27.07.2021 Views

The Delft Sand, Clay & Rock Cutting Model, 2019a

The Delft Sand, Clay & Rock Cutting Model, 2019a

The Delft Sand, Clay & Rock Cutting Model, 2019a

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

6.13.6. Scale Effects.<br />

<strong>The</strong> <strong>Delft</strong> <strong>Sand</strong>, <strong>Clay</strong> & <strong>Rock</strong> <strong>Cutting</strong> <strong>Model</strong>.<br />

<strong>The</strong> soil mechanical research showed that the density of the sand increases slightly with the depth. Since both the<br />

permeability and the volume strain, and less significant the other soil mechanical parameters, are influenced by<br />

the density, it is important to know the size of this influence on the cutting forces (assuming that the twodimensional<br />

cutting theory is a valid description of the process). If the two-dimensional cutting theory is a valid<br />

description of the process, the dimensionless cutting forces will have to give the same results for similar geometric<br />

ratios, independent of the dimensions and the layer-thickness, according to the equations for the non-cavitating<br />

cutting process and the cavitating cutting process. <strong>The</strong> following blade configurations are used to research the<br />

scaling influence:<br />

1. A blade with a width of 150 mm wide and a height of 100 mm.<br />

2. A blade with a width of 150 mm wide and a height of 150 mm.<br />

3. A blade with a width of 150 mm wide and a height of 200 mm.<br />

4. A blade with a width of 150 mm wide and a height of 300 mm.<br />

<strong>The</strong> results of this research can be found in Table 6-4, where every value represents the average value of a number<br />

of tests.<br />

Table 6-4: Influence of the scale factor.<br />

Configuration 1 2 3 4<br />

hb/hi h = 0.10 0.15 0.20 0.30<br />

30° 1 0.93 1.00 0.94 1.18<br />

30° 2 1.23 1.00 1.06 1.13<br />

30° 3 ---- 1.00 0.89 0.90<br />

45° 1 0.95 1.00 1.13 ----<br />

45° 2 0.89 1.00 1.05 1.30<br />

45° 3 ---- 1.00 1.02 1.13<br />

60° 1 0.91 1.00 ---- ----<br />

60° 2 0.90 1.00 1.19 1.04<br />

60° 3 1.02 1.00 1.13 1.21<br />

<strong>The</strong> total cutting force ct with blade heights of 0.10 m (1), 0.15 m (2), 0.20 m (3) and 0.30 m (4) in proportion to<br />

the cutting force at a blade height 0.15 m (2). <strong>The</strong> blade configurations are according chapter 6.13.4. Because the<br />

influences of the gravity and inertia forces can disturb the character of the dimensionless forces compared to 0 to<br />

0, the measured forces are first corrected for these influences. <strong>The</strong> forces in the table are in proportion to the forces<br />

that occurred with blade configuration 2. <strong>The</strong> following conclusions can be drawn from the table:<br />

1. <strong>The</strong>re is a slight tendency to larger dimensionless forces with increasing dimensions of the blades and the<br />

layer-thickness, which could be expected with the slightly increasing density.<br />

2. For a blade angle of 30 and a blade-height / layer-thickness ratio of 2, large dimensionless forces are measured<br />

for blade configuration 1. <strong>The</strong>se are the tests with the thinnest layer-thickness of 25 mm. A probable cause<br />

can be that the rounding of the blade tip in proportion with the layer-thickness is relatively large, leading to a<br />

relatively large influence of this rounding on the cutting forces. This also explains the development of the<br />

dimensionless forces at a blade angle of 30 and a blade-height / layer-thickness ratio of 3.<br />

Page 172 of 454 TOC Copyright © Dr.ir. S.A. Miedema

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!