Animals Are Us: Anthropomorphism in Children’s Literature; Celebrating the Peter J. Solomon Collection
Why do we tell stories to children through and about animals? Are there reasons why we shouldn’t? Animals Are Us invites explores these questions and more through influential historic examples of anthropomorphism in dialogue with contemporary books drawn from the collection of Peter J. Solomon (Harvard College Class of 1960, MBA 1963) and the holdings of Houghton Library. The exhibition invites you to engage critically with animal anthropomorphism, and delight in the artfulness of this enduring literary genre. Catalog of an exhibition on view at Houghton Library, Harvard University, September 1, 2021 - January 7, 2022.
Why do we tell stories to children through and about animals? Are there reasons why we shouldn’t? Animals Are Us invites explores these questions and more through influential historic examples of anthropomorphism in dialogue with contemporary books drawn from the collection of Peter J. Solomon (Harvard College Class of 1960, MBA 1963) and the holdings of Houghton Library. The exhibition invites you to engage critically with animal anthropomorphism, and delight in the artfulness of this enduring literary genre.
Catalog of an exhibition on view at Houghton Library, Harvard University, September 1, 2021 - January 7, 2022.
Transform your PDFs into Flipbooks and boost your revenue!
Leverage SEO-optimized Flipbooks, powerful backlinks, and multimedia content to professionally showcase your products and significantly increase your reach.
<strong>in</strong> 1760, “We don’t form a true judgment of <strong>the</strong> capacity of<br />
children; noth<strong>in</strong>g is out of <strong>the</strong>ir reach . . .” 11 By <strong>the</strong> middle of <strong>the</strong><br />
eighteenth century, children’s books enjoyed wide distribution<br />
on both sides of <strong>the</strong> Atlantic, and publishers and booksellers<br />
were aggressively target<strong>in</strong>g this market—a phenomenon<br />
that exists to this day. All <strong>the</strong> books <strong>in</strong> this exhibition assert<br />
<strong>the</strong> importance of children’s literature, and a selective survey<br />
confirms this assertion.<br />
After a hundred and twenty years, why does The Tale<br />
of <strong>Peter</strong> Rabbit still resonate so deeply with young audiences?<br />
Disobedience and its consequences still mesmerize <strong>the</strong> child.<br />
With this <strong>the</strong>me, Potter’s work anticipates ano<strong>the</strong>r subversively<br />
iconic book of <strong>the</strong> twentieth century, Sendak’s Where <strong>the</strong> Wild<br />
Th<strong>in</strong>gs <strong>Are</strong>, whose characters feature <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> poster Read<strong>in</strong>g is<br />
Fun-damental (ca. 1979; cat. no. 60). Significantly, Potter was<br />
one of Sendak’s literary heroes. Potter had to self-publish <strong>Peter</strong>,<br />
and when it emerged as an immediate phenomenal success, a<br />
publisher came runn<strong>in</strong>g, and Potter’s career was launched.<br />
Like Kenneth Grahame’s The W<strong>in</strong>d <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Willows<br />
(1908; cat. no. 43), A. A. Milne’s W<strong>in</strong>nie-<strong>the</strong>-Pooh (1926;<br />
cat. no. 51) evolved out of bedtime stories for his young son<br />
Christopher. This book, with its cast of talk<strong>in</strong>g stuffed animals<br />
and delightfully <strong>in</strong>nocent episodes, has prospered even <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />
most cynical of times. Its success and endur<strong>in</strong>g fame benefited<br />
fur<strong>the</strong>r from its Disneyfication, and it became a pop culture<br />
phenomenon.<br />
From an unruly rabbit and copacetic stuffed animals, we<br />
turn to a pacifist bull who prefers to smell <strong>the</strong> flowers ra<strong>the</strong>r<br />
than fight <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> r<strong>in</strong>g. Published <strong>in</strong> 1936, The Story of Ferd<strong>in</strong>and<br />
(fig. 2; cat. no. 52) became a lightn<strong>in</strong>g rod for controversy,<br />
garner<strong>in</strong>g outrage from all sides of <strong>the</strong> political spectrum. These<br />
un<strong>in</strong>tended consequences only fueled sales, and <strong>the</strong> Oscarw<strong>in</strong>n<strong>in</strong>g<br />
cartoon of 1938 fur<strong>the</strong>r ensured Ferd<strong>in</strong>and’s legacy.<br />
Deceptively sophisticated, <strong>the</strong> text is succ<strong>in</strong>ct, <strong>the</strong> draw<strong>in</strong>g deft,<br />
and <strong>the</strong> characterization irresistible; after more than eighty<br />
years, The Story of Ferd<strong>in</strong>and cont<strong>in</strong>ues to engage readers young<br />
and old with its gentle message of self-worth.<br />
figure 2. Robert Lawson. “It was [Ferd<strong>in</strong>and <strong>the</strong> Bull’s] favorite<br />
tree and he would sit <strong>in</strong> its shade all day and smell <strong>the</strong> flowers,”<br />
from The Story of Ferd<strong>in</strong>and.<br />
10