17.03.2022 Views

Tomboy Catalog

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Exhibit curated by Kate Wells & Mary Murphy

Essay by Virginia Thomas

Illustrations by Jazzmen Lee-Johnson

April 1 —

June 30

2022


ApPEARing

fIRst

in the 1590s, the term “tomboy” was defined as a “wild,

romping girl, who acts like a spirited boy”; or “strumpet,

bold and immodest woman”.* This exhibition interrogates

the history of cultural expectations and gender norms

for girls and women, especially in the interplay between

lifestyle, aesthetic, play and self-identity. It looks at historical

shifts in definitions of femininity and gender via

three themes to understand who controls cultural norms

and how tomboys have used their capabilities and their

personal expression to challenge them.

*Harper, D. (n.d.). Etymology of

tomboy. Online Etymology Dictionary.

Retrieved December 6, 2021,

from https://www.etymonline.com/

word/tomboy

Visitors are encouraged to ask themselves about the relevance

of the tomboy today. How have various societies

and cultures defined femininity? Does the term “tomboy”

hold meaning currently? As society has developed a

more nuanced understanding of femininity, is it a term

that holds continued relevance? If so, for whom? Do

current cultural conversations about the intersections of

gender identity and queerness complicate the use of the

term? In what ways?

We invite you to learn more by visiting the exhibition,

attending programs and events, and checking out suggested

videos and readings about tomboys at https://

www.provlib.org/programs-exhibitions/tomboy.



What

Would

It meaN

to think about the word “tomboy” as a tool? The word

“tomboy” carries a wide variety of meanings, connotations,

and feelings for different people around the

globe and is most commonly understood as an identity

category. At once a feminist icon, a deviant child, and a

foreshadower of sexual difference, there are many ways

to unpack tomboy’s varied meanings. While many usually

consider the word tomboy an identity label, Tomboy

pivots from the question of what a tomboy is and asks:

what does the term “tomboy” do? In other words: what

does “tomboy” make available or unavailable to those

who use it? Throughout this exhibit, we invite you to

consider “tomboy” less as a set of particular characteristics

associated with an identity, and more as a tool that

enables different possibilities in a world structured to

enforce a strict system of gender originating in Europe:

the gender binary.

What is the gender binary and why does it matter? The

“gender binary” is important because it names two

entwined phenomena: 1) the fact that most people in societies

influenced by European culture understand there to

be only two genders: man and woman and 2) the systems

that reinforce the idea that there are only two genders

as common sense. The first names the dominant way

people understand gender to work. Many of us in the U.S.

were raised to understand that there are two genders,

1–Anne-Fausto Sterling “The Five

Sexes Revisited” in Introduction

to Women, Gender, and Sexuality

Studies, 32-37.

man and woman, and that those two genders are natural

on a biological level (i.e. based on genitalia and chromosomes).

In this way of understanding, “man” and “woman”

are the only two genders that appear in nature and that

these categories are complementary to one another. The

idea here is that any single person is born as either a boy

or a girl, that those gender identities are based on what

kind of genitalia they have, and their gender will stay the

same until they grow into a man or woman respectively.

Behind and supporting this idea is that heterosexuality is

natural because “men” and “women” need each other to

reproduce.

Feminist writers of the eighties and nineties challenged this

idea by revealing the second important part of the “gender

binary”—its role in creating and maintaining systems in our

social and cultural worlds. Feminist scientists such as Anne

Fausto Sterling helped make clear that the idea that there

are two genders—man and woman—is not produced in

nature, but in our culture: that one’s genitalia does not correspond

inherently with their identification with a gender. 1

The term “gender binary,” then, is also useful for describing

the way in which our culture reinforces the idea that there

are only two genders. This reinforcement happens on the

level of the law (birth certificates), religion (Adam and Eve),

clothing (skirts vs. pants), movies (When Harry Met Sally),

books (Harry Potter), familial norms (mom and dad), gender-reveal

parties (pink or blue), sports (men’s vs. women’s

basketball), and countless other arenas of human interaction.

By being surrounded by a world that emphasizes that

there are only two genders and that they are “man” and

“woman,” many people grow up thinking that it is natural

for there to be only two genders. This is where the first

meaning of the gender binary and the second meaning

collide and amplify one another: when we are raised in a





culture that tells us there are two genders, we believe

there are two genders. And when we believe that there

are two genders, we think the culture simply reflects

that reality. However, as feminist, gender non-binary, and

trans people have articulated and expressed, the gender

binary is not only a constructed idea, it is a harmful one.

