Transportable Reading Strategies
Transform your PDFs into Flipbooks and boost your revenue!
Leverage SEO-optimized Flipbooks, powerful backlinks, and multimedia content to professionally showcase your products and significantly increase your reach.
<strong>Transportable</strong> reading<br />
strategies
Table of contents<br />
2<br />
• Annotating<br />
• Anticipation Guide<br />
• Article of the Week<br />
• Chapter Discussion Protocol<br />
• DR-TA<br />
• Final Word Protocol<br />
• Follow-Up Questions<br />
• It Says, I Say, and So…<br />
• KNFS<br />
• KWL<br />
• Marzano’s 4 Questions: Analysing<br />
the Effectiveness of Inferences<br />
• One Minute Write<br />
• Quotation Mingle<br />
Page<br />
3<br />
5<br />
7<br />
9<br />
11<br />
13<br />
15<br />
17<br />
19<br />
21<br />
23<br />
25<br />
27<br />
• Probable passage<br />
• Reciprocal Teaching<br />
• <strong>Reading</strong> a visual<br />
• <strong>Reading</strong> with Questions in Mind<br />
• Rereading Prose<br />
• SQ3R<br />
• Text Coding and Jigsaw<br />
• Think Aloud (student to student)<br />
• Thought-Provoking Statements<br />
• Two-Column Notes<br />
• Tweet the Text<br />
• Written Conversation<br />
• Wide <strong>Reading</strong><br />
• References<br />
Page<br />
29<br />
31<br />
33<br />
35<br />
37<br />
39<br />
41<br />
43<br />
45<br />
47<br />
49<br />
50<br />
53<br />
55
Annotating<br />
The ‘What’: Students ‘mark up’ important, interesting or intriguing parts of a<br />
text and jot down their thinking about it in the margins.<br />
The ‘When’:<br />
• When you want students to actively read and record their thinking about a text they<br />
need to understand well<br />
• Model during the ‘Focused Instruction’ part of the Gradual Release of Responsibility<br />
Model<br />
• Support students with annotation during Guided Instruction<br />
• Engage students in annotating during ‘Collaborative Learning’ and ‘Independent<br />
Learning’, as part of thee Gradual Release of Responsibility<br />
The ‘Why’ :<br />
Helps students engage with the text when their minds are tempted to wander<br />
Helps readers ‘hold’ and recall their thinking so they can refer to it later<br />
• Helps students notice patterns, synthesise new information and thinking and ask<br />
questions to build more background knowledge<br />
• Helps teachers notice how readers are using strategies to construct personal<br />
meaning and diagnose what learners need in order to better comprehend the text<br />
Examples of text codes or<br />
symbols to use when<br />
annotating:<br />
* for a key idea or something<br />
important, memorable or powerful<br />
! for discovering something new or<br />
surprising<br />
L for new learning<br />
R for “it reminds me of ...”<br />
I for inference<br />
V for visualise<br />
Huh? For confusion<br />
+ for something you agree with or<br />
knew<br />
- For something that contradicts<br />
what you know or expect<br />
3
Source of<br />
example:<br />
Harvey<br />
Daniels and<br />
Nancy<br />
Steineke<br />
(2011).Text<br />
s and<br />
Lessons for<br />
Content-<br />
Area<br />
<strong>Reading</strong>,<br />
Heinemann,<br />
Portsmouth,<br />
p. 43.<br />
The ‘How’:<br />
1. Prepare to demonstrate: Get a short piece of text that you can project and annotate ‘live’ in front of the<br />
class. Ensure it is something short and provocative that is related to what students are learning about,<br />
which you’d enjoy reading aloud. Aim for a text chunk less than a hundred words long, and then blow up the<br />
font so students can easily read along when projected.<br />
2. Model annotation: Just read the article aloud, stopping to underline the most important parts. At each<br />
underline, mark up the text with words and phrases describing your thinking (questions, connections,<br />
comments or images) and record that thinking in the margin of the projected text. You might even want to<br />
use ‘text codes’ or symbols like the ones below, before recording thinking in the margins. This should take four<br />
or five minutes.<br />
3. Give instructions for student reading and annotation: “As you read the text, I want you to do what I’ve just<br />
demonstrated: First, underline information that is important, surprising, interesting or though-provoking.<br />
Then, before continuing to read, stop and jot down a sentence or two that explains why you chose that bit to<br />
underline. The goal is to explain your thoughts, opinions or questions briefly. Try to imagine you are having a<br />
conversation with the text inside your head. Your notes are your side of that conversation.”<br />
4. Monitor reading: Circulate as students work. Annotating can feel unnatural at first. Some students will<br />
simply read, others will only underline, and some will just underline and say they want to go back and record<br />
their thoughts before they finish. Keep encouraging students to follow the given instructions.<br />
5. Pairs discuss the article: Invite students to pair up with someone in the class and to have a quick discussion<br />
about the text. Ask them to compare what they’ve annotated and their thoughts with those of their partner.<br />
Urge students to discuss and answer/explore any questions they posed.<br />
6. Share with the whole class: Invite volunteer pairs to read aloud and discuss the annotations that produced<br />
particularly interesting conversations (‘conversation gold’!)<br />
4
Anticipation guide<br />
The ‘What’: Students respond to a list of statements that either support or challenge their prior knowledge,<br />
assumptions and ideas about the topic will learn about when reading or viewing a text/series of texts. First, they indicate<br />
whether they agree or disagree with these statements. Then, they read the text. Afterwards, they return to the statements<br />
to mark any confirmation or shifts in their thinking. They conclude by writing a reflection about what they learned after<br />
reading. See this example of statements at right:<br />
5<br />
Source: Douglas Fisher & Nancy<br />
Frey (2012), Improving Adolescent<br />
Literacy: Content-Area <strong>Strategies</strong><br />
At Work, Boston: Pearson, p. 30-31<br />
The ‘When’:<br />
• As a pre-reading strategy when introducing a new topic, in order to elicit and appraise prior knowledge, encourage<br />
predictions and stimulate curiosity<br />
• Introducing new reading material on an existing topic to check assumptions/deepen understanding<br />
• Revisit after reading to evaluate student knowledge and understanding, and to deepen this through discussion
The ‘Why’ :<br />
6<br />
Stimulates student curiosity and engagement in a topic<br />
Creates a purpose for reading (gathering evidence for/against initial beliefs)<br />
• Encourages critical thinking and can be used to explore assumptions and rethink misconceptions about a topic<br />
The ‘How’:<br />
1. Read your chosen text and identify key ideas, major concepts and supporting details. Identify students’ experiences and beliefs<br />
that will be challenged and in some cases, supported by the material. What common misconceptions are there about this topic? Jot<br />
them down.<br />
2. Come up with a series of statements that might challenge and modify students’ pre-reading beliefs. Create some of these<br />
statements around concepts students would most likely have misconceptions about.<br />
3. Arrange the statements on a graphic organiser, complete with true or false checkboxes and a space for writing their responses<br />
and a reflection (see example on previous page)<br />
4. Distribute graphic organiser and read each statement aloud, asking students to consider each statement carefully. Ask them to<br />
indicate agreement/disagreement and to justify their responses. You might ask them to discuss this in groups.<br />
5. Invite students to read the passage of text and to highlight evidence that confirms their beliefs in one colour, and evidence that<br />
disconfirms their beliefs in another. You might need to model this first. Let them know they can change their minds if they come<br />
across new information that makes them rethink their earlier beliefs.<br />
6. When students have finished reading, have them compare their original responses to the topic with their responses after reading.<br />
Ask them if they changed their mind at any point or modified their responses, and why.<br />
7. Optional: Ask students to complete a reflective writing activity to synthesise their new knowledge using evidence from the text.
Article of the week<br />
7<br />
The ‘What’: A weekly routine where students are either assigned an article or asked to choose one, and are<br />
required to purposefully annotate it. Students note their thinking and confusion in the margins before writing a<br />
reflection on what they they learned/what the article made them think about. The aim is to build students’<br />
background knowledge about world events or topics/issues relevant to a unit of study.<br />
The ‘When’:<br />
• On a weekly basis as part of a class routine, starting at the beginning of a lesson<br />
• Model how to engage in this routine during the ‘Focused Instruction’ part of the Gradual Release of<br />
Responsibility model<br />
• Students are initially guided through this during ‘Guided Instruction’, before being asked to do it independently<br />
The ‘Why’ :<br />
• Builds background knowledge to support comprehension –builds disciplinary knowledge if texts are disciplinespecific<br />
• Helps students build their vocabulary incidentally<br />
• Can enhance student engagement if they choose the article
The ‘How’:<br />
1. Before engaging in this routine, make sure you model how to<br />
annotate an the article (See Strategy #1):<br />
Highlight/underline key words and phrases<br />
• Jot down anything you find surprising, significant, or which<br />
raises questions<br />
Note any connections to self, other texts or world events<br />
• Note anything confusing<br />
2. Select a current, high-quality and high-interest piece of writing<br />
for students to engage with. It could be a news story, essay,<br />
blog, speech. – anything! It could be related to the unit that you<br />
are studying, or an article to help build students’ general<br />
knowledge.<br />
3. The first few times you engage in this routine, you might<br />
want to read the article aloud with students and instruct them to do<br />
the following:<br />
a) Note your confusion<br />
b) Show evidence of annotating purposefully (see Step 1)<br />
c) Write a reflection that captures what you learned and what this<br />
article made you think about.<br />
8<br />
You might want to ask students to share annotations and ideas as a<br />
class.<br />
4. The next few times you engage in this routine, ask<br />
students to do it independently, roving around the room for support.
