Common Ground - Islam and Buddhism
Common Ground - Islam and Buddhism
Common Ground - Islam and Buddhism
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Oneness: The Highest <strong>Common</strong> Denominator<br />
Subhuti: ‘If, O Lord, outside Suchness no separate<br />
dharma can be apprehended, then what is that dharma that<br />
will st<strong>and</strong> firmly in suchness, or that will know this full enlightenment,<br />
or that will demonstrate this dharma?’<br />
Buddha: ‘Outside Suchness no separate dharma can be<br />
apprehended, that could st<strong>and</strong> firmly in Suchness. The very<br />
Suchness, to begin with, cannot be apprehended, how much<br />
less that which can st<strong>and</strong> firmly in it. Suchness does not<br />
know full enlightenment, <strong>and</strong> on the dharmic plane no one<br />
can be found who has either known full enlightenment, will<br />
know it, or does know it. Suchness does not demonstrate<br />
dharma, <strong>and</strong> on the dharmic plane, no one can be found<br />
who could demonstrate it.’ 42<br />
Nobody, not even the Buddha, can ‘demonstrate’ the Absolute, because<br />
such a demonstration requires concepts <strong>and</strong> language, <strong>and</strong> the<br />
Absolute/Suchness transcends all such concepts. For this reason, the<br />
Buddha stresses the need to be stripped of all ‘thought-coverings’<br />
(acitta-āvaranah): thought, by its very nature, ‘covers’ <strong>and</strong> thus obscures<br />
the source or substance or root of its own consciousness. It<br />
is only when thought assumes the nature of a transparent veil over<br />
its own substratum of consciousness that authentic wisdom is attained.<br />
If thought is ‘seen through’, then the thinker, the agent of<br />
thought, is in a sense extinguished before the source <strong>and</strong> goal of<br />
thought. To say ‘thinker’ is to deny the sole reality of the absolute<br />
nature of consciousness—whence the paradox that the Dharma is<br />
both ‘known’ by the Buddha <strong>and</strong> unknown by him; it is both attained<br />
<strong>and</strong> not attained:<br />
Therefore, O Sariputra, it is because of his nonattainmentness<br />
[sic] that a Bodhisattva, through having relied on the<br />
perfection of wisdom, dwells without thought-coverings …<br />
<strong>and</strong> in the end he attains to Nirvana. 43<br />
Let us again turn to al-Ghazālī, who provides a corresponding formulation,<br />
referring not to ‘thought-coverings’ but to ‘individual faculties’.<br />
The highest spiritual sciences (al-ma‘ārif, pl. of ma‘rifa) are<br />
only revealed to the individual through spiritual states of ‘unveiling’<br />
(mukāshafa), <strong>and</strong> these, in turn, are predicated upon the extinction<br />
42. Prajnāpāramitā Sutra, A/27:453, cited in ibid., p. 37.<br />
43. Heart Sutra, verses 37–43, cited in ibid., p. 93.<br />
53