DID MUHAMMAD EXIST YOU DECIDE

matthewmaloney654


Fair use &content disclaimer

FAIR USE NOTICE

This book contains some copyrighted material.

The use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner.I am making such material available.

In my efforts to advance understanding of issues of ecological and humanitarian significance .I believe this constitutes a

fair use of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the us copyright law.In accordance with title 17

u.s.c.Section 107 the material on this book is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in

recieving the included information for research and educational purposes.For more information go to:

https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml.If you wish to use copyrighted material from this book for purposes of

your own that go beyond fair use you must obtain permission from the copyright owner

FAIR USE

THE PRICE OF THE BOOK REFLECTS THE DIRECT COMPENSATION FOR THE RESEARCH,PRODUCTION

ALL IMAGES THAT HAVE BEEN PUT IN HERE DO NOT BELONG TO ME,I HOPE THIS INFORMATION

SHOW’S YOU WHERE AND HOW RELIGION HAS BECOME A MESS AND HOW YOU HAVE BEEN FOOLED.

2020 NOTICE ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ALL IMAGES AND SOME INFORMATION IN REGARDS TO TOPICS IN

THIS BOOK ARE OWNED AND COPYRIGHTED BY OTHERS I THANK EVERYONE FOR THERE RESEARCH

AND TIME AND I REPEAT THAT THE PURPOSE OF THIS BOOK IS TO GIVE YOU SOME KIND OF PATTERN

OF THE LIES YOU HAVE BEEN LED TO BELIEVE.

YOU MUST I REPEAT MUST UNLEARN AND RELEARN WHAT YOU HAVE BEEN PROGRAMMED TO

BELIEVE AND TO VERIFY EVERYTHING FOR YOURSELF.

DO NOT BLIND FOLLOW OUT OF IGNORANCE.


Did Muhammad ever Exist?…

1ST

PIECE OF EVIDENCE

Even one Muslim says: no…

Scandal exposes Islam's weakness (by Spengler)

"Did you hear about the German Gnostic?" "He couldn't keep a secret."

Just such a Teutonic mystic is Professor Muhammad Sven Kalisch, a German

convert to Islam who teaches Muslim theology at the University of Munster.

Kalisch recently laid a Gnostic egg in the nest of Islam, declaring that the Prophet

Mohammed never existed, not at least in the way that the received version of

Islamic tradition claims he did. Given that Kalisch holds an academic

chair specifically funded to instruct teachers of Islam in Germany's school system,

a scandal ensued, first reported in the mainstream English-language press by

Andrew Higgins in the November 15 edition of the Wall Street Journal.

On closer reading, Kalisch offers a far greater challenge to Islam than the secular

critics who reject its claims. The headline that a Muslim academic has doubts over

the existence of the Prophet Mohammed is less interesting than why he has such

doubts. Kalisch does not want to harm Islam, but rather to expose what he believes

to be its true nature. Islam, he argues, really is a Gnostic spiritual teaching

masquerading as myth. Kalisch's heretical variant of Islam may be close enough to

the religion's original intent as to provoke a re-evaluation of the original sources.

A labor of love from inside the fortress of Islamic theology may accomplish what

all the ballistas of the critics never could from outside the walls. Koranic criticism,

I have argued for years (here and elsewhere - You say you want a reformation?

Asia Times Online, August 5, 2003) is the Achilles' heel of the religion. That

argument has been made about Christianity for years by Elaine Pagels and other

promoters of "Gnostic Gospels", and it is dead wrong. In the case of Islam, though,

it might be dead accurate.

Kalisch is a Gnostic, a believer in secret spiritual truths that undergird the myths

manufactured for the edification of the peasantry. But he is a German Gnostic, and

therefore feels it necessary to lay out his secrets in thorough academic papers with

extensive footnotes and bibliography. It is a strange and indirect way of validating

the dictum of the great German-Jewish theologian Franz Rosenzweig: Islam is

a parody of Judaism and Christianity.

It is in weird little byways of academia such as Kalisch wanders that the great

battles of religion will be fought out, not at academic conferences and photo

opportunities with the pope. For example: the Catholic Islamologists who

organized the November 4-7 meeting of Catholic and Muslim scholars in Rome


envision incremental reforms inside Islam through a more relaxed Turkish version

(see A Pyrrhic propaganda victory in Rome Asia Times Online, November 12, 2008

and Tin-opener theology from Turkey Asia Times Online, June 3, 2008). Despite

their best efforts at an orderly encounter with Islam, events have a way of

overtaking them. Last March, Pope Benedict personally received into the Catholic

faith the Egyptian-born Italian journalist Magdi Allam at the Easter Vigil. In

September, Kalisch dropped his own bombshell. In a way, it is longer-acting and

more deadly.

A small group of Koran scholars, to be sure, has long doubted Mohammed's

existence. Their scholarship is sufficiently interesting, though, to question whether

it is worthwhile exposing the alleged misdeeds of the Prophet Mohammed, who

may not have existed in the first place (The Koranic quotations trap Asia Times

Online, May 15, 2007). Earlier this year, I reported on the progress of the critics, as

well as belated emergence of a treasure-trove of photocopies of Koranic

manuscripts hidden away by Nazi Islamologists (Indiana Jones meets the Da Vinci

Code Asia Times Online, January 18, 2008). The Nazis had a Gnostic interest in

Islam (call them "Gnazis"). The manuscripts and copies are now under the control

of mainstream scholars at the University of Berlin, with deep ties to Arab countries.

Kalisch is the first Muslim scholar to dispute the Prophet's existence, while

continuing to profess Muslim. If the Prophet did not exist, or in any case did not

dictate the Koran, "then it might be that the Koran was truly inspired by God, a

great narration from God, but it was not dictated word for word from Allah to the

Prophet", he told a German newspaper. A German Protestant who converted to

Islam as a teenager in search of a religion of reason, Kalisch can live with an

alternative of reading of Islam. Very few of the world's billion and a half Muslims

can.

Islam cannot abide historical criticism of the sort that Judaism and Christianity

have sustained for centuries. "If you're here, then who is that there in my bed?,"

responds the Jewish wife in the old joke when her husband catches her in delicto

flagrante. No one can offer an alternative explanation for the unique persistence of

the Jewish people after 30 documented centuries of Jewish life. "If Moses didn't

exist," the Jews respond to skeptics, "then who brought us out of Egypt?" Told that

perhaps they didn't come out of Egypt, the Jews will respond, "Then what are we

doing here today?"

Christians, by the same token, read the writings of numerous individuals who

either met Jesus of Nazareth or took down the accounts of people who did, and

who believed that he was the only begotten Son of God. Proof of Jesus' divinity,

though, is entirely beside the point. If the Christian God wanted to rule by majesty

and power, he would not have come to earth as a mortal to die on the cross. The

Christian God asks for love and faith, not submission before majesty. The

Christian is not asked to prove the unprovable, but to


love and believe. Muslims have a different problem: if Mohammed did not receive

the Koran from God, then what are they doing there to begin with? Kalisch has the

sort of

answer that only a German academic could love.

"We hardly have original Islamic sources from the first two centuries of Islam,"

Kalisch observes in a German-language paper available on the Muenster

University (website). It is fascinating reading, and since it is not yet available in

English I take the liberty of translating or summarizing a few salient points.

Responsibility for any errors of translation of interpretation is my own.

Kalisch continues, "And even when a source appears to come from this period,

caution is required. The mere assertion that a source stems from the first or

second century of the Islamic calendar means nothing. And even when a source

actually was written in the first or second century, the question always remains of

later manipulation. We do not tread on firm ground in the sources until the third

Islamic century."

This, Kalisch observes, is extremely suspicious: how can a world religion have

erupted in a virtual literary vacuum? A great religion, moreover, inevitably throws

off heresies: where are the early Islamic heretics and Gnostics? Later Islamic

theologians knew the tit les of some of their works, but the content itself was lost.

"The only explanation for the disappearance is that it had long since become

unusable theologically," he alleges of certain Shi'ite sources.

Kalisch draws on the well-known work of Patricia Crone and Martin Hinds, whose

criticism of the received version have a distinctly minority position in Koranic

scholarship:

It is a striking fact that such documentary evidence as survives from the Sufnayid

period makes no mention of the messenger of god at all. The papyri do not refer to

him. The Arabic inscriptions of the Arab-Sasanian coins only invoke Allah, not his

rasul [messenger]; and the Arab-Byzantine bronze coins on which Muhammad

appears as rasul Allah, previously dated to the Sufyanid period, have not been

placed in that of the Marwanids. Even the two surviving pre-Marwanid

tombstones fail to mention the rasul.

The great scandal of Islamic tradition is the absence of Islamic formulations from

coins and monuments dating from the its first two centuries, as well as the

presence of material obviously incompatible with Islam. "Coins and inscriptions

are incompatible with the Islamic writing of history," Kalisch concludes on the

strength of older work, including Yehuda Nevo and Jutith Koren's Crossroads to

Islam.

The oldest inscription with the formulation "Mohammed Messenger of Allah" is to

found in the 66th year of Islamic reckoning, and after that used continuously. But

there also exist coins found in Palestine, probably minted in Amman, on which the

word "Muhammed" is found in Arabic script on one side, and a picture of a man


holding a cross on the other. Kalisch cites this and a dozen other examples. Citing

Nevo/Koren and other sources,

Kalisch also accepts the evidence that no Islamic conquest occurred as presented

in much later Islamic sources, but rather a peaceful transfer of power from the

Byzantine empire to its local Arab allies.

"To be sure," Kalisch continues, "various explanations are possible for the lack of

mention of the Prophet in the early period, and it is no proof for the non-existence

of an historical Mohammed. But it is most astonishing, and begs the question of

the significance of Mohammed for the original Muslim congregation in the case

that he did exist."

The numismatic, archeological, source-critical and other evidence against

acceptance of the received version of Islamic history was well developed by other

scholars. But it was never accepted by mainstream Orientalists. Cynics might point

to the fact that most Middle Eastern studies programs in the West today are

funded by Islamic governments, or depend on the good will of Middle Eastern

governments for access to source material. Academia is not only corrupt, however,

but credulous: the question arises: if Mohammed never existed, or did not exist as

he is portrayed, why was so much effort devoted in later years to manufacturing

thousands of pages of phony documentation in the Hadith and elsewhere?

Why, indeed, was the Mohammed story invented, by whom, and to what end? The

story of the Hegira, Mohammed's flight from Mecca to Medina allegedly in 622,

provides a clue, according to Kalisch. "No prophet is mentioned in the Koran as

often as Moses, and Muslim tradition always emphasized the great similarly

between Moses and Mohammed," he writes. "The central event in the life of Moses,

though, is the Exodus of the oppressed Children of Israel out of Egypt, and the

central event in the life of Mohammed is the Exodus of his oppressed congregation

out of Mecca to Medina ... The suspicion is great that the Hegira appears only for

this reason in the story of the Prophet, because his image should emulate the

image of Moses."

Furthermore, "the image of Jesus is also seen as a new Moses. The connection of

Mohammed to the figure of Jesus is presented in Islamic tradition through his

daughter Fatima, who is identified with Maria ... The Line Fatima-Maria-Isis is

well known to research. With the takeover of Mecca, Mohammed at least returns

to his point of origin. Thus we have a circular structure typical of myth, in which

beginning and end are identical. This Gnostic circular structure represents the

concept that the soul returns to its origin. It is separated from its origin, and must

return to it for the sake of its salvation."

Kalisch concludes that Islam itself began as a Gnosis, a secret teaching much like

the Gnostic Christian sources rejected by the Church Fathers. "The myth of

Mohammed ... could be the product of a Gnosis, which wanted to present its

theology in a new and original myth with a new protagonist, but actually is the old

protagonist (Moses, Jesus). For the Gnostics it always was clear, that the issue was


not historical truth, but rather theology. Moses, Jesus and Mohammed were only

different characterizations of a mythic hero or son of god, who would depict an old

spiritual teaching in mythical form."

He explains,

In the Islamic Gnosis, Muhammed appears along with [his family members] Ali,

Fatima, Hasan and Hussein as cosmic forces ... the Gnostic Abu Mansur al Igli

claimed that God first created Jesus, and then Ali. Here apparently we still have

the Cosmic Christ. If a Christian Gnosis was there are the origin of Islam, then the

Cosmic Christ underwent a name change to Mohammed in the Arab world, and

this Cosmic Mohammed was presented as a new edition of the Myth of Moses and

Joshua (=Jesus) as an Arab prophet.

Thirst for secret wisdom drew Kalisch to Islam as a teenager, and keeps him within

the faith despite his devastating critique. As he writes,

“ The teachings of Islamic mysticism are not specifically Islamic. They are a new

minting of the perennial philosophy, which is found everywhere in the world in

various traditions ... For me, this perennial philosophy is what the Koran means

when it speaks of a teaching that God brought to humankind in all epochs.”

My own views on the subject of Islamic mysticism are contained in a recent essay,

(Sufism, sodomy and Satan Asia Times Online, August 12, 2008). Kalisch, it

should be noted, adheres to a minority sect within the minority Shi'ite current in

Islam, the Zaydi variant. His conclusions will convince few in the Islamic

mainstream. But his work points to the great vulnerabilities of Islam. As I wrote

some months ago, the German Jesuits who advise the Vatican on Islamic matters

invested heavily in the supposedly moderate establishment of Sunni Islam in

Turkey, and the theology department of the University of Ankara in particular

(Tin-opener theology from Turkey Asia Times Online, June 3, 2008).

Of far greater interest may be the wide assortment of variant and quasi-heretical

trends within Islam. Something very ancient and entirely genuine long buried

within Islam may be struggling to the surface, a cuckoo's egg, as it were, waiting to

hatch. It is noteworthy that Germany's Alevi community (immigrants from

Turkey's 5-to-15 million strong Alevi population) expressed solidarity with Kalisch

when he came under attack from other Muslim organizations.

Coming from a minority within a minority, Kalisch has offered a new and credible

explanation of the motive behind the great reshuffling of Islamic sources during

the second and third centuries of the religion. I cannot evaluate Kalisch's handling

of the sources, but the principle he advances makes sense. It is another crack in the

edifice of Islam, but a most dangerous one, because it came from the inside.

Source:http://www.virtueonline.org/portal/modules/news/article.php?storyid=9372


RelatedArticles:

http://www.answering-islam.org/Index/M/muhammad.html

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB122633888141714211.html

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB122669909279629451.html

InGerman(originalVersion):

http://www.uni-muenster.de/imperia/md/content/religioesestudien/islam/_v/kalisch_islamische_theolo

gie_ohne_historischen_muhammad.pdf

A SPECIAL THANKS TO THE PEOPLE WHO PROVIDED THIS

INFORMATION.

DID MUHAMMAD EXIST ?

2ND PIECE OF EVIDENCE

What a strange question. Everybody assumes that Muhammad existed. Does not Islam affirm his existence?

Why would anyone question it?

Strangely enough there are many questions about Muhammad, the Qur’an, and the hadiths (traditions) that

arose about Muhammad that led some scholars and researchers to the conclusion that Muhammad really did not

exist. What is the cause of this doubt?

A recent book by Robert Spencer has the title, Did Muhammad Exist?

The book is well-researched and deals with many historical issues. He describes the “canonical” story, that is,

the common story told by Muslims, of Muhammad and then deals with the problems of supporting the story. The

conclusion is that there is little to support the Muslim claims concerning the existence of Muhammad historically.

What are the sources of information about Muhammad?

First, we must examine the Qur’an, the sacred book of Muslims. There is little information

about Muhammad in the Qur’an. The word “Muhammad” appears 4 times in the Qur’an. In three of the cases

it could merely refer to a title, “the praised one,” or “chosen one.” Other names like Abraham appear 79 times,

Moses 136 times, Pharaoh 74 times. The title “messenger of Allah” appears 300 times. Surah 33:40 is certainly a

reference to a person, but it tells nothing about the life of Muhammad. Surah 48:29 also names Muhammad as a

messenger of Allah.

Spencer concludes that “we can glean nothing from these passages about Muhammad’s biography. Nor is it

even certain, on the basis of the Qur’anic text alone, that these passages refer to Muhammad, or did so originally.”

(p.19)

Second, there are the hadiths, traditions, that are voluminous in quantity, often contradictory in nature, and

most of them fabrications due to the lack of information about Muhammad. The hadiths arose much later after

Muhammad supposedly died in 632.

Third, there is the Sira, an Arabic term for the traditional biographies of Muhammad. “The earliest biography

of Muhammad was written by Ibn Ishaq (d.773), who wrote in the latter part of the eighth century, at least 125


years after the death of his protagonist, in a setting in which legendary material about Muhammad was

proliferating. And Ibn Ishaq’s biography does not even exist as such; it comes down to us only in the quite lengthy

fragments reproduced by an even later chronicler, Ibn Hisham, who wrote in the first quarter of the ninth century,

and by other historians who reproduced and thereby preserved additional sections. Other biographical material

about Muhammad dates from even later.” (p.19)

One of the earliest non-Muslim sources to possibly mention the prophet of Islam is a document known as the

Doctrina Jacobi which was written by a Christian between 634 and 640. The document mentions the Saracens

coming with an army and the prophet leading them. The writer was stopped by an old man well versed in

Scripture and he inquired, “what can you tell me about the prophet who has appeared with the Saracens? He

replied, groaning deeply: ‘He is false, for the prophets do not come armed with a sword.’ (p.21) This unnamed

prophet mentioned in the Doctrina was travelling with his army. Muhammad had died already.

“… there is not a single account of any kind dating from around the time the Doctrina Jacobi was written that

affirms the canonical Islamic story of Muhammad and Islam’s origins.” (p.22)

The conquest of Jerusalem in 637 is mentioned by Sophronius, the patriarch of Jerusalem, who turned the

city over to Umar, the conquering leader, but nothing is said about a holy book, or Muhammad, only that they

were Saracens who were “godless.”

The first reference to the term Muslim comes in 690 by a Coptic Christian bishop, John of Nikiou. He wrote:

“And now many of the Egyptians who had been false Christians denied the holy orthodox faith and life giving

baptism, and embraced the religion of the Muslims, the enemies of God, and accepted the detestable doctrine of

the beast, that is, Muhammad, and they erred together with those idolaters, and took arms in their hands and

fought against the Christians.”