Chapter discussion protocol<br />
The ‘What’:<br />
Students use a protocol to engage in structured collaborative discussion about what is significant to them after reading a<br />
chapter or short text, before sharing as a whole class.<br />
The ‘When’:<br />
• When reading a new text or topic<br />
• When delving more deeply into a topic that has already been introduced to students<br />
• Model how to use the protocol during the ‘Focused Instruction’ part of the Gradual Release of Responsibility model<br />
• Support students to use it during ‘Guided Instruction’<br />
• Students can use the protocol in group discussions during ‘Collaborative Learning’<br />
The ‘Why’ :<br />
• Helps students monitor their thinking about reading by identifying what is most significant to them after reading a<br />
chapter or passage<br />
• Requires students to synthesise their understanding by exploring how reading influences/develops their thinking about<br />
a topic and their shapes their actions<br />
9
The ‘How’:<br />
Part 1:<br />
1. Before students try this strategy on their own with a new text,<br />
demonstrate the protocol with a familiar text they have already read.<br />
Use a small volunteer demonstration group in a ‘fish bowl’ set-up (5<br />
students)<br />
2. As the class observes, guide the small group through the protocol and<br />
discuss how it worked. After this ‘fish bowl’ activity, have the class<br />
debrief the protocol and discuss how it worked.<br />
3. Pre-reading: Have students jot down their thinking about the topic<br />
before reading (see Point #1 at right)<br />
4. <strong>Reading</strong> the text: Have students read the new text. Encourage them to<br />
use specific text-coding symbols to use as they read (! = most important,<br />
* = reinforces ideas about topic, ? = reconsider thinking about topic)<br />
10<br />
Part 2:<br />
1. Organise the class into discussion groups of five. Assign a facilitator and<br />
timekeeper for each group to guide discussion. Review all of the steps<br />
from the chapter discussion protocol before students begin the activity.<br />
2. When students have their discussions using the protocol, circulate<br />
around the room and monitor discussions. Provide feedback as necessary.<br />
3. Finally, debrief the protocol as a whole class.
dr-ta (Directed reading/thinking activity)<br />
The ‘What’:<br />
A series of questions that prompts students to activate their prior knowledge, make predictions, check the<br />
accuracy of their predictions and summarise what they learned.<br />
The ‘When’:<br />
• When introducing students to a new topic or text<br />
• Model how to use this strategy during the ‘Focused Instruction’ part of the Gradual Release of<br />
Responsibility Model<br />
• Students can work in groups during Collaborative Learning<br />
• Students can apply this strategy during Independent Learning<br />
The ‘Why’ :<br />
• Encourages students to be active readers, activating prior knowledge before reading and<br />
summarising what they learned after reading<br />
• Prompts students to read with purpose by making predictions about what they’re going to learn and<br />
reading to check the accuracy of their predictions<br />
11
Source of<br />
example DR-TA<br />
organiser:<br />
Vicki Urquhart<br />
& Dana Frazee<br />
(2012),<br />
Teaching<br />
<strong>Reading</strong> in the<br />
Content Areas:<br />
If Not Me,<br />
Then Who? 3 rd<br />
Ed., Moorabbin,<br />
VIC: Hawker<br />
Brownlow, p.<br />
98.<br />
The ‘How’:<br />
1. Model the strategy by:<br />
Previewing a text and its features to determine the topic<br />
• Sharing your thinking with students using the graphic organiser prompts as<br />
a guide (see example on the right)<br />
2. Have students preview the text, noting the title and any sub-headings,<br />
pictures or graphics. From this preview, ask students to identify the topic.<br />
3. Ask students to complete the first two sections of the DR/TA form (see<br />
right), writing down what they know and what they think they know about<br />
the topic that they are reading about.<br />
4. Ask students to come up with questions or predictions about what they think<br />
they will learn from reading the text. Invite students to write these ideas in<br />
the third section of the organiser. This sets the purpose for reading.<br />
5. After students read the text selection, have them revisit each of their<br />
predictions or questions. Ask them to confirm, revise or reject those ideas<br />
based on what they read.<br />
6. Have students complete the organiser by writing their ‘key takeaways’ in the<br />
fourth section. They can also include material they thought the text would<br />
address but didn’t.<br />
7. Have students discuss this material with classmates to reinforce<br />
understanding of it.<br />
12
FINAL WORD PROTOCOL<br />
The ‘What’:<br />
A small group discussion protocol where students share their thinking about a text in rounds. During<br />
each round, the last person to speak has the final word.<br />
13<br />
The ‘When’:<br />
• When reading a new text or starting a new topic<br />
• Implement the protocol after reading<br />
• When you want to develop students’ understanding of an existing topic<br />
• During the Collaborative Learning part of the Gradual Release of Responsibility model<br />
The ‘Why’ :<br />
• Provides an opportunity to enhance student engagement<br />
• Encourages students to monitor their engagement and develop their comprehension of texts<br />
• Develops students’ oral language and listening skills<br />
• Exposes students to different viewpoints, arguments or interpretations of the same content they<br />
are reading about, providing opportunities for them to synthesise their understanding
The ‘How’:<br />
1. Introduce the protocol to students, explaining each step.<br />
You might want to model this first in a ‘fish bowl’<br />
environment with four students as you coach them<br />
through the steps.<br />
2. Have students read a highly engaging, topic-specific text<br />
and annotate/mark it (see Strategy #1) for questions<br />
they have, points they found surprising, new learning,<br />
important information, points they agree or disagree<br />
with, etc.<br />
3. Encourage students to identify 2-3 things they want to<br />
talk about.<br />
4. Assign a facilitator and a timekeeper for each group.<br />
Alternatively, you can facilitate and keep time for the<br />
whole class. The facilitator makes sure everyone follows<br />
the protocol, and the timekeeper lets everyone know then<br />
the tie allotted for each step has elapsed. Other students<br />
can assume these roles during the round when the<br />
timekeeper or facilitator speaks.<br />
5. At the end of the small-group discussions, have each<br />
group share three key issues they identified with everyone.<br />
Final Word Protocol:<br />
Before small-group discussion:<br />
• Students read a text and identify three things they want to discuss<br />
• Students form groups of four and assign themselves numbers from 1-4.<br />
Round One:<br />
• Student #1 begins and speaks about something in the text for one minute.<br />
No one else can speak while Student #1 speaks. They must listen to the<br />
speaker.<br />
• After one minute, student #1 stops and Student #2 has a minute to<br />
respond to what Student #1 said. Again, no one speaks while student #2<br />
responds.<br />
• After one minute, Student #2 stops and Student #3 responds to what<br />
Student #1 said. Everyone else listens.<br />
• After one minute, Student #3 stops and Student #4 responds to what<br />
Student #1 said.<br />
• After one minute, Student #4 stops and Student #1 has the ‘final word’ for<br />
one minute to respond to what everyone else said.<br />
Round Two:<br />
• Student #2 begins this round<br />
• Repeat all of the steps, ending with Student #2 having the final word.<br />
Round Three:<br />
• Student 3 begins this round<br />
• Repeat all of the steps, ending with Student #3 having the final word.<br />
Round Four:<br />
• Student 4 begins this round<br />
• Repeat all of the steps, ending with Student #4 having the final word.<br />
Closing:<br />
• Each group shares three ideas with the rest of the class<br />
14
FOLLOW-UP QUESTIONS<br />
15<br />
The ‘What’: Supporting students to discuss deep, critical questions about text, followed by asking probing questions<br />
to deepen each other’s ’ thinking.<br />
The ‘When’:<br />
• When you want students to move beyond surface-level learning and thinking about text<br />
• Model asking follow-up questions during the ‘Focused Instruction’ part of the Gradual Release of Responsibility model<br />
• Support students during the ‘Guided Instruction’, ‘Collaborative Learning’ and ‘Independent Learning’ phases of the<br />
Gradual Release of Responsibility model<br />
The ‘Why’ :<br />
• Encourages students to evaluate the questions they have about texts, prompting deeper thinking about the content<br />
they are reading about<br />
• Provides opportunity for students to take responsibility for following up their questions and clarifying thinking about<br />
text
Examples of follow-up<br />
questions:<br />
• “What makes you<br />
say that?”<br />
• “What details in<br />
the text made you<br />
feel that way?”<br />
• “From the details<br />
you’ve just<br />
mentioned, do you<br />
think….? Why”<br />
• “Are you<br />
saying…? Why?”<br />
• “Could you tell me<br />
more about that?”<br />
• What part strikes<br />
you the most?<br />
• “What is the<br />
connection<br />
between…and<br />
…?”<br />
• “What sort of<br />
impact do you<br />
think that would<br />
have on…?”<br />
The ‘How’:<br />
1. Introduce the concept of deep questions: Ask students what kinds of questions make for a good, deep discussion in a small group. Invite students to<br />
