A MUSICAL VOYAGE - Royal Australian Navy
A MUSICAL VOYAGE - Royal Australian Navy
A MUSICAL VOYAGE - Royal Australian Navy
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
- 71 –<br />
7. The <strong>Navy</strong> Strategic Plan 2009-2010 prescribes as one of its key outputs building<br />
partnerships with Government, the <strong>Australian</strong> public and the other Defence elements who<br />
contribute to the <strong>Navy</strong> mission. These relationships provide assurance of the enduring and<br />
effective support of <strong>Navy</strong>’s activities. Externally, to contribute to this, a positive reputation<br />
for <strong>Navy</strong> needs to be maintained. 5<br />
RAN Band’s bid for FRC days<br />
8. The <strong>Navy</strong> Reserve Whole-of-Capability Workforce Review (NR WOCWR) was<br />
established to support the challenges of Chief of <strong>Navy</strong>’s intent outlined in The <strong>Navy</strong><br />
Strategic Plan 2009-2010. The aim of the review was to align the <strong>Navy</strong> Reserve construct to<br />
prioritise capability outputs in accordance with The <strong>Navy</strong> Strategic Plan 2009-2010 and to<br />
ensure a sustainable workforce to meet future capability requirements. 6<br />
9. It is worth noting that prior to the NR WOCWR the band instigated it’s own<br />
measures to establish Reserve Support Element’s in the Sydney and Melbourne detachments<br />
using days allocated to positions in the New South Wales detachment. This intent was to<br />
enable a more effective disposition of reserve musician resources, achieving two fully<br />
integrated detachments without disestablishing any reserve positions. This objective was to<br />
enable the band to deliver a more effective and flexible level of musical service to <strong>Navy</strong>;<br />
including to its ongoing support to Sea Deployments.<br />
10. As part of the consultation phase of the NR WOCWR, Position Managers were given<br />
the opportunity to provide input—specifically how each individual position contributed to<br />
capability output. The band’s bid (shown at Annex A) revised downwards its 34 current<br />
shared positions to 32 shared positions with a small increase from 4,984 to 5,003 days. The<br />
bid equated to a modest average allocation of 40 days for each of the 126 reserve<br />
musicians, and was forwarded ranked as Priority 5 using the given Personnel Prioritisation<br />
guidelines. All but one of the 32 positions were aligned to Part 1 of the Strategic Map, 7 and<br />
all but six were marked by the capability manager as essential to capability.<br />
11. The NR WOCWR assessed each position based on Chief of <strong>Navy</strong>’s priorities,<br />
capability output in accordance with The <strong>Navy</strong> Strategic Plan 2009-2010, and the Position<br />
Manager's priorities. 8<br />
Allocation of FRC days<br />
12. The outcome of the first phase of the NR WOCWR delivered a reduction of the<br />
band’s 32 essential positions to seven (shown at Annex B), and is a meagre 760 days with a<br />
full salary cost of $140,640—this equates to six days for each of the band’s 126 reserve<br />
musicians and represents an 84% cut compared against current levels. 9<br />
13. The detailed analysis of the NR WOCWR has not been made available to all<br />
stakeholders, and there has been no explanation as to how the cutbacks were determined<br />
other than being based on Chief of <strong>Navy</strong> priorities, capability output, and the Position<br />
Manager's priorities. Nor is it apparent how the distribution of the 760 days was<br />
determined. For example, why were all of the positions in the New South Wales<br />
detachment disestablished, and why was the Tasmanian detachment allocated twice as<br />
many days as the Queensland and South <strong>Australian</strong> detachments when the Queensland and<br />
South <strong>Australian</strong> detachments each have twice as many musicians and maintain stronger<br />
capability and significantly higher levels of output when compare to the Tasmanian<br />
detachment? Furthermore, why was the Western <strong>Australian</strong> detachment allocated three<br />
times as many days as the Queensland and South <strong>Australian</strong> detachments when all three<br />
detachments are similar in size and maintain the same capability and levels of output?<br />
5<br />
ibid, para 31<br />
6<br />
AUSNAVSTRATCOM ZNR 162109Z NOV 09 – <strong>Navy</strong> Reserve Capability Review<br />
7<br />
ibid, Annex A<br />
8<br />
Naval Reserve Whole-of-Capability Workforce Review - Phase I – Update, p.1, para7<br />
9<br />
4,984 days were allocated to the band’s FRC positions for FY 09/10 compared to the forecast 760 days in<br />
future years.<br />
<strong>Royal</strong> <strong>Australian</strong> <strong>Navy</strong> Band: A Musical Voyage