What many do not realize is that the gender binary—the

idea that men and women are complimentary and the

only two genders—originated in European cultures as

a means of outcasting the gender systems of peoples

in Africa, Asia, and the lands that became known as the

Americas. The gender binary became a powerful tool

for Europeans to degrade, police, control and capture

Black and Indigenous groups whose gender expressions

differed from that of Europe. This process of maligning

other gender systems provided a rationale for Europeans

to colonize and enslave those peoples as a strategy to

build wealth and power. As Europeans sailed across the

oceans enacting genocide and enslavement in places like

India, Nigeria, and Brazil, they used the idea that there are

only two genders against the people they encountered

whose gender presentations differed from their own as

an excuse to dehumanize them. Holding the European

gender system above other gender systems became a

rationale for dehumanizing, sexually violating and enslaving

Black and Indigenous people as well as stealing their

lands and natural resources in order to accumulate power

and wealth among European nations. 2

It is with this context in mind that we can truly grasp

the power of the gender binary as it continues to function

in a similar way today. The gender binary not only

erases people who fall outside of its narrow definitions

of accepted gender presentation. It remains as a logic

2–Margaret Robinson, “Two-Spirit

Identity in a Time of Gender Fluidity,”

Journal of Homosexuality 67,

no. 12 (2020); Jennifer L. Morgan,

“‘Some Could Suckle over Their

Shoulder’: Male Travelers, Female

Bodies, and the Gendering of Racial

Ideology,” in Laboring Women:

Reproduction and Gender in

New World Slavery (Philadelphia:

University of Pennsylvania Press,

2004); Tani Barlow, “Theorizing

Woman: Funu, Guojia, Jiating

(Chinese Women, Chinese State,

Chinese Family),” in Inderpal Grewal

and Caren Kaplan, Scattered

Hegemonies: Postmodernity and

Transnational Feminist Practices

(Minneapolis: University of Minnesota

Press, 1994); Oyewumi, Oyeronke,

“Conceptualizing Gender:

The Eurocentric Foundations of

Feminist Concepts and the Challenge

of African Epistemologies,”

Jenda: A Journal of Culture and

African Women Studies. 2, no.

1 (2002); Sarah Haley, “Convict

Leasing, (Re)Production, and Gendered

Racial Terror,” in No Mercy

Here: Gender, Punishment, and

the Making of Jim Crow Modernity

(2016); Raewyn Connell, “Rethinking

Gender from the South

Raewyn Connell” Feminist Studies

40, No. 3 (2014).

3–Elías Krell, “Is Transmisogyny

Killing Trans Women of Color?

Black Trans Feminisms and the

Exigencies of White Femininity,”

Transgender Studies Quarterly 4,

no. 2 (2017).

designed to dehumanize those who do not seem to fit

into its two-dimensional, euro-centric scope. People

in power systemically continue to be euro-descended

people who comply with the gender binary and they

use the gender binary with particular force against

Black, Indigenous, and people of color in the present.

Black Lives Matter protests have shed light on the

importance of this issue: that of violence against trans

people of color, and particularly Black trans women,

remains a central way that the dominant class and

those who aspire to be like the dominant class use the

gender binary to oppress and harm Black and Brown

people. Tony McDade, Tyianna Alexander, Domonique

Jackson, Monika Diamond, Nina Pop, Merci Mack, Shaki

Peters, Rayanna Pardo, Bree Black, Dior H Ova, Sophie

Vásquez, Riah Milton, Brayla Stone, Dominique ‘Rem’mie’

Fells, Asia Jynae Foster, Chae’Meshia Simms, Shai

Vanderpump. These are only some of the names of the

Black trans people who were targeted and murdered

in 2020 and 2021 due to their blackness or browness

and the difference of their gender expression from the

euro-centric gender frameworks doctors assigned them

at birth. 3

Where does the word “tomboy” fit into this picture of the

gender binary as a mechanism of domination? “Tomboy”

began to appear in English dictionaries as early as the

1500s, during the onset of those European campaigns to

build wealth by stealing from, harming, and killing people

from lands and cultures outside of Europe. At that time,

it was used, not as a term of empowerment, but as one

of policing girls’ gender expression in English-speaking

countries. In the 1550s and 1560s, the term meant, “1)

A brash, boisterous, or self-assured youth 2) A forward,

immodest, or unchaste woman.” By the mid-1600s, it



began to mean “A girl or young woman who acts or

dresses in what is considered to be a boyish way, esp.

one who likes rough or energetic activities conventionally

more associated with boys.” 4 It is important to consider the

emergence of “tomboy” into popular lexicon and its various

definitions within the historical context of European

expeditions around the world to demolish other peoples

and cultures as a strategy for building wealth and consolidating

power. In order for European colonists to maintain

the idea that they were superior to the Indigenous people

they were encountering due to their improper gender

performance, they needed to ensure that their own families

and children adhered to the gender binary at home in

Europe. The word “tomboy” in this context was designed

to do just this kind of work: to discipline Europeans who

4—Oxford English Dictionary,

(Oxford: Oxford University Press,

2022) s.v. “tomboy”, https://wwwoed-com;

Elizabeth King, “A Short

History of the Tomboy” The Atlantic

January 5, 2017.

