Keeping Tabs - Winter 2021

KEEPING TABS
The Advocates’ Society
Winter 2021

Renew
Your TAS
CONTENTS
Membership
04
06
11
14
17
Chair Chat
Chris Horkins, Cassels
Virtual Mentoring
Diana Vasilescu, DV Law
Civil Litigation
Julie Mouris, Conway Baxter Wilson LLP
TAS Report – Vancouver
Zachary Rogers, Clark Wilson LLP
Interview
Kanon Clifford, Bergeron Clifford LLP
Renew your TAS membership today and continue
to be part of our national advocacy community.
RENEW NOW
Editor: Frédéric Plamondon, Osler, Hoskin & Harcourt S.E.N.C.R.L./s.r.l.
FPlamondon@osler.com
Keeping Tabs Editorial Team: Kanon Clifford, Bergeron Clifford LLP, Carlo Di Carlo, Stockwoods LLP, James Foy, Addario
Law Group, Web Haile, Singleton Urquhart Reynolds Vogel LLP, Matthew Huys, Osler, Hoskin & Harcourt LLP, Alexandra
Shelley, Torys LLP, Rebecca Shoom, Lerners LLP
The Young Advocates’ Standing Committee (“YASC”) is a standing committee of The Advocates’ Society with a mandate to be a
voice for young advocates (advocates who are ten years of call or fewer) within the Society and within the profession. We do this
through networking/mentoring events, by publishing articles by and for young advocates, and by raising issues of concern to
young advocates as we work with the Society’s Board of Directors. The opinions expressed by individual authors are their own
and do not necessarily reflect the policies of The Advocates’ Society.
3

CHAIR CHAT
Chair Chat
Chris Horkins, Cassels
Most of us will be happy that the year
2020 is now in our rear-view mirrors,
and for good reason. COVID-19 has
put new strains on our work and
home lives and has fundamentally
changed what it means to be an
advocate. Our profession has made
great strides as well. I wish it hadn’t
taken a global pandemic to know
the joys of unfettered email service
or conducting a discovery from
my living room in pajama bottoms
(with matching shirt, blazer, and tie
of course), but I’m grateful for the
experience all the same.
It was a stressful year, but thankfully
YASC was there to help us get through
it and this issue of Keeping Tabs
reflects that. I confess I did not know
what “equanimity” meant before
reading Zachary Rogers’ summary
of the Introduction to Mindfulness
for Lawyers event organized by our
Vancouver YASC team (or, as I called
it, our “most Vancouver event ever”),
but after reading his piece, I think I’m
going to need to work on my Shamatha
and Vipassana to stay grounded in the
new year. Diana Vasilescu’s article also
provides helpful tips and tricks from
our recent virtual mentoring event
to help you face the “Fear Factor” of
litigating during the pandemic.
There’s no time like the holidays for
giving back and, in that spirit, Keeping
Tabs checked in with some recipients
of the 2017 TAS Gives Back Campaign
to share with you the positive impact
TAS support has had. For those
unfamiliar with TAS Gives Back, it
is a Society-driven philanthropic
program established to support
advocacy-related causes. A Donate
Your Rate campaign is launched
and events like YASC’s popular Trivia
Challenge for Charity help to raise
funds. In 2017, President Brad Berg
chose to support Indigenous Law
Scholarships at four Canadian law
schools. Kanon Clifford’s roundtable
catches up with some recipients of
those scholarships who are now
beginning their journeys in the legal
profession. It’s inspiring stuff.
For those of us privileged enough to
work in this profession and have our
livelihoods relatively unaffected by the
COVID-19 pandemic, let’s take some
time to think of those less fortunate in
our communities as we enter the new
year and resolve to lend a helping
hand. And, after a long and difficult
year, let’s stay hopeful that better
days are just around the corner. From
our YASC family to yours, I hope you
have a wonderful new year!
4