“There is, however, reason to believe that this text as it stands is not as John of Nikiou wrote it. It survives

only in an Ethiopic translation from the Arabic, dating from 1602. The Arabic itself was a translation from the

original Greek or some other language. There is no other record of the terms Muslim and Islam being used either

by the Arabians or by the conquered people in the 690’s, outside of the inscription on the Dome of the Rock,

which itself has numerous questionable features…” (p.36)

After pursuing various issues Spencer sums up what we know about the traditional account of Muhammad’s

life and the early days of Islam.

No record of Muhammad’s reported death in 632 appears until more than a century after that date.

A Christian account apparently dating from the mid-630s speaks of an Arab prophet “armed with a sword”

who seems to be still alive.

The early accounts written by the people the Arabs conquered never mention Islam, Muhammad, or the

Qur’an. They call the conquerors “Ishmaelites,” “Saracens,” “Muhajirun,” and “Hagarians” but never “Muslims.”

The Arab conquerors, in their coins and inscriptions, don’t mention Islam or the Qur’an for the first six

decades of their conquests. Mentions of “Muhammad” are non-specific and on at least two occasions are

accompanied by a cross. The word can be used not only as a proper name but also as an honorific.

The Qur’an, even by the canonical Muslim account, was not distributed in its present form until the 650’s.

Contradicting that standard account is the fact that neither the Arabian nor the Christians and Jews in the region

mention the Qur’an until the early eighth century.

During the reign of the caliph Muawiya (661-680), the Arabs constructed at least one public building whose

inscription was headed by a cross.

We begin hearing about Muhammad, the prophet of Islam, and about Islam itself in the 690’s, during the

reign of the caliph Abd al-Malik. Coins and inscriptions reflecting Islamic beliefs begin to appear at this time also.

Around the same time, Arabic became the predominant written language of the Arabian Empire,

supplanting Syriac and Greek.

Abd al-Malik claimed, in a passing remark in one hadith, to have collected the Qur’an, contradicting Islamic

tradition that the collection was the work of the caliph Uthman forty years earlier.

Multiple hadiths report that Hajjaj ibn Yusuf, governor of Iraq during the reign of Abd al-Malik, edited the


Qur’an and distributed his new edition to the various Arab-controlled provinces--- again, something Uthman is

supposed to have done decades earlier.

Even some Islamic traditions maintain that certain common Islamic practices, such as the recitation of the

Qur’an during mosque prayers, date from orders of Hajjaj ibn Yusuf, not to the earlier period of Islamic history.

In the middle of the eighth century, the Abbasid dynastic supplanted the Umayyad line of Abd al-Malik. The

Abbasids charged the Umayyads with impiety on a large scale. In the Abbasid period, biographical material about

Mohammed began to proliferate. The first complete biography of the prophet of Islam finally appeared during this

era—at least 125 years after the traditional date of his death.

The biographical material that emerged situates Muhammad in an area of Arabia that never was the center

for trade and pilgrimage that the canonical Islamic account of Islam’s origin depend on it to be. (pp.205-206)

Given these huge problems for the history of Islam, how does Spencer explain the rise of Islam? He

proposes the need for a political theology that would reflect Arabic culture, Arabic

language, and Arabic religion. When warriors from Arabia encountered the conquered cultures they

observed that the Roman empire had a political theology for the purpose of binding the empire together. “The

earliest Arab rulers appear to have been adherents of Hagarism, a monotheistic religion centered around

Abraham and Ishmael.” (p.208) It was not as anti-Christian as Islam developed later since there were Arab coins

with crosses on them. This religious model reached its height in 691 and there began to emerge a defiantly Arabic

one.

By the end of the seventh century and the beginning of the eight, “the Umayyads began to speak more

specifically about Islam, its prophet and eventually its book.” (The Umayyad dynasty ruled from 661 to 750.) The

Dome of the Rock’s inscription referring to the “praised one” no longer could refer to Jesus, but to Muhammad.

Even if Muhammad did not exist his name would be politically useful since the Arabs needed an Arab prophet

who would also have a scripture in Arabic. Since much of the Qur’an has been borrowed from Jewish and

Christian sources of some kind it was easy to plagiarize them and change them for their own uses.

The lack of historical documents seems to be blamed on the Umayyad party who were replaced by the

Abbasids in 750. The Umayyads were regarded as irreligious, failing to appreciate the history of Islam. With the

new Caliph, the Abbasids, there begins a massive attempt to fill in the gaps of ignorance about the past, about

Muhammad, and the manufacture of hadiths (traditions) began in earnest. Many of the hadiths blame the

Umayyads, and the Umayyads created their own hadiths blaming the Abbasids. There are 600,000 hadiths, all of

them forgeries by competing groups. Even the Shia have their own hadiths affirming the claim of Ali as successor

to Muhammad.

Essentially, Spencer maintains that the Arabian empire came first, the theology came later.

He concludes: “A careful investigation makes at least one thing clear: The details of Muhammad’s life that

have been handed down as canonical—that he unified Arabia by the force of arms, concluded alliances, married

wives, legislated for his community, and did so much else—are a creation of political ferment dating from long

after the time he is supposed to have lived. Similarly, the records strongly indicate that the Qur’an did not exist

until long after it was supposed to have been delivered to the prophet of Islam.”

“Did Muhammad exist?

As a prophet of the Arabs who taught a vaguely defined monotheism, his life story is lost in the mists of

legend, like those of Robin Hood and Macbeth. As the prophet of Islam, who received (or even claimed to receive)

the perfect copy of the perfect eternal book from the supreme God, Muhammad almost certainly did not exist.

There are too many gaps, too many silences, too many aspects of the historical record that simply do not accord,

and cannot be made to accord, with the traditional account of the Arabian prophet teaching his Qur’an, energizing

his followers to such an extent that they went out and conquered a good part of the world.” (pp.214-215).


DID MUHAMMAD EXIST?

3RD PIECE OF EVIDENCE

SECRET VATICAN BRIEFINGS ON THE CREATION OF PROPHET MUHAMMAD ?

You just never know where or when some truly insightful information is going to cross our path to share with you.

How the Vatican created Islam.

The astonishing story from an ex-Jesuit priest, Alberto Rivera, which was told to him by Cardinal Bea while he was at the

Vatican.

How about a "comic book" form of publication of important suppressed history about the Jesuit/Vatican hand in the

creation of Islam and Islam's founder, the prophet Muhammad?

According to the Introduction to what you are about to read:

"This information came from Alberto Rivera, former Jesuit priest, after his conversion to Protestant Christianity. It is

excerpted from The Prophet, published by Chick Publications, P.O. Box 662, Chino CA 91708.

Since its publication, after several unsuccessful attempts on his life, he died suddenly from food poisoning.His testimony

should not be silenced.

"The Destruction of the Temple at Jerusalem" by Nicolas Poussin (1637)

Because of the provocative nature of this material, I (E.Y.) asked Rick Martin to contact SPECTRUM friend Eric Jon

Phelps, author of the blockbuster research work VATICAN ASSASSINS, for his opinion.

This is what Eric wrote back via email:

"This is from the Chick comic book 'Alberto' series, titled The Prophet. And it is absolutely true. Islam is a sword of the

Church evidenced by who the Moslems have killed for the last 100 years."

Eric also said, in a later communication, that Dr. Alberto Rivera first publicly released this information back in 1988.

Of course, Eric would likely add another twenty pages of details to this document tracing

the Jesuit hand in these shenanigans, but you'll be able to spot that thread easily enough from what is related in the

following narrative (analysis by Eric Phelps of a recent example of the typically two-faced nature of Vatican

propaganda as carried out through their controlled media puppetry.)


Pay attention to the overall picture being painted below; don't get caught up in arcane theological language and related

concepts that obviously derive from Dr. Rivera's background. The Dark Energies, by any name, reveal themselves

through their ACTIONS!

Also pay close attention to another thread running through the following narrative - one which provides important

background for the long-running Arab-Israeli conflict.

In beautiful contrast to what you're programmed to believe through the media, that Arabs and Israelis can't get along,

elsewhere in this issue of The SPECTRUM is a very warm and personal account of some Jews sharing in the hospitality of

some Arabs.

The actual (natural) inclination for people of even diverse backgrounds to generally live in peace and get along with each

other on common human grounds always reveals when there has been the instigation of conditions (by diabolical ones

operating behind the scenes) that are calculated to artificially provoke strife and war.

The following is a good example of just such behind-the-scenes shenanigans that are carried out by ones long

overshadowed by the Dark Energies.

What I'm going to tell you is what I learned in secret briefings in the Vatican when I was a Jesuit priest, under oath and

induction.

A Jesuit cardinal named Augustine Bea showed us how desperately the Roman Catholics wanted Jerusalem at the end of

the third century. Because of its religious history and its strategic location, the Holy City was considered a priceless

treasure.

A scheme had to be developed to make Jerusalem a Roman Catholic city. The great untapped source of manpower that

could do this job was the children of Ishmael.

The poor Arabs fell victim to one of the most clever plans ever devised by the Powers of Darkness.

Early Christians went everywhere with the gospel, setting up small churches, but they met heavy opposition

Both the Jews and the Roman government persecuted the believers in Christ to stop their spread.

But the Jews rebelled against Rome, and in 70 A.D. Roman armies under General Titus smashed Jerusalem and destroyed

the great Jewish temple which was the heart of Jewish worship - in fulfillment of Christ's prophecy in Matthew 24:2.

On this holy place, where the temple once stood, the Dome of the Rock Mosque stands today as Islam's second most holy

place.

Sweeping changes were in the wind. Corruption, apathy, greed, cruelty, perversion, and rebellion

were eating at the Roman Empire, and it was ready to collapse. The persecution against Christians was useless, as they

continued to lay down their lives for the gospel of Christ.

The only way Satan could stop this thrust was to create a counterfeit "Christian" religion to destroy the work of God.

The solution was in Rome. Their religion had come from ancient Babylon, and all it needed was a face-lift. This didn't

happen overnight, but began in the writings of the "early church fathers".

It was through their writings that a new religion would take shape. The statue of Jupiter in Rome was eventually called St.

Peter, and the statue of Venus was changed to the Virgin Mary. The site chosen for its headquarters was on one of the

seven hills called "Vaticanus" - the place of diving serpent where the satanic Temple of Janus stood.

The great counterfeit religion was Roman Catholicism, called "Mystery, Babylon the Great, the Mother of Harlots and

Abominations of the Earth" (Revelation 17:5). She was raised up to block the gospel, slaughter the believers in Christ,

establish religions, create wars, and make the nations drunk with the wine of her fornication as we will see.

Three major religions have one thing in common - each has a holy place where they look for guidance. Roman

Catholicism looks to the Vatican as the Holy City. The Jews look to the wailing wall in Jerusalem, and the Muslims look to

Mecca as their Holy City.

Each group believes that they receive certain types of blessings for the rest of their lives for visiting their holy place.

In the beginning, Arab visitors would bring gifts to the "House of God" and the keepers of the Kaaba were gracious to all

who came. Some brought their idols and, not wanting to offend these people, their idols were placed inside the sanctuary.

It is said that the Jews looked upon the Kaaba as an outlying tabernacle of the Lord, with veneration until it became


polluted with idols.

In a tribal contention over a well (Zamzam) the treasure of the Kaaba and the offerings that pilgrims had given were

dumped down the well and it was filled with sand; it disappeared.

Many years later Adb al-Muttalib was given visions telling him where to find the well and its treasure. He became the

hero of Mecca, and he was destined to become the grandfather of Muhammad.

Before this time, Augustine became the bishop of North Africa and was effective in winning Arabs to Roman Catholicism,

including whole tribes. It was among these Arab converts to Catholicism that the concept of looking for an Arab prophet

developed.

Muhammad's father died from illness, and sons born to great Arab families in places like Mecca were sent into the desert

to be suckled and weaned and spend some of their childhood with

Bedouin tribes for training and to avoid the plagues in the cities.

After his mother and grandfather also died, Muhammad was with his uncle when a Roman

Catholic monk learned of his identity and said:

"Take your brother's son back to his country and guard him against the Jews, for by God, if they see him and know of him

that which I know, they will construe evil against him. Great things are in store for this brother's son of yours."

The Roman Catholic monk had fanned the flames for future Jewish persecutions at the hands of the followers of

Muhammad.

The Vatican desperately wanted Jerusalem because of its religious significance, but was blocked by the Jews.

Another problem was the true Christians in North Africa who preached the gospel. Roman Catholicism was growing in

power, but would not tolerate opposition. Somehow the Vatican had to create a weapon to eliminate both the Jews and

the true Christian believers who refused to accept Roman Catholicism. Looking to North Africa, they saw the multitudes

of Arabs as a source of manpower to do their dirty work.

Some Arabs had become Roman Catholic, and could be used in reporting information to leaders in Rome. Others were

used in an underground spy network to carry out Rome's master plan to control the great multitudes of Arabs who

rejected Catholicism.

When "St. Augustine" appeared on the scene, he knew what was going on. His monasteries served as bases to seek out and

destroy Bible manuscripts owned by the true Christians.

The Vatican wanted to create a messiah for the Arabs, someone they could raise up as a great leader, a man with

charisma whom they could train, and eventually unite all the non-Catholic Arabs behind him, creating a mighty army

that would ultimately capture Jerusalem for the pope.

In the Vatican briefing, Cardinal Bea told us this story:

A wealthy Arabian lady who was a faithful follower of the pope played a tremendous part in this drama. She was a widow

named Khadijah. She gave her wealth to the church and retired to a convent, but was given an assignment.

She was to find a brilliant young man who could be used by the Vatican to create a new religion and become

the messiah for the children of Ishmael.

Khadijah had a cousin named Waraquah, who was also a very faithful Roman Catholic, and the Vatican placed him in a

critical role as Muhammad's advisor. He had tremendous influence on Muhammad.

Teachers were sent to young Muhammad and he had intensive training. Muhammad studied the works of St. Augustine,


which prepared him for his "great calling". The Vatican had Catholic Arabs across North Africa spread the story of a

great one who was about to rise up among the people and be the chosen one of their God.

While Muhammad was being prepared, he was told that his enemies were the Jews and that the only true Christians were

Roman Catholic. He was taught that others calling themselves Christians were actually wicked impostors and should be

destroyed. Many Muslims believe this.

Muhammad began receiving "divine revelations" and his wife's Catholic cousin Waraquah helped interpret them. From

this came the Koran. In the fifth year of Muhammad's mission, persecution came against his followers because they

refused to worship the idols in the Kaaba.

Muhammad instructed some of them to flee to Abysinnia, where Negus, the Roman Catholic

king, accepted them because Muhammad's views on the virgin Mary were so close to Roman Catholic doctrine. These

Muslims received protection from Catholic kings because of

Muhammad's revelations.

Muhammad later conquered Mecca and the Kaaba was cleared of idols.

History proves that before Islam came into existence, the Sabeans in Arabia worshiped the moon-god who was married

to the sun-god. They gave birth to three goddesses, who were worshipped throughout the Arab world as "Daughters of

Allah". An idol excavated at Hazor in Palestine in the 1950s shows Allah sitting on a throne with the crescent moon on

his chest.

Muhammad claimed he had a vision from Allah and was told:

"You are the messenger of Allah."

This began his career as a prophet and he received many messages. By the time Muhammad died, the religion of Islam

was exploding. The nomadic Arab tribes were joining forces in the name of Allah and his prophet, Muhammad.

Some of Muhammad's writings were placed in the Koran, others were never published. They are now in the hands of high

ranking holy men (Ayatollahs) in the Islamic faith.

When Cardinal Bea shared this information with us in the Vatican, he said:

"These writings are guarded because they contain information that links the Vatican to the creation of Islam."

Both sides have so much information on each other that, if exposed, it could create such a scandal that it would be a

disaster for both religions.

In their "holy" book, the Koran, Christ is regarded as only a prophet. If the pope was his representative on Earth, then he

also must be a prophet of God. This caused the followers of Muhammad to fear and respect the pope as another "holy

man".

The pope moved quickly and issued bulls granting the Arab generals permission to invade and conquer the nations of

North Africa.

The Vatican helped to finance the building of these massive Islamic armies in exchange for three favors:

1.Eliminate the Jews and Christians (the latter were regarded as true believers, which they called infidels)

2.Protect the Augustinian monks and Roman Catholics

3.Conquer Jerusalem for "His Holiness" in the Vatican

As time went by, the power of Islam became tremendous.

Jews and true Christians were slaughtered, and Jerusalem fell into their hands. Roman Catholics were never attacked, nor

were their shrines, during this time. But when the pope asked for Jerusalem, he was surprised at their denial!

The Arab generals had such military success that they could not be intimidated by the pope - nothing could stand in the

way of their own plan.

Under Waraquah's direction, Muhammad wrote that Abraham offered Ishmael as a sacrifice. The Bible says that Isaac

was the sacrifice, but Muhammad removed Isaac's name and inserted Ishmael's name. As a result of this and

Muhammad's vision, the faithful Muslims built a mosque, the Dome of the Rock, in Ishmael's honor, on the site of the

Jewish temple that was destroyed in 70 A.D. This made Jerusalem the second most holy place in the Islamic faith.

How could they give such a sacred shrine to the pope without causing a revolt?

The pope realized what they had created was out of control when he heard they were calling "His Holiness" an infidel.

The Muslim generals were determined to conquer the world for Allah, and now they turned toward Europe.

Islamic ambassadors approached the pope and asked for papal bulls to give them permission to invade European


countries. The Vatican was outraged; war was inevitable. Temporal power and control of the world was considered the

basic right of the pope.

He wouldn't think of sharing it with those whom he considered heathens.

The pope raised up his armies and called them "crusades" to hold back the children of Ishmael from grabbing Catholic

Europe.

The crusades lasted for centuries and Jerusalem slipped out of the pope's hands. Turkey fell, and Spain and Portugal were

invaded by Islamic forces. In Portugal, they called a mountain village "Fatima" in honor of Muhammad's daughter, never

dreaming it would become world famous.

