the food, slow the rate of

oxidation, and prevent microbial attack. As advances

in food packaging technology continue, further

regulatory considerations may need to be addressed.

About the Authors:

George Misko is one of Keller and Heckman’s Food

and Drug practice group leaders. Mr. Misko’s practice

focuses on food and drug matters and environmental

concerns, including pesticide regulation, right-toknow

laws, and toxic substance control regulations.

He has extensive experience counseling clients

on regulatory requirements relating to chemical

substances, plastics and food products in the U.S. and

other jurisdictions, including Canada, the European

Union, Latin America, and the Asia-Pacific region. He

also represents trade associations, including acting

as legal counsel to the Global Silicones Council.

Natalie Rainer practices in the area of food and drug

law. She advises clients on regulatory requirements

for foods, dietary supplements, cosmetics, and food

and drug packaging in jurisdictions around the world,

including North America, Latin America, Europe, Asia,

and the Middle East. Ms. Rainer’s practice includes

evaluating the regulatory status of food-contact

materials, food additives, and color additives; advising

companies on advertising and labeling requirements

(including claim substantiation, nutrition labeling,

menu labeling and environmental/green claims); and

counseling clients on the Food Safety Modernization

Act and its regulations.

Your Source for Print, Packing, and Promotion

500 free business cards with purchase for new customers

Graphic Design Print / Copies Custom Apparel Promotional Parcel Service Will Call & Deliveries

559.237.4747 graphics@fineprintplus.com www.fineprintplus.com

Planting to Processing | July 2020 15


finance

Finance: You’ve Received

an SBA Paycheck Protection

Loan: Now What?

Written by Jeffrey Markarian, CPA

Dedekian, George, Small & Markarian

COVID-19 has had a devastating effect on the

American economy, and agriculture has been

especially hard hit. To help provide economic

relief, various federal legislation has been enacted,

including the Coronavirus Aid, Relief and Economic

Security (CARES) Act. As part of the CARES Act, the

Small Business Administration (SBA) received funding

and authority to establish the “Paycheck Protection

Program” (PPP). The PPP is a forgivable loan program

that was established as an incentive for small

businesses to keep their workers on payroll during

this financially difficult time. As of June 5, 2020, the

SBA had received total funding from Congress in the

amount of $659 billion, and had approved 4,525,081

loans totaling approximately $511 billion.

If you are one of the many small business owners in

the agricultural industry that has received a forgivable

PPP loan, you must apply for forgiveness of your

PPP loan by submitting an SBA “Loan Forgiveness

Application” to the lender servicing your PPP loan,

as the loan is not automatically forgiven. As a result,

it is imperative that you plan now to maximize the

forgiveness of your loan.

The SBA has continued to provide additional guidance

throughout the PPP in response to ongoing requests

for assistance and clarity. Also, on June 5, 2020, the

Paycheck Protection Program Flexibility Act (PPPFA)

was enacted, which provides PPP loan recipients with

increased flexibility in utilizing PPP loan proceeds.

Most significantly, The PPPFA has extended the

period to use funds from eight weeks after the date

of receipt of loan proceeds to twenty-four weeks.

Borrowers receiving PPP loan proceeds prior to

June 5, 2020, retain the option to use an eight-week

covered period if desired. Please note that all of the

following information includes the changes resulting

from the PPPFA.

The original intention of the PPP was to keep

employees paid for the eight-week period beginning

with the date loan proceeds are received. As

mentioned above, recent legislation has extended

this to a twenty-four-week period. Expenses to be

paid with loan proceeds include payroll costs and

specific non-payroll costs.

16 Planting to Processing | July 2020


Payroll costs include the following:

• Salary, wages, commissions, or tips (limited

to $15,384.62 per employee for the covered

period)

• Employee benefits (including payments for

vacation, parental, family, medical, or sick leave;

allowance for dismissal or severance pay; group

health care benefits; payment of retirement

benefits; and state and local taxes assessed on

compensation)

Non-payroll costs include the following:

• Interest on mortgage incurred before February

15, 2020

• Rent on lease agreement in force before

February 15, 2020

• Utilities (including electricity, gas, water,

transportation, telephone or internet) for which

service began before February 15, 2020

• To be eligible for full loan forgiveness, at least

60% of the loan must be used for payroll costs

and not more than 40% for allowable non-payroll

costs. If less than 60% of the loan is used for

payroll costs, the borrower is still eligible for

partial loan forgiveness. The first iteration of

the PPP required 75% of the funds to be used

for payroll or only part of the loan would be

forgiven, but the PPPFA decreased the required

percentage.

Dynamic Coatings, Inc.

Industrial & Commercial Flooring Solutions

• Concrete Polishing

• Polyurethane Cements

• Stained Concrete

• Flooring Demo

• Epoxy Systems

• Shot-Blasting

• Crack & Joint Repair

Fresno

559.225.4605

Sacramento

916.485.6800

Safe and Compliant with:

Before

www.dciflooring.com

After

Oakland

510.352.7000

What happens if your PPP loan is not forgiven? Any

portion of your PPP loan that is not forgiven will be

required to be paid back over a 2-year period at 1%

interest, with payments deferred for ten months from

the date of the PPP loan disbursement. However, for

PPP loans approved by the SBA on or after June 5,

2020, the PPP loan maturity is increased to 5-years.