1. Do not shy away from being assertive
It is normal to feel intimidated by more experienced
counsel or the Court in the early years of your legal
career. While it might be uncomfortable to be assertive
when you feel intimidated, it is important that
you practise this skill. Being assertive does not equal
being rude or disrespectful. Gauge your audience in
determining the level of assertiveness you can adopt
in each instance, but do not shy away from it. Assertiveness
has helped counsel successfully make difficult
arguments before the Court, even when the odds
were against them.
VIRTUAL MENTORING
Facing the Fear Factor
Diana Vasilescu, DV Law
On November 4, 2020, The Advocates’ Society hosted a virtual speed mentoring
event for young advocates on how to best face the “fear factor” in the
legal profession. The event had 28 registrants in addition to 8 mentors, with
attendees coming from Ontario and Quebec. The event’s structure had mentors
shuffling between groups of mentees in Zoom breakout rooms.
The mentors included Rahool Agarwal, Lax O’Sullivan Lisus Gottlieb LLP,
Jeilah Chan, Bennett Jones LLP, Steven G. Frankel, Davies Ward Phillips & Vineberg
LLP, Andrea Gonsalves, Stockwoods LLP, Megan Keenberg, Van Kralingen
& Keenberg LLP, Ewa Krajewska, Borden Ladner Gervais LLP, Malik Martin, Rueters
LLP and David Milosevic, Milosevic Fiske LLP.
This event offered attendees a unique,
collegial and casual setting, ideal for having
honest conversations about practising
law. We discussed practical tips on how
to manage challenges arising from interactions
with the Court, clients and other
lawyers, including senior counsel.
Here are 3 takeaways that I consider
valuable advice from the discussions I
was part of:
2. Think like a doctor
In order to manage the high-stress nature of litigation,
it can help to remind yourself that you are not the
cause of your client’s legal issues, but are the professional
who helps them diagnose and, hopefully, resolve
their legal issues. Just as a patient cannot blame their
doctor for their health problems, you have not caused
the legal issues your client is facing. Just remember to
do your due diligence, your research, meet your deadlines
and communicate with your client.
3. Practice your oral submissions and factum
writing with somebody unfamiliar with the case
For your next court case, ask a colleague unfamiliar
with the case to read your factum or to allow you
to practice your prepared submissions with them.
If someone who is unfamiliar with the details of your
file can understand your factum or submissions, you
will likely succeed in getting your points and argument
across in Court. This kind of feedback can be
valuable in improving your advocacy skills.
Mentorship is crucial in advancing growth and collegiality
in our profession. I would enjoy attending more
events like “Facing the Fear Factor”, and recommend
this program to mentees and mentors alike. I left with
valuable practical knowledge and tips which I can directly
apply in my everyday practice. I hope to return
as a mentor in the future.
6 7

Puzzled
about how to get more involved with TAS?
YASC could be your answer.
Interested in getting more involved with TAS?
Applications are now being accepted for our Young
Advocates’ Standing Committee (YASC).
The Young Advocates’ Standing Committee seeks
engaged, hard-working volunteers to promote the
interests of young advocates (within their first ten
years of practice) through planning and implementing
mentoring/networking programs, administering YASC’s
publication by and for young advocates (Keeping Tabs)
and participating in the work of The Advocates’ Society.
The Society welcomes applications to YASC from
Society members who are ten years of call or fewer.
Successful applicants will serve a two-year term starting
May 2021. Parental leave will be accommodated.
Deadline to apply: February 26, 2021.
Apply for YASC 2021/22 term
Questions? Please contact Erin Pleet at epleet@tgf.ca

Virtual Mentoring:
Built To Last
Wednesday, February 10, 2021
5:30 pm - 7:00 pm
Live Online (ET)
Our popular speed mentoring for
young advocates is back this February
with another virtual edition!
Your career depends on building strong,
lasting relationships with colleagues,
senior partners and clients. But how
do you manage relationship demands
in a 24/7 environment from home? Get
invaluable tips on the steps that are
crucial to building your practice and
your profile. Learn how to manage
your client network, avoid conflicts,
raise your profile and handle challenging
relationships diplomatically while maintaining
your “self” as you build your
practice during a pandemic.
To learn more or register visit
www.advocates.ca
CIVIL LITIGATION
A Junior Litigator’s Essential
Checklist for Liability
Insurance Coverage Disputes
Julie Mouris, Conway Baxter Wilson LLP
If you practise civil litigation, chances are you have come across a dispute
over liability insurance coverage at some point. Insurance coverage disputes
arise in many types of cases, such as oppression remedy claims or
personal injury claims alleging vicarious liability of an institution.
These disputes often center on whether an insurer has a “duty to defend”
and/or a “duty to indemnify” the insured under the policy. The duty
to defend analysis is governed by the “pleadings rule”: if the allegations in
the pleading – which are taken to be true – fall within the scope of coverage,
then the duty is triggered. If the insurer recognizes that this duty is
triggered, the insurer will pay all or part of the insured’s defence costs or
may appoint its own in-house counsel to defend the insured.
As for the insurer’s duty to indemnify the insured for the final judgment
11