Years later, when the Muslim armies were poised on the islands of Sardinia and Corsica, to invade Italy, there was a

serious problem. The Islamic generals realized they were too far extended. It was time for peace talks. One of the

negotiators was Francis of Assisi.

As a result, the Muslims were allowed to occupy Turkey in a "Christian" world, and the Catholics were allowed to occupy

Lebanon in the Arab world. It was also agreed that the Muslims could build mosques in Catholic countries without

interference, as long as Roman Catholicism could flourish in Arab countries.

Cardinal Bea told us in Vatican briefings that both the Muslims and Roman Catholics agreed to block and destroy the

efforts of their common enemy: Bible-believing Christian missionaries.

Through these concordats, Satan blocked the children of Ishmael from a knowledge of scripture and the truth.

The Islamic community looks on the Bible-believing missionary as a devil who brings poison to the children of Allah. This

explains years of ministry in those countries with little results.

The Vatican also engineers a campaign of hatred between the Muslim Arabs and the Jews. Before this, they had co-existed

peacefully. A light control was kept on Muslims - from the Ayatollah, down through the islamic priests,nuns and monks

The next plan was to control Islam. In 1910, Portugal was going Socialistic. Red flags were appearing and the Catholic

Church was facing a major problem. Increasing numbers were

against the Church.

The Jesuits wanted Russia involved, and the location of this vision at Fatima could play a key part in pulling Islam to the

Mother Church. In 1917, the Virgin appeared in Fatima. "The Mother of God" was a smashing success, playing to

overflow crowds. As a result, the Socialists of Portugal suffered a major defeat.

Roman Catholics worldwide began praying for the conversion of Russia, and the Jesuits invented the novenas to Fatima,

which they could perform throughout North Africa, spreading good public relations to the Muslim world.

The Arabs thought they were honoring the daughter of Muhammad, which is what the Jesuits wanted them to believe.

As a result of the vision of Fatima, Pope Pius XII ordered his Nazi army to crush Russia and the Orthodox religion, and

make Russia Roman Catholic. A few years after he lost World War II, Pope Pius XII startled the world with his phony

"dancing Sun" vision to keep Fatima in the news. It was great religious show biz and the world swallowed it.


Not surprisingly, Pope Pius was the only one to see this vision.

As a result, a group of followers has grown into a Blue Army worldwide, totaling millions of faithful Roman Catholics

ready to die for the Blessed Virgin. But we haven't seen anything yet. The Jesuits have their Virgin Mary scheduled to

appear four or five times in China, Russia, and major appearance in the U.S.

What has this got to do with Islam?

Note Bishop Sheen's statement:

"Our Lady's appearances at Fatima marked the turning point in the history of the world's 350 million Muslims. After the

death of his daughter, Muhammad wrote that she 'is the most holy of all women in Paradise, next to Mary.'

He believed that the Virgin Mary chose to be known as Our Lady of Fatima as a sign and a pledge that the Muslims who

believe in Christ's virgin birth, will come to believe in his divinity."

Bishop Sheen pointed out that the pilgrim virgin statues of Our Lady of Fatima were enthusiastically received by Muslims

in Africa, India, and elsewhere, and that many Muslims are now coming into the Roman Catholic Church.

A SPECIAL THANKS TO THE PEOPLE WHO PROVIDED THIS INFORMATION

DID MUHAMMAD EXIST?

4TH piece of evidence

Muhammad the jewish prophet?

It has already been well established that Muhammad is in fact fictitious. So why be concerned over a

fictitious mans racial identity?

Because it illustrates a powerful subconscious tool. The ones duped into following the viscous program

of islam are Gentiles, and the puppet masters are the jews. The entire program of islam is jewish from its

very core, each and every character within it which Gentiles are made to slavishly worship and praise, are

jewish. Their beloved “prophet” is jewish. When one attaches themselves to islam and begins

worhsipping the islamic “god”, they are essentially worshipping the jews. The “god” of the monotheistic

judaic religions is the jews as a collective and their agenda. The huge amounts of energy raised by the

worship of blind devotees filters directly into their agenda, reinforcing it. This is the sole reason why the

Gentiles enslaved within the judaic “religions” are made to worship jewish characters.

It has been spoken of indepth how those at the top of these programs are adept in the art of Black Magick

and Occult secrets, raising and programming energy, etc…

These links focus on christianity, however, the same applies to islam and the quran. It serves the same

purpose. The three “religions” of judaism, christianity and islam are 3 faces of THE SAME program. It is

vital that you understand this.

The major point is that getting millions upon millions of Gentile people to slavishly worship and praise a

jewish figure

such as Muhammad will feed energy into the agenda of those who control these programs. This is the

reason behind forcing a jewish prophet upon Gentile people. It does not matter that these figures never

existed in historical reality. The concepts of these figures, which have taken on lives of their own after

being fed with psychic energy from devout worshipers over the centuries and have actually developed

into thought forms, are enough to feed the agenda. Exactly the same thing was done in the West with the


christian jesus. It has been substantially proven that this character never existed, however, belief in this

fictitious entity and constant praise and worship from the blind followers has been enough to give it

strength.

I want to add here- something about Energy. Like the above site states, those who are unaware of how

the Occult and Spiritual Practices such as raising and programming Energy work, will be profoundly

vulnerable to its effects and can essentially become molding clay in the hands of someone with

knowledge. This is why there was a mass removal of Occult/Spiritual Knowledge from the general

population when the judaic religions spread throughout the world. Destruction of Ancient Schools and

Temples, burning of Occult books and entire libraries and mass murder of the elite Pagan Priesthood

who carried this Knowledge was standard practice as these religions moved through a particular area.

This is historical fact. Look at the destruction of thousands of Ancient European Temples, the burning of

the library at Alexandria, etc… They want to keep you blind so that they can continue to manipulate you.

As well as this, someone who is experienced in Energy work and the knowledge of how Energy operates,

even psychic mediums who work with Spirits, will understand that traumatic and violent events leave

behind huge amounts of Energy. This is due to the powerful emotions and thought output that takes

place during the trauma. This Energy remains behind in the area, and is often referred to as “residual

Energy”. This is exceptionally powerful and can remain in an area for centuries depending on the severity

of the traumatic event that took place. It can also be raised and used by those who have the knowledge to

do so. In this sense, it can be stated that causing traumatic events can be a means of raising powerful

Energy.

This is exactly what was done by the founders of the judaic programs. The West played host to the

horrific actions of the Inquisition in which millions of Pagan Gentiles were brutally tortured and

killed. The Eastern counterpart was the vicious islamic conquest which too left trails of blood across the

lands that hosted it. A separate article exposing the tragedy of the conquests is coming shortly. For now,

suffice it to say that massive amounts of fear and pain related Energy were raised during these horrific

times. This Energy was used as a kind of a “kick start” for these programs as they settled into these

areas. Fear is a very powerful tool. These programs masquerading as religions, obviously now referring

to the judaic religions, rely heavily on fear. “Obey or burn in Hell for all eternity”, etc… Never

underestimate the power of fear.

Now that it is clear how these programs gained their power initially, let us focus on proving that the

prophet muhammad was in fact a jewish character enforced upon the gentile people of the east.

( Dont forget to keep in mind that all of the following characters are FICTITIOUS subliminal tools used to

tie believers into a certain energy. As real flesh and blood people they never existed. As tools created for

a purpose, they are very real. We will speak of these characters as if they had been literal, in order to

prove a point)

First things first, the biggest pointer towards this fact is the descent which muhammad was stated as

having claimed. This is mentioned within the quran and many other islamic religious texts. The mother of

Muhammad was Aminah, descended from Ishmael of israel. This right here points to muhammad as

being of a jewish bloodline. Muhammad is mentioned as being one of the descendants of the jewish

Ishmael.

In fact, every ancestor of this “prophet” was taken from the judaic “holy book”. A further example is that

of Abraham/Ibrahim= the hebrew father of Ishmael, from whom Muhammad was supposedly descended.

According to islamic religious texts, Muhammad referred to himself as a copy of his ancestor Abraham,

returned to the Earth to reinstate Abraham’s faith. Now, Abraham’s “faith” is judaism. Islam and

christianity are often referred to as “Abrahamic religions”, which basically means jewish religions.

If Muhammad was supposedly descended from jewish ancestors, it is only natural to say that he would

have been jewish by blood, and certainly not a Gentile like the native inhabitants of the area.

As well as ancestry, Muhammad promoted and demanded his followers engage in many jewish religious


traditions, such as circumcision, celebrating the jewish holidays like Yom Kippur, kosher food, the

teachings of the Old Testament and probably the most significant aspect, the praying in the direction of

the jewish city of Jerusalem. Why do I say this is the most significant aspect? Well, this goes back to the

raising of Energy. This “prayer”, performed in a very ritualistic

manner, raises a large amount of Energy, all focused at the jewish capital. It is blindingly obvious what is

going on here.

Why all of the strict adherence to jewish religious practices if this prophet was a Gentile? It would make

no sense to suddenly adopt the practices of a foreign tribe, unless you somehow felt bound to that

particular tribe.

The following links are for educational purposes only! They do contain certain misinformation with

regards to being in support of the judaic programs.

The above links speak of Muhammads deep devotion to jewish practices and a profound connection with

the jewish jerusalem. This is due to the fact that Muhammad himself would have been a jew by blood.

Muslims are not revering a Gentile Savior, but a jewish “messiah” created to work towards jewish

supremacy.

Not only was he jewish himself, but Muhammad also took jewish wives. This is symbolic for a deep

connection between islam and judaism. A marriage is a binding and deep connection. A jewish “princess”

by the name of Safiyya Bint Huyayy was taken as a wife of Muhammad, and was regarded as

exceptionally influential in the early days of islam, being referred to as “the mother of the believers”. It is

deeply telling that the muslim prophet had such deep ties with a jewish princess. Again, subliminal

messages of jewish supremacy are reinforced. During these times, it was forbidden for a jew to marry a

non-jew. Therefore, it can be safely assumed that in order to marry this jewish princess, Muhammad

would have to have posessed the jewish gene himself.

“And the Jewish Safiyya became one of the luckiest women in the history of Islam, a wife of the prophet

Muhammad”. – From the book “The Truth About Islam” by Ibn El-Neil.

There was also a jewish concubine, Rayhana Bint Zayd, whom Muhammad was said to have had a sexual

relationship with and eventually married.

This is taken from a book titled “Muhammad’s Jewish Wives” by Moses Creighton.

These close relationships with jewish women send out a powerful message of jewish supremacy and a

strong and significant relationship between judaism and islam.

Having come from a jewish blood line, taking jewish wives, and vehemently promoting jewish religious

practices, it can be clearly seen that the character of Muhammad was in fact jewish, and foreign to the

Gentile People which are enslaved within this program today. The Gentiles who follow islam are

worshipping the jews!

Gentiles Wake Up!!

DID MUHAMMAD EVER EXIST?

5TH piece of evidence from the quran itself

MUHAMMAD NEVER EXISTED

There have been very few people in the past who had the guts to challenge the authenticity of

islams’s muhammad and very little research has been done into the subject however when it is

looked into it becomes more and more apparent that just like the jesus of xianity muhammad is too

a false fabricated character created for no other purpose than the destruction ,desecration

and removal of the true ancient knowledge given to humanity by the gods and the consequent

enslavement of the gentile people


Islam and its false prophet have heaped untold sorrow and suffering upon humanity from the

moment of their creation

one only need look to the middle east and other areas and countries dominated by islam to see

that this is true

The poverty,war,destruction,anti life practices,abuse of women and children,total lack of

personal privacy and freedom,filth,ignorance and violence,child marriage/paedophilla in these

areas all have their roots in islam and its muhammad to rid the world and the gentile people of

this suffering the world must rid of the lie that is muhammad

There is a ton of evidence to prove this character never existed that which stands out most

clearly is the fact that the only so called ancient sources of information concerning the life of

muhammad are extremely questionable and have never been able to be proven accurate and

authentic

As one example the earliest biography of muhammad has left no surviving copies and even so is

dated to at least 100 years after his supposed death very suspicious to say the least and the

question has to arise if this was such an important character as islam states why did people wait

100 years to document his life and achievements?

Also considering the fact muhammad had already been dead 100 years at the time ,the biography

could not have been written by anyone who knew him personally and therefore the accuracy

would have been extremely questionable this biography is known only because it is mentioned in

much later texts and no copies or anything of the sort have ever been found to prove its

existence why?

Because it never existed in the first place

There are many more examples like this one the same as with jesus the only place in which the

life and existence of muhammad is documented is within ism’s quran outside of this there is

nothing one scholar writes it is striking fact that such documentary evidence as survives from

the sufnayid period makes no mention of the messenger of god at all the papyri do not refer to

him the arabic inscriptions of the arab sasanian coins only invoke allah not his rasul (messenger)

and the arab byzantine bronze coins on which muhammad appears as rasul allah previously dated

to the sufyanid period have not been placed in that of the marwanids even the two surviving pre

marwanid tombstones fail to mention the rasul

The quran and pseudo biographies of this supposed prophet claim that he was widely known and

that people many of whom were powerful in the political world of the time traveled from all

over to witness his miracles and teachings if this were so there would be much surviving

documentation for us to investigate and it would be a known historical fact

We have hundreds of documentation of alexander the great,christopher columbus all of the

egyptian pharahos and other powerful and influential people of history from those who saw and

interacted with them because they were real people who existed in a real time and were involved

in events which really took place it is human nature to document events and experiences in order

to preserve them for future generations to learn from however as stated above no

documentation of this man muhammad exists outside of the islamic texts which themselves cannot

be put forward as proof of his existence


As for the inscriptions upon arab sasanian coins mentioning allah it has already been proven

that the name allah was stolen from the ancient pagan title for the chief god or goddess of an

area which was al-ilah the al-ilah was the supreme god of a region the moon god sin was given

this title in much of ancient arabia and many connections have been made between sin and allah

due only to the fact that islam stole this.

This goes a lot deeper

On the other hand the real historical documentation that we have is in contraction with the

islamic version of history which again proves that islam and its muhammad are false.

As a small example according to the history put forth by the quran and other islamic texts islam

spread through much of arabia peacefully and by willing conversions of hundreds of people

however historical documentation tells us that this is not the case at all and that the time

known as the islamic conquest was a time of brutal and savage war perpetrated by the bringers

of islam against the pagan people residing in the arabian peninsula and countries father east

such as india at the time pagan temples had to be destroyed thousands and thousands of ancient

sacred texts full of the knowledge of the gods were destroyed pagan priesthood were brutally

tortured and murdered cities were besieged and raised to the ground and hundreds and

thousands of people died as a result of the spread of islam

Various other artifacts that have been found have blatantly contradicted what islam has put

forth as history and reveal a different story altogether

Everything islam has was blatantly stolen from ancient paganism with the purpose of the

enslavement and eventual destruction of the gentile people there is literally more than a ton

of proof for this Aside from this, once again, we can expose the lies of islam through its

connection to xianity. Xianity has been proven to be false. Everything it has was blatantly

STOLEN from Ancient Paganism with the purpose of the enslavement and eventual destruction of

our Gentile people.

When the enemy formed their trinity of lies, they gave it one major flaw, and that is the fact

that all three are undeniably and irrevocably connected. Thus, when one comes down, the

others must come down with it. At least to a very large extent.

The character muhammad is said to have been descended from the jewish (note another

connection to the jews the root of the lies and the perpetrators of gentile enslavement

muhammad was always described as a jew himself and not an arab/gentile)

Ishmael son of abraham “abraham” has been proven to be fictitious and was a corruption stolen

from the hindu god brahma this has been discussed on exposing chrisitianty .com as the stolen

and corrupted jewish story goes abraham was most famous for his many sons this is a blatant

corruption of brahma and his many forms

Also the connection can be made when when you look at abraham and his wife sarai/sarah this was

stolen from brahma and his wife saraswati the hindu goddess of knowledge once again like all

the fictitious characters invented by the enemy jews there is absolutely no physical proof that

abraham ever existed or that his so called son ishmael ever existed it is safe to assume that

anyone else said to be descended from them never existed either and would therefore make them

fictitious


Connecting muhammad with the jewish characters is yet another subliminal message of jewish

supremacy over gentile people this is the entire purpose for islams invention of muhammad to

enslave the gentile people who have been blinded by the lie of islam and put them under the

power of the enemy jews and their masters it is simple as that

Many of the other supposed family members of muhammad are also nothing more than stolen and

corrupted versions of ancient pagan gods a prime example is fatima supposedly muhammads

daughter who was stolen from the goddess inanna/isis/al uzza she was supposed to be portrayed

as the fertile divine mother and divine feminine although considering how appalling women are

treated in islam any reverence of divine feminine is an outright contradiction none the less

fatimas character is stolen from the goddess al uzza the arabian goddess of fertility

motherhood and the planet venus among other things al uzza was the original arabian feminine

divine and the sacred mother islam took this and horrendously corrupted it into fatima the so

called ideal islamic woman/mother and role model for women to live by.

