24.12.2012 Views

Common Ground - Islam and Buddhism

Common Ground - Islam and Buddhism

Common Ground - Islam and Buddhism

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Transform your PDFs into Flipbooks and boost your revenue!

Leverage SEO-optimized Flipbooks, powerful backlinks, and multimedia content to professionally showcase your products and significantly increase your reach.

Oneness: The Highest <strong>Common</strong> Denominator<br />

The most immediate meaning of the word Dharma relates more<br />

to the teaching, the doctrine, <strong>and</strong> the law or norm stemming therefrom;<br />

but it can also refer to the ultimate content of the doctrine,<br />

that in which both the doctrine <strong>and</strong> the law culminate, <strong>and</strong> of which<br />

the Buddha himself is but the conveyor. This higher metaphysical<br />

meaning of Dharma emerges if we look at the Mahayana scriptures,<br />

<strong>and</strong> particularly at the conception of the three ‘bodies’ of the Buddha.<br />

This will help us to see the extent to which Dharma in its higher<br />

meaning of truth/reality, can be grasped as the same ultimate Truth/<br />

Reality to which Muslims refer as al-Haqīqa or al-Haqq. It can also<br />

help us to see that the Buddha in whom one takes ‘refuge’ is by no<br />

means to be identified exhaustively with the sage Shakyamuni, who<br />

was but the messenger, bearer of the message of the Dharma before<br />

which he himself is effaced. This subordination of the Buddha to the<br />

Dharma is explicitly taught in the following Mahayana Sūtra:<br />

Those who by my form did see me, <strong>and</strong> those who followed<br />

me by my voice, wrong are the efforts they engaged in; me<br />

those people will not see. From the Dharma one should see<br />

the Buddha, for the dharma-bodies are the guides. 55<br />

Two points should be stressed here: the deluded state of those who attach<br />

excessive significance to the human form of the Buddha; <strong>and</strong> the<br />

emphasis on seeing the Buddha in the light of the Dharma, rather than<br />

vice versa. The ontological precedence of the Dharma is thus affirmed<br />

here. Then, in relation to the description of the ‘dharma-bodies’ as<br />

‘guides’, these bodies of the Dharma manifest at different levels in<br />

the form of so many types of Buddha: the human level (nirmānakāya,<br />

or ‘transformation-body’); the celestial level (sambhoga-kāya<br />

or ‘felicity-body’); <strong>and</strong> the divine or Absolute level (dharma-kāya,<br />

translated as ‘Being-body’). One can speak relatively easily of the<br />

first two ‘bodies’ of the Buddha in terms of earthly manifestation<br />

<strong>and</strong> celestial archetype. In <strong>Islam</strong>, the distinction would correspond<br />

to the Prophet as the particular man Muhammad b. ‘Abd Allah, on<br />

the one h<strong>and</strong>, <strong>and</strong> the pre-human archetypal reality of the Prophetic<br />

substance, alluded to in these famous words of the Prophet: ‘I was a<br />

Prophet when Adam was [still] between water <strong>and</strong> clay’. 56<br />

55. Vajracchedikā, 26a, b. Cited in Buddhist Texts Through the Ages, op. cit.,<br />

p. 144.<br />

56. The most strongly authenticated version of this saying is as follows: The Prophet<br />

was asked when he became a Prophet. He replied: ‘When Adam was between spirit<br />

59

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!