Views
5 years ago

FFY 2007 Annual Performance Report - TEA - Home School ...

FFY 2007 Annual Performance Report - TEA - Home School ...

Part B State

Part B State Annual Performance Report (APR) for 2007 Monitoring Priority: Effective General Supervision Part B / Effective Transition Indicator 13: Percent of youth aged 16 and above with an IEP that includes coordinated, measurable, annual IEP goals and transition services that will reasonably enable the student to meet the postsecondary goals. (20 U.S.C. 1416 (a)(3)(B)) Measurement: Percent = # of youth with disabilities aged 16 and above with an IEP that includes coordinated, measureable, annual IEP goals and transition services that will reasonably enable the student to meet the post-secondary goals divided by # of youth with an IEP age 16 and above times 100. FFY Measurable and Rigorous Target 2007 100% of youth aged 16 and above have an IEP that includes coordinated, measurable, annual IEP goals and transition services that will reasonably enable the student to meet the postsecondary goals. FFY 2006 SPP/APR Response Table Update The State collected and reported baseline data for Indicator 13 in FFY 2007. The findings of noncompliance for Indicator 13 reported in FFY 2006 APR are still in the process correction. Notification to districts concerning noncompliance was issued in April of 2008. The status of correction of noncompliance related to Indicator 13 will be reported in the FFY 2008 APR in February of 2010. Data Collection Activities for Baseline and Measurable Targets for FFY 2007 APR: In partnership with Region 11 Education Service Center (ESC), the Texas Education Agency (TEA) developed a secure, online application for the collection of data related to Indicator 13. During the FFY 2007, all districts serving students with disabilities receiving special education services ages 16-21 submitted student level data on compliance aspects of the secondary transition process. Districts that did not serve students with disabilities ages 16-21 were not required to submit data. Districts with less than 30 students with disabilities ages 16-21 were required to submit data on all students. Districts with more than 30 students with disabilities ages 16-21 were required to follow a sampling procedure to ensure the submission of data reflective of the district’s student with disabilities ages 16-21 population. A description of the sampling procedure can be found on the TEA website at: http://ritter.tea.state.tx.us/special.ed/spp/sampling.html. Data collection and use of the online application was an integral part of the statewide training process for this indicator. The training presented data collection tools including a Checklist for Measurement of Indicator 13, a Student Folder/IEP Review Chart, and an On-Line Template for data entry. These tools facilitated the folder review for students. The Checklist items address the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA 2004) legal requirements for high school transition. http://ritter.tea.state.tx.us/special.ed/spp/checklist13.doc Part B State Annual Performance Report for FFY 2007 February 1, 2009 (OMB NO: 1820-0624 / Expiration Date: 08-31-2009) Page 69

Actual Target Data for FFY 2007 (Baseline): Statewide Percentage of youth with disabilities aged 16 and above with an IEP that includes coordinated, measurable, annual IEP goals and transition services a. # of youth with disabilities aged 16 and above with an IEP that includes coordinated, measurable, annual IEP goals and transition services b. # of youth with disabilities aged 16 and above in the dataset c. % of youth with disabilities aged 16 and above with an IEP that includes coordinated, measurable, annual IEP goals and transition services (c. = ( a. / b. ) * 100) FFY 2006 FFY 2007 2006-07 2007-08 677 18,917 3,308 28,084 20% 67% Note: FFY 2006-07 dataset included those students from 14 districts with average daily membership exceeding 50,000 students. FFY 2007-08 dataset included students from 1,088 districts which served students with disabilities ages 16-21. Identification of Noncompliance Of the 1,088 districts that met the reporting criteria for data submission, 654 districts (60%) were in 100% compliance while 434 districts (40%) were not. In spring 2009, the TEA will notify districts with noncompliance. Districts will have no later than one year from notification to provide evidence of correction in order to meet compliance. Findings of noncompliance related to this indicator in FFY 2007 will be reported in Indicators 13 and 15 in the FFY 2008 APR due February 2010. Discussion of Baseline Data: District staff using the Checklist for Measurement of Indicator 13 and the Student Folder/IEP Review Chart reviewed individualized Education Programs (IEPs) of 28,084 students. The data collection tools can be found on the Transition in Texas website at: http://www.transitionintexas.org/Indicator13/Indicator13.html. The Checklist for Measurement of Indicator 13 aligned with the National Secondary Transition Technical Assistance Center (NSTTAC). SPP Indicator 13 IEP checklist ensures that comparable data is collected throughout the state. The reviewer responds either “yes” or “no” to each of the thirteen compliance items included in the Checklist. The Checklist addresses the following key elements of secondary transition: � The IEP includes measurable postsecondary goals � The IEP includes coordinated, measurable annual IEP goals � The IEP includes transition services in the form of coordinated activities. In order to report an IEP in compliance for Indicator 13, all thirteen compliance Checklist items must have a “yes” response. Therefore, if there was one “no” response, the IEP did not meet the SPP Indicator 13 measurement requirements. The data collection tools can be found on the Transition in Texas website at: http://www.transitionintexas.org/Indicator13/Indicator13.html Part B State Annual Performance Report for FFY 2007 February 1, 2009 (OMB NO: 1820-0624 / Expiration Date: 08-31-2009) Page 70

2007-2008 SFDS Annual Report - San Francisco Day School
Annual Report - Colonial School District
Cannon School 2007-08 Annual Report
An Evaluation Report - TEA - Home School Information - Texas ...
ANNUAL PERFORMER REPORT - PPL
2006-2007 Annual Report - K12.com
ANNUAL REPORT - Messmer Catholic Schools
Annual Report - Home HeadQuarters
2010-11 Annual Report - Owensboro Catholic Schools
Annual Performance Report Ð 2007 - States of Jersey
Annual Report - Jefferson County Public Schools
Annual Report 2007-2008 - Ministry of Home Affairs
2007 Annual Report - Environmental Volunteers
AnnuAl RepoRt - The State Education Resource Center
Rising Tide Charter School Annual Report 2006-2007
2011 - 2012 Annual Report Council of the Great City Schools
CCSA's 2007-2008 annual report - Child Care Services Association
YHN Annual Report 2009-10 - Your Homes Newcastle
2007-2008 Annual Report - Shepherd Valley Waldorf School
Annual Report 2010 PERFORMANCE AND GROWTH - Crh.com
2011–2012 ANNUAL REPORT - Cal Performances - University of ...
Annual Report 2002 - Gmcf
2007 Annual Report - New York Public Library
Annual Report 2006-2007 - Institute for Transportation Research ...
Annual Report 2009-10 - Kern County Superintendent of Schools
DeSales High School 2007 - 2008 Annual Report