•<br />
share their ideas and jot them down so students can see. Add to and expand the list. Some suggestions:<br />
Open-ended<br />
Based on things in the text but you’ve got to think about how to answer, not just fill-in-the-blank<br />
Might have to read further before being able to answer<br />
• Involve making predictions, reading between the lines and making connections to text and background knowledge<br />
• Ask for details<br />
2. Distribute text and monitor student reading of text: Introduce text to students. Read it aloud or have them read it on their own. Explain that their<br />
goal is to jot down 5-8 good discussion questions that they will use later. Ensure you have some questions ready to share.<br />
3. Model asking follow-up questions: Explain to students that today’s focus is to refine their discussion skills by practising follow-up questions: “Follow-up<br />
questions are questions you ask after your partner has already given a comment or answer. The goal with these questions is to get your partner to go<br />
back to the text and defend their opinions with specific details.” Ask for a student volunteer and have them bring their text with them and stand next<br />
to you. Ask the student one of your questions and listen carefully. Ask a probing follow-up question (see the yellow box on the left), until the student<br />
shares some deeper thinking and supports what they say with evidence. Continue modelling with a second question and series of follow-up questions.<br />
There are two key points to remember: One, the next question is always based on the partner’s previous response. Two, the partner can’t answer a<br />
follow-up questions until after you’ve written them down. This builds in wait time.<br />
4. Debrief the modelling: Ask students what they noticed about the demonstration. Options might include: good follow-up questions extend a discussion,<br />
waiting for you to write your question down gives partners wait time, the person asking the questions doesn’t add their own thoughts until after all<br />
follow-up questions have been asked.<br />
5. Student pair discussion and share: Students have a go at posing questions and then asking follow-up questions in pairs. Monitor discussions to<br />
ensure students slow down, listen to each other and follow the above points mentioned in the debrief.<br />
6. Pairs share their thinking with the class: Have students share interesting, relevant points and review which questions generated the most discussion<br />
with the class.<br />
16
IT SAYS, I SAY, AND SO…<br />
17<br />
The ‘What’: A simple activity involving a series of prompts which support students in making inferences and<br />
asking questions, while emphasising the importance of basing inferences on evidence found in a text.<br />
The ‘When’:<br />
• When students are trying to make sense of implicit information in a text, visual or graphic<br />
• Model and demonstrate during the ‘Focused Instruction’ part of the Gradual Release of Responsibility Model<br />
• Support students to use it during Guided Instruction<br />
• Students can use this strategy while working collaboratively or independently<br />
The ‘Why’ :<br />
• A versatile strategy that provides a clear ‘thinking framework’ to support students in making inferences and<br />
visualising connections between the texts and their own thinking processes<br />
• Prompts students to become more thoughtful and metacognitive when it comes to inferring and reasoning<br />
• Encourages students to use evidence to support their thinking about text
The ‘How’:<br />
1. Give students some background on the topic to be studied and have students generate questions about it. Have students<br />
create a table on their sheets of paper similar to the sample shown at the end of these steps. Model how to ask<br />
questions and show students how to jot them down in the first column. Ask students to write their own questions in<br />
the first column. Optional: One helpful variation is to brainstorm good questions and then choose the best ones. Then,<br />
ask students to justify why the questions are good.<br />
2. Have students look for text sections that could the question and jot down information form these sections into the ‘It<br />
Says’ column.<br />
3. Have students compare the prior knowledge with the information from the text to form an inference, and to jot this<br />
down in the ‘I Say’ column.<br />
4. Have students use the first two columns as the foundation in which they construct an answer in the ‘and So’ column.<br />
Question: It Says… I Say… And So…<br />
18<br />
What might be the<br />
global effects of<br />
climate change?<br />
If global temperatures continue to<br />
increase, sea levels might rise as much<br />
as between 18 and 59 centimetres by<br />
the end of the 21 st century, causing<br />
water to expand.<br />
The higher the sea levels are,<br />
the higher the risk of flooding.<br />
If the ice melts, then the ocean<br />
level rises, many places just<br />
above sea level may flood.
KNFS<br />
19<br />
The ‘What’: Students use a graphic organiser like the one below to understand, analyse and solve word<br />
problems in Maths and Science, followed by explaining their reasoning process:<br />
K<br />
What facts do I<br />
KNOW from the<br />
information in<br />
the problem?<br />
N<br />
Which<br />
information is<br />
NOT needed?<br />
f<br />
What does the<br />
problem ask me to<br />
FIND?<br />
s<br />
What STRATEGY,<br />
operation or tools will<br />
I use to solve the<br />
problem?<br />
Write an explanation of your reasoning process:
The ‘When’:<br />
• Model and demonstrate during the ‘Focused Instruction’ part of the Gradual Release of Responsibility Model<br />
• Support students to use it during Guided Instruction<br />
• Students can use this strategy while working collaboratively or independently during and after their first encounters<br />
with a word problem in Science and Maths.<br />
20<br />
The Why: Provides a self-questioning framework for students to activate prior content knowledge, selectively read with<br />
purpose and reflect on existing problem-solving strategies to comprehend and solve a worded problem.<br />
The ‘How’:<br />
1. Introduce students to the four-column graphic organiser. Present students with a word problem, and model how to include<br />
appropriate information in each of the columns. Model the process with a think aloud (see Strategy #21) and explain how you<br />
knew what information should be included in each column. Show ‘how’ and explain ‘how you know’.<br />
2. Ask students to work in groups and complete their KNFS organisers as they read other word problems<br />
3. Have group members discuss how they decided which information should be included in each column, and have them write<br />
4. Make sure students continue to use this strategy and have ongoing independent practice reading and comprehending what word<br />
problems are asking them to do.
KWL<br />
21<br />
The ‘What’: A before, during and after reading procedure that encourages active reading behaviours. It invites students to:<br />
list what they know about a particular topic they will be reading about, ask questions regarding what they want to know about it<br />
and record what they found out after reading.<br />
The ‘When’:<br />
• Introducing a new unit<br />
• <strong>Reading</strong> for research and inquiry<br />
• Model and demonstrate during the ‘Focused Instruction’ part of the Gradual Release of Responsibility Model<br />
• Support students to use it during Guided Instruction<br />
• Students can use this strategy while working collaboratively or independently when engaging in a new topic, reading or<br />
research.<br />
The ‘Why’ :<br />
• Encougages active reading through prompting students to activate their prior knowledge , ask questions and read with purpose<br />
• Integrates different comprehension strategies to help students build knowledge and understanding (eg: activating and<br />
connecting, monitoring, summarising and synthesising)<br />
• Opens up opportunities for students to revise their thinking about a topic and correct initial misconceptions
The ‘How’:<br />
1. Introduce: Present students with a blank K-W-L graphic organiser (see example below). Alternatively, you can distribute a blank sheet<br />
of paper and ask students to create their own chart. Students can work individually, in groups or you can do this together as a class.<br />
K<br />
What do I<br />
KNOW?<br />
W<br />
What do I<br />
WANT to<br />
know?<br />
l<br />
What have I<br />
LEARNED?<br />
2. Column 1: Have students respond to the first prompt in Column 1: ‘What do you know (about this topic)?’<br />
3. Column 2: Next, ask students to respond to the prompt in the second column, ‘What do I want to know’(about this the topic)?’ Ask<br />
students to respond with questions. Some students might not know where to begin if they don’t have a lot of background knowledge<br />
about the topic. In this case, jot down some prompts (eg: “Who? What? When? Where? Why? How?’).<br />
4. Read: Students engage in reading or in several readings across a unit. They use their ‘Want to Know’ questions to guide their reading<br />
and any notes they take.<br />
5. Column 3: After reading, students jot down what they learnt in the third column. They review the ‘K,’ column, revising any<br />
misconceptions. They then check the ‘W’ column and note which questions they have explored. If you are using it to introduce a unit, make<br />
connections between students’ initial learning and what they will learn more about as the unit progresses. Encourage students to keep<br />
adding to the ‘W’ and ‘L’ columns as they read more about the topic.<br />
22
Marzano’s 4 Questions: analysing the Effectiveness of<br />