On May 15, the SBA released its long-awaited PPP

forgiveness form and instructions for borrowers to

apply for forgiveness (please note that a modified

forgiveness form is pending as a result of the PPPFA).

The form also provides detailed information related

to the documentation required to be provided with

your loan forgiveness application. It is important to

review the documentation requirements; as extensive

documentation may be required to be submitted

depending upon your eligible expenses submitted

for forgiveness. Although the release of the form by

the SBA brought with it significant changes to the

interpretation of some components of forgiveness

that were not previously known, additional guidance

and clarity is still needed on some of the components

of forgiveness. Changes were made to the following

components of the program based on the release of

the form:

Covered payroll periods – Under original guidance,

the covered payroll period began immediately after

loan disbursement and lasted eight weeks. The

PPPFA has increased the covered payroll period to

twenty-four weeks. For those with payroll schedules

that did not align with the disbursement and covered

period, this generated many questions and concerns.

However, this latest guidance indicates that the eightweek

period may begin starting with the borrower’s

first payroll following disbursement, not necessarily

on the day of disbursement. This alternative period

only covers payroll costs, not other allowable

expenses, although adjustments do exist for other

allowable expenses.

Incurred and/or paid expenses – The CARES Act

originally indicated that, for costs to be covered under

PPP, they would need to be incurred and paid during

the eight-week period (increased to twenty-four

weeks by the PPPFA). The latest guidance, however,

forgives costs that are incurred, but not paid, as long

as they are paid on or before regular billing date. This

expansion applies to costs such as mortgage interest,

rent, utilities, and payroll incurred during the loan

period. Payroll costs incurred during the last payroll

Planting to Processing | July 2020 17


period but not paid during the covered or alternative

periods (mentioned above) may be forgiven if those

payroll costs are paid on or before the next regular

payroll date.

Full-time equivalent (FTE) employee counts and

wages – The guidance also included several

clarifications to the FTE employee count and wage

calculations necessary for forgiveness including:

• FTE calculation can be rounded to the nearest

tenth – The formula to calculate an FTE is

average number of hours paid per week per

employee/40, rounded to nearest tenth (differs

from Affordable Care Act calculation).

• Wage reductions must be analyzed on a per

employee annualized basis – Salary or hourly

calculations should be done on an average

annualized basis compared to period of

Jan. 1, 2020, to March 31, 2020. If the average

for the twenty-four week period is 25% less

than first quarter of 2020, loan forgiveness will

be reduced, unless the reduction is restored at

equal to or greater levels by December 31, 2020,

then forgiveness will not be reduced.

• Safe harbor exists for borrowers who rehire lost

employees by December 31, 2020, at the same

level as of Feb. 15, 2020. Forgiveness will not be

reduced.

• Safe harbor exists for borrowers who made

good faith written offer to rehire employees who

then refused. Forgiveness will not be reduced.

• Safe harbor exists for borrowers who fired

employees for cause, voluntarily resigned, or

voluntarily requested and received reduction in

hours. Forgiveness will not be reduced.

Here is a quick rundown of the changes made by the

PPP Flexibility Act. (See table on opposite page)

Also of note:

• *Borrowers may elect to stick with the 8-week

covered period for loans originating prior to

June 5, 2020. However, it is not clear if the June

30, 2020, safe harbor deadline still applies.

• The amount of any Economic Injury Disaster

Loan (EIDL) refinanced will be factored in when

determining the percentage of proceeds for

payroll costs.

• It is unclear whether compensation limits

formerly prorated based on 8 weeks now

prorated based on 24 weeks.

• It is unclear if the covered period may end prior

to 24 weeks if funds have been used.

Further rules and guidance are expected to be

issued from the SBA, including a modified borrower

application form, and a modified loan forgiveness

application that will included the changes resulting

from the recently enacted PPPFA; however, please do

not hesitate to contact us for further assistance with

your PPP loan questions and help maximizing your

loan forgiveness.

Dedekian, George, Small & Markarian

Accountancy Corporation

8080 North Palm Avenue, Suite 201

Fresno, California 93711-5797

P: 559.431.5500

Cpaplus.com

Advertise with Us!

Reach Your Target Audience

Manufacturing | Food Processing | Food & Beverage | Agriculture

Represented at over 20 trade shows annually

Distribution of 10,000+

wcismag.com/advertise/

18 Planting to Processing | July 2020


Criteria Prior Guidance Current Guidance

Covered Period*

Usage of Funds

Extension of Safe Harbor

for Compensation

& FTE Reductions

Deferral of Loan Payments

8 weeks from PPP loan

disbursement

Minimum of 75% of funds

must be used for payroll to

with a maximum of 25% for

non-payroll costs to achieve

forgiveness

Salary or hourly wage

reductions must be reinstated

by June 30, 2020, to avoid

reduced forgiveness

6 months from loan

origination date

The earlier of 24 weeks from

date of loan disbursement

or Dec. 31, 2020.

