Common Ground - Islam and Buddhism
Common Ground - Islam and Buddhism
Common Ground - Islam and Buddhism
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
c o m m o n g r o u n d between i s l a m a n d b u d d h i s m<br />
of dharma. However, at the highest level, the Dharma is also identified<br />
with absolute Truth, absolute Reality. Recognition of this kind<br />
of conceptual affinity at the metaphysical level can help bring the<br />
two traditions into harmony, however much the orthodox or conventional<br />
frameworks of the two traditions contradict each other.<br />
To speak of orthodoxy calls for the following remark. The definition<br />
of ‘orthodoxy’ in <strong>Islam</strong> derives not from some official magisterium<br />
but from the Qur’ān <strong>and</strong> the Prophetic Sunna; the question<br />
of who is <strong>and</strong> who is not ‘orthodox’ in terms of these two sources is<br />
resolved by the consensus of the learned (al-‘ulamā’) in any given<br />
period. In our times, Muslim orthodoxy has received its broadest<br />
ever definition, thanks to the collective fatwā of the leading scholars<br />
of <strong>Islam</strong> issued in Amman in July 2005. 3 This fatwā recognized eight<br />
schools of law as being orthodox: the four Sunni schools (Hanafi,<br />
Shafi’i, Maliki, Hanbali), the two principal Shi’i schools (Ja‘fari <strong>and</strong><br />
Zaydi), <strong>and</strong> the Ibadi <strong>and</strong> Zahiri schools.<br />
When we address <strong>Buddhism</strong>, however, we are compelled to acknowledge<br />
that there is no analogous, clearly definable normative<br />
tradition of dogmatically defined orthodoxy. Even referring to <strong>Buddhism</strong><br />
as a ‘religion’ comparable to monotheistic religions is problematic.<br />
<strong>Buddhism</strong> is more a network of spiritual schools of thought<br />
<strong>and</strong> praxis than a unified religion, the numerous branches not only<br />
differing widely on the level of doctrine <strong>and</strong> rituals, but also occasionally<br />
engaging in considerable mutual ostracism. All Buddhist<br />
schools are however united on the fundamental teachings of the<br />
Buddha, as expressed in the Pali canon; for this reason we have<br />
tried to engage with this body of teachings as much as possible, in<br />
addition to addressing some perspectives expressed in later schools,<br />
which more clearly manifest similarities with <strong>Islam</strong>ic doctrines.<br />
Even though we have restricted our reflections to a few principles<br />
within a few of the Buddhist traditions—given our own scholarly<br />
limitations—we are nonetheless addressing the main schools of<br />
thought within <strong>Buddhism</strong>, <strong>and</strong> invite all of them to engage in this<br />
dialogue: the two principal branches of this tradition: the Theravada<br />
(‘Way of the Elders’), <strong>and</strong> the Mahayana (‘Greater Vehicle’), this<br />
latter comprising such schools as the Madhyamaka (‘Middle Path’<br />
founded by Nāgārjūna, ca. 2nd century CE) 4 , Yogacara (founded by<br />
3. See http://www.ammanmessage.com.<br />
4. Scholars are divided over the question of the dates of the birth <strong>and</strong> death of this<br />
immensely influential figure in <strong>Buddhism</strong>, considered by many within the tradition<br />
6