Inferences<br />
23<br />
The ‘What’: A four-step thinking process that prompts elaborative interrogation (asking ‘how’ and ‘why’ questions) of students’<br />
inferences. Students first make an inference, then ask themselves a series of questions to analyse and evaluate their thinking. Finally, they ask<br />
themselves if they need to modify their initial inference based on new evidence and thinking.<br />
The ‘When’:<br />
Introducing students to a new unit, topic or reading<br />
Engaging in problem solving<br />
Model and demonstrate during the ‘Focused Instruction’ part of the Gradual Release of Responsibility Model<br />
Support students to use these questions during Guided Instruction<br />
• Students can use this strategy while working collaboratively or independently<br />
The ‘Why’:<br />
Encourages students to become more active readers by interacting with and considering evidence from their reading<br />
Prompts students to become more thoughtful and metacognitivei n their reasoning and synthesis of information<br />
• Supports students to critically review their inferences, hypotheses and thinking process
I’m thinking<br />
________<br />
because<br />
_______ . After<br />
considering<br />
_________, my<br />
original thinking<br />
has been<br />
strengthened/<br />
needs to<br />
change,<br />
because<br />
____________<br />
____________<br />
The ‘How’:<br />
Engage students in previewing/reading a text about a topic. This could involve:<br />
Examining the front cover, images and blurb of a book<br />
• Skimming the title, headings, sub-headings, text features and visual features of a non-fiction text<br />
• <strong>Reading</strong> a passage, short text or visual<br />
1. What is my inference? Ask students a question linked to the text that they just previewed or read, which prompts them to use what they know<br />
along with the clues in the text to make an inference (see ‘Strategy #8’ for more detail)<br />
Eg #1: Why might<br />
[character] react in<br />
this way?”<br />
Eg #2: “Using what you have read<br />
and what you know, what do you<br />
think is happening inside<br />
someone’s heart when they have<br />
a heart attack?”<br />
Students can use the sentence starters to help them express their inferences: “I’m thinking…” ,“This could mean…” , “Maybe…”<br />
2. What information did I use to make this inference? Ask students return to their reading and ask them to highlight what evidence or clues<br />
from the text they used to make their inference. If students cannot find evidence to support their inference, then perhaps they drew upon<br />
prior knowledge, which they will need to check. Alternatively, they might have some misconceptions about the topic which they can address.<br />
3. How good was my thinking? Invite students to consider other possibilities or to explain their thinking (‘What are some other reasons why<br />
this character might feel conflicted in this situation? What do we know for sure?’ ‘What made you say that?’, ‘What do other sources of<br />
information tell us?’). Students might realise they need more information or considerations to make a reasoned inference.<br />
4. Do I need to change my thinking? Invite students to consider possible changes to their initial thinking and to jot this down, explaining why.<br />
The idea is not to discredit students’ original inferences, but to help them build the habit of updating their thinking as they encounter new<br />
information.<br />
24
ONE-MINUTE WRITE<br />
25<br />
The ‘What’: An after-reading strategy that prompts students to listen carefully to a text/part of a text being<br />
read aloud, before recording their reactions to it in a ‘One-Minute Write’.<br />
The ‘When’:<br />
• After reading a short text – when you want students to express and extend their thinking about it<br />
• Model writing a ‘One Minute Write’ during the ‘Focused Instruction’ part of the Gradual Release of Responsibility<br />
model<br />
• Support students during Guided Instruction<br />
• Engage students in applying it during ‘Collaborative Learning’ and ‘Independent Learning’<br />
The ‘Why’ :<br />
• Encourages students to monitor their comprehension and thinking in relation to a text<br />
• Prompts students to synthesise different perspectives about a text with their own<br />
• Helps students form opinions and develop thoughts about what they are reading<br />
• Encourages students to critically reread a text, providing a ‘bridge’ between personal connections and analysis
The ‘How’:<br />
1. Explain that you are going to read a text/section of text aloud and would like students to stop and complete a ‘One Minute Write’<br />
afterwards. Explain that a ‘One Minute Write’ means they will be writing nonstop for a short period of time about the first things that<br />
spring to mind after they have read. Eg: “I’m going to read you a _______ by _______ . After I’m done, we are all going to take one<br />
minute and jot down our responses and reactions to what we’ve read. Okay, ready?”<br />
26<br />
2. Read the text out aloud and ask students to listen carefully and/or jot down their thinking in the margins as you go.<br />
3. One Minute Write: Ask students to jot down what the text:<br />
makes then see, think or wonder<br />
what it makes them feel<br />
encourages them to connect to (other texts, personal experiences, world events)<br />
• what they think about the author’s purpose, genre or key ideas<br />
Ask them to “keep the pen moving” for the whole minute.<br />
You might want to write alongside the students or rove the room.<br />
What does the text make you…<br />
• see, think or wonder?<br />
• feel?<br />
• connect to?<br />
• think about in terms of the topic, author’s<br />
purpose, genre, key ideas or content?<br />
4. Ask students to meet in pairs and take turns reading aloud their responses to the text. Circulate and support them as needed. As students<br />
share, project the text again and encourage them to reread it and see what else they notice.<br />
5. Ask students to share as a class: “Now let’s get a sense of all the different responses that this text inspired”.<br />
6. Reread the text aloud and prompt students with “Why?” and “How?” questions relevant to the reading/content. Use this to start a class<br />
discussion.
QUOTATION MINGLE<br />
27<br />
The ‘What’:<br />
A pre-reading strategy that introduces students to key quotes from a text and encourages them to<br />
share predictions and summarise what they think the text will be about.<br />
The ‘When’:<br />
• Before reading a text<br />
The ‘Why’ :<br />
• Stimulates student interest and curiosity<br />
• Encourages students to predict, hypothesise, pose questions and draw inferences before reading<br />
• Creates purpose for reading<br />
• Encourages collaborative learning
The ‘How’:<br />
28<br />
1. Prepare the materials: Extract around eight interesting sentences from an engaging piece of text that students will read and copy them onto<br />
index cards or paper strips (virtual learning variation: make one PowerPoint or Google slide per quote, group students in a Google Doc and assign<br />
them a quote, or use Padlet to present each quote in a separate grid). You’ll need one quotation for each student in your class, so you might need to<br />
make multiple copies.<br />
2. Describe the activity: “Today we are going to read a really interesting _________, but this time I’m not going to tell you the topic beforehand.<br />
You’ll have to guess. I’ve taken eight sentences from the article and copied them for you on these cards. We’re going to have a ‘quotation mingle’,<br />
where we take our cards and walk around the room and compare out quotes to ones other people have, one at a time. We’re going to mingle and<br />
have some small talk about our sentences from the mystery text. Your job is to figure out what this text is about by reading the sentence you have,<br />
and then hearing seven other sentences and talking with the people who have them. Okay? With each person you talk to, discuss what the whole<br />
text might be about. The more people you talk to, the more quotes you’ll see –plus your partners can tell you about other quotes they’ve seen. When<br />
you need a partner, wave your hand in the air, like this. When you find a partner, take turns reading your quotations aloud –then talk.” (Virtual<br />
learning variation: If working synchronously, hold online breakout discussion rooms. If working asynchronously, group students and have them<br />
post their thoughts about their own quotes followed by comments on others’ thoughts on a Padlet or Google Doc/slides)<br />
3. Monitor and coach: Let students mingle for six to eight minutes. Be in the crowd, urging students to switch partners keep it brisk and lively. Be a<br />
partner to lost or hiding students.<br />
4. Call time and monitor: Ask each pair to join up with another pair to form a group of four. Explain to students that you want them to discuss<br />
what they think the text will be about in their groups. Allow three minutes and circulate, supporting students. When the time is almost up, explain<br />
that you want them students come up with what they think the title of the text will be, word for word. Allow two more minutes for this.<br />
5. Share with the whole class: Reconvene as a class and invite discussion about the main predictions students made while mingling, as well as their<br />
predicted titles. Discuss similarities and differences in thinking.<br />
6. Read the text: Now it’s time to reveal the text and let students read it. Have students mark the text for the spots where their predictions have<br />
been confirmed or contradicted. Then, gather in small groups or as a class and talk, first about the content of the article, then about how the<br />
predicting process worked.