This is no different than in xianity where the virgin like mary was also stolen from inanna/isi/al

uzza once again it is a common theme throughout the enemy programs

As well as this muhammad accompanied by his four family members ali,fatima,hassan and hussein

can be seen as a corrupted (stolen) spiritual allegory the five together are a representation

and corruption of the five elements of the soul muhammad ali,fatima,hassan and hussein =

akasha,fire,water,air and earth the elements which make up all that exists the central forces of

the universe

These five characters are the central characters of islam in the same way that the akasha was

supposed to have given life to fire and water which further joined and gave birth to air and

earth muhammad (akasha) gave life to fatima who married/joined with ali (fire and water ) and

they in turn gave birth to hassan and hussein (air and earth) the spiritual/alchemical

corruption is blatant here and it is also blatant that these were never real characters but

stolen allegories

There are countless more examples like this one another is the 12 imams who are a rip of the 12

constellations of the zodiac and the 12 great ages accompanying them

The quran makes many more connections between muhammad and other characters who have been

proven fictitious an example is moses /musa who is stolen from a number of ancient pagan

gods such as the egyptian gods set and horus

Muhammad is also frequently compared to and given ties to jesus who again has been 100%

proven to be stolen and fictitious a character who is constantly compared with and so deeply

connected to fictitious characters is fictitious themselves

The events which are said to have occured throughout the life of muhammad are also nothing

more than alchemical corruptions here are but a few examples (there are far too many to list

here but more will be dealt with in a separate article)

1.the quran relates how when muhammad was only an infant two men appeared to him and cut

open his breast retrieving his heart and removing from it a black clot which they proceeded to

cast away the black clot is the philosophers stone the philosophers stone has often been

decribed as black ie the black stone referred to in many alchemical writings black refers to and

alchemical process before the stone is transformed and becomes white black is base/lead as has

been said before the philosophers is contained within the chakra thus why they removed it from

his heart note how islam removes the philosophers stone (true satanic power,godhead etc) and

casts it away this is a powerful subliminal message


2.the angel (enemy nordic) gabriel appears before muhammad striking the side of a hill and

causing a spring to come gushing forth with it he instructs muhammad on how to perform ritual

ablution for purification also teaching him the prayer postures the standing the inclining the

prostrating and the sitting to be accompanied by repetitions of sacred names this is ripped

straight from ancient yoga and mantra practices of the far east anyone who practices yoga and

meditation will be able to see this easily the postures that are performed along with

mantras/words of power in order to drastically increase bio electricity although in islam the

energy raised is reversed and directed not to the person performing the postures and mantras

but to the enemy thoughtform as well as this the striking the hill causing a spring to come

gushing forth is an alchemical corruption

The chakras have often been portrayed allegorically as hills or mountains in various ancient

texts throughout the world due to their true form the spring is referring to the alchemical

elixirs which are released and dripped from the chakras during the magnum opus

3.muhammad performs a miracle by splitting the full moon into two halves causing half a moon

to shine on either side of the mountain once again the mountain represents the chakras and the

moon being split in two represents the two polarities of the soul

4.the isra and miraj the night journey and the ascension through the seven heavens this entire

event is an alchemical corruption and rip off of the raising of the kundalini serpent through

the seven chakras the word miraj means ladder which is referring to the spine up which the

serpent ascends the quran relates how muhammad rode a winged horse (an ancient alchemical

symbol) to the circles of heaven the chakras he is taken through each one until finally after

going through the seventh heaven he meets with god it is blatantly obvious that this is a

corruption of reaching enlightenment when the kundalini rises to the seventh (croen) chakra

this story is even in zoroastrism

The stolen and corrupted alchemy is astounding and blatant throughout islam and its quran

This not only proves muhammad to be false but it also proves the quran to be false throughout

its pages it has professed these characters and events to be real yet it has been proven that on

the contrary all of these characters are fictitious and stolen and corrupted from Ancient

Pagan Religions that are many thousands of years older.

NO HUMAN MESSENGERS

DEDUCING THE LEXICON MEANING OF WORD RASUL:

The root word is لسر - r-si-l -The basic meaning is - he became easy in pace, became lank not crisp,

pendent - means that what hangs down like hair or descend, r-s-l signifies bringing a message -

- easy utterance, without haste, reading in leisurely manner, was grave, staid, sedate or ليسرت

calm and endeavor to understand, without raising his voice...We cannot ignore the overall

meaning while understanding any word.

After taking into consideration all the meanings of word Rasul and its derivatives I came to the

conclusion that the word rasul connotes an organism which continuously hangs or descend

upon us emitting signs or messages or voice in an easy and calm manner - And in Quranic context

the Rasul in you, with you and from you.

I challenge the readers to explain the above verse from the traditional or popular or so called


established point of view.

Finally according to Arabic classical lexicons plus the context of the entire Quran, rasuls are

described as inner voices that are 24x7 hanging [like hair] on our head, speaking without raising

voices, uttering articulate / real messages with ease and without haste, in calm and sedate

manner.

Can the readers understand this verse [3:81] from their traditional point of view?

3:81 - Behold! The creator took the covenant of the prophets, saying: "I give you a script [al-kitab]

and Wisdom; then comes to you a rasul [calm and sedate voice / sign, message], confirming what is

with you; do you believe in him and render him help." the creator said: "Do you agree, and take this

my Covenant as binding on you?" They said: "We agree." He said: "Then bear witness, and I am with

you among the witnesses."

From the traditional point of view the creator took the the covenant from all the nabiyeens,

saying I give you a script and wisdom; then comes a Rasul confirming what is with you. My

question is who is this new Rasul confirming what is with is with the nabiyeen [prophets]?

According to the book Al-Quran Nuh....Ibrahim...Musa, Pharaoh...Isa.....& Mohammed never ever

existed in physical forms as popularly assumed. Rasul is called bashar [7:188][41:1-6] which can

be literally deduced as our thoughts / senses (Bashar) that exposes the inner view or removes

the cover by changing the complexion of the face and insight (12:96). They are continuously

present or part of our mind / psyche (23:44). The life of this world is like a passing dream/sense

‏(ىَرْشُبْلا)‏

for those who are conscious and righteous in their work (10:61-65); the Rabb is always over them

and there is no escape from Him. All these names are apps or senses that are living in the lower

consciousness (fil-ardh) of an individual without which the existence of man with his senses is

not at all possible.

‏َناَكَو ‏ِلُسُّرلا ‏َدْعَب ‏ٌةَّجُح ‏ِهّللا ىَلَع ‏ِساَّنلِل ‏َنوُكَي ‏َّالَئِل ‏َنيِرِذنُمَو ‏َنيِرِّشَبُّم ‏ًالُسُّر 4:165

اًميِكَح اًزيِزَع ‏ُهّللا

Rasuls [inner voices / signs] are bearer of sensations [one who change the expression / color of

the face] and they are also warners, so that there is no place for agitated minds [mankind]

against the system of consciousness the creator any state of argument after the Rasul's

message. And the creator [system of consciousness] is Mighty and Wise.

اَم ‏ْاوُلوُقَت نَأ ‏ِلُسُّرلا ‏َنِّم ‏ٍةَرْتَف ىَلَع ‏ْمُكَل ‏ُنِّيَبُي اَنُلوُسَر ‏ْمُكَءاَج ‏ْدَق ‏ِباَتِكْلا ‏َلْهَأ اَي 5:19

‏ٌريِدَق ‏ٍءْيَش ‏ِّلُك ىَلَع ‏ُهّللاَو ‏ٌريِذَنَو ‏ٌريِشَب مُكَءاَج ‏ْدَقَف ‏ٍريِذَن ‏َالَو ‏ٍريِشَب نِم اَنَءاَج

O possessor of the inherent script! Surely ensued / emerges unto you, Our rasul making clear

for you, over the gradual process from the rasuls, lest you would say: "There ensued / emerged

unto us no senses and not any warner": But now has ensued for you a state of sense and a warner

(from evil). And the creator [system of consciousness has measure over all desires.

‏ْمِهْيَلَع ‏ٌفْوَخ ‏َالَف ‏َحَلْصَأَو ‏َنَمآ ‏ْنَمَف ‏َنيِرِذنُمَو ‏َنيِرِّشَبُم ‏َّالِإ ‏َنيِلَسْرُمْلا ‏ُلِسْرُن اَمَو 6:48

‏َنوُنَزْحَي ‏ْمُه ‏َالَو


And We do not sent those rasuls [inner voices / signs] except as sensations and warners, so

whoever trusted and reformed, so no fear on them and nor they be grievous.

These Rasuls are not individual persons but important inherent senses installed to operate the

complicated machine or program called Adam [mankind] whose nature is like potter’s clay which

can be molded or can be adapted ‏(نيط)‏ in any character he yearn for.

When we believe these names of rasuls and their adversaries as human beings or personalities

we undermine or limit their role or function in our self and in current / present life. We assume

rasuls as mortal bodies and make them part of history to which we either revere or hate

I am saying this because all these names of rasuls in the Quran are not proper nouns or a name

of any particular person. The stories of rasuls mentioned in the book Quran are part of

symbolic parables that are attached or faculty within the human consciousness called Adam

All sensible men are embedded with the senses in the form of different thoughts and they are

active within us. We need to activate the right senses or the messages that the sensors or the

messengers provide us through a series of mental waves or perception or ayaats. They are body

of thoughts which control our actions. The body is useless unless the self (nafs) knows the

function and the benefit of its system of thoughts or what data is to be fed in or to be deleted

out. The problem is we underestimate or ignore our own valuable senses and look out for help

from weak sources or wait for some haloed messenger's arrival or rely on some self help book

for guidance.

What bothers me is that in spite of all the senses or messengers or Kingdom of God exists within

us or available to us we either don’t rely or trust (Iman) them or we are ignorant (Kafir) of them

or we kill them because of lack of awareness. We don’t look inward towards our personal

messengers or senses that are integral part of an inherent prescription (Kitab 21:10). We are

capable enough to take charge of our regular needs which is guided through the messengers /

senses in the

language we understand (14:4). Those to whom We have given the Book know this as they know

their own sons. Those who have lost their own souls refuse therefore to believe (2:146)(6:20) –

These verses are talking about the inherent script [al-kitab] and those who don’t trust it are

senseless.

Most among mankind is impure (Najis) because they mix (Shirk) with their pure inherent system of

the creator and Rasul with external influences. They ultimately become Mushrik an

unpardonable sin. Such people cannot achieve the enshrined state of humbleness

(Masjid-e-Haram) as they are not pure in their thinking (9:28). They are diverted from their own

inherent script and try to emulate others.

Those who think that messengers (rasuls) are physical entities should know that the ideology of

Islam does not allow its follower to worship or revere or serve anything or any entity except

the creator (5:44) the system of consciousness [the creator].

Those who think that these messengers (Rasuls) are corporeal or tangible bodies also believe in

the mythological stories of Adam and Iblees, Abraham and Satan, Musa and Pharaoh, Maryam and


Isa as real historical facts. They fail to understand that the book Quran teach its readers by

giving relevant examples in the form of meaningful parables which contain deep messages for

human consciousness. But sadly we have made these exemplary representations as historical

figures thus confining its actual application in our real life.

To me the book Quran has the potential to become the number one psychological manual for all

mankind but unfortunately its core message is lost in bad translation.

The Rasuls and its adversaries are inherent senses which is inside our psyche (nafs) or in our

lower consciousness.

Please check the references, that rasuls are inside us - (2:129) (2:151) (3:101) (3:164) (4:59)

(9:128)

(10:16) (23:32) (37:72) (43:6) (49:7) and there is a continuous battle of differences / succession

(Khilafat) going on between all negative and positive senses inside the lower consciousness

(fil-ardh) which the Malaikah [faculty of mind] knew beforehand that it is going to happen and

this can create problem (fasad) – (2:30).

All these senses or messengers are inside us and you م ُ ك ي ِ ف]‏ ْ ] and we can feel / witness /

experience them if we know the role of each one of them … we can able to recognize them by their

names. If we recognize, sensed and adapt the characteristics of each one of these messengers we

can achieve a very high moral standard. But our "eminent" translators have translated this

simple Arabic preposition [ ‏[ْمُكيِف as among you; and made these immortal rasuls as physical

mortal beings.

Nuh is the first informer / warner whose function is to warn or caution or notify or send wahi to

the body (Adam) of upcoming dangers. Mohammed is the last and final sense which approves all

the self acquired information (Nabiyeen) of all the other senses and order them into action.

These inherent informers, messengers or senses continuously keep on prompting, guiding,

dictating and warning us in our own language (14:4) but we fail to understand their voices

because we are more inclined to listen to outside voices rather the voices of the vital

messengers who reside inside us.

This clearly explains our dilemma why all the messengers belong to the same region and are

related to each other, because they all live in the lower consciousness of Adam (Mankind) and

not in some Semitic land or culture. The book Quran confirms this that Adam was taught all

these names and its applications (2:31) and children of Adam have to testify this upon themselves

(Nafs) the ownership of the Consciousness (Rabb) (7:172)… The sense [Rasul] who has seen or

experienced or testify the all the informations [Al-Nabiyeen] by himself can only give the

testimony of the existence of Rabb and his Nabiyeen… and they can only affirm a covenant with

Him (3:81).

To justify the roles of these Rasuls as humans and historical entities the theologians have

created their entire background. They planted their place of birth and then concocted their

entire family with time line of their date of birth and showed them all as genetically related.

Gradually the believers began to revere these make-believe entities as real heroes and to

imitate their personal life; they infer it as an act of piousness. Now the believer’s only


aspiration is to visit the birthplace of these “Holy Figures" once in their lifetime. The entire life

of the “believer” began to rotate around the stories of these "holy / historical / mythological

characters”.

One such example is in the visualization of story of Abraham and his son. For this the “believers”

travel all the way to Mecca to throw stones at man-made Satan of concrete and cement and

revolve around “the stone house built by Abraham”. The performance of this ritual is a matter

of great pride and a big life time achievement for them. The problem with the so called believers

is that they don’t understand that the Satan (one of the sense) is not an outside force but he is

the main rival of Allah, who is near to us than our jugular vein (50:16) so naturally the Satan

has to

be within us. We don’t have to travel to holy places to meet Allah or throw stones at Satan; they

all are living within our Nafs / in lower consciousness.

Nafs / self / soul / psyche / lower consciousness is a vital topic of the book Quran and it is very

important to know this word thoroughly. As it is clear from the following verses, Nafs or

Nafsiyat is the Soul or Inner Self mentioned in the book Quran refers to that entity inside us

that is continuously interacting with our mind and can easily affect us (as a person) in a positive

or negative way. Nafs has the potential to become what we aspire for.

As for whoever exceeded the limits and preferred the life of this world, surely his abode will

be the Fire; and as for whoever feared to stand before his Rabb and restrained the desires of his

self (nafs), surely his abode will be the Garden. (79:38-40)

Man or Nafs (self) is the topic of “Quran” (21:10).

"The (human) soul (nafs) is certainly prone to evil" (12:53).

By the soul (nafs) and (by) Him who made it perfect, and then inspired it to understand what is

wrong and what is right for it. Truly is successful the one who purifies (his soul). (91: 7-9)

But ah! You soul (nafs) at peace! Return unto thy Lord, content in His good pleasure! Enter thou

among My bondmen! Enter thou My Jannah! (89:27)

Just as We have sent IN you a rasul [calm and sedate voice] from yourselves dictating on you Our

signs and purifying / developing you and teaching you the script and wisdom and teaching you

that which you did not know. (2:151)

And no bearer of burdens will bear the burden of another. And if a heavily laden soul calls

[another] to [carry some of] its load, nothing of it will be carried, even if he should be a close

relative. You can only warn those who fear their Lord unseen and have established salat. And

whoever purifies himself only purifies himself for [the benefit of] his soul (nafs). And to the

creator is the [final] destination. (35:18) -

(All traditional translations)

Thoughts are our messengers of peace or destruction we have to be diligent while choosing them

to reside in us.


FOR FURTHER CLARIFICATION PLEASE VERIFY FROM FOLLOWING VERSES:

‏.(مكيف لوسر)‏ Rasul is in you

‏.(مكعم لوسر)‏ Rasul is with you

‏.(مكنم لوسر)‏ Rasul is from you

‏.(مكسفنا نم لوسر)‏ Rasul is from your nafs / soul

‏ْمُهْنِم اًلوُسَر ‏ْمِهيِف - 2:129

اًلوُسَر ‏ْمُكيِف اَنْلَسْرَأ - 2:151

‏ْمُهْنِم اًلوُسَر ‏ْمِهيِف اَنْلَسْرَأَف - 23:32

‏ُهُلوُسَر ‏ْمُكيِفَو - 3:101

‏ْمِهِسُفْنَأ ‏ْنِم اًلوُسَر ‏ْمِهيِف ‏َثَعَب ‏ْذِإ - 3:164

‏ْمُكِسُفْنَأ ‏ْنِم ‏ٌلوُسَر ‏ْمُكَءاَج ‏ْدَقَل - 9:128

اًلوُسَر ‏َثَعْبَن ‏ٰىَّتَح ‏َنيِبِّذَعُم اَّنُك اَمَو - 17:15

== اًلوُسَر ‏َثَعْبَن ‏ٰىَّتَح ‏َنيِبِّذَعُم اَّنُك اَمَو - 17:77

‏ِساَّنلا ‏َنِمَو اًلُسُر ‏ِةَكِئاَلَمْلا ‏َنِم يِفَطْصَي ‏ُهَّللا - 22:75

اًليِبَس ‏ِلوُسَّرلا ‏َعَم ‏ُتْذَخَّتا يِنَتْيَل اَي ‏ُلوُقَي - 25:27

‏ْمُكِّبَر ‏ِتاَيآ ‏ْمُكْيَلَع ‏َنوُلْتَي ‏ْمُكْنِم ‏ٌلُسُر ‏ْمُكِتْأَي ‏ْمَلَأ - 39:71

اَنَلُسُر ‏ِهِب اَنْلَسْرَأ اَمِبَو ‏ِباَتِكْلاِب اوُبَّذَك ‏َنيِذَّلا - 40:70

‏َهَّللا اَّلِإ اوُدُبْعَت اَّلَأ ‏ْمِهِفْلَخ ‏ْنِمَو ‏ْمِهيِدْيَأ ‏ِنْيَب ‏ْنِم ‏ُلُسُّرلا ‏ُمُهْتَءاَج ‏ْذِإ - 41:14

‏ٌنيِبُم ‏ٌلوُسَر ‏ْمُهَءاَج ‏ْدَقَو ‏ٰىَرْكِّذلا ‏ُمُهَل ‏ٰىَّنَأ - 44:13

‏ٌميِرَك ‏ٌلوُسَر ‏ْمُهَءاَجَو ‏َنْوَعْرِف ‏َمْوَق ‏ْمُهَلْبَق اَّنَتَف ‏ْدَقَلَو - 44:17

‏َناَزيِمْلاَو ‏َباَتِكْلا ‏ُمُهَعَم اَنْلَزْنَأَو ‏ِتاَنِّيَبْلاِب اَنَلُسُر اَنْلَسْرَأ ‏ْدَقَل - 57:25

- ‏ٌنيِبُّم ‏ٌلوُسَرَو ‏ُّقَحْلا ‏ُمُهَءاَج ىَّتَح ‏ْمُهَءاَبآَو ‏ِءاَلُؤَه ‏ُتْعَّتَم ‏ْلَب - 43:29

Yea, I have given the good things of this life to these (men) and their fathers, until the Truth has

- 44:13 - ‏ٌنيِبُّم ‏ٌلوُسَرَو - clear come to them, and a RASUL making things

‏َحَلْصَأَو ىَقَّتا ‏ِنَمَف يِتاَيآ ‏ْمُكْيَلَع ‏َنوُّصُقَي ‏ْمُكنِّم ‏ٌلُسُر ‏ْمُكَّنَيِتْأَي اَّمِإ ‏َمَدآ يِنَب اَي 7:35


‏َنوُنَزْحَي ‏ْمُه ‏َالَو ‏ْمِهْيَلَع ‏ٌفْوَخ ‏َالَف

O ye Children of Adam! whenever there come to you rasuls from you, rehearsing My signs on

you,- those who are righteous and mend (their lives),- on them shall be no fear nor shall they

grieve.

