21.12.2012 Views

Work sample Materials, Design and Technology (Metal) Stage 1 ...

Work sample Materials, Design and Technology (Metal) Stage 1 ...

Work sample Materials, Design and Technology (Metal) Stage 1 ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Work</strong> <strong>sample</strong><br />

<strong>Materials</strong>, <strong>Design</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Technology</strong><br />

(<strong>Metal</strong>)<br />

<strong>Stage</strong> 1<br />

<strong>Work</strong> <strong>sample</strong>: MDT_MET_ST1_C2_patio_art Assessment type: <strong>Design</strong><br />

Performance associated with Grade C, representing satisfactory achievement.<br />

<strong>Work</strong> <strong>sample</strong> summary<br />

Grades are allocated at the end of a unit or<br />

semester based on the rank order of<br />

students. Grades should not be allocated<br />

to individual assessments.<br />

This work <strong>sample</strong> illustrates a design process in a <strong>Stage</strong> 1C metal unit. The task involved designing a garden<br />

sculpture/wall hanging. The excerpt shows a number of limitations in terms of depth, detail <strong>and</strong> quality of<br />

expression, <strong>and</strong> represents a low C st<strong>and</strong>ard.<br />

<strong>Stage</strong> 1<br />

Grade descriptions<br />

<strong>Design</strong><br />

With regular assistance uses some elements<br />

of an identifiable design process, which<br />

includes some research <strong>and</strong> investigation of<br />

similarly designed products in terms of<br />

aesthetics, function <strong>and</strong> cost.<br />

Documentation shows superficial <strong>and</strong><br />

partially-annotated concept sketches with<br />

limited use of appropriate terminology <strong>and</strong><br />

little evidence of design progression <strong>and</strong><br />

research into existing products. Includes<br />

simple working drawings, lists of materials<br />

selected, a simple production plan, <strong>and</strong> an<br />

evaluation of the end product.<br />

Grade evidence in work <strong>sample</strong><br />

Brief statements are used to relate the properties of materials to<br />

the design fundamentals of function aesthetics, cost <strong>and</strong> safety.<br />

The research is limited in detail <strong>and</strong> descriptions of the metals<br />

investigated are a little ambiguous. The sketches are basic, with<br />

little or no notation, <strong>and</strong> measurements use centimetres instead<br />

of millimetres. The materials <strong>and</strong> price list appear to have<br />

miscalculations in the amount of materials required. A simple<br />

production procedure is developed. A reference list of websites is<br />

included.<br />

2009/26049 <strong>Materials</strong>, <strong>Design</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Technology</strong> (<strong>Metal</strong>): <strong>Stage</strong> 1 Grade C <strong>Work</strong> <strong>sample</strong> 1


<strong>Work</strong> <strong>sample</strong><br />

<strong>Materials</strong>, <strong>Design</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Technology</strong><br />

(<strong>Metal</strong>)<br />

<strong>Stage</strong> 1<br />

Grades are allocated at the end of a unit or<br />

semester based on the rank order of<br />

students. Grades should not be allocated<br />

to individual assessments.<br />

Provided general, brief<br />

statements about the<br />

key features needing<br />

investigation.<br />

Expresses very few<br />

considerations about<br />

material<br />

characteristics <strong>and</strong><br />

locations for the<br />

design product.<br />

2009/26049 <strong>Materials</strong>, <strong>Design</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Technology</strong> (<strong>Metal</strong>): <strong>Stage</strong> 1 Grade C <strong>Work</strong> <strong>sample</strong> 2


<strong>Work</strong> <strong>sample</strong><br />

<strong>Materials</strong>, <strong>Design</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Technology</strong><br />

(<strong>Metal</strong>)<br />

<strong>Stage</strong> 1<br />

Grades are allocated at the end of a unit or<br />

semester based on the rank order of<br />

students. Grades should not be allocated<br />

to individual assessments.<br />

Presents a collection<br />

of images of garden<br />

art <strong>and</strong> sculptures.<br />

However the page<br />

does little to develop<br />

the design ideas with<br />

no comments or<br />

notation, other than a<br />

tick on the compass<br />

rose image.<br />

Reproduces the<br />

compass rose image.<br />

No additional notes<br />

are made, other than<br />

two dimensions of<br />

50cms.<br />

Establishes the size of<br />

the design at 50cm,<br />

with some indication of<br />

design progress in the<br />

apparent choice of the<br />

material thickness of<br />

metal at 0.8cm.<br />

Two brief statements<br />

justify the compass<br />

rose design <strong>and</strong> reaffirm<br />

the size choice<br />

expressed in a mixture<br />

of millimetres <strong>and</strong><br />

centimetres.<br />

Indicates decisions<br />

about materials <strong>and</strong><br />

ideas about protecting<br />

the sculpture from<br />

rust, erosion <strong>and</strong> the<br />

elements.<br />

2009/26049 <strong>Materials</strong>, <strong>Design</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Technology</strong> (<strong>Metal</strong>): <strong>Stage</strong> 1 Grade C <strong>Work</strong> <strong>sample</strong> 3