PROBABLE PASSAGE<br />
The ‘What’:<br />
Before reading, students categorise important words and concepts from a text, before writing a prediction. Then,<br />
students read the text and discuss how it compares to their predictions, before modifying them to summarise the text.<br />
29<br />
The ‘When’:<br />
• Begin the strategy before reading<br />
• Model each part of the strategy as part of the ‘Focused Instruction’ part of the Gradual Release of Responsibility<br />
• You can support students to categorise the words from the passage during the ‘Guided Instruction’ part of the<br />
Gradual Release of Responsibility model<br />
• Students can write their predictions and summaries as part of ‘Collaborative Learning’ or ‘Independent Learning’<br />
The ‘Why’ :<br />
• Provides students with inventive to read to find out if their predictions are accurate<br />
• Provides an opportunity for vocabulary instruction<br />
• Engages students in active reading as they read to critically evaluate their predictions and summarise key points
The ‘How’:<br />
1. Select an appropriate text for students and identify<br />
important words and concepts in it.<br />
2. Present the words and concepts to students and discuss<br />
their meaning together. Ask students to categorise the<br />
words and concepts according to pre-selected categories<br />
that relate to what you are teaching (in an English class<br />
studying narratives, this might include story elements like<br />
character, setting, conflict, resolution, themes. For a<br />
History class, this might include long-term causes, shortterm<br />
causes and immediate triggers. See another example<br />
on the right). Some words might belong in several<br />
categories. You might want to guide students and do this<br />
together as a class.<br />
3. Have each student write a ‘probable passage’ with words<br />
from each category that predicts what the text will be<br />
about. You can provide sentence starters if students need<br />
extra scaffolding.<br />
4. Invite students to read the text, with the purpose of<br />
checking their predictions. Ask students to compare the<br />
predictions in their ‘probable passage’ with the text –how<br />
accurate were they?<br />
5. Have students modify their probable passages so they<br />
become a summary paragraph of the actual text.<br />
30
RECIPROCAL TEACHING<br />
31<br />
The ‘What’: A highly effective reading strategy that involves<br />
students working collaboratively to talk and think their way through their<br />
understanding of a text; involving predicting, clarifying, questioning and<br />
summarising.<br />
The ‘When’:<br />
• Asking students to read a complex text they need support to<br />
understand<br />
Before and during reading<br />
• Model first during the ‘Focused Instruction’ component of the<br />
Gradual Release of Responsibility Model<br />
• Student Reciprocal Teaching groups occur during the ‘Collaborative<br />
Learning’ part of the Gradual Release of Responsibility Model<br />
The ‘Why’ :<br />
Encourages active reading and monitoring of comprehension<br />
• Provides an opportunity for improving comprehension through<br />
collaborative learning and scaffolded dialogue<br />
• Over time, provides multiple exposures to a thinking routine designed<br />
to encourage students to think about their own thinking when they<br />
read
The ‘How’:<br />
(Note: These steps might occur across a number of lessons)<br />
1. Explain the rationale and introduce the four comprehension strategies: First, explain to students that we learn best when we have the<br />
opportunity to teach others. Next, identify the four strategies that students will learn and use to help themselves comprehend what they read:<br />
32<br />
Predicting Clarifying Questioning Summarising<br />
What it is: Using information from a text, text<br />
structure, reader aids and background knowledge<br />
to form a guess about where the text is ‘going.’<br />
Prediction sets reading purpose.<br />
Group leader language:<br />
“After reading the heading and looking at the<br />
images I predict that this part of is going to be<br />
about…”<br />
“Would anyone like to add something or make a<br />
different prediction?”<br />
Group member language:<br />
• I think…<br />
• I predict…<br />
• I think I will learn…because…<br />
• I think… will happen because…<br />
What it is: Dealing with difficulties in the text by being alert to:<br />
vocabulary, text structure, new or difficult concepts and loss of<br />
meaning.<br />
Employing fix-up strategies like: re-reading, using the context<br />
of the passage, using language knowledge (vocabulary,<br />
structure, grammar), using a dictionary or thesaurus to check<br />
some words, using other references<br />
Group leader language:<br />
“Is there anything that anyone needs clarified?”<br />
Group member language:<br />
• I didn’t understand the part where…<br />
• This is… is not clear<br />
• I can’t figure out…<br />
• We can try…<br />
• What if we tried…?<br />
What it is: Going deeper into the text by forming<br />
questions about what you don’t know, what you<br />
need to know, or what you are curious about. It<br />
involves coming up with your own questions and<br />
finding relevant information to answer them, rather<br />
than waiting for the teacher to give you questions.<br />
Group leader language:<br />
“What questions does everyone have?”<br />
Group member language:<br />
• Who…?<br />
• What…?<br />
• Where/when…?<br />
• Why do you think…?<br />
• What was…about?<br />
• How…?<br />
• In what ways…?<br />
What it is: Identifying and condensing the most<br />
important parts of the text.<br />
Group leader language:<br />
“My summary of this part of the reading is…”<br />
“The key points are…”<br />
“Would anyone like to add anything further?”<br />
Group member language:<br />
• The most important ideas are…<br />
• This part was mostly about…<br />
• First...then…next…then…finally<br />
• The story takes place..<br />
• The main characters are…<br />
• A problem occurs when…<br />
2. Model how to apply the strategies with a familiar text: Choose a familiar text and read it aloud, thinking aloud to make predictions, clarify confusing<br />
text, generate questions and summarise important points. Show students how you work through a sequence of these strategies with a short chunk of<br />
a text, before inviting them to join in and help you with the next ‘chunk’ (see ‘Group language’)<br />
3. Demonstrate reciprocal teaching with a group of four students in a ‘fishbowl’ format: Next, act as a the group leader with a group of four students<br />
and model how to facilitate discussion (see ‘Group Leader Language’ in the table above). Students can use the ‘Group member language’ stems.<br />
4. Students work in groups with a text: Students work in groups with their own group leaders. They might want to use the sentence stems above. ‘The<br />
teacher monitors and circulates, supporting students and giving feedback. Students debrief the process each time, noting what they learned.
READING A VISUAL<br />
33<br />
The ‘What’:<br />
An activity that encourages students to actively read and interpret visual images elements or data.<br />
The ‘When’:<br />
• When engaging students in reading texts with visual elements (eg: paintings, sketches, cartoons, photographs,<br />
graphics, diagrams, charts, graphs, etc.)<br />
• When beginning a new unit (to build anticipation, curiosity and interest)<br />
• Model how to actively read and interpret visual images or elements during the ‘Focused Instruction’ part of the<br />
Gradual Release of Responsibility Model.<br />
• During ‘Collaborative Learning’ and ‘Guided Instruction’<br />
The ‘Why’ :<br />
• Engages students in noticing and asking questions about visual details, in order to interpret visual elements<br />
• Encourages supportive, collaborative learning
The ‘How’:<br />
1. Prepare and image in advance: Choose an image that has abundant detail throughout. Create a ‘projectable’ version of the image. Create a cut-out<br />
that can frame one quadrant at a time, blocking the rest of the image from view:<br />
If you’re using PowerPoint slides, your first and last slides will be entire image, while the middle four will reveal only one of the quadrants.<br />
2. Students prepare for the activity: Make sure students know who their partner will be for the later discussion, and have them sit near each other.<br />
Help students set up note taking forms by folding a sheet of paper in half and then in half again. Instruct them to unfold it to use for viewing<br />
notes. During the lesson, they’ll jot notes in the same quadrant as the one you are showing.<br />
3. Viewing the image: First, show students the whole image and give them one minute to study it. Ask them to look and see what they notice, but not to<br />
write anything down.<br />
4. View by quadrants: Next, show the image one quadrant at a time. Ask students to jot down their notes in the corresponding square on their sheet.<br />
•<br />
Ask them what they notice about:<br />
the setting or backdrop(objects, labels, landscape, lighting, weather, foreground, background, edges)<br />
objects or people (positioning of objects or people, labels, symbols, clothes, facial expressions, posture, positioning, lighting, colour)<br />
• action and activities (what seems to be shown or happening here?, who is doing what?, who is active/inactive?, how are the objects in the image<br />
relating to each other, what goals/emotions/information/motivations are shown?)<br />
Ask them what questions they have as they look at each part of the image. Observe students as they write, and quietly confer with any who are struggling.<br />
5. Reviewing the whole image: After students have taken notes on all quadrants, display the full image again. Let students take another few moments<br />
to add to their notes. Ask students to turn and talk to their partner about the image. After three to five minutes, invite students to draw some<br />
conclusions by engaging in the following questions: ‘What are the three most important details you and your partner noticed?’, ‘What conclusions<br />
about the image can you draw from these details?’, ‘If you were to give this image a title, what would it be?’ Ask students to share their thinking<br />
with the class, and connect the image with the content that’s going to be studied.<br />
34
READING WITH QUESTIONS IN MIND<br />
35<br />
The ‘What’: Students ask questions about a text before and during reading to read with purpose and focus.<br />
The ‘When’:<br />
• Begin the strategy before reading a text and continue the strategy during reading<br />
• Model how to engage in this strategy during the ‘Focused Instruction’ part of the Gradual Release of Responsibility Model<br />
• Support and engage students in using this strategy during ‘Guided Instruction’, ‘Collaborative Learning’ and ‘Independent Learning’<br />
The ‘Why’ :<br />
Stimulates student curiosity and interest<br />
Provides purpose and focus for reading<br />
Builds foundations for student-driven conversation about text<br />
• Shifts the focus from compliance to comprehension<br />
The ‘How’:<br />
1. Introduce the topic and text: “Today we are going to read a ________ about ________ . That’s a topic you might have ideas,<br />
opinions and questions about. One of the ways to read so you stay engaged with the text is to be constantly thinking of questions<br />
that you’ll later use when you talk about the text with other people. However, some work better than others. Good questions are ones<br />
that are intriguing, puzzling or can make others think about a text from different angles. They prompt you to go back and use the<br />
text to defend your answer.”