FUNCTION OF RASUL IN THE CONTEXT OF THE BOOK QURAN:

The Rasuls are just confirmation of our inner script [Al-Kitab] - 2:101

The Rasuls are voice in us that recites signs [ayaat], teaches us our inherent script [Al-Kitab],

wisdom and develop us - 2:129, 2:151

The Rasul will be the witness upon us and guide us to our goal / aim [Qibla] - 2:143

The creator and Rasul can wage war against you - 2:279 - Ponder how this is possible?

‏ْمِهْيَلَع ‏ْاوُلْتَي ‏ْمِهِسُفنَأ ‏ْنِّم ‏ًالوُسَر ‏ْمِهيِف ‏َثَعَب ‏ْذِإ ‏َنيِنِمؤُمْلا ىَلَع ‏ُهّللا ‏َّنَم ‏ْدَقَل - 3:164

‏ٍنيِبُّم ‏ٍلاَلَض يِفَل ‏ُلْبَق نِم ‏ْاوُناَك نِإَو ‏َةَمْكِحْلاَو ‏َباَتِكْلا ‏ُمُهُمِّلَعُيَو ‏ْمِهيِّكَزُيَو ‏ِهِتاَيآ

The creator had conferred favor on the believers, when He raised in them a rasul from

themselves / nafs, he continuously peruse/recites/dictate/follow on them His signs / ayaats and

he continuously purifies/develops / corrects them, and he teaches/instructs them the script, and

the wisdom, and they were far from acceptance, certainly in a clear / evident misguidance.

TRADITIONAL UNDERSTANDING OF RASUL:

1) Rasul are human but cannot be women - because they interpret bashar and rajul as human and

man respectively. They should refer the classical Arabic lexicons to understand the basic

meanings of them.

2) Sometimes they assume rasuls as Angels.

3) They also believe that when an angels takes form of human being they are called rasuls

4) Rasul can also take soul during death.

5) Rasul can talk to God

6) All rasuls belong to Middle East region.

A SPECIAL THANK U TO “AHLE AQAL” FOR HIS WORK ON THIS SUBJECT


DID MUHAMMAD EXIST

6TH PIECE OF EVIDENCE

The truth about the origins and spread of islam

- how the jews developed the program of islam to invade and destroy the East

***This is the story of the prelude to the “islamic conquests”***

The quran and deluded followers of islam claim that this “religion” spread due to the followers of Muhammad traveling

the east and spreading the word, acquiring new converts as they went by performing miracles, trading goods etc. This is a

very fanciful story, and one which is NOT corroborated by actual historical events. The truth paints a very different

picture and we are taken back to the Ancient Pagan Tribes and Civilizations of Arabia and the Middle East, who were

brutally attacked and besieged for centuries by violent psychotic bandits who were the true founders of what we now know

as islam. These attacks left trails of blood across the globe and ended in the destruction of Ancient Gentile culture and the

enslavement of our People which is still effective to this day.

There never was any “ prophet Muhammad ” who led the Arabian people in efforts to convert the tribes to islam.

Muhammad never existed, but was fabricated AFTER the conquests had taken place in order to be used as a tool, no

different than the christian “jesus”.

http://exposingthelieofislam.weebly.com/muhammad-never-existed.html

So who did orchestrate the spread of this vile program? Who was this program meant to benefit? The following article will

illustrate how it was in fact the jews who instigated and developed this program as a means of judaising the Pagan

Eastern World, eliminating the original Pagan religion and practices, removing the power from the hands of the Gentile

Pagan ruling class and developing a new system of ruler ship that placed all of the power and wealth in the hands of a

new ruling class who had a jewish blood line.

Afterall, Muhammad himself was described as being of jewish decent, having jewish ancestry and even taking jewish wives

and thus birthing jewish children.

http://exposingthelieofislam.weebly.com/muhammad–the-jewish-prophet.html

Whereas this character of Muhammad never existed himself, this is symbolic for how the jews placed their own in

positions of power in the newly developed islamic world. This was either done by the ousting of a Gentile leader/ruler via

the use of physical force and replacing them with someone of jewish descent or by using their women to infiltrate the

Gentile bloodlines. The latter has long been a common tactic and is still used even today. The jews often use their females

to infiltrate by siccing them onto powerful and influential Gentile men. Once they have managed to worm their way in,

they take full control over that persons life, decisions and actions and can easily manipulate events according to their own

agenda. As well as this control aspect, any future offspring produced will be considered jewish and carry jewish genes.

Thus there is total judaising of everything.

The jews brag about this tactic in their story of “Esther”, the jewish whore who was sent to seduce the Persian King. As the

story goes, the Persians were involved in constant battles with the jews and were attempting to exile them from Persia

altogether, the jews needed a means of taking

control of the Persian Kingdom and undermining the Persian King and Persian Gentile rulership. Using deceit and

treachery (disgusing herself to appear more Gentile, taking a Persian name and getting rid of the Kings first Persian

Gentile wife), “Esther” got the King to fall in love with and marry her, making her Queen. On guidance from her jewish

brothers, she carefully gained the Kings trust and instructed the King to make all of the moves which would benefit the

jewish people, and all of the moves which would inevitably lead to the destruction of his own Gentile People. She ensured

that he had all of the Gentile Persian leaders who had once been his most trusted council, beheaded and publically

shamed by using lies and fabrications to turn the King against them. “Esther” brags of planting seeds of doubt in the

Kings mind, leading him to believe that his own People were his enemies. This is the age old tactic of divide and conquer.

She separated the King from his most important support system, isolating him and taking control. Once the Gentile

leadership has been slaughtered, Esther invites her own jewish people to take their places. By the time the King finds out


who Esther really is and how he has been deceived, it is already too late.

Now, this is a fictitious story, however, the tactics behind it are very real, and were used ad nauseam by the jews of the

time to infiltrate the Gentile Royal bloodlines and essentially destroy them. The story of “Esther” is a bragging of how

they used these tactics to achieve their own end.

This is the same sort of tactics as were used by the jewish Rothschild family to infiltrate the British Royal Family. They

began with financial manipulation, and then intermarriage. Nowadays, the “ Royal Family ” is 100% jewish, even

practicing jewish traditions during wedding ceremonies and so on. Once the jewish gene has been inserted into the

bloodline via the jewess, it is maintained by instilling laws that state the male offspring must take a jew as a bride.

Remember, the child is considered legally jewish according to jewish law if the mother is a jew. This is why the marriage

between William and Kate Middleton was necessary. Kate Middleton has a jewish mother, who was born Carol Goldsmith.

Both of her grandparents were of jewish descent.

Here is an interesting excerpt:

“ It was a Rothschild plan to marry superfluous daughters into the families of influential Gentiles; in this case of the

Rothschild unions with Baron Battersea and the son of the fourth Earl of Hardwicke, the marriages were sterile, but a

daughter of Mayer Amschel Rothschild married the fifth Earl of Rosebery, so that there is Rothschild blood in the present

earl, one of whose sisters married the present Marquis of Crewe, himself with Villa Real blood: thus after many days, the

blood of the Villa real Jewess mingles with that of the Rothschild in the issue of this marriage of “British Aristocrats”.

This custom of mating with Jewesses now become a common one; the instinct of the Aryan has been broken down by

continued propaganda, and H. Belloc in his BOOK on The Jews writes of the Jewish penetration of our great aristocratic

families: “With the opening of the twentieth century, those of the great territorial English families in which there was no

Jewish blood were the exception.” -From “JEWISH INROADS INTO BRITISH ROYALTY UP TO THE YEAR 1937”

However, this is another story for another time altogether. The point here is to note the tactics which are used in order to

infiltrate. This is how the infiltration of the Gentile Eastern and Arabian cultures began, and it was this careful

infiltration into Gentile Society that aided in the

creation and spread of islam, which is, in truth, judaism at its core. Now, we will look at how this began.

Actual historical records show that the creation of islam as it stands today, the writing of the quran and the invention of

the fictitious Muhammad actually came AFTER the events now called the islamic conquests, and not before as

mainstream media and muslims will have you believe. The conquests and destruction of the East took place before islam

was actually created as a means of further destroying the original Pagan religion, cultures and knowledge and further

weakening and enslaving the Gentile People. The purpose of the conquests, exactly like the Inquisition that took place in

the West, was to eliminate the Pagan Gentile Royalty, slaughter the Pagan Priesthood and destroy Pagan Spiritual

Knowledge, thus enslaving the Pagan Gentile People who were left totally cut off from their original identities, their

original leaders, their original Gods and their original sources of Empowerment. They were reduced to mere slaves

working for a foreign master. The program of islam was installed after this in order to ensure the continuance of this

enslavement.

There in fact was never any mention anywhere of any established religion called islam, or any prophet by the name of

Muhammad, during the times at which the violent conquests were taking place and there is no evidence for it having

existed yet at that point in time. These religious aspects were created and fed into the records years later. This is no

different than how the so-called biographies of Muhammad only appeared over 100 years after he was supposed to have

died. During the time he was meant to have lived, not a word was breathed about him despite the presence of many

Ancient historians whom were very accustomed to recording important events and stories. Very suspicious, to say the least.

So how would the conquests and the spread of islam have benefited the jews?

Other than islam being a jewish program that worships a jewish god/agenda

(Please see the rest of the exposingthelieofislam.weebly.com site),

as for the actual events as historically recorded, it has been proven that the major conquests took place with a great deal

of jewish aid and worked in favor of the jews.

At this point in time, much of the Pagan Eastern world was attempting to banish the jews from their midst due to

centuries of ongoing problems with them. Thievery, ritual murder and other attocities were common in societies where the


jews decided to settle, and were the reasosns many Ancient Gentile societies either banished or attempted to banish them.

Ancient Rome, Persia and Egypt declared laws at one stage or another expelling the jews for these very reasons.

So in order to solve the problem of constantly being banished or suppressed from the Gentile societies which they invaded,

and in order to take control for themselves so that they would be free to carry out their acts undisturbed, the jews needed

to divise a plan to help them infiltrate the top levels of the Gentile societies and place themselves within all of the major

positions of power. What better way of doing this than enforcing their own customs, beliefs and practices upon the people

of these societies, establishing their own religion as the major religion, their own “ priesthood ” as the ruling class and

essentially forcing their own alien culture onto the Gentile Peoples of the region and forcing them to worship their own

“god” and their own prophets. If they could judaise everything, they would hold the reigns of control. Islam was the perfect

means of doing this, and as has been stated, islam is merely judaism in a different form.

“PROTOCOL No. 14

When we come into our kingdom it will be undesirable for us that there should exist any other religion than ours of the

One God with whom our destiny is bound up by our position as the Chosen People and through whom our same destiny is

united with the destinies of the world. We must therefore sweep away all other forms of belief. If this gives birth to the

atheists whom we see to-day, it will not, being only a transitional stage, interfere with our views, but will serve as a

warning for those generations which will hearken to our preaching of the religion of Moses, that, by its stable and

thoroughly elaborated system has brought all the peoples of the world into subjection to us. ” - The words of the jews

themselves.

*Note- “Moses” is called Musa in the Quran where he is decleraed one of the prophets. The Quran is jewish through and

through!!!

But this had to be done slowly and carefully and before this could be achieved successfully, the Gentile Societies would

have to be infiltrated, weakened and undermined first.

To do this, the jews would first have to integrate themselves into the local Gentile cultures, adapting to their customs and

ways of life. Once they had been fully integrated and had gained the trust of these people, they would begin to inflict their

own culture, bizarre anti-life practices and beliefs and their own religion upon them.

This is destruction of a People from the inside out. It is an extremely effective means of weakening a group before

engaging in outright warfare against them. First, they will rot the structure from within, so that it crumbles easily when

they choose to attack. The best infiltrator first disguises themselves as that which they intend to destroy so that they may

gain access to the very core of their object of attack. This is the same as was done with the Gentile Secret Societies, which

were originally PAGAN in nature.

The following excerpt is interesting regarding how the jews worked to integrate themselves into the Arab societies before

they began the judaisation of these societies:

“Syed Abu-Ala’ Maududi in his “The Meaning of the Qur’an” points out that the Jews of the Hejaz “In the matter of

language, dress, civilization and way of life, they had completely adopted Arabism, even their names had become

Arabian … They even inter-married with the Arabs…..This intermarriage between Jews and Arabs, for example between

the families of Quraish and Jewish women is well documented. “.” – From “The Persian conquest of Jerusalem in 614CE

compared with Islamic conquest of 638CE. Its Messianic nature and the role of the Jewish Exilarch”, by Ben Abrahamson

and Joseph Katz.

(Note that the above is written by jews who are fully aware of the jewish origins of islam.)

Once again, we see how the jews used their women to infiltrate Arabian Gentile society, attaching themselves to the

Arabian royalty. By first adapting to the culture, they were able to infiltrate on a deep level.

So lets look at how the foundation for islam was first laid. It began with this jewish infiltration of the Arabian culture. It

was documented that after adopting the Arabian culture and intermarrying with the influential Arabian men, the jewish

women would force their unwitting Arabian husbands to adopt judaism and jewish practices.

This began to lead to the development of a bizarre amalgamation of judaic practices with traditional Arabian practices

and resulted in an Arabian form of judaism beginning to rise. This mixing of practices and what resulted is what would

later be officially developed into islam. This mirrors exactly how the jews laid the foundation for christianity in

Alexandria when they


developed a Hellenized form of judaism.

The creation of islam in many ways overlaps with the events surrounding the creation of christianity:

“This is why Christianity as noted by scholars is so identical to the Egyptian Pagan religions. This is the major template

the Jews stole and corrupted it from. Even lifting the title for their fictional Godman from one of the major Pagan deities.”

The exact same thing was done with the Ancient Arabian Pagan religion. The jews simply lifted the name and identity of a

Pagan Arabian God, known as Sin the Moon God, whose title in the Ancient Arabian world was “ Al ’ Ilah ”, meaning

“Supreme Deity amongst all the Deities”. Note the similarity between Allah and Al’Ilah. Islam shares much in common

with the Pagan Arabian religion, for example the symbol of the Crescent Moon and Star, the Lunar basis for the calendar,

etc because the jews literally stole and corrupted the Arabian religion of the area as a template for their depraved

program of islam.

Looking again to the jewish infiltration of Arabia -“Michael Lecker of Hebrew University in his article “A note on early

marriage links between Qurashis and Jewish women”, in. Jerusalem Studies in Arabic and Islam (1987),” says that there are

three choices:

1. The women gave up Judaism and embraced paganism.

2. The women didn’t care about intermarriage with non-Jews

3. The men embraced Judaism

Due to various supporting evidence he gives, Dr. Lecker discounts the first two and is left with possibility of the third

choice.” I.e., the only option was for the men to convert to judaism.

Please note from the above how the jews themselves are FULLY AWARE that islam is a facade and was created by them.

They openly admit this and admit to purposefully deceiving the Gentile People.

Now let us look at some of the historical events that led to the jews inventing islam as their final attempt to take control

of the Eastern World.

As mentioned above, incessant problems with the jews were a common theme in Ancient Gentile societies which were

desperately seeking means of ridding themselves of these jewish parasites.

During the time of the First Century C.E., Ancient Egypt, Cyprus and Cyrene had laws in place controlling the jews among

them and protecting the native Gentile Populations from these unwanted tribes of blood thirsty criminal bandits.

However, the jews organised a violent uprising in an attempt to take power from the Gentile People and carry out

destruction of the Pagan Gentile religious centers. This was later termed the “kitos war” by the jews and was literally a

massacre of the Pagan Gentile Peoples of these regions and a rampage of destruction against Gentile Pagan sacred sites

and artifacts. The mass murder spree was orchestrated by a jew by the name of “Lukas” who had proclaimed himself as

king of the jewish tribes.

“ Their revolt started in Cyrene, where one Lukuas -sometimes called Andreas- ordered the Jews to destroy the pagan

temples of Apollo, Artemis, Hecate, Demeter, Isis and Pluto, and to assail the worshippers.” -From Wars between the Jews

and Romans: the revolt against Trajan (115-117 CE)

Thousands upon thousands of Gentile Pagan men, women and children were brutally murdered and Sacred Temples such

as the Temples of Hecate and Isis were stormed and destroyed. The jewish murderers then proceeded to drink the blood

and eat the flesh of their Gentile Pagan victims.

YES. You read that correctly. They engaged in cannibalistic ritualized mutilation of the bodies of the innocent Gentiles

which they brutally killed. Here is a quote from an Ancient Roman Historian recounting the aftermath of this horrific

jewish-orchestrated massacre:

“ In Cyrene, the Jews massacred 220,000 Greeks; in Cyprus, 240,000; in Egypt, a very great multitude. Many of these

unhappy victims were sawed asunder, according to a precedent to which David had given sanction of his examples. The

victorious Jews devoured the flesh, licked up the blood, and twisted the entrails like a girdle around their bodies”- Dion

Cassius I

This is sick, twisted and depraved in the very worst sense and clearly illustatres the sadistic nature of these parasites to

civilisation. Here is another very telling quote relating to this massacre:

“Humanity is shocked at the recital of the horrid cruelties which Jews committed in the cities of Egypt, of Cyprus, and of

Cyrene, where they dwell in treacherous friendship with the unsuspecting natives and we are tempted to applaud the


severe retaliation which was exercised by the arms of legions against a race of fanatics, whose dire and credulous

superstition seemed to render them the implacable enemies not only of Roman government, but also of humankind.” –

By Edward Gibbon

***Note- “ dwell in treacherous friendship with the unsuspecting natives ” . The jews have been famous since time

immemorial for biting the hand which feeds them. They will settle amongst a people, pretend to be a friendly presence,

leech off of their lands, their labour and their goods, and suddenly without warning they will attack and destroy the very

people from whom they were feeding. Many times throughout the pages of their bible they brag of this very behavior. They

would settle amongst a Gentile nation, and once they had fed off of and exhausted their resources, they would massacre

them, steal their remaining goods and rape their women before moving on to the next unsuspecting group of Gentile

People to begin their cycle of parasitic leeching all over again. This is even evident today in how they are currently

massacring the Palestinian People, whose land and farms they stole and falsely proclaimed to be their own. Nothing has

changed over the last 10 000 years with this race of beings, and nothing ever will. They are natural born parasites who

eventually destroy the People to which they attach themselves. They can never be trusted.