5—For example, Kale Bantigue

Fajardo discusses the figure of

the Filipino tomboy as one that

troubles conventional masculine

and heterosexist narratives of the

Filipino diaspora. Kale Bantigue

Fajardo, “Transportation Translating

Filipino and Filipino American

Tomboy Masculinities through

Global Migration and Seafaring”

GLQ 1, no. 2-3 (2008).

did not comply with the gender binary by assigning them

a label that marked them as outside of the norm. This is

largely how the term has functioned until more recent

decades when people with varying relationships to the

history of colonialism have begun to reclaim the term and

use it as a source of pride. 5

The term tomboy continues to carry weight as both a

mechanism of policing and, as this exhibit will explore, a

tool of empowerment. In Tomboy, we are interested in

the multiple ways “tomboy” has been and continues to

be used, both as a way to enforce compliance with dominant

ideas of what “boys” and “girls” should be like as

well as the way people use it to undermine and challenge

the rigid gender binary system. While “tomboy” has often



been used as a way to bully girls who could be perceived

as “gay,” it is also a source of camaraderie for those who

don’t vibe with heterosexuality. There are some who have

argued that the term “tomboy” only reinforces the gender

binary by creating an acceptable window of time for girls

to express themselves outside of gender norms while

they are young, as long as they conform to appropriate

expressions of womanhood later in life. 6 Building on this

idea, others have argued that tomboy ingrains the gender

binary by labeling any non-“girl” behavior in people

assigned female at birth as “boyish” behavior. According

to the work of Michelle Abate, “tomboy” was also used to

reinforce white supremacy during campaigns to abolish

slavery in the United Kingdom as well as United States.

“Tomboy” was revived as a kind of precursor to eugenics

in response to fears of the white race dying out. It

encouraged acceptance of a more able-bodied physical

presentation for white women so as to become robust

mothers of white children. 7 Over the last few years, the

word “tomboy” has seen a resurgence in popular culture

and commercial products. 8 The figure of the tomboy has

appeared in movies, literature, in comics, and—lately—

marketed as a style in the fashion industry, even as a kind

of underwear. These modes of deploying the tomboy

figure both bring the tomboy to broader publics and also

seek to make profit off of the idea of the tomboy. This

marketing tool relies on selling tomboy as an identity that

one can access through purchasing a product. These

examples demonstrate the movement of “tomboy” in and

out of white colonial culture–absorbed into acceptability

at some points while refuted as disdainful at others.

Tomboy lingers on tomboy as a tool of possibility and

rupture, a tool with the power to crack open spaces in the

Euro-centric gender binary. “Tomboy” is a name that many

6—Dianne Elise, “Tomboys and

Cowgirls: The girl’s disidentification

from the mother” in Sissies

and Tomboys: Gender Nonconformity

and Homosexual Childhood

Ed. M. Rottnek, (New York:

New York University Press, 1999);

Sheana Ahlqvist, “The Potential

Benefits and Risks of Identifying

as a Tomboy: A Social Identity Perspective,”

Self and Identity 12, no.

5 (2013).

7—Michele Ann Abate, “Launching

a Gender B(l)Acklash: E. D. E.

N. Southworth’s the Hidden Hand

and the Emergence of (Racialized)

White Tomboyism,” Children’s

Literature Association Quarterly

31, no. 1 (Spring, 2006); Michelle

Ann Abate, Tomboys: A Literary

and Cultural History (Philadelphia,

Temple University Press, 2008).

8—Anna Kolos, “Tomboyism in

Fashion and Contemporary Popular

Culture,” The Contested and

the Poetic: Gender and the Body

(2014).

people of many backgrounds wear with pride and this

exhibit highlights tomboy as a tool designed to challenge

the gender binary and its history as a tool of gender-censorship.

