27.12.2012 Views

A MUSICAL VOYAGE - Royal Australian Navy

A MUSICAL VOYAGE - Royal Australian Navy

A MUSICAL VOYAGE - Royal Australian Navy

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

- 71 –<br />

7. The <strong>Navy</strong> Strategic Plan 2009-2010 prescribes as one of its key outputs building<br />

partnerships with Government, the <strong>Australian</strong> public and the other Defence elements who<br />

contribute to the <strong>Navy</strong> mission. These relationships provide assurance of the enduring and<br />

effective support of <strong>Navy</strong>’s activities. Externally, to contribute to this, a positive reputation<br />

for <strong>Navy</strong> needs to be maintained. 5<br />

RAN Band’s bid for FRC days<br />

8. The <strong>Navy</strong> Reserve Whole-of-Capability Workforce Review (NR WOCWR) was<br />

established to support the challenges of Chief of <strong>Navy</strong>’s intent outlined in The <strong>Navy</strong><br />

Strategic Plan 2009-2010. The aim of the review was to align the <strong>Navy</strong> Reserve construct to<br />

prioritise capability outputs in accordance with The <strong>Navy</strong> Strategic Plan 2009-2010 and to<br />

ensure a sustainable workforce to meet future capability requirements. 6<br />

9. It is worth noting that prior to the NR WOCWR the band instigated it’s own<br />

measures to establish Reserve Support Element’s in the Sydney and Melbourne detachments<br />

using days allocated to positions in the New South Wales detachment. This intent was to<br />

enable a more effective disposition of reserve musician resources, achieving two fully<br />

integrated detachments without disestablishing any reserve positions. This objective was to<br />

enable the band to deliver a more effective and flexible level of musical service to <strong>Navy</strong>;<br />

including to its ongoing support to Sea Deployments.<br />

10. As part of the consultation phase of the NR WOCWR, Position Managers were given<br />

the opportunity to provide input—specifically how each individual position contributed to<br />

capability output. The band’s bid (shown at Annex A) revised downwards its 34 current<br />

shared positions to 32 shared positions with a small increase from 4,984 to 5,003 days. The<br />

bid equated to a modest average allocation of 40 days for each of the 126 reserve<br />

musicians, and was forwarded ranked as Priority 5 using the given Personnel Prioritisation<br />

guidelines. All but one of the 32 positions were aligned to Part 1 of the Strategic Map, 7 and<br />

all but six were marked by the capability manager as essential to capability.<br />

11. The NR WOCWR assessed each position based on Chief of <strong>Navy</strong>’s priorities,<br />

capability output in accordance with The <strong>Navy</strong> Strategic Plan 2009-2010, and the Position<br />

Manager's priorities. 8<br />

Allocation of FRC days<br />

12. The outcome of the first phase of the NR WOCWR delivered a reduction of the<br />

band’s 32 essential positions to seven (shown at Annex B), and is a meagre 760 days with a<br />

full salary cost of $140,640—this equates to six days for each of the band’s 126 reserve<br />

musicians and represents an 84% cut compared against current levels. 9<br />

13. The detailed analysis of the NR WOCWR has not been made available to all<br />

stakeholders, and there has been no explanation as to how the cutbacks were determined<br />

other than being based on Chief of <strong>Navy</strong> priorities, capability output, and the Position<br />

Manager's priorities. Nor is it apparent how the distribution of the 760 days was<br />

determined. For example, why were all of the positions in the New South Wales<br />

detachment disestablished, and why was the Tasmanian detachment allocated twice as<br />

many days as the Queensland and South <strong>Australian</strong> detachments when the Queensland and<br />

South <strong>Australian</strong> detachments each have twice as many musicians and maintain stronger<br />

capability and significantly higher levels of output when compare to the Tasmanian<br />

detachment? Furthermore, why was the Western <strong>Australian</strong> detachment allocated three<br />

times as many days as the Queensland and South <strong>Australian</strong> detachments when all three<br />

detachments are similar in size and maintain the same capability and levels of output?<br />

5<br />

ibid, para 31<br />

6<br />

AUSNAVSTRATCOM ZNR 162109Z NOV 09 – <strong>Navy</strong> Reserve Capability Review<br />

7<br />

ibid, Annex A<br />

8<br />

Naval Reserve Whole-of-Capability Workforce Review - Phase I – Update, p.1, para7<br />

9<br />

4,984 days were allocated to the band’s FRC positions for FY 09/10 compared to the forecast 760 days in<br />

future years.<br />

<strong>Royal</strong> <strong>Australian</strong> <strong>Navy</strong> Band: A Musical Voyage

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!