Views
5 years ago

COLLEGE OF SOCIAL SCIENCE

COLLEGE OF SOCIAL SCIENCE

CHAPTER 5 RESULTS AND

CHAPTER 5 RESULTS AND IMPLICATIONS Results Panel Probit Analysis of Conservation Amendments To estimate the influences of the indicators on local land use policy change, I employed the random effect panel probit model with the dichotomous variable of conservation amendments using robust standard errors. Before I used robust standard errors in this model, I ran the panel probit model without standard errors to check whether this model is appropriate for this analysis. LR (Likelihood Ratio) test of rho=0 59 is not statistically significant but this does not mean using the panel probit model is not appropriate 60 . However, the Wald tests of model fits for four models (without and with interaction terms) are all statistically significant at p=.01 level. Table 11 shows the results of the panel probit model of conservation amendment of local comprehensive plans. The first column of the table 11 reports the coefficients without interaction effects. There are five variables that are statistically significant: strong mayor form of government (Mayor); council member turnover (Turnover); Regional Planning Council participation (RPC); homogeneity of community (White); and the population (Population). A distinguishing result of this model is that the strong mayor form of government is positively related to the conservation amendments while holding other variables constant (significant at p=.01 level). This confirms the hypothesis of 59 LR test statistics does not appear after standard errors are corrected. 60 When LR test of rho=0 is statistically significant, that means the data structure only allow panel probit model, not pooled probit model. So, even though LR test is not significant, that does not necessarily mean we cannot use panel probit. Rather that means coefficient values are not different between pooled probit and panel probit. In addition, the LR test is very sensitive to adding or dropping an independent variable. So, I keep the panel probit result in this research. 75

mayoral influence on comprehensive plan amendments, meaning that if a city adopted strong mayor form of government, the probability to offer conservation amendments are much higher than the cities with other forms of governments. However, the legislative institution (proportion of council members elected by district) has no significant influence on the pro-environmental land use policy change. This result may be caused by mixed nature of election types mitigating the influence of one election type’s influence on conservation amendments. Table 11. Panel Probit Model of Conservation Amendments 1 Institutions Variables Formal Institutions Mayor Expenditure District Turnover Informal Institutions RPC ILA Community Interests Development Interests Construction Real Estate Environmental Interests White Income Homeownership Degree 1 with Robust Standard Errors Without Interaction .65 (.11)*** 0.00 (0.00) .00 (.00) -.01 (.00)** .30 (.13)** .00 (.00) 1.26 (1.07) 1.05 (1.76) .008 (.004)* -.00 (.00) .004 (.055) .004 (.006) Interaction with Mayor 76 -1.59 (.88)* 0.00 (0.00) .00 (.00) -.01 (.00)** .31 (.14)** .00 (.00) 1.14 (1.21) 1.30 (1.73) .002 (.004) -.00 (.00) .005 (.008) .003 (.007) Interaction with District Election .66 (.11)*** 0.00 (0.00) -.02 (.01) -.01 (.00)** .31 (.14)** .00 (.00) 1.42 (1.09) .92 (1.82) .007 (.004) -.00 (.00) .002 (.006) .002 (.006) Interaction with RPC .63 (.11)*** 0.00 (0.00) .00 (.00) -.01 (.00)** -.92 (.78) .00 (.00) 1.08 (1.07) 1.27 (1.82) .006 (.005) -.00 (.00) .003 (.008) .007 (.005)

The Rural Policy - College of Social Sciences and International ...
school of social science - Hampshire College
afPE Trainee/Student Membership - College of Social Sciences and ...
speech and respect - College of Social Sciences and International ...
Community, Care and Social Sciences - City of Glasgow College
isipta '11 - College of Humanities and Social Sciences - Carnegie ...
Born out of Crisis - College of Social Sciences and International ...
CLEP Social Sciences and History Exam Secrets: CLEP Test Review for the College Level Examination Program
Scholars for the Community - College of Health and Social Sciences ...
Constitutional Fundamentals - College of Social Sciences and ...
The Administration of Justice - College of Social Sciences and ...
Choice and Regulation in Private Life - College of Social Sciences ...
Lawyer and Litigant in England - College of Social Sciences and ...
Spring 2012 - College of Social and Behavioral Sciences ...
Maladministration and its Remedies - College of Social Sciences ...
The British Tradition in Canadian Law - College of Social Sciences ...
Punishment, Prison and the Public - College of Social Sciences and ...
SOCIAL SCIENCES DIVISION - Marymount Manhattan College
mapping social science research provision in the higher education ...
Dia 1 - Division of Social Sciences
The Electoral Process - Social Sciences - Miami-Dade County ...
STEVENS - College of Social Sciences and International Studies ...
The English Judge - College of Social Sciences and International ...
English Law and the Moral Law - College of Social Sciences and ...
HAMLYN - College of Social Sciences and International Studies ...
Indie Film in Pittsburgh - College of Humanities and Social Sciences ...
The National Insurance Commissioners - College of Social Sciences ...
Rights at work - College of Social Sciences and International ...
the quest for security - College of Social Sciences and International ...
College of Social and Behavioral Sciences - The University of Texas ...