5 years ago

Miller and Tsang (2011)

Miller and Tsang (2011)

154 K. D.

154 K. D. Miller and E. W. K. Tsang doubt. Both intensive and extensive designs can provide such tests. Identifying and testing causal mechanisms calls for increased use of designs and methods found most frequently elsewhere in the social sciences— such as generating data through laboratory experiments, behavioral simulations, quasi-experiments, case studies, ethnography, or grounded theory building in field settings. Cross-disciplinary collaborations and drawing guidance from the methods literature in other academic fields can facilitate such research designs. Because each of the four steps requires specific research techniques and no researcher is well versed in all these techniques, there is a need for specialization, with different researchers focusing on different steps, and the potential for collaboration as researchers coordinate sequential steps or work together on more than one step. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS We thank Gregory Dess, Joseph Mahoney, Donald Palmer, Arkadiy Sakhartov, Roy Suddaby, and the anonymous reviewers for their helpful comments on earlier versions of this article. REFERENCES Ackroyd S. 2004. Methodology for management and organisation studies: some implications of critical realism. In Critical Realist Applications in Organisation and Management Studies, Fleetwood S, Ackroyd S (eds). Routledge: London, U.K.; 137–163. Aldrich HE. 1992. Incommensurable paradigms? Vital signs from three perspectives. In Rethinking Organization: New Directions in Organization Theory and Analysis, Reed M, Hughes M (eds). Sage: London, U.K.; 17–45. Allison GT. 1971. Essence of Decision: Explaining the Cuban Missile Crisis. Little, Brown and Company: Boston, MA. Amihud Y, Lev B. 1999. Does corporate ownership structure affect its strategy towards diversification? Strategic Management Journal 20(11): 1063–1069. Anderson PJJ, Blatt R, Christianson MK, Grant AM, Marquis C, Neuman EJ, Sonenshein S, Sutcliffe KM. 2006. Understanding mechanisms in organizational research: reflections from a collective journey. Journal of Management Inquiry 15: 102–113. Archer MS. 1995. Realist Social Theory: The Morphogenetic Approach. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, U.K. Archer M. 1998. Introduction: realism in the social sciences. In Critical Realism: Essential Readings, Archer M, Bhaskar R, Collier A, Lawson T, Norrie A (eds). Routledge: London, U.K.; 189–205. Archer MS. 2000. Being Human: The Problem of Agency. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, U.K. Argyris C, Schön DA. 1978. Organizational Learning: A Theory of Action Perspective. Addison-Wesley: Reading, MA. Astley WG, Van de Ven AH. 1983. Central perspectives and debates in organization theory. Administrative Science Quarterly 28: 245–273. Astley WG, Zammuto RF. 1992. Organization science, managers, and language games. Organization Science 3: 443–460. Bacharach SB. 1989. Organizational theories: some criteria for evaluation. Academy of Management Review 14: 496–513. Bernstein RJ. 1983. Beyond Objectivism and Relativism: Science, Hermeneutics, and Praxis. University of Pennsylvania Press: Philadelphia, PA. Bhaskar R. 1998. The Possibility of Naturalism: A Philosophical Critique of the Contemporary Human Sciences (3rd edn). Routledge: London, U.K. Bhaskar R. 2008. A Realist Theory of Science (2nd edn). Verso: London, U.K. Bradbury H, Lichtenstein BMB. 2000. Relationality in organizational research: exploring the space between. Organization Science 11: 551–564. Brennan MJ. 1994. Incentives, rationality, and society. Journal of Applied Corporate Finance 7(2): 31–39. Bromiley P, Johnson S. 2005. Mechanisms and empirical research. In Research Methodology in Strategy and Management (Vol. 2), Ketchen DJ Jr, Bergh DD (eds). Elsevier Science: Amsterdam, The Netherlands; 15–29. Buckley PJ, Chapman M. 1997. The perception and measurement of transaction costs. Cambridge Journal of Economics 21: 127–145. Buckley PJ, Chapman M. 1998. The management of cooperative strategies in R&D and innovation programmes. International Journal of the Economics of Business 5: 369–381. Bunge M. 1997. Mechanism and explanation. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 27: 410–465. Caldwell BJ. 1984. Some problems with falsificationism in economics. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 14: 489–495. Campbell K. 1963. One form of scepticism about induction. Analysis 23(4): 80–83. Carley K. 1992. Organizational learning and personnel turnover. Organization Science 3: 20–46. Carter B, New C. 2004. Introduction: realist social theory and empirical research. In Making Realism Work: Realist Social Theory and Empirical Research, Carter B, New C (eds). Routledge: London, U.K.; 1–20. Caudill SB, Holcombe RG. 1987. Coefficient bias due to specification search in econometric models. Atlantic Economic Journal 15(3): 30–34. Caudill SB, Holcombe RG. 1999. Specification search and levels of significance in econometric models. Eastern Economic Journal 25: 289–300. Copyright © 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Strat. Mgmt. J., 32: 139–158 (2010) DOI: 10.1002/smj

