3.2 <strong>The</strong> Right to <strong>Water</strong>: Moving from International Recognition to National Action David R. Boyd Adjunct Professor, School of Resources <strong>an</strong>d Environmental M<strong>an</strong>agement, Simon Fraser University, C<strong>an</strong>ada
Introduction It is widely recognized that a minimum supply of potable water is a vital prerequisite for life, health, dignity, <strong>an</strong>d the realization of other hum<strong>an</strong> rights (Gleick, 1996; Howard <strong>an</strong>d Bartram, 2003; UN High Commissioner for Hum<strong>an</strong> Rights, 2007). Yet there are approximately 1 billion people who currently do not enjoy safe drinking water, there are thous<strong>an</strong>ds of children who die every day from water-related illness, <strong>an</strong>d climate ch<strong>an</strong>ge is expected to exacerbate these crises (United Nations Children’s Fund, 2006; World Health Org<strong>an</strong>ization <strong>an</strong>d United Nations Children’s Fund, 2010). Even in the wealthiest nations on Earth, such as the United States <strong>an</strong>d C<strong>an</strong>ada, there are thous<strong>an</strong>ds of people who lack access to cle<strong>an</strong> water <strong>an</strong>d adequate s<strong>an</strong>itation (de Albuquerque, 2011; Boyd, 2011). M<strong>an</strong>y experts agree that legal recognition of the hum<strong>an</strong> right to water is a signific<strong>an</strong>t step towards increased access to safe drinking water (Smets, 2006; United Nations Development Programme, 2006; World <strong>Water</strong> Council, 2010; Sult<strong>an</strong>a <strong>an</strong>d Loftus, 2011). <strong>The</strong>refore, prominent individuals, governments, <strong>an</strong>d civil society org<strong>an</strong>izations have campaigned vigorously for recognition of this right at both the international <strong>an</strong>d national levels (Dubreuil, 2006; Barlow, 2007; Gorbachev, 2010). Examples include Mikhail Gorbachev, the Government of Bolivia, <strong>an</strong>d NGOs such as Green Cross International, the Council of C<strong>an</strong>adi<strong>an</strong>s, <strong>Water</strong>Aid, Rights <strong>an</strong>d Hum<strong>an</strong>ity, <strong>an</strong>d the Freshwater Action Network. Given recent progress in recognizing the right to water as a fundamental hum<strong>an</strong> right (described below), the focus must now shift to implementing <strong>an</strong>d fulfilling this right (Barlow, 2011; World Health Org<strong>an</strong>ization, 2011). 1. Defining the Right to <strong>Water</strong> <strong>The</strong> right to water requires that all persons have affordable access to a supply of safe water in qu<strong>an</strong>tities adequate for essential personal <strong>an</strong>d domestic uses, which include drinking, s<strong>an</strong>itation, clothes washing, food preparation, <strong>an</strong>d personal <strong>an</strong>d household hygiene (UN Committee on Economic, Social, <strong>an</strong>d Cultural Rights, 2002). An adequate supply requires a minimum of 50 to 100 litres per person per day (Gleick, 1996; Howard <strong>an</strong>d Bartram, 2003). Establishing the right to water requires governments to satisfy three aspects, namely, to respect, protect, <strong>an</strong>d fulfill the right. Respecting the right requires states to refrain from interfering directly or indirectly with the right (e.g. government c<strong>an</strong>not deny water services to individuals who c<strong>an</strong>not afford to pay). Protecting the right me<strong>an</strong>s ensuring that third parties do not interfere with or violate the right (e.g. through enacting <strong>an</strong>d enforcing legislation that prevents water pollution). Fulfilling the right requires positive state action, such as investment in water treatment <strong>an</strong>d distribution infrastructure, to ensure that the right is universally enjoyed (de Albuquerque, 2010). <strong>The</strong> benefits, for people <strong>an</strong>d states, of recognizing that water is a legally protected hum<strong>an</strong> right include: • Triggering stronger water laws, regulations, <strong>an</strong>d policies; • Prioritizing resources for investment in water infrastructure, govern<strong>an</strong>ce, <strong>an</strong>d m<strong>an</strong>agement; • Empowering citizens <strong>an</strong>d communities to take part in decision-making processes related to water; • Clarifying the appropriate priorities in allocating scarce water supplies; • Providing a potential remedy for those whose right is being or may be violated; • Protecting water from pollution <strong>an</strong>d other adverse impacts; • Preventing discrimination or neglect of under-privileged or marginalized communities; <strong>an</strong>d, • Providing a me<strong>an</strong>s of holding governments <strong>an</strong>d corporations accountable (Bluemel, 2004; McCaffrey <strong>an</strong>d Neville, 2009; Sult<strong>an</strong>a <strong>an</strong>d Loftus, 2011). It c<strong>an</strong> be argued that the right to water does need not to be explicitly recognized because it is implicit in other widely acknowledged rights, such as the rights to life, health, a healthy environment, <strong>an</strong>d <strong>an</strong> adequate st<strong>an</strong>dard of