<strong>Work</strong> <strong>sample</strong><br />

<strong>Materials</strong>, <strong>Design</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Technology</strong><br />

(<strong>Metal</strong>)<br />

<strong>Stage</strong> 1<br />

Grades are allocated at the end of a unit or<br />

semester based on the rank order of<br />

students. Grades should not be allocated<br />

to individual assessments.<br />

Considers different<br />

methods of hanging<br />

the wall sculpture.<br />

Uses limited notation<br />

to describe the best<br />

choice.<br />

2009/26049 <strong>Materials</strong>, <strong>Design</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Technology</strong> (<strong>Metal</strong>): <strong>Stage</strong> 1 Grade C <strong>Work</strong> <strong>sample</strong> 4


<strong>Work</strong> <strong>sample</strong><br />

<strong>Materials</strong>, <strong>Design</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Technology</strong><br />

(<strong>Metal</strong>)<br />

<strong>Stage</strong> 1<br />

Grades are allocated at the end of a unit or<br />

semester based on the rank order of<br />

students. Grades should not be allocated<br />

to individual assessments.<br />

Investigates chosen<br />

hanging methods to<br />

determine production<br />

process <strong>and</strong> mounting<br />

method.<br />

Very few<br />

measurements are<br />

provided.<br />

2009/26049 <strong>Materials</strong>, <strong>Design</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Technology</strong> (<strong>Metal</strong>): <strong>Stage</strong> 1 Grade C <strong>Work</strong> <strong>sample</strong> 5


<strong>Work</strong> <strong>sample</strong><br />

<strong>Materials</strong>, <strong>Design</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Technology</strong><br />

(<strong>Metal</strong>)<br />

<strong>Stage</strong> 1<br />

Grades are allocated at the end of a unit or<br />

semester based on the rank order of<br />

students. Grades should not be allocated<br />

to individual assessments.<br />

<strong>Design</strong> choices are<br />

based on time<br />

available for<br />

construction. Brief<br />

comments are<br />

provided about<br />

appearance <strong>and</strong><br />

aesthetics.<br />

Considers different<br />

hangers.<br />

Justifies the chosen<br />

process.<br />

<strong>Design</strong> considerations<br />

<strong>and</strong> consequences of<br />

the materials being<br />

outside are shown.<br />

Procedures to improve<br />

durability are also<br />

considered.<br />

<strong>Materials</strong> are listed,<br />

but the size of each<br />

part is not indicated.<br />

The price list<br />

calculations are<br />

questionable.<br />

Presents a limited<br />

explanation of the<br />

production procedure.<br />

Few tools are named<br />

<strong>and</strong> no estimated<br />

timeline is offered.<br />

2009/26049 <strong>Materials</strong>, <strong>Design</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Technology</strong> (<strong>Metal</strong>): <strong>Stage</strong> 1 Grade C <strong>Work</strong> <strong>sample</strong> 6


<strong>Work</strong> <strong>sample</strong><br />

<strong>Materials</strong>, <strong>Design</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Technology</strong><br />

(<strong>Metal</strong>)<br />

<strong>Stage</strong> 1<br />

Grades are allocated at the end of a unit or<br />

semester based on the rank order of<br />

students. Grades should not be allocated<br />

to individual assessments.<br />

Information is taken<br />

from websites <strong>and</strong><br />

edited <strong>and</strong><br />

paraphrased to<br />

maintain relevance.<br />

The description of the<br />

properties of stainless<br />

steel is not relevant to<br />

the design as<br />

stainless steel was not<br />

chosen for the project.<br />

The information is<br />

truncated <strong>and</strong><br />

ambiguous.<br />

No comments are<br />

made about the<br />

design or the choice<br />

of zinc anneal for the<br />

project.<br />

A relevant list of<br />

websites is included.<br />

2009/26049 <strong>Materials</strong>, <strong>Design</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Technology</strong> (<strong>Metal</strong>): <strong>Stage</strong> 1 Grade C <strong>Work</strong> <strong>sample</strong> 7

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!