30.07.2020 Views

Boxoffice Pro - August 2020

The Official Magazine of the National Association of Theatre Owners

The Official Magazine of the National Association of Theatre Owners

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

gave young moviegoers what they were<br />

looking for. These films defied taboos and<br />

censorship and embraced an experimental<br />

approach to filmmaking. Among them<br />

were movies hailing from swinging London,<br />

which exported the Bond franchise<br />

and Beatles films—and stars like Sean<br />

Connery, Michael Caine, and Vanessa<br />

Redgrave—to North American audiences.<br />

The French New Wave introduced young<br />

urban intellectual audiences to Truffaut,<br />

Godard, Brigitte Bardot, and Alain Delon.<br />

Italian films propelled Antonioni, Fellini,<br />

Sophia Loren, Marcello Mastroianni, and<br />

Gina Lollobrigida to fame.<br />

The foreign craze was evident in the<br />

pages of <strong>Boxoffice</strong> <strong>Pro</strong>. Coverage of<br />

foreign film festivals boomed, as did<br />

editorial by foreign correspondents<br />

and columns like “Tokyo Report” and<br />

“London Report.” In fact, one anonymous<br />

writer reported in 1961 that 70 out of 176<br />

pictures released by 10 companies in the<br />

U.S. between November 1960 and <strong>August</strong><br />

1961 were foreign. By February 1964,<br />

Twentieth-Century-Fox, MGM, Columbia,<br />

and United Artists were leading importers<br />

of foreign films. Smaller players like<br />

Embassy and Janus Films, which imported<br />

the work of Ingmar Bergman, steadily<br />

became more prominent.<br />

It was the first time in Hollywood’s<br />

history that stars and films competed with<br />

their international counterparts. And<br />

Hollywood was scared. A writer summed<br />

up the situation in <strong>August</strong> 1961: “The<br />

foreign invasion appears to be creeping<br />

up on the American production industry<br />

and, in time, may equal it or surpass it.<br />

And from all indications, U.S. companies<br />

will increase their imports in the coming<br />

years. While the top pictures still come out<br />

of Hollywood, the quantity is diminishing.”<br />

The artistic merit of foreign films was often<br />

recognized in the magazine with positive<br />

reviews and the honor of <strong>Boxoffice</strong> <strong>Pro</strong>’s<br />

Blue Ribbon Award, but Shlyen always<br />

encouraged Hollywood to regain its<br />

dominant position.<br />

Art house and specialty theaters thrived<br />

thanks to the influx of foreign films. Leonard<br />

Lightstone, executive vice president at<br />

Embassy, said in 1963 that specialty theaters<br />

were “mushrooming” and becoming<br />

more profitable as foreign films cut costs<br />

and became more flexible in their release<br />

strategies than first-run product. In 1960,<br />

Irving M. Levin, divisional director at San<br />

Francisco Theatres, attributed the proliferation<br />

of foreign films to their universal<br />

appeal and to “the inevitable maturing<br />

of film audiences as the country’s level of<br />

education and appreciation broadens.”<br />

Independent cinemas, like the Bleecker<br />

Street Cinema in Greenwich Village, began<br />

showcasing international films. In April<br />

1967, Shlyen urged exhibitors to “drop the<br />

notion that they must have ‘big box office<br />

The new social context<br />

created by the civil<br />

rights movement and the<br />

counterculture revolution<br />

produced an appetite<br />

among younger audiences<br />

for films that spoke to the<br />

reality of the decade.<br />

<strong>August</strong> <strong>2020</strong><br />

43

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!