Work sample Materials, Design and Technology (Metal) Stage 1 ...
Work sample Materials, Design and Technology (Metal) Stage 1 ...
Work sample Materials, Design and Technology (Metal) Stage 1 ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
<strong>Work</strong> <strong>sample</strong><br />
<strong>Materials</strong>, <strong>Design</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Technology</strong><br />
(<strong>Metal</strong>)<br />
<strong>Stage</strong> 1<br />
<strong>Work</strong> <strong>sample</strong>: MDT_MET_ST1_C2_patio_art Assessment type: <strong>Design</strong><br />
Performance associated with Grade C, representing satisfactory achievement.<br />
<strong>Work</strong> <strong>sample</strong> summary<br />
Grades are allocated at the end of a unit or<br />
semester based on the rank order of<br />
students. Grades should not be allocated<br />
to individual assessments.<br />
This work <strong>sample</strong> illustrates a design process in a <strong>Stage</strong> 1C metal unit. The task involved designing a garden<br />
sculpture/wall hanging. The excerpt shows a number of limitations in terms of depth, detail <strong>and</strong> quality of<br />
expression, <strong>and</strong> represents a low C st<strong>and</strong>ard.<br />
<strong>Stage</strong> 1<br />
Grade descriptions<br />
<strong>Design</strong><br />
With regular assistance uses some elements<br />
of an identifiable design process, which<br />
includes some research <strong>and</strong> investigation of<br />
similarly designed products in terms of<br />
aesthetics, function <strong>and</strong> cost.<br />
Documentation shows superficial <strong>and</strong><br />
partially-annotated concept sketches with<br />
limited use of appropriate terminology <strong>and</strong><br />
little evidence of design progression <strong>and</strong><br />
research into existing products. Includes<br />
simple working drawings, lists of materials<br />
selected, a simple production plan, <strong>and</strong> an<br />
evaluation of the end product.<br />
Grade evidence in work <strong>sample</strong><br />
Brief statements are used to relate the properties of materials to<br />
the design fundamentals of function aesthetics, cost <strong>and</strong> safety.<br />
The research is limited in detail <strong>and</strong> descriptions of the metals<br />
investigated are a little ambiguous. The sketches are basic, with<br />
little or no notation, <strong>and</strong> measurements use centimetres instead<br />
of millimetres. The materials <strong>and</strong> price list appear to have<br />
miscalculations in the amount of materials required. A simple<br />
production procedure is developed. A reference list of websites is<br />
included.<br />
2009/26049 <strong>Materials</strong>, <strong>Design</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Technology</strong> (<strong>Metal</strong>): <strong>Stage</strong> 1 Grade C <strong>Work</strong> <strong>sample</strong> 1
<strong>Work</strong> <strong>sample</strong><br />
<strong>Materials</strong>, <strong>Design</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Technology</strong><br />
(<strong>Metal</strong>)<br />
<strong>Stage</strong> 1<br />
Grades are allocated at the end of a unit or<br />
semester based on the rank order of<br />
students. Grades should not be allocated<br />
to individual assessments.<br />
Provided general, brief<br />
statements about the<br />
key features needing<br />
investigation.<br />
Expresses very few<br />
considerations about<br />
material<br />
characteristics <strong>and</strong><br />
locations for the<br />
design product.<br />
2009/26049 <strong>Materials</strong>, <strong>Design</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Technology</strong> (<strong>Metal</strong>): <strong>Stage</strong> 1 Grade C <strong>Work</strong> <strong>sample</strong> 2
<strong>Work</strong> <strong>sample</strong><br />
<strong>Materials</strong>, <strong>Design</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Technology</strong><br />
(<strong>Metal</strong>)<br />
<strong>Stage</strong> 1<br />
Grades are allocated at the end of a unit or<br />
semester based on the rank order of<br />
students. Grades should not be allocated<br />
to individual assessments.<br />
Presents a collection<br />
of images of garden<br />
art <strong>and</strong> sculptures.<br />
However the page<br />
does little to develop<br />
the design ideas with<br />
no comments or<br />
notation, other than a<br />
tick on the compass<br />
rose image.<br />
Reproduces the<br />
compass rose image.<br />
No additional notes<br />
are made, other than<br />
two dimensions of<br />
50cms.<br />
Establishes the size of<br />
the design at 50cm,<br />
with some indication of<br />
design progress in the<br />
apparent choice of the<br />
material thickness of<br />
metal at 0.8cm.<br />