Chalmers AF. 1999. What Is This Thing Called Science? (3rd edn). Open University Press: Maidenhead, U.K. Chamberlin TC. 1965 [1890]. The method of multiple working hypotheses. Science 148(3671): 754–759. Child J. 1972. Organizational structure, environment and performance: the role of strategic choice. Sociology 6: 1–22. Child J. 1997. Strategic choice in the analysis of action, structure, organizations and environment: retrospect and prospect. Organization Studies 18: 43–76. Chiles TH, McMackin JF. 1996. Integrating variable risk preferences, trust, and transaction cost economics. Academy of Management Review 21: 73–99. Collier A. 1994. Critical Realism: An Introduction to Roy Bhaskar’s Philosophy. Verso: London, U.K. Croson R, Anand J, Agarwal R. 2007. Using experiments in corporate strategy research. European Management Review 4: 173–181. Cruickshank J (ed). 2003. Critical Realism: The Difference It Makes. Routledge: London, U.K. Danermark B, Ekström M, Jakobsen L, Karlsson JC. 2002. Explaining Society: Critical Realism in the Social Sciences. Routledge: London, U.K. Davis GF, Marquis C. 2005. Prospects for organization theory in the early twenty-first century: institutional fields and mechanisms. Organization Science 16: 332–343. De Cock C, Jeanes EL. 2006. Questioning consensus, cultivating conflict. Journal of Management Inquiry 15: 18–30. Denis DJ, Denis DK, Sarin A. 1999. Agency theory and the influence of equity ownership structure on corporate diversification strategies. Strategic Management Journal 20(11): 1071–1076. Donaldson L. 1995. American Anti-management Theories of Organization: A Critique of Paradigm Proliferation. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, U.K. Donaldson L. 1996. For Positivist Organization Theory: Proving the Hard Core. Sage: London, U.K. Douma S, George R, Kabir R. 2006. Foreign and domestic ownership, business groups, and firm performance: evidence from a large emerging market. Strategic Management Journal 27(7): 637–657. Downward P, Finch JH, Ramsay J. 2002. Critical realism, empirical methods and inference: a critical discussion. Cambridge Journal of Economics 26: 481–500. Duhem P. 1954. The Aim and Structure of Physical Theory. Princeton University Press: Princeton, NJ. Dutton JE, Stumpf SA. 1991. Using behavioral simulations to study strategic processes. Simulation and Games 18: 207–224. Easton G. 2000. Case research as a method for industrial networks: a realist apologia. In Realist Perspectives on Management and Organisations, Ackroyd S, Fleetwood S (eds). Routledge: London, U.K.; 205–219. Fabian FH. 2000. Keeping the tension: pressures to keep the controversy in the management discipline. Academy of Management Review 25: 350–371. Fairclough N. 2005. Discourse analysis in organization studies. Organization Studies 26: 915–939. Testing Management Theories 155 Feige EL. 1975. The consequences of journal editorial policies and a suggestion for revision. Journal of Political Economy 83: 1291–1296. Ferraro F, Pfeffer J, Sutton RI. 2005. Economics language and assumptions: how theories can become selffulfilling. Academy of Management Review 30: 8–24. Ferraro F, Pfeffer J, Sutton RI. 2009. How and why theories matter: a comment on Felin and Foss (2009). Organization Science 20: 669–675. Fleetwood S. 2005. Ontology in organization and management studies: a critical realist perspective. Organization 12: 197–222. Fleetwood S, Ackroyd S (eds). 2004. Critical Realist Applications in Organisation and Management Studies. Routledge: London, U.K. Gadamer H. 2002. Truth and Method (2nd revised edn). Continuum: New York. Ghoshal S. 2005. Bad management theories are destroying good management practices. Academy of Management Learning and Education 4: 75–91. Ghoshal S, Moran P. 1996. Bad for practice: a critique of the transaction cost theory. Academy of Management Review 21: 13–47. Gist ME, Hopper H, Daniels D. 1998. Behavioral simulation: application and potential in management research. Organizational Research Methods 1: 251–295. Godfrey PC, Hill CWL. 1995. The problem of unobservables in strategic management research. Strategic Management Journal 16(7): 519–533. Goldthorpe JH. 2001. Causation, statistics, and sociology. European Sociological Review 17: 1–20. Grant AM, Wall TD. 2009. The neglected science and art of quasi-experimentation: why-to, when-to, and how-to advice for organizational researchers. Organizational Research Methods 12: 653–686. Greenwald AG, Pratkanis AR, Leippe MR, Baumgardner MH. 1986. Under what conditions does theory obstruct research progress? Psychological Review 93: 216–229. Grünbaum A. 1960. The Duhemian argument. Philosophy of Science 27: 75–87. Guala F, Mittone L. 2005. Experiments in economics: external validity and the robustness of phenomena. Journal of Economic Methodology 12: 495–515. Hambrick DC. 2007. The field of management’s devotion to theory: too much of a good thing? Academy of Management Journal 50: 1346–1352. Hamlin CL. 2002. Beyond Relativism: Raymond Boudon, Cognitive Rationality and Critical Realism. Routlege: London, U.K. Harré R, Second PF. 1972. The Explanation of Social Behavior. Basil Blackwell: Oxford, U.K. Harrison D, Easton G. 2004. Temporally embedded case comparison in industrial marketing research. In Critical Realist Applications in Organisation and Management Studies, Fleetwood S, Ackroyd S (eds). Routledge: London, U.K.; 194–210. Hedström P. 2005. Dissecting the Social: On the Principles of Analytical Sociology. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, U.K. Copyright © 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Strat. Mgmt. J., 32: 139–158 (2010) DOI: 10.1002/smj