2. Read aloud and model: Model some initial questions about the topic before reading the text. Then, read the title and first paragraph aloud as you<br />
think aloud and annotate, and students make note of your examples. Eg: “Before you start writing your own questions, I’m going to show you how I<br />
do it. Be sure to jot down the example questions I share with you.”<br />
36<br />
As you read, stop and pose some open-ended, text-based questions. Write them down so that students can see the projection and jot down your examples.<br />
Here are some examples: Fiction text: “Why is the story called ‘Noel’? What night it mean beyond the obvious definition?’ or ‘Even though there are some<br />
holiday decorations, why doesn’t this setting seem very welcoming?’ Non-fiction text: ‘The text says that fewer teens are attempting to go for their driver’s<br />
licences – what might be the reasons for this?’ or ‘What role do state laws play in people’s decisions to go for their licences?’<br />
3. Invite students to analyse the questions: “Take a look at the questions I just wrote down. What do you notice about them? Turn to your partner and<br />
jot down some ideas.” Take a minute for a pair-share, and then list their suggestions. They might make the following observations: open-ended, based on<br />
things in the text but you’ve got to think about how to answer –it’s not just ‘fill in the blank’, might have to read further before being able to answer,<br />
makes you read between the lines, use imagination, ask for details, prompts you to make predictions or connections to what you know. Conclude by<br />
summarising what these questions have in common – they all dig into the text, ask the reader to think about what the details mean and how they<br />
interrelate.<br />
4. Individual work: Students finish reading the text individually, and stop and write some discussion questions. Encourage them to use your examples<br />
and the criteria for good questions the class established earlier as a guide. Ask students to aim for 3-6 questions and circulate, supporting students.<br />
5. Question elimination and ranking: Ask students to review their questions and cross out any with ‘yes/no’ answers or which can be easily answered.<br />
Ask students to rank their three most intriguing questions from 1 (most intriguing) to 3. Their ‘Top 3’ questions will be used in a discussion with a partner.<br />
6. Partners meet, discuss and analyse questions: Partners discuss their questions, taking turns to ask a question and share some ideas, opinions and<br />
thoughts, using evidence to support their answers.<br />
7. Whole class share: Ask a few pairs to volunteer their best question and explain what made it work. Encourage students to share what they discussed.
REREADING PROSE<br />
37<br />
The ‘What’: Students reread challenging, complex text ‘like detectives’ after breaking it down into manageable<br />
chunks.<br />
The ‘When’:<br />
• When reading difficult, complex, or subtle text that initially might not make sense to students<br />
• Model how to apply this strategy during the ‘Focused Instruction’ part of the Gradual Release of Responsibilty<br />
model<br />
• Students apply this strategy during ‘Independent Learning’ and ‘Collaborative Learning’<br />
The ‘Why’ :<br />
• Supports students to read closely and use clues from a text to make logical inferences about it<br />
• Prompts students to carefully consider different aspects of the topic they are reading about<br />
• Encourages students to use evidence from the text to support their thinking
The ‘How’:<br />
1. Introduce the idea of reading like a detective: “Some texts that we read might be difficult to understand at first, and require us to pay<br />
attention to all the details and put the clues together so we can understand. When we read texts like this, we have to put ourselves in the shoes<br />
of a detective. A detective gathers clues and then puts them together like a puzzle. They keep looking for evidence and even return to the scene of<br />
a crime lots of times in the hopes of noticing something they’ve missed. That’s what you’re going to do today.” Pass the text around and a 3-<br />
column chart with categories related to what students will be reading about.<br />
38<br />
Fiction: Setting details Character details Plot events<br />
Non-fiction: Vocabulary Main idea Key details<br />
2. Give instructions for note taking: “Instead of trying to read this text looking for everything, I want you to examine the ‘crime scene’, looking for<br />
only one kind of evidence at a time. Take your chart and fold it in thirds to so that just the first column is visible. The first time you read this<br />
text, all I want you to do is look for setting clues/important vocabulary words or clues and jot them down in that column as you read. The clues<br />
might be directly stated or just hints that will make you ‘read between the lines’ to fill in the missing details. I’ll model the first paragraph for<br />
you.<br />
3. Model the process: Read the first paragraph aloud and stop. As you think aloud, be sure to write your notes on the board or project them so<br />
that students can jot down your details onto their charts as an example. Show students how you use clues from the text to determine important<br />
details about setting or vocabulary.<br />
4. Students read and take notes: Give students time to read the rest of the text and jot down their own notes in the first column.<br />
5. Pair –share and complete other columns: Then bring the class together and add to the list. When a student shares, always ask them what<br />
evidence made them think that (eg: “what makes you say that?” ). Repeat Steps 3—5 as you move through the other columns on the chart.<br />
6. Class discussion: After students have reread the text for the third time, invite them to review their notes prior to talking about the ending or<br />
the over-arching learning gained from the text and share. Advise students that whenever they encounter a confusing text, to break it down and<br />
look for different aspects through multiple readings, rather than looking for everything all at once the first time they read it.
SQ3R (Survey, question, read, recite, review)<br />
The ‘What’:<br />
A reading strategy applied to informational text, involving:<br />
• previewing a text to make predictions (Survey)<br />
• setting a purpose for reading by generating questions about a topic (Question)<br />
• actively reading and searching for answers to their questions (Read)<br />
• monitoring their comprehension as they summarise main ideas and key points (Recite)<br />
• evaluating their comprehension by reviewing what they have learned and summarising (Review)<br />
The ‘When’:<br />
• When reading non-fiction texts<br />
• Model and demonstrate how to use the strategy during the ‘Focused Instruction’ part of the Gradual Release of Responsibility<br />
model<br />
• Support students to use this strategy during Guided Instruction<br />
• Students can use this strategy collaboratively (during ‘Collaborative Learning’) or independently (‘Independent Learning’)<br />
The ‘Why’ :<br />
• Engages students during each part of the reading process<br />
• Encourages strategic, purposeful reading<br />
• Guides students in monitoring their comprehension<br />
39
The ‘How’:<br />
40<br />
Source of<br />
example SQ3R<br />
organiser:<br />
Vicki Urquhart<br />
& Dana Frazee<br />
(2012),<br />
Teaching<br />
<strong>Reading</strong> in the<br />
Content Areas:<br />
If Not Me,<br />
Then Who? 3 rd<br />
Ed.,<br />
Moorabbin,<br />
VIC: Hawker<br />
Brownlow, p.<br />
181.<br />
1. Hand out copies of an SQ3R organiser like the one<br />
on the right and model how you would respond to<br />
each set of questions or tasks:<br />
• Survey: Model skimming headings and asking yourself<br />
questions<br />
• Question: Model how you can turn headings into<br />
questions<br />
• Read: Actively read, looking for answers to questions<br />
• Recite: Model how to answer questions you thought<br />
of without looking at the text<br />
• Review: Model summarising what you learned<br />
2. Assign a text passage from the current lesson or unit<br />
and have students practice this strategy in pairs or<br />
small groups.<br />
3. When students are familiar and comfortable with the<br />
strategy, assign additional passages for students to<br />
read individually.<br />
4. Bring students back together and have them discuss in<br />
pairs or small groups the questions and notes they<br />
made for each stage of the organiser.