Getting back to the massacre which took place in the Ancient East. Despite the fact that they had massacred thousands of

Gentile People, their attempt to take control was quashed by the armies of the Pagan Roman Emperor Trajan, who was

later succeeded by Emperor Hadrian. Another quote by Dion Cassius:

“‘Meanwhile the Jews in the region of Cyrene had put one Andreas at their head and were destroying both the Romans

and the Greeks. They would cook their flesh, make belts for themselves of their entrails, anoint themselves with their

blood, and wear their skins for clothing. Many they sawed in two, from the head downwards. Others they would give to

wild beasts and force still others to fight as gladiators. In all, consequently, two hundred and twenty thousand perished. In

Egypt, also, they performed many similar deeds, and in Cyprus under the leadership of Artemio. There, likewise, two

hundred and forty thousand perished. For this reason no Jew may set foot in that land, but even if one of them is driven

upon the island by force of the wind, he is put to death. Various persons took part in subduing these Jews, one being

Lusius, who was sent by Trajan.”

After this, the jews were exiled from the Roman Empire which at the time included Egypt, Cyprus and Cyrene and heavy

sanctions were placed upon them, many laws forbidding jewish religious practices and so forth. Angered, they began to

organize another uprising in the region which is today called Palestine. It was this uprising that would lead to huge

amounts of jewish “refugees” flooding Arabia and Babylon. This uprising was known as the Bar kokhba revolt and was

organised by a jewish leader Simon Ben kosiba, whom was regarded by the jews at the time to be a jewish “messiah” and

prince who would lead them in a victorious slaughter and take over of the Gentile Pagan People. This “jewish prince” was

aided by a rabbi Akiva. Persia at the time had a significant jewish population, as the jews had invaded it in much the same

way they invaded Alexandria, and the jews took advantage of Persian military personnel to carry out this revolt against

the Pagan Roman Empire.

This revolt was said to have been even more violent than the previous massacre and was reported by many Ancient

Roman Historians as being a horrific sight which they wished only to forget.

Emperor Hadrain managed to once again quash the revolt, and ensure that sanctions against jews within the Roman

Empire were kept in place. Large amounts of the jewish murderers and plunderers fled back to Persia and to Arabia and

Babylon to escape justice and to continue planning a means of taking control of the East. This is how the official

development of islam began.

Some of the jewish immigrants to Arabia established their own tribal groups known in later islamic literature as the Bani

Al-Nadir and the Bani Quraizah. That these were jewish tribes from the start comprised of those whom had taken part in

the bloody Bar khokba revolt and NOT native Arab tribes is well-documented. It was stated that these tribes were

comprised of the jewish cohen priests.

“Maududi says that the Bani Al-Nadir and Bani Quraizah were tribes made up of Cohenim. It is known that the Bani al

Nadir and the Bani Quraizah were the clients of the Aus, and the Bani Qainuqa were the clients of the Khazraj.”

They at first integrated with and adopted Arabian culture mixed in with their own judaic beliefs and practices. It was said

that they adopted islam easily because of their judaic origins and the heavy similarities between judaism and islam. Of

course- islam was created by them using the stolen and corrupted Pagan Arabian template. It was these immigrant jewish

tribes that began the creation of islam in this very manner. The Aus and Khazraj are referred to in the quran as the


“uncles of islam”.

“The third wave of immigrants were mostly refugees and soldiers from Bar Kochba’s revolt –fighters trained in the art of

war and zealously nationalistic – sought refugee in Arabia.This last wave of immigrants included people who are known

in Islamic literature as the Aus andthe Khazraj.” – The Persian Conquest of Jerusalem.

These crypto-jewish Arabian tribes began to seize control via various war efforts, spreading their version of Arabian

judaism (islam) as they went. The instillation of this Arabian judaism was brought into fruition when a marriage between

an Arab leader and a jewish princess lead to the birth of the jewish-Arabian warlord “Dhu-Nuwas”. Dhu Nuwas means

“lord of the sidelock”, referring to a jewish custom in which a rabbi wears a sidelock hairstyle. Through violent war

efforts, Dhu-Nuwas managed to establish Arabian judaism quite firmly.

“ In 518, when Ethiopian troops landed in Himyar, Dhu-Nuw,as ’ s forces soundly defeated the invaders. Flushed with

success, he now saw himself as the champion of Arabian Jewry. It has been suggested by some scholars that Dhu-Nuwas’s

ultimate objective was the creation of a Jewish empire stretching from Eretz Israel to Himyar. ” – From Yosef Dhu

Nuwas, a Sadducean King with Sidelocks

Although Dhu Nuwas was eventually defeated, Pagan Arabia had been weakened, and the foundation was set for the

judaising of Arabia. Jews had already infiltrated Arabia at all levels of society, from the leadership to the religious centers.

This, in truth, is how islam was born. The jews pushed this Arabian-judaism on the population of Arabia. This is what

they developed into islam, as we noted above in stating that the jews liften the Pagan Arabian religious elements such as

“Al’Ilah” and the Lunar Calendar, and simply combined them with jewish religious practices and the jewish prophets,

stories and the jewish “god”. This can clearly be seen in the glaring similarities between judaism and islam:

http://exposingthelieofislam.weebly.com/judaism-christianity-and-islam-the-false-trinity –

fighting-amongst-these-programs-is-all-a-facade.html

Many historians also noted how the conquests which led to the spread of this new Arabian judaism later called islam was

largely supported and funded by the jews who pushed the concept of a “messiah” destined to lead them in the efforts to

instate this new religion. The “prophet Muhammad” was invented as a jewish messiah and symbol of these conquests that

brainwashed fools could rally around, however, he never existed as a real person.

http://exposingthelieofislam.weebly.com/muhammad-never-existed.html

http://exposingthelieofislam.weebly.com/muhammad–the-jewish-prophet.html

Once Pagan Arabia had been weakened and the foundations had been laid, the conquests began which would establish

the new religion of islam as the primary religion of the Eastern World.

Conquestor Caliph Umar ibn Al-Khattab was even said so have received a great deal of aid from the jews. A group of

extremely wealthy jewish bankers funded military campaigns with the use of taxe,s which swept through the East,

slaughtering thousands upon thousands of Pagan Gentiles and destroying thousands of Pagan sacred sites. Those

individuals who had been judaised, brainwashed or simply bought out joined the armies of the conquests. Following these

military conquests which left the land absolutely ravaged and weakened to the point at which the Pagan Gentiles were no

longer able to fight back, islam was developed and put in place, the quran was written, and islam (Arabian-judaism) was

enforced upon the region.

A much more in depth article on the islamic conquests will be written shortly, displaying the severe brutality which they

engaged in. This truly was a shocking string of events that saw so much blood shed throughout the Eastern World that

places that still stand today are named with words that bare translations such as “Death Mountain”. The purpose of this

article was to expose the jewish origins and foundations of islam, and how it was the jews that developed this program and

funded its spread.

A SPECIAL THANKS TO “EXPOSINGTHELIEOFISLAM” FOR THERE WORK.


WAS MUHAMMAD SOMEONE ELSE?

7TH PIECE OF EVIDENCE

The Ebionites, Muhammad, and the Quran

In an article well worth reading about the religious practices of the Ebionites found here, author Stephen Tomkins

notes, "... it sounds not unlike Islam in all those respects."

There is a reason for that. The Ebionites followed a text known as the Gospel of Matthew to the Hebrews. Although

most scholars would say it was lost to history, it is possible that its precepts can be found today in the

early suras of a text far more famous known as the Quran.

If true, this could be a fascinating study. Two of the major controversies in the early Christian church were the nature

of the divinity of Jesus (how could he be both a man and God?), and the extent to which Christians were to follow

Jewish practices and traditions. Although the Apostle Paul's conviction that Jesus was both fully God and fully man

and that being Christian meant leaving everything Jewish behind eventually won the day, many groups disagreed.

As they and their gospels were declared heretical by early Church councils, they were forced away from the

Christian geographical centers of power and some of them ended up in Arabia and Yemen. Two of these were the

Nestorians and the Ebionites. Although they are sometimes lumped together, they are distinct in that the Nestorians

believed in the divinity of Jesus whereas the Ebionites saw him merely as a Prophet.

One difference between those declared heretics and the orthodox church was that the former often followed only one

text, or gospel, rather than all the books that became the New Testament. The Ebionites followed The Gospel of

Matthew to the Hebrews (called by some scholars simply the Gospel of the Ebionites). It is probably a second-century

compilation including passages from Matthew, Mark, and Luke that emphasizes the compassion and humanity of Jesus

while denying his divinity. The Ebionites believed that Jesus was a man, not God, and that a presence called the

Holy Spirit descended upon him at his baptism and remained with him until just before his crucifixion. They followed

the dietary and health practices of the Jews and placed much emphasis on rituals such as ablution, fasting, and

circumcision.

Available online studies of the Ebionites found here and here seem unaware of their continued history

after

persecution possibly forced them from the Levant into Arabia in the early centuries of the Christian era. There are

several reasons for this historical lack of knowledge. One is the fact that the Ebionites were less significant and

less known than the Nestorians, the larger Christian sect in Arabia at the time that did accept the divinity of Jesus.

Another is that Christian historians typically had little access to ancient Islamic history, until recently only available

in Arabic, that made scattered references to the Nusraniyah (taken from the town of Nazareth, this is the Quranic

word used to describe the non-orthodox Christians in Mecca at the time of Muhammad).

There is another and more significant reason. After Muhammad, Muslims paid little or no attention to the beliefs

of Christians and Jews in the Arabian Peninsula other than to compare them critically to Islam. Muslims believe

the Quran was revealed directly to Muhammad from Allah via the angel Gabriel. They historically had little interest

in the beliefs of others, and even less interest in the possibility that their religious texts and practices influenced

Muhammad and the formation of the Quran.

Muslims have placed much emphasis in creating an imaginary genealogy for Muhammad that passes through Abraham

all the way back to Adam. Of more historical relevance is that Muslim scholars emphasize his lineage from his ancestor


Qusay to Muhammad's grandfather Abdel Mutallib, but ignore that same lineage from Qusay to grandson Assad who

was the grandfather of Khadijah, Muhammad's first wife, and Waraqa bin Naufal, the Prophet's distant uncle. The

reason Muslims have deliberately ignored that side of the family is that it included relatives including Waraqa and

possibly Khadijah herself who were members of the Nusraniyah.

Ancient historian Abu Faraj Al Isfahani noted in his Kitab Al Aghani that Waraqa bin Naufal converted to Nusraniyah,

and biographer Ibn Ishaq describes him as a Hanif, one who believed in only one God.

Hadith compilers Bukhari and Sahih Muslim both state that Waraqa bin Naufal translated the Book of the Hebrews and

the Gospel into Arabic. It is possible the book they meant was the Gospel of Matthew to the Hebrews.

Among the characteristics of the Ebionites was compassion for the poor and the orphaned. Waraqa bin Naufal, who

was both a scholar and the leader of the Ebionites in Mecca, took a special interest in his young relative the orphaned

Muhammad. He saw in him qualities of leadership, spent much time with him, and over the years taught Muhammad

the Gospel of the Ebionites as well as the contents of the Torah. Waraqa bin Naufal performed Muhammad's marriage

to Khadijah, and groomed Muhammad to replace him as the Ebionite spiritual leader in Mecca.

(When presented with criticism of Muhammad's later multiple marriages, Muslims often point out that the Prophet

remained in a monogamous relationship with Khadija for 25 years. The reality is that Muhammad's marriage with

Khadijah was essentially a Christian marriage, with both divorce and having more than one wife not allowed to the

Ebionites).

When Muhammad first announced that he was receiving revelations from God, the revelations were in large part

the stories he had learned from Waraqa bin Naufal. Waraqa encouraged Muhammad to consider himself a Prophet,

with the understanding that just as Abraham had been the Prophet to call the Jews back to Allah, and Jesus the

Prophet who called his generation back to Allah, so Muhammad would be the Prophet who could call the Arabs

back to Allah. It is interesting to note that at this time Muhammad did not see himself as founding a new religion,

but only in calling people back to the Islam of Abraham, Moses, and Jesus.

The influence of Waraqi bin Naufal upon Muhammad and his revelations continued until Waraqa died. It is not

accidental that the Hadith writers note that "revelations ceased for some time" following the death of Waraqa. The

reason, of course, is that Muhammad was no longer learning from his Ebionite uncle.

The presence of the Gospel of the Ebionites in the short, poetic Meccan suras with their vivid descriptions of hell and

Muhammad's repeated claim that he is a Prophet just like Abraham, Moses, and Jesus is something most Muslims

are not allowed to even think about, at least publicly. It's much easier, and safer, to just toe the party line. I would

encourage Muslims to be a little more open in their thinking and scholarship.

(Acknowledgements to Joseph Azzi, author of The Priest and the Prophet, for much of the above material).

WAS MUHAMMAD SOMEONE ELSE?

8TH PIECE OF EVIDENCE

You see the first thing a caliph or king or leader does is to mint coins so they put there image on the coins and their name

on the coins and they explain who they are and they always say what their religion is and they always say where the mint

is.

So look at the coins this is evidence from the 7 th century where are they minted yes correct in 2 areas one in syria and the


other in iran none of them in the hejaz to far north again.

Everything we see happening in the 7 th century is coming from the north not from the south not from mecca and not from

medina.

When you look at the coins you can follow a sequence on the coins if you start from the left those are arab coins so its not

as if they were not minting coins,they were but look at whats on the coins these arab leaders had crosses in the hands and

above their heads.

So why would you be wearing a cross if you were a muslim?

No reference to muhammad on these no reference to abu bakr,umar,uthman and ali.

Finally in 651AD mu’awiya he would be the first ummayad caliph take a look at hes coins in the west he himself has a

cross on hes head and holding a cross in hes hand is he a muslim?

No reference to people called muslims no reference to any religion called islam no reference to any man called

muhammad no reference to any book called the quran and no reference to any city called mecca it is blank on all these

coins.

And the coins are great because they are from the 7 th century they do not disintegrate they do not deteriorate and we can

look at them today.

SO LETS RECAP:


All early coins show a clear christian identity on both sides of the coin in the west and zoroastrian in the east.

624-660AD:early islamic coins just dont exist why?

Since they controlled so much land and mints in syria and iran (north).

640-660AD:some arab proxy states seem to be christian and others seem to want no religious symbols.

661-680AD:mu’awiya=christian symbols (west) zoroastrian (east) to 680AD adds allahs name but not muhammad’s.

692-693AD:abd al-malik (and zubayr) introduce muhammad (shahada) 1 st islamic coin (or blessed one as messianic).

693-696AD:justinian II attacks abd al-malik because he was doing something different to what the byzantine want,proving

that the influence is coming from christianity from the west and abd al-malik who adds his image with the shahada either

to confront or claim messiah-ship and look at whats coming out of iran on the backside of the coin look at mu’awiya’s

coin all the way up from 661-680AD on the backside of the silver coin in the east are zoroastrian fire altars nothing to do

with mohammad.

696-705AD:arab script shahada with no associates.

690-710AD (so called muhammad appears).

710-720 AD(muslim rites appear)(pilgrimage,prayer,fasting and the rest of the rituals)

720-730AD(the names muslim and islam refer to a specific group in contradistinction to christianity).

While allahs name is introduced early (its nabataean) mohammad is not (hes uniquely islamic).

Does not the numismatic evidence support the archaeological and documentry evidence?.

Does not this therefore suggest that islam was not introduced by mohammad but by abd al-malik?

These 7 th century coins confront the traditional 9 th ,10 th century islamic narrative.

So who is this man we are looking at:

Iyas ibn qabisah of tayaye (7 th century muhammad).

The traditions:

Tell us that mohammad lived in the hejaz and invaded the byzantines and the persians so he was significant yet nothing is

written about him from that time and everything we know about him is from the 9 th ,10th centuries.

But we do find a man nicknamed mahmet (mohammad) referred to in the 7 th century but he lived much further north.

HOW THE CULT MOHAMMEDANISM WAS CREATED?

Although not much is known about the Ummayad period [41 AH - 133 AH] but I believe Abd al- Malik [66 AH - 86 AH]

did a commendable job by spreading the slogan of Islam [There is no ilah except Allah, Mohammed is a rasul of Allah] -

He was an Arab and his mother tongue was Arabic, he and his comrades very well knew what they were spreading. He

very well knew what the Islamic ideology is and what the book of Islam [Quran] was all about. He printed / engraved 'La

ilaha illallah Muhammadur Rasulullah' on the coins, arches and domes he knew what he was doing. He and his

contemporaries knew Mohammedun is not a name of a person, they knew Allah is not a name of a deity and they very

well knew what the actual connotation of Rasul is.

But his main contemporary adversaries [Christians, Zoroastrians and Pagans] could also sense the future impact of this

effective slogan 'La ilaha illallah Muhammadur Rasulullah' will have on their respective ideologies. Thus all the history

related to Ummayad period was systematically wiped out by the conquerors. A series of mass assassinations of learned

Arabs were carried out. A parallel literature [Hadith] was created to counter the book of Islam [Quran] and this

marvelous slogan 'La ilaha illallah Muhammadur Rasulullah' – This is why we don’t see the true essence of Islam and

the book Quran but we see the baptized version of Islam. We must also understand that Mohammed bin Abdullah [PBUH]

of history is a different person than Mohammed ur Rasul Allah of the book Quran. Mohammedanism is a cult built on

the stories of personalities whereas the ideology of Islam does not promote any personalities. PEACE / SALAM


Websters deluxe unabridged dictionary (second edition) page 147

BAPH-O-MET derived from MAHOMET or MOHAMMAD an idol or spiritual symbol

which the medieval knights templars were accused of worshiping in their secret ceremonies.