and/or settlement of the underlying action, liability
policies usually provide that this duty will
only be determined after the resolution of the
underlying claim. Even if an insurer has recognized
its duty to defend and has paid defence
costs throughout the action, it may dispute that
indemnification is warranted.
Given the expensive nature of litigation, the
question of whether a litigant has insurance
coverage can be a very important one. This article
outlines an essential checklist of questions
for junior litigators to consider when faced with
liability insurance coverage issues in the context
of an existing action.
1. Does a copy of the entire insurance policy
exist?
Coverage claims can arise years after a triggering
event because of the discoverability or other
exemptions from the strict application of statutory
limitation periods. If the claim occurred a
long time ago and involves a historic liability insurance
policy, the insured may no longer have
a copy of the policy. Insurers are not technically
required to keep a copy of policies issued to
their insureds. In cases where neither the insured
nor the insurer has a copy of the policy,
the existence of the policy and its terms can be
proved by the insured based on secondary evidence,
on a balance of probabilities.
2. Is the policy an occurrence-based policy or
a claims-based policy?
An occurrence-based policy means that coverage
is provided when the “occurrence”, or claim
event, occurs during the policy period. A claimsmade
policy means that coverage is for a claim
made during the policy period, regardless of
when the claim event occurred.
3. What are the policy limits and the policy
period?
Consider what the maximum amount is that
the insurer will pay out to the insured if the underlying
action is covered under the policy, and
whether a dispute would be worthwhile.
Consider whether the claim falls within the
policy period indicated on the policy. Determine
whether the policy was renewed for a further
term by an endorsement attached to the policy.
Also, even if the claim only partly falls within the
policy period, the duty to defend may still be
triggered. Consider whether there are other insurers
on coverage for any portion of the claim
not covered by this policy.
4. Who is covered under the policy?
First, identify the named insured under the
policy – for example, it may be the corporation.
Second, check whether others are also
covered, such as the corporation’s officers and
directors, or even shareholders, and if so, in
what circumstances.
5. What is covered and what is excluded under
the policy?
The scope of what a given policy covers is critical.
Consider whether the scope of the relevant
clause has been interpreted in the case law.
However, even if you determine that there is
likely coverage for the claim under that clause,
you must then review the exclusions to determine
whether coverage for all or part of the
claim is in fact excluded. Consider whether a
given exclusion has been interpreted in the
case law.
6. Providing notice of claim to the insurer
and keeping the insurer informed
If you determine that there is likely coverage
under the policy, ensure that your client, the insured,
provides notice of the claim to the insurer
as soon as possible. The policy will likely have
a clause requiring prompt notice so that the insurer
can fully investigate the matter. In addition,
the policy will likely require the insured to
keep the insurer informed of all developments
in the litigation, and to obtain the insurer’s approval
for any settlement of the action.
7. Limitations periods for coverage disputes
and manner of commencing dispute
Liability policies will often provide a limitation
period for commencing a dispute against the
insurer regarding coverage and may specify
that a dispute can only occur after the underlying
action has been resolved. An insured
can commence a separate court application
against the insurer seeking a declaration of
coverage. Review the policy for an arbitration
clause requiring that any dispute be submitted
to binding arbitration.
8. Consider the relevance of the broker’s
actions
Brokers have a duty of care to provide information
and advice to their insureds. If the insured
had a broker that was advising them regarding
the liability policy, consider whether the broker’s
actions were negligent, causing damage to
the insured. If so, consider whether to proceed
by way of action against the broker and the insurer.
9. Relief from forfeiture
If an insured’s compliance with the policy was
imperfect – for example, failing to pay a premium,
or providing late notice of a claim – it may
be able to invoke the principle of relief from forfeiture,
codified in Canadian common law jurisdictions
(for instance, under section 98 of Courts
of Justice Act and/or section 129 of Insurance Act
in Ontario). If the insurer is denying coverage
due to the insured’s actions under the policy,
consider whether your client can invoke this
principle as a defence.
10. Further reading
Gordon Hilliker, Q.C.’s textbook, Liability Insurance
in Canada, 7 th ed, Toronto: LexisNexis,
2020, is an excellent resource for liability insurance
coverage questions for Canadian common
law jurisdictions. As Mr. Hilliker notes, liability
insurance contracts in Quebec are governed by
the Civil Code.
12 13