TEXT CODING AND JIGSAW<br />
41<br />
The ‘What’: A combination of reading strategies involving<br />
searching for and categorising specific information in a text, followed by<br />
collaboratively reading and then sharing information from several short texts<br />
on the same topic.<br />
The ‘When’:<br />
• When you want students to synthesise information from a variety of<br />
readings and sources<br />
• When you want students to make sense of complex text<br />
• During the ‘Collaborative Learning’ and ‘Independent Learning’<br />
components of the Gradual Release of Responsibility Instructional<br />
Model<br />
The ‘Why’ :<br />
• Encourages students to monitor their developing comprehension<br />
(through writing in the margins) while reading<br />
Prompts students to categorise information in a text when reading<br />
• Encourages students to collaborate, engage in dialogue and synthesise<br />
their thinking about reading<br />
What are the conditions that favour<br />
the success of invasive species?<br />
Arrive (A) Survive (S) Thrive (T)
The ‘How’:<br />
1. Introduce the text and topic: Distribute a captivating news item related to what students are learning. Introduce the topic and raise<br />
questions about the reading. Read the first three paragraphs or sections of the text to students, stopping strategically to think aloud,<br />
verbalising your thoughts, reactions, questions and connections as you go.<br />
2. Students read, reconvene and share: Engage students in reading the rest of the text quietly, then invite pairs to talk and react. Encourage<br />
discussion and speculation by asking students what struck them the most and to jot down possibilities for discussion. Reconvene the whole<br />
class and share thinking.<br />
3. Distribute new articles: Arrange students in groups of 4-5 and distribute a stack of 4-5 engaging short texts or articles on the same topic,<br />
each one addressing a different aspect (eg: if studying invasive species, each text will look at one type of species. If studying the causes of<br />
WWII, each text will look at one particular cause). Students choose which short text they will read.<br />
4. Break students up into groups and : Encourage students to read their texts looking for specific information related to the topic, encouraging<br />
them to categorise and ‘code’ this information. Eg: if studying invasive species, students might look for how the species arrive (represented by<br />
an ‘A’), what makes them survive (represented by an ‘S’) and what makes them thrive (represented by a ‘T’). They read their texts and<br />
‘code’ them, marking them for specific information. Students can do this individually, or they can read it aloud in collaborative ‘expert groups’<br />
with students who are reading the same text and code it together.<br />
5. Invite discussion: Invite students to go back to their original groups and pool their notes, comparing information about each coding<br />
category, one at a time.<br />
6. Add a question and share findings with the class: Pose a question to the class that broadly addresses what they are trying to find out (eg:<br />
if studying invasive species, the question might be ‘What are the conditions that favour success for invasive species?’ If studying the causes<br />
of WWII, the question might be ‘Why did WWII occur?’ ). Create a chart with the question written at the top of the page and columns for<br />
each text-coding category, inviting students to share their responses. Fill it in (see blank example on the previous page).<br />
42
Think aloud (student to student)<br />
The ‘What’:<br />
In pairs, students share what they notice and think about a text out loud as they develop their understanding of it.<br />
43<br />
The ‘When’:<br />
• When you want to demonstrate a thinking process to students they can apply to their own reading independently<br />
• Model during the ‘Focused Instruction’ component of the Gradual Release of Responsibility Model<br />
• Student think-alouds occur during the ‘Collaborative Learning’ part of the Gradual Release of Responsibility<br />
Model<br />
The ‘Why’ :<br />
• Helps students learn to tune into and monitor their thinking as they read, improving comprehension<br />
• Through thinking aloud, notice the thinking strategies they are using (or not using!) to make sense of what<br />
they’re reading<br />
• Encourages students to be metacognitive and purposeful while reading
The ‘How’:<br />
1. Show text and explain thinking aloud: Project a copy of a text up<br />
onto a screen and share copies with students. Explain to students<br />
that whenever we read, we have an ‘inner reading voice’ in our<br />
minds that’s trying to make sense of what we’re reading, and you’ll<br />
be focusing on making that voice heard by thinking aloud with a<br />
partner.<br />
2. Model thinking aloud: Read a part of the text aloud, modelling<br />
how to select a line of text. Think aloud, verbalising what you<br />
notice, think or wonder about that line and link it to your lesson<br />
purpose (eg: if my intention as a History teacher is to engage<br />
students in source analysis, some goals might include to notice<br />
author and source details, or wonder about the historical context<br />
in which it was created). Ask students to select a line and<br />
highlight what they notice or think about it: Does it remind them<br />
of any other text they’ve read or problem they’ve encountered? Do<br />
they need to clarify any unknown words or concepts? Students jot<br />
down their points.<br />
3. Share: ask students to share with a partner and to jot down<br />
what they noticed or thought when they talked with their<br />
partner.<br />
4. Class share: Ask students to share insights from the activity.<br />
Think-Aloud Sentence-starters:<br />
• “I’d like you to watch me closely as I provide you<br />
with a window into my mind as I read this first<br />
part. Then, I’m going to ask you what you noticed<br />
about what I was doing…<br />
• “I’m thinking…”<br />
• “Hmm… this makes me think…”<br />
• “Okay, so the first thing I notice when I look at the<br />
title is…”<br />
• “So far, I’ve learned…”<br />
• “This made me think of…”<br />
• “That didn’t make sense…so I’ll try…”<br />
• “I think this next part will be about…”<br />
• “I reread that part because…”<br />
• “I think the most important part here is…”<br />
• “That is interesting because…”<br />
• “I’m confused by…”<br />
• “This reminds me of…”<br />
• “I wonder why…”<br />
• “I just thought of…”<br />
44
thought-provoking statements<br />
45<br />
The ‘What’: Posing provocative statements to students which are relevant to the<br />
content they will be reading about, that are likely to spark curiosity and lively discussion.<br />
Students are encouraged to come up with two reasons for ‘yes’ and two reasons for ‘no’ in<br />
response to the statements and to discuss their reasoning with peers, activating prior<br />
knowledge, before reading the text to locate evidence in relation to the statements. See examples<br />
of these statements in the box on the right.<br />
The ‘When’ :<br />
• Introduction to a new unit, topic or reading - ‘hook and hold’ students with this strategy<br />
• Begin this strategy before reading, then use it to encourage purposeful reading and review<br />
The ‘Why’:<br />
• Activates prior knowledge<br />
• Stimulates student curiosity and interest regarding the topic they will be reading about<br />
• Prompts students to critically reconsider content-specific statements in light of new<br />
evidence they encounter through reading<br />
• Prompts students to consider areas for further inquiry or research<br />
Eg #1: Food<br />
Technology<br />
Class<br />
“Organic foods<br />
are healthier<br />
than nonorganic<br />
foods”<br />
Eg #2: Maths<br />
class<br />
“Is a square a<br />
type of<br />
rectangle?”
The ‘How’:<br />
1. Consider the content students will be engaging with and select an appropriate reading/set of readings.<br />
2. Think of some provocative statements that will spark lively conversation amongst students and jot them down. Choose one<br />
statement to present to students.<br />
3. Present the statement to students .<br />
4. Ask students to draw up a T-chart with ‘Yes’ and ‘No’ written on each side. Ask students to individually jot down two reasons for<br />
‘Yes’ and two reasons for ‘No’ , if they can.<br />
Yes<br />
No<br />
46<br />
5. Next, ask students to elaborate on their ‘Yes’ and ‘No’ reasons with partners or in groups.<br />
6. Ask students to share as a whole class and to add to their lists again.<br />
7. Present students with text or a set of texts. Invite them to use the texts to locate evidence that does/does not support the<br />
thought-provoking statement from the beginning of the lesson. They can highlight evidence for ‘Yes’ in one colour, and evidence for<br />
‘No’ in another, annotating (See Strategy #1) their thinking as they go.<br />
8. After reading, invite students to reconsider their ‘Yes’ and ‘No’ reasons and give them a chance to add to/modify their thinking.<br />
9. As a whole class, invite students to pose questions or areas for further inquiry in order to develop a deeper understanding of the<br />
topic.
two-column notes/DOUBLE ENTRY JOURNAL<br />
The ‘What’:<br />
When students take notes in two columns about a text. Usually they note quotations or paraphrased statements about a text in one column<br />
and their own thinking in the other. Other categories can be used for the columns, including:<br />
47<br />
What I noticed/What I wondered<br />
Film or video detail/text connection<br />
Words /connotation<br />
The author says/I say<br />
Facts/opinions<br />
Reasons to believe/reasons to doubt<br />
Observations/inference<br />
Mathematical terms or symbols/meaning<br />
• What Source 1 says/What I know<br />
The ‘When’:<br />
• During reading<br />
• Model how to do this during the ‘Focused Instruction’ part of the Gradual Release of Responsibility Model<br />
• Engage students in applying this during ‘Guided Instruction’, ‘Collaborative Learning’ and ‘Independent Practice’<br />
The ‘Why’ :<br />
• Promotes active reading and monitoring of comprehension
48<br />
The ‘How’:<br />
1. Model how to use two-column notes first, jotting down a striking or thought-provoking quote in the<br />
first column, and noting your thinking in the other (see example below).<br />
2. Have a go as a class: Invite students to choose some quotes and together, note down your<br />
thinking in the right column as a class.<br />
3. Students have a go:<br />
Engage students in having a go at using the<br />
graphic organiser to record striking parts of<br />
the text along with their thinking, either<br />
independently or in groups.<br />
4. Invite students to share their thinking<br />
in small groups or as a class afterwards.
Tweet the text<br />
49<br />
The ‘What’: A reading procedure that prompts students to break a text up into manageable ‘chunks’ and write<br />
a 140-character ‘tweet’ for each chunk, reacting to what they just read.<br />
The ‘When’:<br />
• You want students to strategically read a longer piece of text and to track their thinking about it<br />
• During reading<br />
• Model the strategy during the ‘Focused Instruction’ part of the Gradual Release of Responsibility Model<br />
• Support students to apply it during ‘Guided Instruction’<br />
• Engage students in applying it during ‘Collaborative Learning’ and ‘Independent Learning’<br />
The ‘Why’:<br />
• Provides a simple, familiar process for students to determine important ideas and summarise and synthesise their<br />
thinking<br />
• Engages students in ‘chunking’ text and monitoring their understanding of it as they go
The ‘How’:<br />
1. Preview and ‘chunk’ the text – look at the title, headings, text features and images and break it up into logical ‘chunks’ or parts,<br />
explaining to students why you are breaking it up that way (eg: by sub-heading, paragraph, idea, etc.). Encourage students to do<br />
the same on their copy of the text.<br />
2. Explain synthesizing with a tweet: a short, concise piece of writing that brings together the reader’s ideas and thinking about a<br />
section of text. If reading fiction, a possible focus is what the characters or speakers discover or experience. If reading nonfiction,<br />
a possible focus is the new information the reader is discovering along the way.<br />
3. Model tweeting the text: Read the text aloud up to the end of the first chunk, stop, and think aloud, modelling how you bring your<br />
ideas together into a short, concise statement.<br />
50<br />
Eg: Fiction text: “What has Caroline learned so far? It looks like Farfire has lots of things Earth does: roses, lemons, grass. The big<br />
difference is that nothing gives off an aroma. The only exception is when someone is dying, and that aroma is incredibly pleasant. What<br />
would Caroline tweet? Maybe something like this: ‘Fanfire resembles Earth, but nothing has an odour on this planet except for death.<br />
People smell intoxicating just before they die. Odd.”’<br />
4. Students tweet through the story: Give students time to read the rest of the text and to jot down a ‘tweet’ at the end of each<br />
chunk of text.<br />
5. Pairs compare tweets: Move students into pairs to compare and discuss their tweets. Encourage them to discuss and clarify parts<br />
of the text that confused them.<br />
6. Whole-class discussion: Bring the class together and ask pairs to share their ‘sweetest tweets.’ Give students the opportunity to<br />
add to their own notes.