living (Tully, 2005). However, a more compelling argument is that ensuring sufficient attention <strong>an</strong>d resources for the right to water requires that it be given the prominence <strong>an</strong>d visibility of <strong>an</strong> explicit <strong>an</strong>d distinct right (L<strong>an</strong>gford, 2006; Khalf<strong>an</strong> <strong>an</strong>d Kiefer, 2008). <strong>The</strong>re are m<strong>an</strong>y misconceptions regarding the right to water (Center on Housing Rights <strong>an</strong>d Evictions, 2007). It does not entitle everyone to <strong>an</strong> unlimited supply of water at all times, in <strong>an</strong>y place, under <strong>an</strong>y circumst<strong>an</strong>ces. It may be limited by the concept of progressive implementation, i.e. that a state’s obligation is contingent on the availability of adequate <strong>The</strong> Right to <strong>Water</strong>: Moving from International Recognition to National Action Part 3 129
- Page 1:
The Global Water Crisis: Addressing
- Page 4 and 5:
About the InterAction Council Estab
- Page 6 and 7:
Acknowledgements
- Page 8:
Foreword
- Page 11 and 12:
The undeniable seriousness of the g
- Page 13:
Foreword xiii
- Page 16 and 17:
The Global Water Crisis: Framing th
- Page 18 and 19:
Ethical considerations also need to
- Page 20 and 21:
3. Support Ratification of the UN W
- Page 23 and 24:
1 Water and Global Security
- Page 25 and 26:
Introduction Since the serious stat
- Page 27 and 28:
Jury and Vaux project that the numb
- Page 29 and 30:
5. The Potential for Conflict and t
- Page 31 and 32:
References Cullen, H., 2010. The We
- Page 33 and 34:
Introduction Water is an integral p
- Page 35 and 36:
shortage Statewide Regional Local N
- Page 37 and 38:
summer months. To alleviate the con
- Page 39 and 40:
References Department of Energy, 20
- Page 41 and 42:
Introduction Water, economic and en
- Page 43 and 44:
Economic analyses of ecosystem good
- Page 45 and 46:
• Managing for sustainability. De
- Page 47 and 48:
Richter, B.D., M.M. Davis, C. Apse
- Page 49 and 50:
Introduction Water is an essential
- Page 51 and 52:
early post-Cold War period, from a
- Page 53 and 54:
2.4. Water, conflicts, and institut
- Page 55 and 56:
Renaud et al. (2011) proposed a pre
- Page 57 and 58:
Carius, A., D. Tänzler and A. Maas
- Page 59 and 60:
Turton, A.R., 2004. “The Evolutio
- Page 61 and 62:
Introduction In the West Asia and N
- Page 63 and 64:
2. Water in the WANA Region 2.1. De
- Page 65 and 66:
Following on this, during a persona
- Page 67 and 68:
Below are some suggestions for how
- Page 69 and 70:
plants through evapo-transpiration)
- Page 71 and 72:
WANA Forum, 2010b. Toward Supra-nat
- Page 73 and 74:
Introduction “The trouble with wa
- Page 75 and 76:
• Upgrading current water infrast
- Page 77 and 78:
60,000 ventilation improved pit lat
- Page 79 and 80:
5. The Bottom Line It is widely ack
- Page 81:
The Blue Economy: Risks and Opportu
- Page 84 and 85:
2.1 A Human Development Approach to
- Page 86 and 87:
apparatus assists nation-states in
- Page 88 and 89:
By ensuring that the international
- Page 90 and 91:
2.2 Water and Health Security Ganes
- Page 92 and 93: 1.1. Human-induced Pollutants Domes
- Page 94 and 95: Table.1. Water pollutants and human
- Page 96 and 97: In many urban and semi-urban areas,
- Page 98 and 99: 2.3 Water, Sanitation, Hygiene and
- Page 100 and 101: 1. The Impacts of Poor Water, Sanit
- Page 102 and 103: 77 64 2015 MDG target Coverage (%)
- Page 104 and 105: 3. The Neglect of the WASH Sector a
- Page 106 and 107: References Checkley, W., G. Buckley
- Page 108 and 109: 2.4 Water, Food and the Development
- Page 110 and 111: 2. Keeping Pace with Change Since t
- Page 112 and 113: one and has yet to attain widesprea
- Page 114 and 115: 2.5 Investing in Women’s Particip
- Page 116 and 117: of agriculture resulting mainly fro
- Page 118 and 119: their substantial contribution is p
- Page 120 and 121: Although cultural constraints still
- Page 122 and 123: UNEP, 2009. Water Security and Ecos
- Page 124 and 125: 2.6 Water Governance Reform in Afgh
- Page 126 and 127: 1.2. The Extreme risk of food secur
- Page 128 and 129: Furthermore, within each basin, lan
- Page 130 and 131: 3.2. Early doubts vis-à-vis progre
- Page 132 and 133: transboundary water management conc
- Page 135 and 136: 3 Will the Right to Water Alleviate
- Page 137 and 138: Introduction A growing number of ar
- Page 139 and 140: 2. Ethical Perspectives on State Ob
- Page 141: References Barlow, Maude, 2007. Blu
- Page 145 and 146: Later in 2010, the UN Human Rights
- Page 147 and 148: 3.2. Legislative Recognition Dozens
- Page 149 and 150: Mandela, M., 2002. No Water, No Fut
- Page 151 and 152: Introduction South Africans have a
- Page 153 and 154: water per person per day. The appli
- Page 155 and 156: References Bluemel, E. B., 2004.
- Page 157 and 158: Introduction Water conflicts are nu
- Page 159 and 160: 4. Water Policies and Their Impact
- Page 161 and 162: y its interconnection to encompass
- Page 163 and 164: Access to Water and Conflict: An In
- Page 166 and 167: Response from the InterAction Counc
- Page 168 and 169: As former U.S. President Mr. Bill C
- Page 170 and 171: The InterAction Council Québec Dec
- Page 172: List of Participants
- Page 175 and 176: List of Participants: 29 th Annual