TAS REPORT – VANCOUVER
Introduction to
Mindfulness Event
Zachary Rogers, Clark Wilson LLP
As we close off a chaotic 2020, and look to a fresh start in 2021, most of us
could benefit from some equanimity.
On December 4, 2020, the Young Advocates’ Standing Committee,
through a dedicated group of young advocates from British Columbia,
hosted advocates from across Canada in a virtual mindfulness event for
lawyers. Two sessions were led by Jason Leslie, an experienced meditation
practitioner and instructor. As a lawyer, former litigator with the
Department of Justice, and current PhD candidate at the Peter A. Allard
School of Law at UBC, Jason reflected on the mental demands of legal
practice and extolled the virtues of mindfulness and meditation as tools
to address those demands.
Jason explained how mindfulness is often
pitched in the corporate context as a stress-reduction
tool. While mindfulness can reduce
stress, other benefits may include a relaxed
mind, inner peace, and a greater sense of self.
With practice, mindfulness may help you come
to an intuitive understanding of how your
mind works, and may also help you cultivate
equanimity (a state of psychological stability
and composure which is undisturbed by experience
of or exposure to emotions, pain, or other
phenomena). As litigators, much of our work
may be “reactionary” and equanimity may help
to address that.
After introducing the participants to mindfulness,
Jason led two sessions:
1. Shamatha (calm-abiding) - in this session, the
participants sat comfortably and focused on
their breath. Each time the participants caught
themselves thinking of something else they
drew their focus back to their breath. This “repetition”
steadies, composes, unifies, and concentrates
the mind.
2. Vipassana (insight practice) - in this session,
instead of focusing on their breath, the
participants observed and identified the emotions,
thoughts, and judgments they were experiencing.
After they acknowledged those
emotions, they were to consciously “let go” of
them. With practice, this technique allows the
practitioner to keep their mind from repeating
patterns of thoughts that take up space
and hold them back.
I personally found both sessions challenging
since it is not an easy thing to “turn off” as a
lawyer. I can however see great benefits of
mindfulness with continued practice.
I definitively recommend people to give
mindfulness a try. No equipment is needed.
You simply need a few minutes to spare, the
willingness to “look inward”, and the desire to
live with intention.
For those interested in learning more about
mindfulness, Jason recommends “The Wise
Heart” by Jack Kornfield, and “Mindfulness: A
Practical Guide to Awakening” by Joseph Goldstein.
Finally, to join an existing meditation group,
check out the BC Insight Meditation Society at
https://www.bcims.org/sitting-groups .
14 15

INTERVIEW
TAS Gives Back Check-in:
Recipients of TAS Indigenous
Law Scholarships
Compiled by: Kanon Clifford,Bergeron Clifford
Now Live! Friends Who Argue - A new TAS podcast jointly
hosted by our Young Advocate and 10+ Standing Committees.
Segments will feature dialogue with the people who get what you
do, as we delve into both the serious and lighthearted aspects of
life as an advocate in Canada. Know a TAS member we should
talk to? Contact Webnesh Haile at WHaile@singleton.com
Thank you to our Technical Sponsor Dentons Canada LLP
for their support in producing this podcast!
In 2017, President Bradley Berg’s TAS Gives Back Campaign raised over $100,000 for Indigenous Law
School scholarships to support Indigenous law school students or students studying Indigenous law.
The funds were directed equally to four Canadian law schools - University of British Columbia, University
of Saskatchewan, Lakehead University and Dalhousie University. These schools were selected
because of their commitment to Indigenous law students and to offering Indigenous law studies
as part of their curriculum. Learn more about the 2017 TAS Gives Back Campaign here.
In this issue of Keeping Tabs, we are checking in with some recent recipients of the TAS Gives
Back Indigenous Law Scholarship. We asked them about their studies and practice, how they are
doing and where they plan to go.
17