Written conversation<br />
51<br />
The ‘What’: A post-reading activity where students respond in writing to a rich, open-ended prompt and then<br />
respond to each other, building on their ideas and understanding.<br />
The ‘When’:<br />
• After reading<br />
• When students have read<br />
• During the ‘Collaborative Learning’ part of the Gradual Release of Responsibility Model<br />
The ‘Why’ :<br />
• Encourages students to actively read and record their thoughts, feelings and questions in a low-stakes<br />
environment<br />
• Encourages total participation when sharing ideas about a text
The ‘How’:<br />
1. Form groups: Place students in groups of three or four. Have each student get a full-size blank piece of paper and put their first name in the<br />
upper left-hand margin.<br />
2. Students read the text: Have students read a high-interest, topical, controversial text related to the content being studied.<br />
3. Explain the written conversation: Invite students to engage in written conversation: “Today we are going to have a conversation in small groups.<br />
We have done this plenty of times. But this time we are going to have that conversation in writing instead of out loud. We are going to write<br />
notes about our thinking, pass them around, and write back to each other. Okay? There are three rules for this kind of conversation:<br />
52<br />
• Use your best handwriting so people can read what you are saying<br />
• Use all the time given for writing<br />
• Don’t talk, even when passing notes to teach other –all energy goes to the writing!”<br />
4. Begin the written conversation: “Now we are going to start our written conversation. Remember, you are just writing an informal note to the<br />
people in your group. What did you think about while reading this? What are your thoughts, reactions, questions or feelings about the text or<br />
topic? Write what is on your mind. You will have two minutes to write and then we will start exchanging papers.” As students write, circulate<br />
and note when they have filled out a quarter of the page. Warn them it is almost time to stop writing and pass.<br />
5. Call for the first pass: “Okay, in about ten seconds we are going to pass papers for the first time, so you might want to finish writing the<br />
sentence you are working on right now. Ready? Pass to the right. Read the note your classmate wrote, and right beneath it, write an answer or<br />
response. You might agree or disagree, jot down a connection, or raise a whole new idea. Just keep the conversation going!”<br />
6. Call for additional passes: “Pass again, please. Now you have two notes to respond to. So I’m going to give you a little more time. You can respond<br />
to one note, or the other one, or both. Just keep the conversation going.” Reiterate instructions if needed, repeat another round, and continue.<br />
7. Return to sender and whole class share: When you are ready to stop, have the students pass back their papers so that everyone gets the paper<br />
they started with. Students take a moment to scan the writing in front of them and are invited to share ideas with the whole class.
Wide reading<br />
The ‘What’: Teachers identify topically-appropriate, appealing texts and provide students with<br />
class time for reading texts of their choice about the topic they are learning about.<br />
53<br />
The ‘When’:<br />
• During a regular, routine timeslot during each lesson or across a week of learning, for a set amount<br />
of time (eg: 15 minutes, 20 minutes, 30 minutes)<br />
• During the ‘‘Independent Learning’ part of the Gradual Release of Responsibility Model<br />
• Can involve students reading a text together (Collaborative Learning)<br />
The ‘Why’ :<br />
• Enhances student engagement<br />
• Helps students build background knowledge to support comprehension<br />
• Helps students build their vocabulary incidentally<br />
• Helps students build disciplinary knowledge
The ‘How’:<br />
1. Identify highly-engaging, accessible texts relevant to the content students will be learning about. Texts can include articles, picture story<br />
books (non-fiction or fiction), graphic novels, poems, songs, speech transcripts, interview transcripts, research-based blog posts, detailed<br />
infographics and many more. Select texts that align with student interests and their contexts and spark curiosity.<br />
2. Prepare for wide reading: The lesson before starting wide reading, explain to students that they will be reading texts of their choice about the<br />
topics you will be learning about. Explain they can choose texts from your selection, or from outside of it (if they choose this option, they need<br />
to bring their chosen text to class or ask you to print it for them). Present the texts from your selection to students and provide a quick<br />
summary of each (title, text type, topics covered, ideal ‘match’ for this book – “Readers who enjoyed…are likely to enjoy this…”) before<br />
encouraging them to jot down their choice and to hand this up to you. Use this as a guide to ensure there are enough copies of each text for<br />
students. Have a few spare copies available for students in case they change their minds.<br />
3. Norm-setting: Before beginning wide reading, establish some norms to build the environment for it. Ask students to jot down what an ideal<br />
reading environment looks like, sounds like and feels like, and make a chart to help reinforce these positive behaviours. Ask all students to sign<br />
it.<br />
4. Start wide reading: Remind students of norms and invite them to select one of the texts from your selection, or to bring in their own, if this is<br />
what they chose. Let students know that they can change their minds if they spend a session or two with a text and find it’s not for them.<br />
They can always browse the selection of texts or work with the teacher to choose something more suitable. Provide protected time for students<br />
to ‘just read’ and get lost in their texts.<br />
5. Possible ungraded follow-up activities that allow students to share their ideas from their texts with others. Ideas could include:<br />
• Think, Pair and Share in response to the prompt ‘What struck you the most/do you wonder about when it comes to what you just read?’ or<br />
‘One thing everyone needs to know about [text or topic]’<br />
• Sticky note share – Put up a chart with the name of the topic students are reading about in the middle and ask them to share either<br />
questions or key learning from the texts they read on sticky notes<br />
54
References<br />
55
References and associated strategies:<br />
56<br />
Beers, K (2003). When Kids Can't Read:<br />
What Teachers Can Do. Portsmouth:<br />
Heinemann.<br />
o It Says, I Say, and So… (Strategy #8)<br />
Buehl, D. (2017). ‘Text Prep’, Educational<br />
Leadership, Vol. 74, No. 5: pp.60—65.<br />
o Thought-Provoking Statements<br />
(Strategy #22)<br />
Daniels, H, & Steineke, N. (2011). Texts and<br />
Lessons for Content-Area <strong>Reading</strong>.<br />
Portsmouth: Heinemann.<br />
o Annotation (Strategy #1)<br />
o Quotation Mingle (Strategy #13)<br />
o <strong>Reading</strong> a Visual (Strategy #16)<br />
o <strong>Reading</strong> with Questions in Mind<br />
(Strategy #17)<br />
o Text Coding and Jigsaw (Strategy<br />
#20)<br />
o Think aloud (Strategy #21)<br />
o Two-Column Notes (Strategy #23)<br />
o Written Conversation (#25)<br />
Daniels, H, & Steineke, N. (2013). Texts and<br />
Lessons for Teaching Literature, Portsmouth:<br />
Heinemann.<br />
Follow-Up Questions (Strategy #7)<br />
One Minute Write (Strategy #12)<br />
o <strong>Reading</strong> with Questions in Mind<br />
(Strategy #17)<br />
Rereading Prose (Strategy #17)<br />
o Tweet the Text (Strategy #18)<br />
Fisher, D. & Frey, N. (2012), Improving<br />
Adolescent Literacy: Content-Area <strong>Strategies</strong><br />
At Work, Boston: Pearson.<br />
o Anticipation Guide (Strategy #2)<br />
o KWL (Strategy #10)<br />
Fisher, D. & Frey, N (2013). Rigorous <strong>Reading</strong>:<br />
5 Access Points for Comprehending Complex<br />
Texts, Corwin: Thousand Oaks.<br />
o Wide <strong>Reading</strong> (Strategy #26)<br />
Gallagher, K. (2009). Readicide: How Schools<br />
are Killing <strong>Reading</strong> and What You Can Do<br />
About It. Portland: Stenhouse.<br />
o Article of the Week (Strategy #3)<br />
Marzano, R.J (2010). ‘The Art and Science of<br />
Teaching: Teaching Inference’, Educational<br />
Leadership, Vol. 67, No. 7, pp. 80-81.<br />
Marzano’s 4 Questions: Analysing the<br />
Effectiveness of Inferences (Strategy #11).<br />
Tovani, C. (2011). So What Do They Really<br />
Know? Assessment That Informs Teaching,<br />
Portland: Stenhouse.<br />
o Annotation (Strategy #1)<br />
Urquhart, T, & Frazee, D. (2012). Teaching<br />
<strong>Reading</strong> in the Content Areas: If not me,<br />
then who?, Moorabbin: Hawker Brownlow.<br />
o Anticipation Guide (Strategy #2)<br />
o Chapter Discussion Protocol (Strategy<br />
#4)<br />
o DR-TA (Strategy #5)<br />
o Final Word Protocol (Strategy #6)<br />
o KNFS (Strategy #9)<br />
o Probable Passage (Strategy #14)<br />
o Reciprocal Teaching (Strategy #15)<br />
o SQ3R (Strategy #19)