Rather than trying to make concrete exactly

what a tomboy is, however, we draw upon the themes

Control, Capability, and Expression to consider the ways

tomboy creates spaces of potential, of containment, and

of subversion. Breaking open a discussion about tomboy,

we acknowledge that “tomboy” is just one term, embedded

with layers of colonial history, that people have used

to contest the gender binary. The figures you see in this

exhibit may or may not have identified as a “tomboy” but

we are interested in how tomboy joins and complements

other forms of rebellion against the gender binary across

history. As you walk through each section, we invite you

to think and rethink what “tomboy” means to you and

how you see this meaning refracted and altered in the

light of the various people, stories, and objects who have

defied the gender binary across this exhibit.

Exhibit curated by Kate Wells, Curator for Rhode Island Collections at

Providence Public Library and Mary Murphy, Nancy L. Buc Pembroke

Center Archivist at Brown University.

Essay by Virginia Thomas, Postdoctoral Fellow at the Center for the

Study of Women, Gender, and Sexuality at Rice University.

Illustrations by Jazzmen Lee-Johnson.

Exhibit produced in partnership with the Pembroke Center for Teaching

and Research on Women at Brown University. For more information,

please visit pembroke.brown.edu



CoNTROL

CAPABILItY

EXPRESSION

“The Story of Romping Polly”,

Slovenly Peter; or, cheerful stories

and funny pictures for good

little folks by Heinrich Hoffman.

Philadelphia: Porter & Coates,

189-.

“Tomboy Kate and Naughty May”,

Freaks and Frolics of Little Girls

by Josephine Pollard. New York:

McLoughlin Bros., 1887.

Eloise by Kay Thompson, illustrated

by Hilary Knight. New York:

Simon and Schuster, 1955.

Five on a Treasure Island by

Enid Blyton. London: Hodder &

Stoughton, 1951.

Girl who would rather Climb Trees

by Miriam Schlein. New York:

Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, 1975.

On loan from private collection.

Ramona Quimby, Age 8 by

Beverly Cleary. New York: Morrow

Junior Books, 1981.

Harriet the Spy by Louise

Fitzhugh. New York: Harper &

Row, 1964.

I Wish I’d Been Born A Boy,

words and music by Al Trahern.

Williamsport, Penn.: Vandersloot

Music Pub. Co, 1906. Sheet music.

Tomboy by Hal Ellson. New York:

Bantam Books, 1950.

No No No: A Guide to Girling

Wrong by Annie Mok. 2015. Zine

On loan from the Sarah Doyle

Center for Women and Gender,

Brown University.

Dorothy Young, ca. 1930. Bertillon

card. On loan from Providence

City Archives.

Sydney Allen, ca. 1930. Bertillon

card. On loan from Providence

City Archives.

“Yale versus Vassar”. Illustration

in The Gibson book : a collection

of the published works of Charles

Dana Gibson. Scribner’s, 1906.

Reproduction courtesy of Mohr

Memorial Library.

Girl Scout doll, ca. 1900. On loan

from Boston Children’s Museum.

Girl Scout uniform belonging to

Mary Turner Tinney, Wollaston,

Mass, 1928-1935. On loan from

Girl Scout Museum at Cedar Hill.

The Girl Scout Canoe Trip by Edith

Lavalle. 1922. On loan from Girl

Scout Museum at Cedar Hill.

How Girls Can Help Their

Country: Handbook for Girl Scouts

by Juliette Low. {Savannah], 1917.

Photographs: New Bedford

Drum & Bugle Corps, circa

1916, Cornflower Troop, 1927,

Fairhaven, MA, Luscomb Personal

CollectionCornflower Troop,

Fairhaven Mass., 1927; Hiking,

Troop III, Brookline Mass., 1933.

On loan from Girl Scout Museum

at Cedar Hill.

Film: I don’t want to be a man

by Ernst Lubitsch. Germany:

Friedrich-Wilhelm-Murnau-

Stiftung, 1920.

Alwilda the Pirate, scrimshaw on

whale tooth. Nicholson Whaling

Collection.

Broadside ballads: The Female

Rambling Sailor, The Gallant

Female Sailor, The Handsome

Cabin Boy, The Female Husband.

Potter & Williams Collection on

Irish Culture.

Historia de la Monja Alferez,

Dona Catalina de Erauso by

Herself. Paris: Julio Dido, 1829.

A General history of the pyrates,

from their first rise and settlement

in the Island of Providence

by Charles Johnson. London: T.

Woodward, 1726.

Postcards: Two unidentified

women on horseback near the

woods, “Little Sure Shot” - portrait

of Annie Oakley, “Calamity

Jane when a Scout for Gen.

Cook, South Dakota”, Two young

women riding an Ariel motorcycle.

Reproduced from images

in the Elizabeth West Postcard

Collection, Schlesinger Library.

Flaming iguanas: an illustrated

all-girl road novel thing by

Erika Lopez. New York: Simon &

Schuster, 1997.