Amy Sweet, Lakehead University (2020)
Cian-James Dionne Hoey
University of Saskatchewan (2021)
1) How have you found your legal training
journey to date?
I have found it, like many of my peers I am sure,
to be a challenging yet rewarding experience. The
COVID-19 pandemic has required us to finish law
school online, which has been particularly interesting.
Learning to think like a lawyer is an inherently
social activity, so doing it solely from home
has posed some unique challenges. That said, it
has taught me to be especially creative in securing
the resources I need for success.
2) What do you love about the work you are
doing now (in particular, any work in Indigenous
law)?
I am in 3L and so have not done much work outside
of my studies, but I am currently enjoying
learning about the interface between Indigenous
customary law, Aboriginal law and current
issues in family law in Saskatchewan (a particular
area of interest to me).
3) Do you have any tips for students for developing
their network?
Talk to every lawyer you can and get in the habit of
asking many questions, however simple or small.
Attend networking events and just chat – even if it
is not about the law.
4) How has the TAS Scholarship helped you
and your goals for the future?
On a very practical level, it has helped me survive
financially in 2020. My summer job fell
through due to the implications of COVID-19
and I was able to use the resulting time to move
back to my hometown (Prince Albert, SK) where
I intend to article and practise upon graduation.
5) If you could meet any lawyer or judge
(living or dead) for lunch, who would that
be and why?
I would love to have lunch with Madam Justice
L’Heureux-Dubé, in particular to hear about
her experiences advocating for minority rights
throughout her career and on the Supreme
Court in the 1980s/90s.
Amy Sweet (she/her)
Lakehead University (2020)
Currently practising at Sweet Law.
1) How have you found your legal training
to date?
My legal training so far has been really great.
I had the opportunity to complete my Practice
Placement (Lakehead’s form of articles) with a
solo practitioner here in Guelph. It gave me the
confidence to go out on my own right away. I am
still learning every day.
2) What do you love about the work you are
doing now (in particular, any work in Indigenous
law)?
The ability to help people. I am currently
building a practice in criminal law and wills &
estates and find my work in criminal law incredibly
rewarding. I have not had the opportunity
to do any work in Indigenous law yet
as a field, but without question criminal law
disproportionately affects Indigenous people.
The overlap between human rights, Indigenous
issues, and our legal system is something
I always have in the back of my head to
bring attention to.
3) Do you have any tips for students / new
lawyers for improving their legal writing?
Read out loud to someone who has no idea
what your case or issue is about. I feel like we
always try and sound too sophisticated when
we are speaking in court or drafting legal documents.
So much of what we do is about real
life things that happen outside of a courtroom.
If we cannot explain it to a neighbour, then we
are missing the point. The law needs to make
sense to everyone, so why should our arguments
be any different?
4) How has the TAS Scholarship helped you
and your goals for the future?
The TAS scholarship has helped me immensely
as it alleviated some of the financial stress that
is so prominent in law school. I would not be
in the same position I am in starting my own
practice if I did not receive the privileges I was
afforded, like the TAS scholarship. I am incredibly
grateful.
5) If you could meet any lawyer or judge
(living or dead) for lunch, who would that
be and why?
Hands down – I would love to have lunch with
Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg. Justice Ginsburg is
pretty self-explanatory because of how much of
a pioneer she was in her field and how impactful
her presence was on the bench. She is truly
one of my heroes.
Tyra Soosay
Peter A. Allard School of Law,
University of British Columbia (2021)
1) How have you found your legal training
journey to date?
Legal training will change and impact your
mindset. You will develop bonds with other
law students and lawyers. Of course legal
training is hard work, but it has so many
rewarding experiences. I am so thankful
UBC is such a progressive university especially
in relation to Indigenous law and legal
studies. I have enjoyed research about
decolonizing the legal system, investigating
what resurgence means in respect to Indigenous
legal orders, and how to apply indigenization
into one’s advocacy toolbelt.
Cian-James Dionne Hoey, University of Saskatchewan (2021)
Tyra Soosay, University of British Columbia (2021)
18 19