In 618AD saracens rebelled took syria,arabia and mesopotamia and selected a king in 622.

So we need a lakhmid king who rebelled was kicked out of a city and then reconquered it.

Al bukhari says muhammad=ibn abi kabsha similar to iyas qabisah of the al-tayaye (hira).

Khusraw (sassanian) chose iyas qabisah to control the lakhmids gave him 30 villages.

Iyas rebelled was deposed joined the arabs in 622 against the sassanids.

Thus the arab identity began with this 7 th century muhammad of a high status and not poor at all.

Itas ibn qabisah then moved to the west close to jordan maybe petra perhaps?

Note:

The 7 th century muhammad lived and worked much further north.

Conclusion:

So the later traditions have the wrong muhammad as the real muhammad lived much further north was quite wealthy and

powerful and is credited with helping to initiate the arab rebellion against the sassanians and the byzantines around

622AD.

We cant find anything about the rightly guided caliphs.

The rock inscriptions:,but all north and in the wrong language:

The rock inscriptions are just as good as the coins:

30,000 rock inscriptions were catalogued and surveyed across arabia,the negev,the trans-jordan and syria with possibly

another 70,000 more yet to do.

One would expect muhamamd ’ s name on the inscriptions along the haj routes yet we dont find one inscription with

muhammads name on it until 690 ad.

South of medina the script is sabaic originating in yemen created in 600 bc and continuing for 1200 years.

Yet it contained all the needed vowels and consonants required for a religious text unlike 7 th century arabic.

The arabic script we find on these inscriptions are nabataean-aramaic which are only found in the north and are similar

to the quran text.

They should be down in the bottom part where the sabaic script is all these rock inscriptions up to the 7 th century up until

690 are all using nabataean-aramaic which is from petra.


Now lindstedt’s 100 dated rock inscriptions

Lindstedt looked at 100 rock inscriptions from 640-740 AD

Prior to 690 there was no evidence of anything islamic on the inscriptions.

Everything comes after 690.

Conclusion:

It was only in the 730’s onwards that there is evidence of popular devotion to muhammad as a prophet and messenger

which makes the islamic traditions incredibly awkward.

Furthermore:

There is a 100 year silence prior to this that indicates that islam did not exist as a distinct religion until long after the time

of muhammad which casts doubt on whether he had any part in starting islam.

The 741ad inscription describes the ist mecca:

The apocalypse of pseudo methodius continuatio byzantia arabica (741ad).

Habedeimele (abd al malik) assuming the apex of his kingdom ruled for 20 years in the first year of his rule he directed all

the experience and virtue of the mind of his army against habdella (abdulllah al zubair) (whom his father had attacked so

many times in various wars) all the way finally to macca-AS THEY CONSIDER IT THE HOME OF ABRAHAM

WHICH LIES IN THE DESERT BETWEEN UR OF THE CHALDEANS (MAGICIANS) AND CARRA THE CITY OF

MESOPOTAMIA”

In the 8 th century J.E TAYLOR had not yet discovered ur (1853 he discovered it ) so the people then assumed it was near

edessa just south and between edessa and harran (the town of abraham’s brother).

A 697ad inscription near ta’if indicats the building called AL MASJID AL HARRAM (referring to the KA’ABA?) this is

close to the place that later became known as mecca (hejaz) but it was not yet called mecca.

Conclusion:

the original mecca was located in southern turkey in ur,south of edessa.

Note:

it is too far north once again but directly above the present and 2 nd mecca.


The need for a place was already in place:

Petra has all the stations of the pilgrimage which are now in mecca.

A square center (ka’aba) with the exact dimensions mentioned by azraki which dont fit the present day ka’aba.

Safah and marwah mountains to commemorate hagar looking for water are in petra with places for idols on the top and

not little rocks as we find in mecca.

The washing of water with cisterns and waterways are only in petra not in mecca which only has one well the zamzam

well.

The plain of muzdalifah a slippery sloped mountain with a mosque and church at the top and where 5,000 people could

pray is again only found in petra.

The jamaraat platform with the pillar to throw the 49 or 72 rocks at is also found in petra not the 3 platforms in mecca

suggesting 3 devils.

Notice where petra is:

Petra is the ancient sanctuary city of tombs and temples.

It is on the trade routes east and west and north.

Mecca isnt on any international trade route because of the red sea to its west.

Petra is where the nabataean aramaic was spoken and written which later gave birth to quranic arabic.

Petra is where all the mosques qiblas up to 706ad are facing even as far away as canton in china and cherman in india.

Conclusion:

Petra seems to have been the original sanctuary which became mecca.

Note:

petra is much too far north to support the later traditions once again.

The northern dominance:

1.mecca & medina= no manuscripts the north =6-9 manuscripts

2.Mecca & medina =8 qira’ats the north =22 qira’ats

3.Mecca & medina =no canonical quran the north =gave us the final hafs quran

4.Mecca & medina=no quranic arabic the north=created quranic arabic.

5.Mecca & medina=no qiblas until 727 the north =where all qiblas until 706 (face petra).

6.Mecca & medina=the wrong muhammad the north=where ilays ibn qabisah lived

7.Mecca & medina=no rock inscriptions the north =all inscriptions and pre-islamic

8.Mecca & medina=no hijra the north=created the original 622 date.

9.Mecca & medina=gave us the 2 nd mecca the north=gave us the 1 st mecca

10.Mecca & medina=no ancient sanctuary the north=had the original sanctuary.

Conclusion:

Almost everything we know about islam today came primarily from the north

Note:

All of these northern areas(except cairo)are where the abbasids originated from.


Conclusions:

1.the sources for everything we know about traditional islam come too late and from too far away.

2.Except for the 1 st canonization (which is impossible to find) the other four canons are too far north (cairo,damascus,kufa

and basra thus all in egypt,syria or iraq).

3.The quranic arabic is derived from nabataean aramaic which is much to far north.

4.The ashtiname letter is not from the 7 th century but the 16 th century thus much too late.

5.The constitution of medina is not from the 7 th century but from the 9 th century again too late.

6.The doctrine lacobi refers to the wrong man at the wrong place and from the wrong time.

7.Muhammad is not in the quran nor is he on the inscriptions of the dome of the rock.

8.The coins support the 7 th century archaeological and documentary evidence and simultaneously confront the traditional

9 th -a0th century islamic narrative.

9.iyas ibn qabisah of tayaye may be a 7 th century muhammad the later traditions borrowed.

10.We cant find any of the 4 rightly guided caliphs in the 7 th century at all which is odd.

11.The rock inscriptions prior to 690ad say nothing about islam,muhammad,mecca the quran or about musiims.These only

begin to appear after 690 and are finally introduced as we know it today between 720-730ad.

12.The hijra of 622 was simply a later redaction by the abbasids on to an earlier battle won by heraculis for the arabs yet

recognized as the year the arabs finally created their own identity.

13.The 741 inscription is the first reference to mecca yet places it below edessa in southern turkey.

14.Petra was the initial sanctuary of the arabs which was later replaced by the current mecca

Conclusion:

The historical record suggests that most everything we now know about islam in the 7 th century is either too far north or

too far away or much too late to be the islam of the 9 th century “islamic traditions”

Final conclusion:

Islam is really an abbasid creation.

A big thank u to jay smith and the rest of the researchers for the information you can watch

the full debate on youtube.I have just picked pieces from there.

WAS MUHAMMAD SOMEONE ELSE?

9TH PIECE OF EVIDENCE

although tony Bushby believes that Jesus really existed. I have added his references below

this excerpt. —

— “Today he is called Mohammed (570-632), but his real name was Lothar Schmalfuss.


( 1) Ancient Christian writings recorded a remarkable revelation about Mohammed’s early

religious life and revealed the true reason for the commencement of the Islamic faith. The

reference is found in a book called ‘ Chronica Majora ’ , a summary of world history from

biblical Creation to the year of the author’s death. It was written by Matthew Paris (d.1259),

a pious Christian monk, described by the church ‘as an historian who holds the first place

among English chroniclers’ .

(2) From his quaint specimen of Abbey records, the erudite Monk explained how Mohammed

started an ‘impious religion’:

“‘ It is well known that Mohammed was once a cardinal, and became heretic because he

failed to be elected pope. Also (later in life) having drunk to excess, he fell by the roadside,

and in this condition was killed by swine. And for that reason, his followers abhor pork even

unto this day.'

(3)“Monk Matthew Paris called Mohammed ‘cardinal’; a term that today signifies councilors

of the pope, and the origin of that category of priesthood reveals another area of censored

information in Christian development. The 16th Century church said that ‘ the office of

cardinal (incardinatus) first came into being in the 6th Century…its true origin to this day

remains unanswered for in none of the Councils (records) do we find authority for the

distinguishing features of the office’.

(4) However, the position of cardinal was created by special decree at a French synod in

January 560 and that information is recorded church history. ‘The Synods which were held

during the sixth century were confined to France and Spain. They amount to twenty-six in

number, and like those of the minor Councils which preceded them, are interspersed with

canons, having in view the security of the church proper’.

(5)“ It was at one of those Synods that the ‘ creatio ’ of cardinals occurred and the

deliberations involved in its manufacture were termed ‘frivolous’ by the 19th Century church.

At that gathering a group of seven old bishops ‘of carnal nature'

(6)established for themselves a special office to protect their earthly privileges. Many

bishops of the time ‘were given up to worldliness and gain, and we hear of worse scandals'

(7)and the creation of a new hierarchal administrative body of churchmen was one of those

disgraces. Under the guise of ‘bearers of hidden knowledge’ they generated a new upper

level class of ecclesiastics that were sworn by oath never to reveal the true origins of

Christianity outside their select group.Professional clergymen were now entering the

church and to protect the knowledge of Constantine’ s deification of his descendants at

Nicaea from reaching new priests, a directorial code of silence was developed by the

Incardinatus.

“ Incoming clerics were naive about the true Christian origins and the basis of their

preaching was not revealed until they achieved and maintained the office of bishop. They

were then eligible to enter the College of Cardinals, and after swearing a vow of secrecy,

were enlightened as to the invented nature of the Christian deity. Mohammed had achieved

the position of cardinal, knew the false essence of Christianity, and having being passed

over for the top papal job at around the age of forty, departed and established his own

religion.

“Mohammed alleged that he received ‘divine communication’ from god in a cave on Mt. Hira

and that information subsequently becaem the contents of the Holy Koran. The competitive


religion that he established was similar in concept to Christianity, but excluded the ‘son of

God on Earth’ dogma, and its variant system of belief had devstating effects upon the growth

of Christianity. . . .

“. . . From the position of cardinal, Mohammed knew the church’s farcical presentation of its

deity and confirmed that Jesus was ‘verily a true prophet of Allah and a grand man: But lo!

his disciples all went insane one day, and made a God of him’.

(8)In the Koran he added this extraordinary passage, ‘and they killed him not, nor did they

cause his death on a cross’.

(9)“Mohammed had nine wives and one Roman Catholic concubine, his favorite being Aisha,

who resided with him until his gory death.

(10) In the Koran he summoned followers to ‘give alms’, ensuring that he lived in sumptuous

surroundings amidst vast wealth during his life.”

Bushby’s references:

(1) –“The World’s Religions” Lion Publishing, Pg. 315, 1994

(2) –“Catholic Encyclopedia” , i. 187, i, 620-1, x. 425

(3) –“Catholic Encyclopedia” , i. 187, i, 620-1, x. 425)

(4) –“Annales Ecclesiastici” , tome viii, Fol. Antwerp, 1597, Cardinal

Caesar Baronius

(5) –“Ecclesiastical History”, Du Pin, vol. i, pg. 710

(6) –“The Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers”, Second Series. Edited by the

Rev. Professor Roberts, D.D., and Principal James Donaldson, L.L.D., St.

Andrews, The Christian Literature Publishing Co., Buffalo, NY, 1885

(7) –“Catholic Encyclopedia” , 1908, Vol. IV. Pg. 583

(8) –Notes on Abulfeda, Gagnier, also; The Life of Mahomet, Updated

(9) –Koran, Surah 4. (Did he know something the rest of us don’t know? Of

course, Bushby’s theory is that “Jesus” had been stoned to death and not

crucified. But this statement can just as well suggest that there was no one

to crucify anyway.)

(10) –“Encyclopedia Britannica, Macropedia, Vol. 12, Pg. 607

Linda

A big thank u to all these researchers for there hard work.

WAS MUHAMMAD SOMEONE ELSE?

10TH PIECE OF EVIDENCE

12 Similarities between Muhammad and Pharaoh Akhenaten.

Islam is "Repackaged Polytheism".

Like Akhenaten (1352-1336 BC), Muhammad chose one god, from among hundreds of pagan

gods, to be his one monotheistic god. Both merely repackaged polytheism and called it

monotheism. Since archeology only recently discovered details of Pharaoh Akhenaten in the

late 19th century, it is clear that Muhammad had never even heard of Akhenaten. But the

similarities between these two founders of religion are quite striking.


Akhenaten worshipping Aten with his family.

Reformed Polytheism: Muhammad & Pharaoh Akhenaten

When it comes to starting a new religion, the parallels between Muhammad (600AD) and

Pharaoh Akhenaten (1400 BC) are stunning. We see a "something old, something new"

theme in both religious founders.

The story of Akhenaten's conversion to repackaged polytheism (monotheism)

A. Dating the Exodus: Akhenaten's learns Monotheism from the Jews:

We feel that the phenomenon of Akhenaten's sudden zeal for monotheism was clearly a

result of the Jewish exodus from Egypt in 1440 BC. Akhenaten is a thorn in the side of liberal

"Bible trasher" archeologists who date the exodus at 1250 BC.

To anyone except the blind, it is clear that the miracles of Moses in Egypt are the obvious

cause of Akhenaten's conversion to pagan monotheism. Jacob and his twelve sons moved to

Egypt as free men in about 1900 BC. Akhenaten began his reign in 1352 AD. Since the exodus

of the Jews is dated at about 1440 BC, that means that Akhenaten lived about 60 years after

the Pharaoh who experienced the 10 plagues of Moses. This would allow just enough time

for all Akhenaten's ancestors who hated Jehovah, the monotheistic God of the Jews, to die.

Akhenaten was therefore free to abandon the many false gods of Egypt in favour of his own

version of monotheism, without any personal emotional baggage connected with

monotheism. But rather than a 60 year old memory of how Jehovah triumphed over Egypt,

why not current events? If our timing is right, the Jews began their occupation of the

promised land (Canaan) about 20 years before Akhenaten became Pharaoh. This also means

that Joshua and Akhenaten lived at the same time and knew of each other. Surely the

nations that surrounded Israel learned to fear Jehovah as a more powerful God then the

pagan gods who were driven out of Canaan. So for 60 years, Jehovah was triumphing over all

the god's of the nations. This spectacular display of the advantages of monotheism, surely

must have impressed Akhenaten who would have surely heard about it. In fact it may have

been the stories he heard of the conquest of Joshua that converted him to a monotheistic

view. Although the connections we have suggested are circumstantial, it would be quite

unbelievable that Akhenaten was unaware of the 10 plagues, the 40 years in the wilderness

and the conquest of Canaan by Joshua.

We can infer with similar confidence, that Muhammad was influenced by Jewish and

Christian monotheism. It is well documented that Christian missionaries had infiltrated even

the interior of Arabia with the monotheistic gospel of Christ. Had Muhammad's monotheistic

movement sprung up without the strong monotheist presence of Christianity, then this

would be worth taking note of. But the facts of history prove the presence of non-Arab

monotheism before birth of Islam.


B. Akhenaten: Monotheist or Henotheist?

Jehovah's Witnesses are Henotheists. Although accused of being polytheists, the correct

term would be Henotheist. Jehovah's Witnesses reject the trinity and believe in an entire

"henotheist" system of gods, including the "Almighty God", (the Father), "mighty God" (Son)

to lesser gods including the devil, angels, and finally even men are gods. Now was

Akhenaten a monotheist or a henotheist? Some suggest that Akhenaten was never a true

monotheist during the Amarna period, since some evidence suggests, (although not

conclusive) that he gives homage to Horus, Isis and Osiris. If he did, then Akhenaten was a

henotheist. Other inclusive evidence suggests that Akhenaten viewed himself as the

incarnate god Horus. After all, the whole premise of Egyptian rule by Pharaoh is that the

Pharaoh is Horus on Earth; without this premise, there is no Pharaoh. Had he declared

himself to not be a god, he would have immediately been deposed as a fraud. Some however,

think Akhenaten may have been a closet monotheist, merely keeping the status quo. For a

discussion of Akhenaten's possible monotheism, see Cyril Aldred's, "Akhenaten: King of

Egypt".

C. Akhenaten's Proclamation of Monotheism:

To the complete surprise of the people and the outrage of the polytheistic priesthood,

Akhenaten proclaimed that only one god "Aten" was to be worshipped and the other 733

gods were to be forsaken. Aten was somewhat unknown for two generations before

Akhenaten. The popularity of the Aten is known in the reign of Amenhotep III when that ruler

named the pleasure boat for his wife Tiye after the Aten. It is popularly believed that

Nefertiti (and possibly Tiye) were adherents to the cult of the Aten, which was very small,

and was able to magnify it through her husband (son). Other gods certainly were considered

far more important to Egyptian culture at the time. For whatever reason, Akhenaten decided

that Aten, an obscure "mail room" god, was to be promoted to the "board room" and become

the CEO god of the official state religion. Akhenaten's command to stop worshipping the

hundreds of old Egyptian gods, was met with quite a bit of stubbornness with his people, and

outright rebellion among the elite and powerful priesthood. Aten, formerly one of hundreds

of Egyptian gods, was now the one and only god.