Minimum of 60% of funds must be

used for payroll with a maximum of

40% used for non-payroll costs to

achieve forgiveness. If 60% of loans

are not used for payroll, forgiveness

is calculated on a sliding scale.

Salary or hourly wage reductions

have until Dec. 31, 2020, to be

restored to avoid reduced

forgiveness

Earlier of 10 months after the last

day of Covered Period or when SBA

remits the loan forgiveness funds to

lender

Loan Maturity

Safe Harbors Based on

Employee Availability,

Rehiring, New Hires

2 years

None

Loans originated after

June 5, 2020:

5 years

Loans originated prior

to June 5, 2020:

Borrowers and lenders may mutually

agree to extend the maturity date of

loans to 5 years

Forgiveness would not be reduced

if borrowers can document in

good faith:

-Inability to rehire individuals

employed on Feb. 15, 2020

-Inability to hire similarly qualified

employees by Dec. 31, 2020

Safe Harbors Based on

Employee Availability in

Compliance with HHS,

CDC, or OSHA guidelines

None

Forgiveness would not be reduced

if borrowers can document in

good faith the inability to return to

same level of business activity as

before Feb. 15, 2020, due to

compliance with requirements

issued by HHS, CDC, OSHA

from the period of March 1, 2020,

to Dec. 31, 2020

Planting to Processing | July 2020 19


explore

The Case For a Makerspace in Downtown

Fresno

Written by Janelle Smith Ozeran

Fresno Ideaworks, established in 2012 in downtown

Fresno, California, is a source of a myriad of tools and

creative opportunities. But, like makers everywhere,

we also value our friendships, collaborative projects,

the comfort of our “third space”, and the therapeutic

value of getting our hands dirty as we mold clay,

wood, metal, textiles, electronics, or plastics into

something new and wonderful.

Over eight years Fresno Ideaworks has grown from

a small group of friendly hackers into a community

workshop full of curious and creative people, eager

to learn and hone new skills and share them with

anyone who comes through our doors. But since the

16th of March 2020 our doors have been closed to all

regular activity - a crushing situation for people who

come to the Shop for any reason, and a threatening

blow to our survival as a non-profit, all-volunteer,

member-driven organization.

We immediately joined the ranks of makerspaces

all over the country, manufacturing PPE for

healthcare professionals and other essential workers.

Collaborating with two other non-profits in Fresno

- Root Access Hackerspace, and Pi Shop Fresno -

we designed, manufactured, and delivered more

20 Planting to Processing | July 2020


than 4000 pieces of PPE by the first week of May to

everyone from hospital nurses to bus drivers, and

from mail carriers to food service workers. We are very

proud of our role in helping protect our neighbors

and caregivers, but we are also very proud of the

collaborative effort. We are already trying to imagine

what new projects we can undertake together when

our spaces are open again!

Meanwhile, we have lost nearly 15% of our

membership, and watching our family shrink is

breaking our hearts. A goal for the immediate future

is to establish a sponsorship fund for those former

members facing financial hardship because of the

COVID-19 experience. Although our membership

fees are among the lowest for similar spaces, they are

suddenly an impossible luxury for some, even though

the emotional health benefits of making and creating

would go a long way to ease the anxiety those same

people are experiencing.

welcome), but opening the whole structure to more

makers will require the help of angels that embrace

our mission. Downtown Fresno, and our Cultural Arts

District neighborhood in particular, have suffered the

adversity of economic downturn for several decades

now. Ideaworks is relentlessly dedicated to being

part of the growth of both the economic health of

the neighborhood, and, through skill-building and

fellowship, part of the economic and emotional wellbeing

of everyone who comes through our doors.

Please help however you can. Donations to

Ideaworks general fund can also be made through

our website at https://ideaworksmakerspaces.

org/Donate, through Venmo at @Fresno-

Ideaworksthrough, or through Givebutter (https://

givebutter.com/KbPYYR). And thank you, in advance,

from all of us at Fresno Ideaworks.

We also have to focus more intently on the facility

upgrades that will enable us to welcome more

members with a greater diversity of skills and abilities

throughout the entire space. Maintaining a historic

building is already a huge challenge (one we makers

Planting to Processing | July 2020 21


PO Box 7864

Fresno, CA 93747

PRSRT STD

U.S. POSTAGE

PAID

FRESNO, CA

PERMIT NO. 451

Protective Coating Applications & Restoration Services

Fast Stair Treads

Custom Sizes

Catwalks & Landings

Immediate Service

ADA Compliant

USDA Compliant

Skid Resistant

Any Color

Extremely Durable

Chemical Resistant

Seamless

Structural Stair Treads

Decorative

Forklift Durable

Industrial & Commercial

Floors - Walls - Linings - Stairs

CHEMPROOF

POLYMERS

INCORPORATED

PermaTec 5000

PermaTec 6000

Designed for immersion in 98% Sulfuric Acid

Provides protection from many solvents

RezTech Industrial Services • 5757 E. Fountain Way #101 • Fresno, CA 93727

559-292-4342 • Fax: 559-292-3521 • www.reztechservices.com

We ship anywhere in the US

Repair / Patching Kits Available

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!