06.09.2021 Views

Calculus- Early Transcendentals, 2021a

Calculus- Early Transcendentals, 2021a

Calculus- Early Transcendentals, 2021a

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

152 Derivatives<br />

Solution. We take ln of both sides:<br />

Using log properties we have:<br />

Differentiating implicitly gives:<br />

Solving for y ′ gives:<br />

Replace y = x x gives:<br />

lny = lnx x .<br />

lny = xlnx.<br />

y ′<br />

y =(1)lnx + x1 x .<br />

y ′<br />

= lnx + 1.<br />

y<br />

y ′ = y(1 + lnx).<br />

y ′ = x x (1 + lnx).<br />

Another method to find this derivative is as follows:<br />

d<br />

dx xx = d dx exlnx<br />

( ) d<br />

=<br />

dx xlnx e xlnx<br />

= (x 1 x + lnx)xx<br />

= (1 + lnx)x x ♣<br />

In fact, logarithmic differentiation can be used on more complicated products and quotients (not just<br />

when dealing with functions to the power of functions).<br />

Example 4.47: Logarithmic Differentiation<br />

Differentiate (assuming x > 0):<br />

y = (x + 2)3 (2x + 1) 9<br />

x 8 (3x + 1) 4 .<br />

Solution. Using product and quotient rules for this problem is a complete nightmare! Let’s apply logarithmic<br />

differentiation instead. Take ln of both sides:<br />

( (x + 2) 3 (2x + 1) 9 )<br />

lny = ln<br />

x 8 (3x + 1) 4 .<br />

Applying log properties:<br />

lny = ln ( (x + 2) 3 (2x + 1) 9) − ln ( x 8 (3x + 1) 4) .<br />

lny = ln ( (x + 2) 3) + ln ( (2x + 1) 9) − [ ln ( x 8) + ln ( (3x + 1) 4)] .

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!