D. Akhenaten's Banishment of competing gods:

Akhenaten was prepared to take action to ensure his new found monotheism was the

dominant religion. Similar to a few of the kings and Judges of the Bible, he cleaned house by

eradicating some, but not all, of the symbols or structures associated with polytheism. He

tore down some pagan temples, removed publicly displayed names of some pagan gods from

official buildings and statues. The god Amun, who formerly enjoyed a most popular position

in Egyptian religious life, was suddenly out of a job. The extent to which Akhenaten rejected

polytheism is actually astonishing since he even replaced the plural "gods" with the

monotheistic singular "god" from official records, laws and proclamations. But Akhenaten

did not ban the worship of all of the other gods; he particularly banned Amun and the cult of

Amun-Ra since he was the former (and later) chief of all gods, a position that Akhenaten

believed the Aten filled.


E. Akhenaten's repackaging Polytheism

As Jeroboam, the son of Solomon understood, if you are going to start a new religion, you

need to change the priesthood and places of worship. He started by making himself the High

Priest, thus the top religious authority and power. He even changed his name to

"Akhenaten" which means, "He who serves the Aten", to express his new found monotheism.

His original name was Amenhotep, meaning "Amun is Satisfied". In order to make a clean

break from polytheism, he moved the Egyptian capitol from Thebes to a location 300 KM

north and named it Akhetaten (present day Amarna), which means the "The Place Of The

Aten's Effective Power." Akhenaten constructed beautiful, open air temples that would

invite "divine sunlight" to bath the floor and worshippers with his presence.

Akhenaten did not like the existing logos of the sun god, so to his credit, came up with a

unique new logo and symbol. Islam, on the other hand, merely copied the 2500 year old

"crescent moon" logo of the pagan moon god and didn't bother to hire a graphic design artist.

The crescent moon is found on top of every mosque and even at the Kaba on top of

the Maqam Ibrahim, is virtually identical to that used in Babylonian moon god "Sîn" worship

at Harran in 2100 BC.

Like Muhammad, Akhenaten retained the polytheistic practices and rituals of his newly

repackaged monotheistic god.

In a hymn written by Akhenaten where he expresses his monotheism in poetry he says, "O

thou sole god, whose power no other possesses. Though didst create the earth according to

thy desire, being alone: Man, all cattle, large and small; All that are upon the earth." (Hymn

to the Sun, Akhenaten, c. 1370 BC)

Note: Desperate bible skeptics suggest David plagiarized Akhenaten's hymn when he wrote

Psalm 104 of the Bible. However the similarity is remote and not impressive, especially in

light of the fact that Ps 104 doesn't even contain monotheistic statements like " O thou sole

god, whose power no other possesses." In the very unlikely case that anyone copied, it

would be Akhenaten who heard these kinds of statements from the Jews who once lived in

Egypt. Perhaps David was recording an ancient Jewish Song that Pharaoh Akhenaten was

familiar with and copied. However, our view is that the similarity between the two is so

insignificant, that no one copied from anyone. After all, Akhenaten is praising the "sun god"

while David is praising the God who created the sun.


F. Reverting to Polytheism after Akhenaten's death

The famous "King Tut", (Tutankhamun) discovered in 1922 AD by Howard Carter. was most

likely the son of Akhenaten.

The most compelling reason Tutankhamun was the son of Akhenaten, is because King Tut's

original name given by his father was Tutankhaten. Tut's birth name was in honor of his

father's religion in honor of "Aten". After his father died and he became Pharaoh, King Tut

reversed all the changes brought in his father Akhenaten. The young king also changed his

name from Tutankhaten to Tutankhamun, as he is known in history. His new name means

"Living image of Amun". Amun was a pagan Egyptian god.

King Tut

Shortly before Pharaoh Akhenaten's death in 1336 BC the "forced to be monotheistic"

priesthood, ruling class and common folk, desired to revert back to polytheism. Perhaps,

like in many Muslim nations today, the people were never really converted, but were

silenced under the threat of death. Shortly after Akhenaten's death, like the Judges of the

Bible, monotheism was forgotten and all the pagan gods of Egypt were once again

worshipped as before. In fact, special effort was made by Akhenaten's successors to

appease the formerly shunned gods. Akhenaten's name was deleted from official king lists,

and he was thereafter referred to in Egypt as "that criminal of Akhetaten." We wonder what

immediate changes would take place in the Muslim controlled parts of the world, if the

common people were free to practice their religion as they desire without the threat of

death?

Although Muhammad never knew the details of Akhenaten's conversion to monotheism, it

seems Muhammad could have learned important lessons from him on "how to start your own

religion". Akhenaten was a pacifist who deplored "murdering his opposition for conquest" as

most other Pharaohs practiced. Muhammad, on the other hand, "evangelized with the

sword", just as we see today. The result was that the entire Arab world continued in its new

found monotheism to the present.

What Muhammad and Akhenaten had in common:

1.Both were born into families who worshipped hundreds of pagan gods.

2.Both actively worshipped as pagan polytheists until their conversions to monotheism as

adults.

3.Both were strongly influenced by the monotheism of other religions. Jews and Christians.

4.Both converted to a form of monotheism, where they continued to worship one pagan god.

We call this repackaged polytheism.

5.Both elevated obscure, lessor known deities to the top position. Aten and Allah

6.Both chose the gods of celestial objects: sun and moon.

7.Both banned the worship of all other pagan gods but the one pagan god they had selected.

8.Both retained the name of the old polytheistic gods which the general population were

familiar with: Aten and Allah.

9.Both retained pagan practices and concepts in their new found monotheism.

10.Both employed symbolic logos to represent their gods: solar disk with sun rays. Although

Muhammad my not have directly adopted the crescent moon symbol, it was adopted shortly

after his death.

11.Both made themselves the highest human representative on earth for their gods. High


priest and Muhammad the last and greatest prophet.

12.Neither men performed any miracles or displayed any divine powers as both Moses and

Christ and the apostles did when Judaism and Christianity were begun. Muhammad was a

prophet without supernatural power.

How Muhammad and Akhenaten differed:

1.Akhenaten's chose a lower ranking god "Aten" to be his highest god, whereas Muhammad

chose "Allah" who, although not the most popular god, was considered to be a top ranking

god.

2.While both were former polytheists converted to monotheism, Akhenaten continued to

worship the sun itself, whereas, Muhammad's merely retained the disk of the crescent moon

as a symbol for the one true god "Allah" who created the sun and moon. In this regard

Muhammad's monotheism was superior to Akhenaten's. But then again, Muhammad had a

2600 year advantage of history over Akhenaten!

3.Akhenaten's religion was one that did not require faith as it worshipped the visible sun as

god. Muhammad's religion does require faith as it worships an invisible god.

4.While Muhammad continued to worship the same pagan moon god in the same pagan

temple (Kaba) before and after his conversion to monotheism, Akhenaten created a new

temple in a new city for the old pagan god. The symbols and rituals of Islam are

re-enactment rituals borrowed from the Bible with a grotesquely distorted mythical twist.

We suggest Muhammad would have done much better had he hired a more imaginative "new

religion writer". Akhenaten is clearly superior, for like Judaism and Christianity, Akhenaten

realized that a new religion needed unique symbols and meanings. Muhammad failed to

come up with anything new, but heavily plagiarized other religions and local myths.

Akhenaten gets points for originality. While Christ introduced unique and new spiritualized

meanings to physical Judaism, Islam merely creates physical re-enactment's of historical

events as seen in the "stand", "walk" and "throw" rituals of Islam. These ritual

re-enactment's evoke emotion, in the same way a remembrance day service does, but

nothing new is happening.

5.Akhenaten tolerated some other religions to be practiced under his domain. Muhammad

murdered those who attempted to openly practice Christianity under his domain.

6.Akhenaten was a pacifist who deplored "murdering his opposition for conquest" as most

other Pharaohs practiced. Muhammad, on the other hand, "evangelized with the sword". In

the absence of miraculous signs and powers, Muhammad chose the necessary path to

ensure his newly invented religion would endure. Akhenaten's religion of monotheism

collapsed shortly after his death, while Muhammad's has endured the centuries.

I would like to thank all for there in depth research.

DID MUHAMMAD EXIST?

Food for thought.

Muhammad: Astrological Article and Chart

You will find below the horoscope of Muhammad with his interactive chart, an excerpt of his astrological portrait and his

planetary dominants.

Born: Monday, April 20, 571, 1:25 AM (Julian cal.)


In: Mecca (Saudi Arabia)

Sun: 1°29' Taurus AS: 11°10' Aquarius

Moon: 24°58' Leo MC: 23°14' Scorpio

Dominants: Taurus, Scorpio, Leo

Venus, Sun, Saturn

Houses , , / Earth, Water / Fixed

And this is why the flag has the crescent on it because its the crescent of venus.

Muhammad (c. 570 CE – 8 June 632 CE) was an Arab religious, social, and political leader and the founder of Islam. The

date and time of birth are speculative, and comes from Astrodatabank "Manly P. Hall in the NAJ 1933, and also in his

book "The Story of Astrology: The Belief in the Stars As a Factor in Human Progress" states "recorded" at April 20, 571

AD O.S., 1:25:35 AM LMT. This is apparently a quotation from Royal Horoscopes by B. (Bangalore) Suranarain Rao

(Row in Manly's book text). This is a speculative chart, but it is quite close to the time suggested by old Islamic astrologers

of 12 Rabi al-Awwal, which works out to 24 April Julian in 571 AD.")

By the way thats if he did exist it could have been another man of high consciousness that was

teaching the state of consciousness to the people that they named mohammad he could have been anyone and they used

hes teachings of consciousness and manipulated and twisted them to fit there narrative and to create a religion like many

of the other scriptures.

There are many alternative dates, and effectively the birth year or date is unknown. The rest of the source notes is kept

just as a (confusing) record.

Within the science of astrotheology and the doctrine of the COMING ONE every 600 years the earth produces someone

that turns up in history that symbolizes perfectly the consciousness that has arrived.And thats how it happens thats why

we still here talk about a jesus now If there was a jesus the essene well he would have been someone who had saved

himself,these men save themselves they become avatars.

We all ascend but the earth and history does produce these holy men but this historical jesus if you must have an historical

jesus was a good man that taught astrotheology.So how do we know well because he had 12 apostles which represent the

zodiac and he was the sun so please dont be confused with the jesus in the scriptures because they read like a myth and


looks like a myth therefore it is a myth and a myth is not a story,a myth is the greatest of truths.

The scriptures are full of myths written in the skys by the language you got/have which is astrology its all about

astrology.THE LATE COMER because he came exactly 600 years to the day after jesus did because there is always a 600

year period in the doctrine of the avatar in the doctrine of the Savior THE COMING ONE thats what jesus means IU

“IESUS” simply means the coming one always,hes coming so as the wheel of the zodiac goes around theres always someone

coming.

It simply means we are the saviors we give the information whilst having to save ourselves and then we ascend job done.

Please check out santos bonacci who will explain astrotheology in much more detail.

Websters deluxe unabridged dictionary (second edition) page 147

BAPH-O-MET derived from MAHOMET or MOHAMMAD an idol or spiritual symbol

which the medieval knights templars were accused of worshiping in their secret ceremonies.

By wiktionary:

Mehmet

Etymology

From Ottoman Turkish ̈́ 怀 ‎ (Mehmed, Mehmet), from Arabic ḯ e 怀 ‎ (muḥammad). Doublet of Muhammad,

Mahomet and Baphomet.

Proper noun

Mehmet

A male given name from Turkish, variant of Muhammad.

RASUL

UNDERSTANDING RASUL IN SHORT:

Quran clearly states the Rasul is within us - ̈́ 怀 (IN YOU ALL), ̈́me (WITH YOU ALL), ̈́me (FROM YOU ALL) and

̈́m 怀 s (AMONG YOU ALL) - These are the prepositional phrases used by the book Quran to show the exact

positions of the Rasul in our life -

Please read the Quran with your own glasses rather than believing in somebody's else understanding –

The Rasul is present in all including the tribes of African, Australian and Amazonian jungles… instructing them

and guiding them in their own Language.

My Allah is not unjust to these tribes that He only favors the followers of Abrahamic Religions by sending chain

of Rasuls among them… THINK, PONDER…

According to Classical lexicons and the context of the book Quran, Rasul is our inner voice that impart

messages, signs to us.


I have intentionally not provided the references from the Quran - No offence intended, I just want you all to re

study the book Quran with the open mind if you are really interested in rediscovering Deen.

DO WE REALLY NEED A GUIDE OR A MESSENGER:

“Muslims” all over the world acknowledge only one book as their valid document and that is the Quran. They

revere this book more than any other book or literature but very few depend on it for guidance and direction.

Al-Quran the book considered to be the best compass by which the Arabs of past navigated their entire course

of life is now been made an object of ridicule by the actions of today’s “Believers”.

Absurdly this is the only book in the world that is rote read and recited daily widely by its followers only for

earning “huge rewards” rather than for understanding its contents.

Those who claim to have understood the book actually understood the different versions of various

interpretations of their respective scholars they believe to be the exact interpretation of the original message of

the book Quran the 114 chapter book. The “Muslims” will apply their mind in every big and small affair but when

it comes to understanding the book Quran their mind gets numb as if they are facing some big monster.

It is really a pity that the man one of the best creation of the nature does not use his own sense / logic and relies

on other man or books for guidance for his day to day routine work. This is an insult to the dignity of man and his

intellect. A Man can only give advice to another man but the onus for following the advice remains the

prerogative of that man who had been advised. The book Quran clearly states many times that one should use

reason and verify any message before believing it (17:36) (25:73).

Man fails to realize that the main crucial book of guidance is available inside him (21:10) (18:54) which he fails to

recognize (2:146) (6:20). Without having a glance on his / her inherent book [Al-Kitab] he immediately runs and

tries to looks for outside help / guidance.

I can’t understand why people need guidance from “holy messengers” when they don’t even bother to ponder

on the available inherent messengers constantly sending out messages to them (9:128) (10:16) (23:32) (37:72)

(43:6) (49:7) (3:101) (3:164) (4:59) (2:139) (2:151) (3:81).this applys to all scriptures.

THE REAL MESSENGERS:

The sense of pain, the fears, the anxieties, the worries, inner voices, the urges, hopes, assurances, the gut

feelings, inspirations, confidence, courage, happiness, sadness and the curiosities are the only true messengers

and warners of God, plus they even speak in our own language. We don't have to learn their languages it is easy

to understand but we seldom give heed to them. This is what Rumi meant when he said pains or signs/ayaats

you feel or experience are God’s messengers listen to them and overcome / conquer your shortcomings.

But we are busy revering human messengers, searching to locate their exact birth places, their culture. We even

try to decode their dead languages by making tremendous efforts to learn and pronounce it properly, learning

grammar in order to know the true message. In the process we are missing the signs [Ayaat] within and all

around us which the inherent messengers provoke us time and again to take heed of.

imesiN imsNiw me 怀 m imesiN emNe memsiN me 怀 imi imeiNe e e NmimeNiw iism̈́wN ii ̈́mewNiw me 怀 NiweNiw iem N ieis ewNmwimwN e 怀 m̈́iewN


Our Rabb, and raise in them a Rasul from them (who) follow/recites upon them Your ayaat/signs and He

teaches/instructs them the script, and the wisdom , and grow them, that You are the glorious/mighty the wise/

judicious.

I would like to thank again ahle aqal for hes great work.

Isaiah 6:9-10

“And he said, Go, and tell this people, Hear ye indeed, but understand not; and see ye indeed, but perceive not.

Make the heart of this people fat, and make their eats heavy, and shut their eyes; lest they see with their eyes,

and hear with their ears, and understand with their heart, and convert, and be healed.”

Besides being a prophecy fulfilled in the New Testament, God is telling us through this scripture that when most

hear or see the scriptural stories and sayings, they do not understand. Our hearts have to be opened to the

spiritual truth which is beyond any literal interpretation or meaning.

1 Corinthians 2:7:

“But we speak the wisdom of God in a mystery, even the hidden wisdom, which God ordained before the world

unto our glory.”

Notice how Paul states that the wisdom of God is a hidden mystery. The Greek word for hidden means higher

spiritual wisdom, which is again is spiritual, not literal.

Ezekiel 17:2:

“Son of man, put forth a riddle, and speak a parable unto the house of Israel.”

Again, we can see that God loves riddles!

I BELIEVE THAT NO PROPHET’S/MESSENGERS EVER EXISTED AND IF A MAN OR MEN DID THEN THESE

WERE MEN OF HIGH CONSCIOUSNESS AND THEN THE TITLE’S WERE PUT ONTO THESE PEOPLE TO

CREATE RELIGION’S IN ORDER TO CONTROL HUMANITY.

MESSENGERS CAN ALSO COME FROM WITHIN WE HAVE ALL WE NEED BUILT INTO OUR DNA THAT I DO

BELIEVE.

THERE IS WISDOM AND INFORMATION IN THESE SCRIPTURES BUT IT IS MIXED WITH FALSE

INFORMATION TO.

YOU HAVE TO LOOK AT THE ESOTERIC KNOWLEDGE OF EVERYTHING

ITS YOUR JOB TO SORT THROUGH THE LIES.

What does all this mean?

Wordsworth once stated:

“Hebrew history, as written by the Holy Spirit in the Old Testament, is a divine parable.”

Even though Wordsworth boldly declared the Old Testament to be parables, he still called them “divine.” A lot of

the time Christians get caught up in the idea that if the scriptures aren’t literal history, then they’d be worthless

stories and all their faith would be for nothing. This couldn’t be further from the truth. As divine parables they

illustrate the spiritual laws of the inner world through outer reflections. This was their purpose all along. And they

were certainly inspired of the Spirit.

The Bible has always been one of the greatest road-maps for the soul ever compiled. It doesn’t have to be literal

history to fulfill this role.

AND THANK U FOR READING MY AIM IS NOT TO ATTACK ANY BELIEF MY AIM IS TO EXPOSE

THE LIES AND GIVE YOU THE TRUTH YOU WILL FIND ALL INFORMATION ON

THE INTERNET.SO PLEASE VERIFY FOR YOURSELF BEFORE YOU ACCEPT ANY

INFORMATION IN THIS BOOK.YOUR BROTHER IN HUMANITY “MATTHEW.H”


Think and reflect


More magazines by this user
Similar magazines