Views
5 years ago

FFY 2007 Annual Performance Report - TEA - Home School ...

FFY 2007 Annual Performance Report - TEA - Home School ...

Identification and

Identification and Notification of Districts In December of 2008, the TEA, using the methodology referenced above, identified 13 districts that met State-defined criteria for a significant discrepancy in the rates of suspension and expulsion of students with disabilities for Indicator 4. Number of Districts Identified for Indicator 4 in 2007-08 Total 13 Identified districts will be required to review policies, procedures, and practices related to the discipline of students with disabilities. Upon the completion of this self assessment, districts will be required to submit a written assurance statement affirming that its policies, procedures, and practices were in compliance with federal regulations and state rules related to the discipline of students with disabilities. A status of compliance will be reported in the FFY 2008 APR due in February of 2009. Information about disproportionate representation can be found on the TEA website at http://ritter.tea.state.tx.us/special.ed/guidance/discipline/. Actual Target Data for FFY 2007: Districts Identified with Significant Discrepancies in the Rates of Suspension and Expulsion of Students with Disabilities 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 a. # of districts with significant discrepancy 8 2 13 b. Total districts 1242 1237 1230 Calculation: a / b * 100 0.6% 0.2% 1% Source: Public Education Information Management System (PEIMS) Datasets Discussion of Improvement Activities Completed and Explanation of Progress or Slippage that occurred for FFY 2007: I. Improvement Activities Completed The improvement activities related to decreasing the rates of suspension and expulsion for students with disabilities are interrelated to several other indicators in the Annual Performance Report (APR) including: � Indicator 1: Graduation Rate � Indicator 5: Educational Environments, Ages 6-21 (placements in the least restrictive environment) The data associated with the indicators above must be considered when addressing the suspension and expulsion indicator. Specific improvement activities related to these areas include all the activities listed in Indicator 1 (Graduation). Part B State Annual Performance Report for FFY 2007 February 2, 2009 (OMB NO: 1820-0624 / Expiration Date: 08-31-2009) Page 35

FFY 2007 Technical Assistance Update As part of the consequence of the State’s determination level of Needs Assistance or lower for two consecutive years, the State is required to report in its Annual Performance Report technical assistance it sought during the reporting period. In addition to participating in the regularly scheduled monthly technical assistance calls with OSEP, the following technical assistance was received for this indicator: � TEA staff attended the National Accountability Conference and OSEP Leadership Conference held in Baltimore, Maryland in August, 2008. The conference provided OSEP guidance, clarification, technical assistance, and presentations related to Indicator 4 in the SPP/APR. Additionally, the conference afforded TEA staff the opportunity to network with other states in regard to their approach, experience and activities associated with the indicator. II. Explanation of Progress or Slippage The number of districts identified with a significant discrepancy in the rates of suspension and expulsion increased from 2 in 2006-07 to 13 in 2007-08. This increase may be attributed to the analysis process used by the TEA to identify districts. The methodology the State has used in the past APR submission is currently being reviewed and will be changed for the FFY 2008 reporting period. The change in methodology will ensure that the TEA is accurately reporting only those districts with a significant discrepancy. Revisions, with Justification, to Proposed Targets / Improvement Activities / Timelines / Resources for FFY 2008: I. Targets No revision to the 0% target for FFY 2008. II. Improvement Activities / Timelines / Resources The improvement activities related to decreasing the rates of suspension and expulsion for students with disabilities are interrelated to several other indicators in the Annual Performance Report (APR) including: � Indicator 1: Graduation Rate � Indicator 5: Educational Environments, Ages 6-21 (placements in the least restrictive environment) The data associated with the indicators above must be considered when addressing the suspension and expulsion indicator. Specific improvement activities related to these areas include all the activities listed in Indicator 1 (Graduation). Part B State Annual Performance Report for FFY 2007 February 2, 2009 (OMB NO: 1820-0624 / Expiration Date: 08-31-2009) Page 36

2007-2008 SFDS Annual Report - San Francisco Day School
Annual Report - Colonial School District
Cannon School 2007-08 Annual Report
An Evaluation Report - TEA - Home School Information - Texas ...
ANNUAL PERFORMER REPORT - PPL
2006-2007 Annual Report - K12.com
ANNUAL REPORT - Messmer Catholic Schools
Annual Report - Home HeadQuarters
2010-11 Annual Report - Owensboro Catholic Schools
Annual Report - Jefferson County Public Schools
2007 Annual Report - Environmental Volunteers
E2BN Annual Report 2007
AnnuAl RepoRt - The State Education Resource Center
2011 - 2012 Annual Report Council of the Great City Schools
CCSA's 2007-2008 annual report - Child Care Services Association
YHN Annual Report 2009-10 - Your Homes Newcastle
Annual Report 2007-2008/5768 - The Rashi School
2007-2008 Annual Report - Shepherd Valley Waldorf School
Annual Report 2002 - Gmcf
2011–2012 ANNUAL REPORT - Cal Performances - University of ...
Annual Report 2010 PERFORMANCE AND GROWTH - Crh.com
Annual Report 2006-2007 - Institute for Transportation Research ...
2007 Annual Report - New York Public Library
Annual Report 2009-10 - Kern County Superintendent of Schools
Annual Report 2006 – 2007 - pilch
Download the 2007 Annual Report - Administration on Aging