Photograph. “Women’s Auto

Class, 1918”, YMCA of Greater

Providence Archives.

Photograph. “Lady

Longshoremen”, RI General

Photograph Collection.

Hard hat and construction

boots. On loan from Sarah Gray,

Plumber Local 51.

WorldTeam Tennis dress worn by

Billie Jean King, 1974. On loan

from the International Tennis Hall

of Fame Museum.

Poster advertising the “Battle of

the Sexes” between Billie Jean

King and Bobby Riggs, 1973.

On loan from the International

Tennis Hall of Fame Museum.

Nancy Ann doll, circa 1955. On

loan from Boston Children’s

Museum.

Nancy Drew board game, 1957.

On loan from Boston Children’s

Museum.

Royal Court softball jersey and

ball cap, Kim Deacon Collection,

RI LGBTQ+ Community Archives.

Tomboy! Go Go Doll, 1965. On

loan from private collection.

Roller Derby player portraits and

tickets, circa 1950. Collection

of Rhode Island roller derby

ephemera.

Playtex sports bra, circa 1980

and Playtops advertisement. On

loan from private collection.

I Always Wanted to be somebody

by Althea Gibson. New York:

HarperCollins, 1958. 1st edition.;

Photographs of Althea Gibson,

1957 & 1958. On loan and reproductions

courtesy of International

Tennis Hall of Fame.

GB2B binder in trans flag print,

circa 2019. On loan from PPL

employee Rae Fotheringham and

their spouse, Charlie Tanzi.

The Female Review; or, memoirs

of an American young lady...by

a Citizen of Massachusetts [by

Deborah Sampson]. Dedham,

Mass: Heaton, 1797. On loan

from University of Connecticut at

Storrs, Special Collections.

History of Jemima Wilkinson, a

preacheress of the eighteenth

century; containing an authentic

narrative of her life and character,

and of the rise, progress and

conclusion of her ministry by

David Hudson. Geneva, N.Y.: S.P.

Hull, 1844.

Tomboy: a graphic memoir by

Liz Prince. San Francisco: Zest

Books, 2014. On loan from the

Sarah Doyle Center for Women

and Gender, Brown University.

The Woman in Battle: a narrative

of the exploits, adventures and

travels of Madame Loreta Janeta

Valezquez, otherwise known

as Lieutenant Harry T. Buford

by Loreta Janeta Valezquez.

Hartford: T. Belknap, 1876.

Photograph. Gladys Bentley at

the Ubangi Club in Harlem, circa

1930. Reproduction courtesy

of Rochester Visual Studies

Workshop.

Postcard: Two unidentified

women dressed as men in suits.

Reproduced from images in

the Elizabeth West Postcard

Collection, Schlesinger Library.

Coloring books. Girls Will Be

Boys Will Be Girls Will Be… by

Jacinta Bunnell. Oakland: PM

Press, 2018. & Gender Now by

Maya Christina Gonzalez. San

Francisco: Reflection Press, 2010.

Patti Smith: Before, Easter, After

by Patti Smith & Lynn Goldsmith.

Koln: Taschen, 2019. Limited

edition. On loan from a private

collection.

Photograph. “Pretty Please,

1974” - Delgado girls, Lou Costa

Collection on Fox Point.

Jean jacket with Siouxsie Sioux

patch. ca.1990. On loan from

private collection.

Shotgun Seamstress, Volume

IV by Osa Atoe, zine, ca.2010;

Xicanistas & Punkeristas Say It

Loud! by Brenda Montaño, zine,

2013. On loan from Sarah Doyle

Center for Women and Gender,

Brown University.

Photograph of punk youth

by unknown photographer.

Savannah, GA, ca.1985. On loan

from private collection.

Poster.“Every Girl Every Boy” by

Irit Reinheimer & Jacinta Bunnell,

Gender Subversion Kit, 2001.

Video. Tomboys of Tiktok.

Compilation of TikTok videos

courtesy of @imkellcantyoutell,

@Emxalexbxy, @genlacombe, @ayrara19,

@Leniselani, @Bexx0308, @Auntyskates,

@Lemontwisst, @Royaloakfc16,

@Sugarza20, @Danaecummins,

@Katieee10, @_kileaux, @Mototi46,

@Lizzytaf_, @Dumarspaige,

@Kbuena95, @Carlitayes, @Monikkaam,

@Smallsideofcurlyfries, @Bortbytinq.



Providence Public Library

150 Empire Street

Providence RI 02903

provlib.org

Printed by

BInCh PRESs

Design by

emILy RYE

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!