2) What do you love about the work you are doing now (in particular,
any work in Indigenous law)?
I am currently a temporary articled student participating in UBC’s
Indigenous Community Legal Clinic (ICLC) this term. As a kinaesthetic
learner, I thrive in situations where I can learn by doing. I am
learning how to be a legal advocate in family, criminal, administrative,
civil, and Aboriginal law under the fantastic guidance of ICLC’s
Supervising Lawyers. I will always remember this mentorship. Law
is first and foremost a helping profession. When I am able to work
with the Indigenous community and clients, it really solidifies the
importance of having Indigenous women such as myself, and Indigenous
people being involved in both Indigenous legal systems
and colonial legal systems. We make a difference in our workplaces
anywhere we go, and even more so for other Indigenous members
of the community we serve.
3) Do you have any tips for students/new lawyers for developing
their oral advocacy?
Oral advocacy is developed through experience, so be kind to
yourself while you are learning and developing.
4) How has the TAS Scholarship helped you and your goals
for the future?
A big part of my personal and volunteer life is centred on mentorship.
Without mentorship and a hand up in my professional
life when I was learning and growing, I could have had a very
different experience. The TAS Scholarship is one of the many
different types of mentorship I received while in law school. The
behind the scenes work of navigating the legal and education
system could have been harder if done without help. My goal is
to become a legal veteran one day giving back to young Indigenous
law students and advocates because mentorship is an
important aspect to thriving in law and life.
5) If you could meet any lawyer or judge (living or dead) for
lunch, who would that be and why?
I would love to have lunch with Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg and
Senator Murray Sinclair. Also, I would love to sit down and learn
with Indigenous lawyers and judges who are learned in our Indigenous
legal systems. The Elders, ceremony makers, and story keepers
are sacred because they hold our ancestral knowledge about
Indigenous law and legal systems. These people are key to our survival
as Indigenous peoples.
Tom Curry and Martha McCarthy Present:
On Oral Advocacy 2:
Required Reading,
Viewing & Listening
Thursday, February 11, 2021
12:00 pm - 2:00 pm
Live Online
TAS Members: $25.00 + Tax
Non-members: $50.00 + Tax
Join Tom and Martha as they celebrate their
love of the profession and their shared
passion for oral advocacy. They will share their
latest list of favourite instructive, inspiring
and entertaining resources for advocates,
including: texts, literature, films, online
videos and podcasts. You will come away
with recommendations on resources to help
you prepare for your next hearing, entertain
you on a Friday evening, or both. From classic
dissertations to current podcasts, there is
something for every advocate.
To learn more or register visit
www.advocates.ca
20

TAS Jolly Jamboree!
Sunday, November 29, 2020 | Live Online
Bench
Perspectives
for Women
Advocates
Thursday, February 18, 2021
12:00 pm - 1:30 pm
Live Online (ET)
Join women advocates for a roundtable
discussion with members of
the bench from across Canada. Judicial
panelists will share insights
and advice with mid-career women
litigators on key issues from courtroom
“dos and don’ts” to the impact
of COVID-19 on women advocates in
the virtual courtroom.
To learn more or register visit
www.advocates.ca
23

3rd Annual British Columbia Big Mingle - Virtual Edition
Friday, November 6, 2020 | Live Online
Virtual Advocacy
Fridays
Join us on Fridays once a month for a
quick fix of timely and practical CPD
content focused on virtual advocacy.
The Art of Virtual Persuasion
Friday, January 22, 2021
Total CPD: 1.5 Professionalism
Technology Gone Wrong: Cautionary
Tales from the Remote Courtroom
Friday, February 26, 2021
Total CPD: 1.5 Professionalism
Virtual Roadmap: Help Judges Help You
Friday, April 23, 2021
Total CPD: 1.5 Professionalism
Virtual Client Management
Friday, May 7, 2021
Total CPD: 1.5 Professionalism
24
To learn more or register visit
www.advocates.ca

Young Advocates’ National Social: Mixer & Mixology
Thursday, November 12, 2020
Legal Drafting
for Litigators
Friday, February 19, 2021
1:00 pm - 4:00 pm
Live Online (ET)
The role of written advocacy in a digital
world is more important than ever.
Take your writing skills to a new level
with this popular program on legal
drafting. Hear from top litigators and
judges on how you can improve your
written argument and draft better
pleadings, affidavits and facta.
The plenary program will be held on
February 19 and the writing workshop
will be held on February 23. There are
two registration options: (1) plenary +
workshop or (2) plenary only.
To learn more or register visit
www.advocates.ca
27

www.advocates.ca