26.11.2021 Views

Australian Polity, Volume 9 Number 3 - Digital Version

Australia's hot topics in news, current affairs and culture

Australia's hot topics in news, current affairs and culture

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

as anyone identifying as woman, a women’s prison or

women’s changeroom can therefore be accessed by

anyone identifying as a woman. If you don’t like that, you’ll

be directed to a piece of anti-discrimination legislation

stating that it’s illegal to discriminate against anyone

on the basis of gender identity, or to a bureaucratic

guideline which says the government values inclusivity

and respects everyone’s identity.

Gender and Sport

Of all the areas where gender theory has impacted

women’s rights, sport has been one of the most

visible. The broad appeal of sport means that there is

widespread understanding in the general public about

why male and female athletes are separated in the vast

majority of sports. Yet against all common sense and

scientific understanding of male and female sporting

performance, sporting bodies around Australia and

the world are eagerly re-writing their rules and policies

to allow biologically male trans women to compete in

women’s sport.

sport. To put the scale of this advantage in perspective, in

running, males enjoy a mere 10-13 per cent advantage –

which is enough for the women’s 100 metre world record

to have been bettered by male athletes more than 10,000

times, including by boys in high school.

When Hubbard qualified for the women’s category

in Tokyo with the second-biggest qualifying lift and

subsequently lifted a weight of 125kg which few other

competitors even attempted (the lift was ruled out by

judges due to a faulty technique), what we saw was a

mediocre male athlete, more than a decade past physical

peak, using that 34 per cent male advantage to qualify

for the very highest level of women’s sport. Hubbard

demonstrated this point by immediately retiring following

the Olympics, saying “Age has caught up with me. In

fact if we’re being honest it probably caught up with me

some time ago. My involvement in sport is probably due,

if nothing else, to heroic amounts of anti-inflammatories.”

Is this what we want for women’s sports, for the women’s

Olympics to be a last hurrah for ageing male athletes while

dedicated young females miss out and watch on TV?

Most prominently, in the recent Tokyo Olympic Games

New Zealand 42-year-old trans weightlifter Laurel

Hubbard was gifted an Olympic berth in the women’s

87kg+ category, at the expense of a young Nauruan

weightlifter, Roviel Detenamu, who now may never have

the opportunity to become an Olympian. Had her spot

at the Olympics not been taken by a biological male,

Roviel would have become the first woman from her

country to compete at the Olympics for more than 20

years. Around the last time a Nauruan women qualified

for the Olympics, Gavin Hubbard was a junior male record

holder at national level in New Zealand. This early career

success never translated into success at a higher level,

until Hubbard transitioned and began winning medals

and topping the rankings at Oceania level in women’s

weightlifting.

Hubbard’s story was widely publicised because there is

no scientific question that going through male puberty

provides a huge advantage over female athletes in

weightlifting. Peer-reviewed research puts this advantage

males have over females in weightlifting at 29-34 per

cent, which is at the higher end of male advantage in any

The Tokyo Olympics also put an end to the false and

misleading rhetoric that trans people are “banned” or

“prevented” from playing sport when Canadian soccer

player Quinn, a biological female who identifies as

transgender, won a gold medal with the Canadian

women’s team. Hubbard too would have been eligible to

qualify for the Olympics in the appropriate sex category

– the only obstacle being that the lift which achieved a

ranking of 5th in the world in the women’s category was

more than 100 kilograms off the standard required to

qualify for the male category.

Even the International Olympic Committee was

begrudgingly forced to admit that their current rules

around transgender participation are not fit for purpose.

This has been blatantly obvious to experts in the field for

some time, with IOC rules focused exclusively on trans

women being required to lower current testosterone

levels to 5 nmol/L. This limit, which is still many times

the normal testosterone level for females, is not fit

for purpose as a guideline for participation because

it is not current testosterone levels which confers the

vast majority of male athletic advantage. It’s the way in

which testosterone permanently alters the body during

24 Australian Polity

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!