Two brief statements<br />
justify the compass<br />
rose design <strong>and</strong> reaffirm<br />
the size choice<br />
expressed in a mixture<br />
of millimetres <strong>and</strong><br />
centimetres.<br />
Indicates decisions<br />
about materials <strong>and</strong><br />
ideas about protecting<br />
the sculpture from<br />
rust, erosion <strong>and</strong> the<br />
elements.<br />
2009/26049 <strong>Materials</strong>, <strong>Design</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Technology</strong> (<strong>Metal</strong>): <strong>Stage</strong> 1 Grade C <strong>Work</strong> <strong>sample</strong> 3
<strong>Work</strong> <strong>sample</strong><br />
<strong>Materials</strong>, <strong>Design</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Technology</strong><br />
(<strong>Metal</strong>)<br />
<strong>Stage</strong> 1<br />
Grades are allocated at the end of a unit or<br />
semester based on the rank order of<br />
students. Grades should not be allocated<br />
to individual assessments.<br />
Considers different<br />
methods of hanging<br />
the wall sculpture.<br />
Uses limited notation<br />
to describe the best<br />
choice.<br />
2009/26049 <strong>Materials</strong>, <strong>Design</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Technology</strong> (<strong>Metal</strong>): <strong>Stage</strong> 1 Grade C <strong>Work</strong> <strong>sample</strong> 4
<strong>Work</strong> <strong>sample</strong><br />
<strong>Materials</strong>, <strong>Design</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Technology</strong><br />
(<strong>Metal</strong>)<br />
<strong>Stage</strong> 1<br />
Grades are allocated at the end of a unit or<br />
semester based on the rank order of<br />
students. Grades should not be allocated<br />
to individual assessments.<br />
Investigates chosen<br />
hanging methods to<br />
determine production<br />
process <strong>and</strong> mounting<br />
method.<br />
Very few<br />
measurements are<br />
provided.<br />
2009/26049 <strong>Materials</strong>, <strong>Design</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Technology</strong> (<strong>Metal</strong>): <strong>Stage</strong> 1 Grade C <strong>Work</strong> <strong>sample</strong> 5
<strong>Work</strong> <strong>sample</strong><br />
<strong>Materials</strong>, <strong>Design</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Technology</strong><br />
(<strong>Metal</strong>)<br />
<strong>Stage</strong> 1<br />
Grades are allocated at the end of a unit or<br />
semester based on the rank order of<br />
students. Grades should not be allocated<br />
to individual assessments.<br />
<strong>Design</strong> choices are<br />
based on time<br />
available for<br />
construction. Brief<br />
comments are<br />
provided about<br />
appearance <strong>and</strong><br />
aesthetics.<br />
Considers different<br />
hangers.<br />
Justifies the chosen<br />
process.<br />
<strong>Design</strong> considerations<br />
<strong>and</strong> consequences of<br />
the materials being<br />
outside are shown.<br />
Procedures to improve<br />
durability are also<br />
considered.<br />
<strong>Materials</strong> are listed,<br />
but the size of each<br />
part is not indicated.<br />
The price list<br />
calculations are<br />
questionable.<br />
Presents a limited<br />
explanation of the<br />
production procedure.<br />
Few tools are named<br />
<strong>and</strong> no estimated<br />
timeline is offered.<br />
2009/26049 <strong>Materials</strong>, <strong>Design</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Technology</strong> (<strong>Metal</strong>): <strong>Stage</strong> 1 Grade C <strong>Work</strong> <strong>sample</strong> 6
<strong>Work</strong> <strong>sample</strong><br />
<strong>Materials</strong>, <strong>Design</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Technology</strong><br />
(<strong>Metal</strong>)<br />
<strong>Stage</strong> 1<br />
Grades are allocated at the end of a unit or<br />
semester based on the rank order of<br />
students. Grades should not be allocated<br />
to individual assessments.<br />
Information is taken<br />
from websites <strong>and</strong><br />
edited <strong>and</strong><br />
paraphrased to<br />
maintain relevance.<br />
The description of the<br />
properties of stainless<br />
steel is not relevant to<br />
the design as<br />
stainless steel was not<br />
chosen for the project.<br />
The information is<br />
truncated <strong>and</strong><br />
ambiguous.<br />
No comments are<br />
made about the<br />
design or the choice<br />
of zinc anneal for the<br />
project.<br />
A relevant list of<br />
websites is included.<br />
2009/26049 <strong>Materials</strong>, <strong>Design</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Technology</strong> (<strong>Metal</strong>): <strong>Stage</strong> 1 Grade C <strong>Work</strong> <strong>sample</strong> 7