Forecast - Dec. 2011 - BC Centre for Excellence in HIV/AIDS
WBS Newsletter Issue 5 2011 - Wits Business School
2011 Policy Address by Donald Tsang, Chief Executive of Hong ...
Annual Report 2011 - Miller Group
October 2011 - WC Miller Collegiate
EndNote X1 - RCT Ref 2011 - Jean Baker Miller Training Institute
professor mirka miller professor mirka miller - University of Newcastle
Miller School of Albemarle Student and Parent Handbook 2011 ...
2011-2012 Season Announcement - Miller Theatre
Habitat Restoration—Do We Know What We're Doing? - Miller Lab
1. Agreement with Custom Miller 2011-12 - Odisha State Civil ...
Miller An Extreme Reading of Facebook - Open Anthropology ...
A Very Childish Moral Panic: Ritalin - Toby Miller
ISTP Conference Programme March 2011 -
Arnold W. Miller Department of Mathematics University of Wisconsin ...
ALL STAR GAME JULY 23, 2011 Miller Park Helfaer Field
Polish Law Review Fall 2011 - Miller Canfield
Business Notes, April 2011 - Kean Miller LLP
Clara Miller 2011.pdf - Philanthropy New Zealand
What Is Realism, and Why Should Qualitative Researchers Care?
fred w. miller elementary school staff calendar 2010-2011
A Classification of Qualitative Research Methods - EuroJournals